Solder joint flip chip interconnection having relief structure

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9773685
  • Patent Number
    9,773,685
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 21, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 26, 2017
    6 years ago
Abstract
A flip chip interconnect has a tapering interconnect structure, and the area of contact of the interconnect structure with the site on the substrate metallization is less than the area of contact of the interconnect structure with the die pad. A solder mask has an opening over the interconnect site, and the solder mask makes contact with the interconnect structure at the margin of the opening. The flip chip interconnect is provided with an underfill. During the underfill process, the contact or near proximity of the solder mask with the interconnect structure interferes with flow of the underfill material toward the substrate adjacent the site, resulting in formation of a void left unfilled by the underfill, adjacent the contact of the interconnect structure with the site on the substrate metallization. The void can help provide relief from strain induced by changes in temperature of the system.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to semiconductor packaging and, particularly, to flip chip interconnection.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Flip chip packages include a semiconductor die mounted onto a package substrate with the active side of the die facing the substrate. The substrate is made up of a dielectric layer and at least one metal layer, patterned to provide substrate circuitry, which includes among other features traces (“leads”) leading to interconnect pads. The metal layer may be patterned by, for example, a mask- and etch process. Conventionally, interconnection of the circuitry in the die with circuitry in the substrate is made by way of bumps which are attached to an array of interconnect pads on the die, and bonded to a corresponding (complementary) array of interconnect pads (often referred to as “capture pads”) on the substrate. The capture pads are typically much wider than the leads, and can be as wide as, for example, about 2 to 4 times the nominal or design width of the leads. Conventionally, the interconnect area on the capture pad is approximately equal to the interconnect area on the die pad.


The areal density of electronic features on integrated circuits has increased enormously, and chips having a greater density of circuit features also may have a greater density of sites (“die pads”) for interconnection with the circuitry on a package substrate.


The package is connected to underlying circuitry, such as a printed circuit board (e.g., a “motherboard”), in the device in which the package is employed, by way of second level interconnects (e.g., pins, secondary interconnect solder balls) between the package and the underlying circuit. The second level interconnects have a greater pitch than the flip chip interconnects, and so the routing on the substrate conventionally “fans out”. Significant technological advances in patterning the metal layer on the substrate have enabled construction of fine lines and spaces; but in the conventional arrangement space between adjacent pads limits the number of traces than can escape from the more inward capture pads in the array, and the fan out routing between the capture pads beneath the die and the external pins of the package is conventionally formed on multiple metal layers within the package substrate. For a complex interconnect array, substrates having multiple layers may be required to achieve routing between the die pads and the second level interconnects on the package.


Multiple layer substrates are expensive, and in conventional flip chip constructs the substrate alone typically accounts for more than half the package cost (about 60% in some typical instances). The high cost of multilayer substrates has been a factor in limiting proliferation of flip chip technology in mainstream products.


In conventional flip chip constructs the escape routing pattern typically introduces additional electrical parasitics, because the routing includes short runs of unshielded wiring and vias between wiring layers in the signal transmission path. Electrical parasitics can significantly limit package performance.


Flip chip interconnection is commonly used in a wide variety of integrated circuit designs, including for example ASIC, GPU, Chipset, DSP, FPGA.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The aforementioned challenges presented by conventional flip chip interconnect can be addressed by connecting the interconnect bump directly onto a lead (“Bump-on-Lead” interconnect, or “BoL”); or by connecting the interconnect bump directly onto a narrow interconnection pad, or narrow pad (“Bump-on-Narrow Pad”, or “BoNP”) rather than onto a conventional capture pad. Such approaches are described in, for example, related U.S. application Ser. No. 10/985,654 (BoL) and U.S. application Ser. No. 11/388,755 (BoNP).


BoNP or BoL approaches can provide more efficient routing of traces on the substrate. Particularly, the signal routing can be formed entirely in a single metal layer of the substrate. This can reduce the number of layers in the substrate, and forming the signal traces in a single layer also permits relaxation of some of the via, line and space design rules that the substrate must meet. This simplification of the substrate greatly reduces the overall cost of the flip chip package. The bump-on-lead architecture also helps eliminate such features as vias and “stubs” from the substrate design, and enables a microstrip controlled impedance electrical environment for signal transmission, thereby greatly improving performance.


We have discovered that, within selected design parameters, a BoL or BoNP flip chip interconnection can be at least as reliable as a conventional bond on capture pad interconnect. Generally, within a range, interconnect structures formed on narrower leads—that is, more sharply tapered interconnect structures—can be more reliable than interconnect structures formed on less narrow leads.


Particularly, where the CTE of the die differs significantly from the CTE of the substrate, improved reliability can result from configuring the interconnect so that the interconnect structure is tapered, and the area of contact of the solder with the site on the lead is significantly less than the area of contact of the solder with the die pad. The contact at the site on the lead can be narrower as a result of a narrow dimension of the lead at the site (BoL) or of a narrow pad at the site (BoNP); or the contact at the site on the lead can be narrow as a consequence of masking a larger pad or otherwise limiting the solder-wettable area of a larger pad.


In some embodiments the CTE of the substrate is significantly greater than the CTE of the die; and the material of the interconnect structure is selected to be close to that of the substrate. For example, the CTE of a laminate (organic) substrate is typically in a range about 16-18 ppm/degree C.; the CTE of silicon is about 2-3 ppm/degree C.; the CTE of “glass ceramic” (in earlier use for substrates) is about 3-4 ppm/degree C.; the CTE of a co-fired ceramic (in use in multilayer substrates—as many as 16-18 layers, for example) is about 8-8.5 ppm/degree C. The CTE of a laminate (organic) substrate, on the other hand, is typically in a range about 16-18 ppm/degree C., and so a significant CTE mismatch exists between silicon die and organic laminate or build-up substrates. In some embodiments, the die is silicon-based, the substrate is an organic laminate or build-up substrate, and the tapered interconnect structure has a CTE in the range about 18-28 ppm/degree C.


In one general aspect the invention features a flip chip interconnection having tapered interconnect structures, in which a width of the connection of the interconnect structure with a die pad is greater than a width of the connection of the interconnect structure with a site on a lead. In some embodiments the connection at the die pad is about 1.5 times as wide as the connection at the lead, or is about 2 times as wide as the connection at the lead, or is about 3 times as wide as the connection at the lead, or is about 4 times as wide as the connection at the lead. The width of the connection at the die pad can be in a range about 50 m to about 150 m; die pads in common use have widths about 110 (or 120) um and about 90 m. The width of the connection at the site at the lead can be in a range about 20 m to about 100 m; some standard leads have widths at the site about 50 m, or about 40 m, or about 30 m. Where the CTE mismatch between the die and the substrate is greater, a more sharply tapering interconnect structure may prove more reliable; where the CTE mismatch is less, a less sharply tapered interconnect structure may prove suitable.


In some embodiments the interconnect structure is a composite structure, including a higher-melting bump connected to the die pad, and a lower-melting solder connecting the bump to the site on the lead. The lower-melting component of the composite structure can be provided as a cap on the bump; or, the lower-melting component can be provided on the interconnect site (for example as a solder paste, or a plated spot); or a lower-melting material could be provided on each the bump and the site. The higher-melting bump can be of a material that is substantially non-collapsible at the reflow temperatures employed in making the interconnect. In such embodiments the higher-melting bump can be, for example, a high-lead solder (such as a lead-tin alloy having high lead content), or copper, or gold, or nickel, or a combination of these. The lower-melting solder can be, for example, a eutectic solder, which may be tin-based, including tin and alloys of tin such as silver, copper, or lead, or a combination of these. Or, the bump could be entirely of a material that melts at the reflow temperature.


The bump can be affixed to the die pad; or, it can be formed on the die pad in situ, by printing or plating the bump material at the die pads and then heating to form the bumps.


In another general aspect the invention features a flip chip package including a die having interconnect pads in an active surface, and a substrate having interconnect sites on electrically conductive traces in a die attach surface, in which tapered interconnect structures connect the die pads to the sites. In some embodiments the sites include locations in the leads (BoL); in some embodiments the sites include narrow pads in the leads (BoNP); in some embodiments the sites include small-area portions of capture pads.


The bump-on-lead interconnection is formed according to methods of the invention with use of a solder mask to confine the molten solder during a re-melt stage in the process. According to the invention the solder mask and openings in the solder mask are configured so that the solder mask contacts—or is very close to—the interconnect structure at the margin of the solder mask opening, so that it interferes with the flow of underfill material to the region adjacent the connection of the interconnect structure with the metallization on the substrate. As a result, voids remain following completion of the underfill process. According to the invention, these voids can provide some relief from thermal stress. The voids may contain whatever atmosphere was present during the underfill process.


Accordingly, in some embodiments the substrate is further provided with a solder mask having openings over the interconnect sites on the leads, and the solder mask contacts the interconnect structures at the margin of the solder mask openings; the assembly includes an underfill between the die and the substrate, but voids remain adjacent the interconnection with the sites on the substrate, defined in part by the locus of the contact of the solder mask with the interconnect structures.


Accordingly in one general aspect the invention features a flip chip interconnection having tapered interconnect structures, in which a width of the connection of the interconnect structure with a die pad is greater than a width of the connection of the interconnect structure with a site on a lead, and further including a solder mask having openings, in which the solder mask contacts the interconnect structure at the margin of the openings, and further comprising an underfill between the die and the substrate, wherein voids are present adjacent the sites on the substrate.


We have also found by computer modeling that thermally-induced maximum stress in BoL interconnections is less on leads that are oriented at the interconnect site toward a thermally neutral point on the die (that is, in a “radial” direction) than on leads that are oriented at the interconnect site perpendicularly to a radial direction.


In another general aspect the invention features a substrate for BoL or BoNP flip chip interconnection, in which the lengthwise dimension of the interconnect site (the mating portion of the lead or narrow pad) is oriented in a direction approximately aligned toward the thermally neutral point of the die, or deviating less than about 45° (more usually, less than about 20°; still more usually, less than about) 10° from such an alignment.


In another general aspect the invention features a method for forming flip chip interconnection, by providing a substrate having interconnect sites in conductive traces formed in a die attach surface, providing a die having bumps attached to interconnect pads in an active surface; providing a fusible conductive material on the bumps or on the interconnect sites (or on each of the bumps and the interconnect sites); supporting the substrate and the die; positioning the die with the active side of the die toward the die attach surface of the substrate, and aligning the die and substrate and moving one toward the other so that the bumps contact the corresponding sites; and melting and then re-solidifying the fusible material, forming a metallurgical interconnection between the bump and the trace. In some embodiments the method further includes forming an underfill between the die and the substrate.


In another general aspect the invention features a method for forming flip chip interconnection, by providing a substrate having traces formed in a die attach surface and having a solder mask having openings over interconnect sites on the leads, and a die having bumps attached to interconnect pads in an active surface; supporting the substrate and the die; positioning the die with the active side of the die toward the die attach surface of the substrate, and aligning the die and substrate and moving one toward the other so that the bumps contact the corresponding traces (leads) on the substrate; melting and then re-solidifying to form the interconnection between the bump and the interconnect site on the trace.


In some embodiments the solder bump includes a collapsible solder portion, and the melt and solidifying step melts the bump to form the interconnection on the interconnect site. In some embodiments the substrate is further provided with a solder paste on the interconnect site, and the step of moving the die and the substrate toward one another effects a contact between the bump and the solder on the site, and the melt and solidifying step melts the solder on the site to form the interconnection.


In another general aspect the invention features a method for forming flip chip interconnection, by providing a substrate having traces formed in a die attach surface and having a solder mask having openings over interconnect sites on the leads and having solder paste on the leads at the interconnect sites, and a die having bumps attached to interconnect pads in an active surface; supporting the substrate and the die; positioning the die with the active side of the die toward the die attach surface of the substrate, and aligning the die and substrate and moving one toward the other so that the bumps contact the solder paste on the corresponding traces (leads) on the substrate; and melting and then re-solidifying the solder paste, forming a metallurgical interconnection between the bump and the trace.


In another general aspect the invention features a flip chip package, including interconnections formed as described above, and additionally including forming an underfill between the die and the substrate.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1A is a diagrammatic sketch of a portion of a conventional bump-on-capture pad (“BoC”) flip chip interconnection, in a sectional view parallel to the plane of the package substrate surface.



FIG. 1B is a diagrammatic sketch in a plan view showing a die mounted on a substrate in a flip chip manner, in which the die and the substrate have significantly different thermal expansion coefficients, and showing dimensional change of the die in relation to the substrate as a result of change in temperature.



FIG. 2A is a diagrammatic sketch showing a portion of a flip chip interconnection according to the invention, in a sectional view perpendicular to the plane of the package substrate surface and generally transverse to the long axes of the leads.



FIG. 2B is a diagrammatic sketch showing a portion of a flip chip interconnection according to the invention, in a sectional view perpendicular to the plane of the package substrate surface and generally parallel long axes of the lead.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are diagrammatic sketches as in FIGS. 2B and 2B, respectively indicating dimensional references for various of the features.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will now be described in further detail by reference to the drawings, which illustrate alternative embodiments of the invention. The drawings are diagrammatic, showing features of the invention and their relation to other features and structures, and are not made to scale. For improved clarity of presentation, in the FIGS. illustrating embodiments of the invention, elements corresponding to elements shown in other drawings are not all particularly renumbered, although they are all readily identifiable in all the FIGS.


The conventional flip chip interconnection is made by using a melting process to join the bumps (conventionally, solder bumps) onto the mating surfaces of the corresponding capture pads and, accordingly, this is known as a “bump-on-capture pad” (“BoC”) interconnect. Two features are evident in the BOC design: first, a comparatively large capture pad is required to mate with the bump on the die; second, an insulating material, typically known as a “solder mask” is required to confine the flow of solder during the interconnection process. The solder mask opening may define the contour of the melted solder at the capture pad (“solder mask defined”), or the solder contour may not be defined by the mask opening (“non-solder mask defined”).


The techniques for defining solder mask openings have wide tolerance ranges. Consequently, for a solder mask defined bump configuration, the capture pad must be large (typically considerably larger than the design size for the mask opening), to ensure that the mask opening will be located on the mating surface of the pad; and for a non-solder mask defined bump configuration, the solder mask opening must be larger than the capture pad. The width of capture pads (or diameter, for circular pads) is typically about the same as the ball (or bump) diameter, and can be as much as two to four times wider than the trace width. This results in considerable loss of routing space on the top substrate layer. In particular, for example, the “escape routing pitch” is much bigger than the finest trace pitch that the substrate technology can offer. This means that a significant number of pads must be routed on lower substrate layers by means of short stubs and vias, often beneath the footprint of the die, emanating from the pads in question.



FIG. 1A shows a portion of a conventional flip chip package, in diagrammatic sectional view; the partial sectional view in FIG. 1A is taken in a plane perpendicular to the package substrate surface. Referring now to FIG. 1A, a die attach surface of the package substrate includes a patterned electrically conductive layer formed on a dielectric layer 10. The metal layer is patterned to form leads and capture pads 16. An insulating layer 11, typically termed a “solder mask”, covers the die attach surface of the substrate; the solder mask is usually constructed of a photodefinable material, and is patterned by conventional photoresist patterning techniques to have openings, indicated at 12, leaving the mating surfaces of the capture pads 16 exposed. Interconnect bumps 17 attached to pads (so-called “under bump metallization”) 18 on the active side of the die 14 are joined to the mating surfaces of corresponding capture pads 16 on the substrate to form appropriate electrical interconnection between the circuitry on the die and the leads on the substrate. The active side of the die 14 is covered, except at the contact surfaces of the die pads 16, with a die passivation layer 15, which may be, for example, a polyimide layer. After the reflowed solder is cooled to establish the electrical connection, an underfill material (not shown in these FIGS.) is introduced into the space between the die and the substrate, mechanically stabilizing the interconnects and protecting the features between the die and the substrate.


In such a conventional flip chip interconnect arrangement, signal escape traces in the upper metal layer of the substrate lead from their respective capture pads across the die edge location, and away from the die footprint. The capture pads are typically three times greater than the trace width. In one example of a conventional arrangement, the capture pads are arranged in a 210 um two-row area array pitch in a solder mask defined configuration, with one signal trace between capture pads in the marginal row, resulting in an effective escape pitch about 105 um, for example. In one example of a BoL interconnect, the interconnect sites can be arranged in a 210 um three-row area array pitch, with two signal traces between sites in the outer row, resulting in an effective escape pitch about 70 um. This escape pitch is adequate to route a significant proportion of integrated circuit designs that commonly employ flip chip interconnection on a single metallization layer, based on the inherent I/O density of the IC device architectures. BoL interconnection also further opens the prospect of routing a considerable proportion of flip chip designs in conventional through-hole laminate substrates, inasmuch as laminate substrates have line/space capacities of about 40 um/40 um (or better). This could provide for substantial cost reduction.



FIG. 1A shows a solder mask defined solder contour. As the fusible material of the bumps on the die melts, the molten solder tends to “wet” the metal of the capture pads, and the solder tends to “run out” over any contiguous metal surfaces that are not masked. The solder tends to flow along the underlying pad (and exposed contiguous lead), and in the solder mask defined contour the solder flow is limited by the solder mask, for example by the width of the opening 12 in the solder mask 11.


A non-solder mask defined solder contour may alternatively be employed, in which the flow of solder along the lead is limited at least in port by a patterned deposition of non-solder-wettable material on the lead surface.


Thermal movement (in the x-y plane) of die pads on the die attach surface of the die in relation to the corresponding points on the substrate (as indicated for example by arrow 13 in FIG. 1A), can result in stresses to the interconnections between the die pad and the site on the substrate. Dimensional change, resulting from temperature changes, of a flip chip mounted die in relation to a substrate, is shown diagrammatically (and with dimensions exaggerated) in plan view in FIG. 1B. In this example, there is a significant mismatch between the CTE of the die and the CE of the substrate. A portion of the substrate is shown at 11. Dimensional change of the die in the x-y plane (parallel to the plane of the substrate) in relation to the substrate as the temperature changes (for example, during thermal cycling in assembly or test or die burnout routines) is shown by the arrows 113. A footprint of the die at a higher temperature (the substrate is more “thermally expanded” than the die) is shown at 14B; a footprint of the die at a lower temperature is shown at 14B. As will be appreciated, registration of any point on the active surface of the die 14 with respect to a corresponding underlying point on the die attach surface of the substrate 11 will change as the dimensions of the die and substrate change differentially as a result of thermal stress. At some point on the active surface of the die there is no net movement with relation to the corresponding point on the underlying substrate, as a result of expansion or contraction of the die in relation to the substrate; that point may be referred to herein as the “thermally neutral point”. Generally, as may be appreciated, the thermally neutral point may approximately coincide with the geometric center of the die surface. The extent of movement of any point on the die in an x-y plane (parallel to the plane of the substrate) in relation to the substrate as a result of thermal expansion or contraction (the “thermal movement”) depends at least in part upon the distance of that point from the thermally neutral point on the die; accordingly, there is greater relative thermal movement at points nearer the edges of the die (and, particularly, near the corners of the die) than at points nearer the thermally neutral point.


Movement (in the x-y plane) of a die pad in relation to an underlying contact pad can result in stresses to the interconnection between the pad and the contact pad. Where the movement passes a limit, something has to give: failure of the interconnect can result. In conventional flip chip interconnects, where there is a thermal mismatch between the die and the substrate, failure typically occurs at the joint between the solder bump and the die pad. And, in convention flip chip interconnects, where there is a thermal mismatch between the die and the substrate, even if there is no failure, thermal stress at the die pad can cause damage to the die.


Conventionally it is thought that, in an ideal solder joint structure, the area (diameter) of the interconnect pad on the substrate is approximately equal to the area (diameter) of the interconnect pad on the die, as shown by way of example in FIG. 1A.


By analysis of interconnect configurations using computer simulations, we have determined that the primary locus of stress is as referenced at 19 in FIG. 1A. Particularly, where the thermal movement of the die in relation to the substrate is as shown at arrow 13 in FIG. 1A, the greatest (“Maximum”) plastic strain on the interconnect is predicted by the computer model to be at the “leading edge” 19 of the connection (interface) between the solder 17 and the die pad (UBM) 18. (As will be appreciated, the arrow might be positioned at the substrate, but reversed, showing relative movement of the substrate in the opposite direction; the relative movement is pointed out here in relation to the die, because the thermally neutral point is established in relation to the die footprint. The appearance of actual failures during accelerated fatigue testing is consistent with the model, that is, failure in conventional bond-on-capture pad interconnects usually appears at the interface of the solder with the die pad, rather than at the interface of the solder with the capture pad on the substrate.


A BoL interconnection according to an embodiment of the invention is shown by way of example in sectional views perpendicular to the surface of the substrate in FIGS. 2A and 2B. In FIG. 2A, two solder joints are shown in a sectional view transverse to the lead, and in FIG. 2B, one solder joint is shown in a sectional view parallel to the lead. Referring to FIG. 2A, a die attach surface of the package substrate includes a patterned electrically conductive layer formed on a dielectric layer 20. The metal layer is patterned to form leads having interconnect sites 26. An insulating layer 21, typically termed a “solder mask”, covers the die attach surface of the substrate; the solder mask is usually constructed of a photodefinable material, and is patterned by conventional photoresist patterning techniques to have openings, indicated at 22, leaving the top surface and the sides of the lead (the “mating surfaces”) exposed at the interconnect site 26. Interconnect structures 27 are attached to pads (so-called “under bump metallization”) 28 on the active side of the die 24 and are joined to the mating surfaces of the leads at the interconnect sites 26 on the substrate to form appropriate electrical interconnection between the circuitry on the die and the leads on the substrate. The active side of the die 24 is covered, except at the contact surfaces of the die pads 26, with a die passivation layer (such as a polyimide layer) 25. After the reflowed solder is cooled to establish the electrical connection, an underfill material (not shown in these FIGS.) is introduced into the space between the die and the substrate, mechanically stabilizing the interconnects and protecting the features between the die and the substrate.


Referring now to FIG. 2B, an interconnect is shown in a sectional view taken along the line 2B-2B in FIG. 2A. (In this view, the solder mask 21 is not shown.) This view shows the solder of interconnect structure 27 covering the sides of the lead 26.


The interconnect structures according to some embodiments can be made using entirely fusible materials, or using composite bumps, or using a solder-on-lead method, as described above.


Particularly, for example, so-called composite interconnect structures may be used. Composite structures have at least two bump portions, made of different materials, including one which is collapsible under reflow conditions, and one which is substantially non-collapsible under reflow conditions. The non-collapsible portion is attached to the interconnect pad on the die; typical conventional materials for the non-collapsible portion include various solders having a high lead (Pd) content, for example, (such as a lead-tin alloy having high lead content), or copper, or gold, or nickel, or a combination of these. The collapsible portion is joined to the non-collapsible portion, and it is the collapsible portion that makes the connection with the interconnect site on the lead. Typical conventional materials for the collapsible portion of the composite bump include eutectic solders, for example, which may be tin-based, including tin and alloys of tin such as silver, copper, or lead, or a combination of these.


This structure can be formed in the following way, for example. Solder bumps (or balls) are attached to or formed on the die pads (under bump metallization or UBM). Solder is applied to the interconnect sites on the traces, for example in the form of a solder paste. The die is oriented, active side facing the mounting surface of the substrate, so that the bumps on the die are aligned with the respective interconnect sites on the leads, and the die is moved toward the substrate to bring the bumps into contact with the solder on the leads. The assembly is then heated, to reflow the solder and form the connection at the interconnect site. As the solder on the lead reflows, it wicks to the solder-wettable surface of the solder bump, and to the solder-wettable mating surfaces of the lead. The surface of the substrate dielectric 20 is not solder-wettable, and the solder tends to make little or no contact with the substrate dielectric. The tapered form of the connection structure (as viewed in section across the lead, as in FIG. 2A) results from the narrow dimension of the lead at the interconnect site, and the wicking of the solder during reflow.


For example, the bumps may be formed of a high-lead (high-Pb) solder (e.g., 97% lead, 2% tin), and the solder on the interconnect site can be a eutectic solder. Reflow in some such examples can be carried out at a peak temperature of 235° C., employing flux in a jet flux method.


In a BoL construct such as is shown here, although the width of the leads may vary over their length, no particular widening of the leads is formed at the interconnect sites; in a BoNP construct, the leads may be widened to a limited extent at the interconnect sites. In either BoL or BONP construct, the sides of the lead—as well as the top—(the mating surfaces) are exposed to the solder at the interconnect site, and during reflow solder wicks to the solder-wettable surfaces.


As noted with reference to FIG. 2B, a solder mask is employed in these embodiments to limit the flow of solder along the length of the leads. In other embodiments the leads may be treated to be non-solder-wettable along portions of the leads adjacent the mating surfaces at the interconnect sites, so that flow of solder away from the interconnect sites along the leads is limited without use of a solder mask.


Any of a variety of substrate types can be employed according to the invention, including for example build-up film substrates and laminate substrates. For example, a 1-2-1 high-density build-up substrate can be used (such as an Ajinomoto Build-Up Film, or other high density substrate build-up film), or a 4-layer laminate substrate can be used.


Testing of samples constructed generally as shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B and employing a high-lead solder ball and a eutectic solder on the interconnect site shows that eventual failure can occur at or near the lead, rather than at the die pad, as in the conventional interconnect. Moreover, in embodiments according to the invention, where the difference between the areas of contact at the die pad and at the lead is sufficiently great, a greater number of thermal cycles to failure can be obtained.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are similar to FIGS. 2A and 2B, marked up for reference to dimensions of certain of the features. The features are referenced as follows: H, interconnect height as measured from the die surface to the solder mask surface; D, bump diameter at half the interconnect height (H/2); UD, under bump metallization diameter; OPx, mask opening width in the x-direction (across the lead); OPy, mask opening width in the y-direction (along the lead); CW, width of the (Copper) lead at the interconnect site; CH, thickness (height) of the lead at the interconnect site; T, solder mask thickness.


With further reference to FIG. 2A, a flip chip package according to the invention includes an underfill 47, which contributes to the mechanical stability of the structure and serves to protect the interconnection and the die and substrate surfaces. As inspection of FIG. 2A shows, the solder mask makes contact with (or is in close proximity to) the interconnect structure 27 at the margin of the opening 22. During the underfill process, the contact (or near proximity) of the solder mask with the interconnect structure interferes with flow of the underfill material toward the substrate adjacent the site. This results in the creation of voids 48 left unfilled by the underfill material, adjacent the contact of the interconnect structure with the site on the substrate metallization. Conventionally, it is generally believed that any voids in a flip chip construct are undesirable, for a variety of reasons. However, we have discovered that these voids adjacent the interconnect cite on the substrate can help provide relief from strain induced by changes in temperature of the system; and the generally perceived complications imposed by voids can be mitigated.


A BoL construct according to the invention may have the following dimensions, for example: UD, 90 um; D, 0.110 um; H, 75 um; T, 40 um; CW, 30 um, CT, 20 um. A BoL construct having these dimensions formed on an Ajinomoto Build-Up Film (ABF) 1-2-1 substrate has performed well in fatigue failure tests. This result is surprising, because it is conventionally believed that preferred interconnects should have a shape and support area for the joint at the die side approximately equal to that on the substrate side (bond-on-capture pad, or BoC). (A similar BoL construct, having a wider CW (40 um) and formed on a 4-layer BT laminate, performed less satisfactorily.) Without intending to be bound thereto, the applicants suggest that the following hypothesis might explain this surprising result. Although in the conventional BoC the average strain on the interconnect system is determined by the magnitude of the CTE mismatch between the die and the substrate, a high strain concentration occurs at the bump/die interface, because at this location there is an abrupt difference in CTE. Accordingly, applicants suggest that fatigue failure is driven by a concentration of plastic strain at this location, and not by the average strain. In the BoL construct, because the interconnect structure is tapered, the portion of it nearer the substrate has a greater compliancy; particularly, applicants suggest that there is a high compliancy region (or “relief structure”) at or near the narrow interface at the interconnect site on the trace. Applicants suggest that this relief structure has an effect of diffusing the strain away from the die pad, resulting in improved fatigue life of the system. A computer analysis (Finite Element Modeling, FET) can lend support to this view.


A conventional (BoC) construct having the following dimensions was used for the FET analysis: UD, 90 um; D, 0.110 um; H, 75 um; OPx, 95 um; T, 40 um; CW, 115 um, CT, 20 um. The analysis showed a considerable concentration of maximum strain at the interface with the die pad in the BoC model, and a maximum plastic strain in a zone on the “leading edge” of the structure at the die pad (see, FIG. 1A). In the BoL model, the maximum plastic strain is reduced, and it is shifted away from the die pad interface.


Other embodiments are within the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate including an interconnect site;a semiconductor die including an interconnect pad, the semiconductor die disposed over the substrate; anda bump material disposed between the interconnect pad and interconnect site in contact with the interconnect site at a contact surface, wherein a width of the contact surface of the interconnect site in a direction across the interconnect site is less than a length of the contact surface of the interconnect site in a direction along the interconnect site.
  • 2. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein a length of the bump material in the direction along the interconnect site is about 1.5 to 4 times a width of the bump material in the direction across the interconnect site.
  • 3. The semiconductor device of claim 1, further including an insulating layer formed over the substrate including an opening over the interconnect site.
  • 4. The semiconductor device of claim 3, wherein the bump material contacts the insulating layer while leaving a void between the insulating layer and interconnect site.
  • 5. The semiconductor device of claim 1, wherein the bump material includes a composite interconnect structure comprising a non-collapsible portion and collapsible portion.
  • 6. The semiconductor device of claim 5, wherein the non-collapsible portion includes lead-tin alloy, copper, gold, or nickel.
  • 7. A semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate including an interconnect site;a semiconductor die including an interconnect pad; anda bump material formed between the interconnect pad and interconnect site in contact with the interconnect site at a contact surface, wherein a width of the bump material at the contact surface in a direction across the interconnect site is less than a length of the bump material at the contact surface in a direction along the interconnect site.
  • 8. The semiconductor device of claim 7, wherein the length of the bump material in the direction along the interconnect site is about 1.5 to 4 times the width of the bump material in the direction across the interconnect site.
  • 9. The semiconductor device of claim 7, further including an insulating layer formed over the substrate including an opening over the interconnect site.
  • 10. The semiconductor device of claim 9, wherein the bump material contacts the insulating layer while leaving a void between the insulating layer and interconnect site.
  • 11. The semiconductor device of claim 7, wherein the bump material includes a composite interconnect structure comprising a non-collapsible portion and collapsible portion.
  • 12. The semiconductor device of claim 11, wherein the non-collapsible portion includes lead-tin alloy, copper, gold, or nickel.
  • 13. A semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate including an interconnect site; anda bump formed over the interconnect site, wherein a width of the bump at the interconnect site in a direction across the interconnect site is less than a length of the bump at the interconnect site in a direction along the interconnect site.
  • 14. The semiconductor device of claim 13, wherein the length of the bump in the direction along the interconnect site is about 1.5 to 4 times the width of the bump in the direction across the interconnect site.
  • 15. The semiconductor device of claim 13, further including an insulating layer formed over the substrate including an opening over the interconnect site.
  • 16. The semiconductor device of claim 15, wherein the bump contacts the insulating layer while leaving a void between the insulating layer and interconnect site.
  • 17. A semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate including an interconnect site; anda bump formed over the interconnect site, wherein a width of the bump in a direction across the interconnect site is less than a length of the bump in a direction along the interconnect site and wherein the bump includes a composite interconnect structure comprising a non-collapsible portion and collapsible portion.
  • 18. The semiconductor device of claim 17, wherein the non-collapsible portion includes lead-tin alloy, copper, gold, or nickel.
  • 19. The semiconductor device of claim 17, wherein the collapsible portion includes eutectic solder.
  • 20. A semiconductor device, comprising: a substrate including an interconnect site; anda bump formed over the interconnect site, wherein an interface surface between the bump and interconnect site includes a width in a direction across the interface surface less than a length in a direction along the interface surface.
  • 21. The semiconductor device of claim 20, further including an insulating layer formed over the substrate including an opening over the interconnect site, wherein the bump contacts the insulating layer and leaves a void between the insulating layer and interconnect site.
  • 22. The semiconductor device of claim 20, wherein the length of the interface surface in the direction along the interconnect site is about 1.5 to 4 times the width of the interface surface in the direction across the interconnect site.
  • 23. The semiconductor device of claim 20, wherein the bump includes a composite interconnect structure comprising a non-collapsible portion and collapsible portion.
  • 24. The semiconductor device of claim 23, wherein the collapsible portion includes eutectic solder.
CLAIM TO DOMESTIC PRIORITY

The present application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/643,180, filed Dec. 21, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,216,930, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/640,534, filed Dec. 14, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,659,633, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/597,648, filed Dec. 14, 2005. Additionally, U.S. application Ser. No. 11/640,534 is continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/985,654, filed Nov. 10, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,368,817, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/533,918, filed Dec. 31, 2003 and Provisional Application No. 60/518,864, filed Nov. 10, 2003. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/640,534 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/388,755, filed Mar. 24, 2006, which claims the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/665,208, filed Mar. 25, 2005, which applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (205)
Number Name Date Kind
5186383 Melton et al. Feb 1993 A
5340435 Ito et al. Aug 1994 A
5378859 Shirasaki et al. Jan 1995 A
5383916 Brown Jan 1995 A
5386624 George et al. Feb 1995 A
5434410 Kulwicki Jul 1995 A
5473197 Idaka et al. Dec 1995 A
5508561 Tago et al. Apr 1996 A
5519580 Natarajan et al. May 1996 A
5587337 Idaka et al. Dec 1996 A
5650595 Bentlage et al. Jul 1997 A
5710071 Beddingfield et al. Jan 1998 A
5795818 Marrs Aug 1998 A
5798285 Bentlage et al. Aug 1998 A
5844782 Fukasawa Dec 1998 A
5854514 Roldan et al. Dec 1998 A
5869886 Tokuno Feb 1999 A
5872399 Lee Feb 1999 A
5889326 Tanaka Mar 1999 A
5915169 Heo Jun 1999 A
5985456 Zhou et al. Nov 1999 A
6002172 Desai et al. Dec 1999 A
6049122 Yoneda Apr 2000 A
6109507 Yagi et al. Aug 2000 A
6149122 Berger et al. Nov 2000 A
6201305 Darveaux et al. Mar 2001 B1
6218630 Takigami Apr 2001 B1
6228466 Tsukada et al. May 2001 B1
6229209 Nakamura et al. May 2001 B1
6229220 Saitoh et al. May 2001 B1
6229711 Yoneda May 2001 B1
6251704 Ohuchi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6259163 Ohuchi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268568 Kim Jul 2001 B1
6278184 Brofman et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281107 Moriyama Aug 2001 B1
6281450 Urasaki et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281581 Desai et al. Aug 2001 B1
6297560 Capote et al. Oct 2001 B1
6297564 Chung Oct 2001 B1
6324754 DiStefano et al. Dec 2001 B1
6329605 Beroz et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333206 Ito et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335222 DiStefano Jan 2002 B1
6335568 Yuzawa et al. Jan 2002 B1
6335571 Capote et al. Jan 2002 B1
6383916 Lin May 2002 B1
6396707 Huang et al. May 2002 B1
6409073 Kaskoun et al. Jun 2002 B1
6441316 Kusui Aug 2002 B1
6448665 Nakazawa et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458622 Keser et al. Oct 2002 B1
6459622 Ogura et al. Oct 2002 B1
6462425 Iwasaki et al. Oct 2002 B1
6472608 Nakayama Oct 2002 B2
6495397 Kubota et al. Dec 2002 B2
6510976 Hwee et al. Jan 2003 B2
6518674 Interrante et al. Feb 2003 B2
6518678 James et al. Feb 2003 B2
6550666 Chew et al. Apr 2003 B2
6556268 Lee et al. Apr 2003 B1
6563712 Akram et al. May 2003 B2
6573610 Tsai Jun 2003 B1
6578754 Tung Jun 2003 B1
6592019 Tung Jul 2003 B2
6600234 Kuwabara et al. Jul 2003 B2
6608388 Lin et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612024 Sasaki et al. Sep 2003 B1
6660560 Chaudhuri et al. Dec 2003 B2
6661084 Peterson et al. Dec 2003 B1
6664483 Chong et al. Dec 2003 B2
6678948 Benzler et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681982 Tung Jan 2004 B2
6710458 Seko Mar 2004 B2
6734557 Taniguchi et al. May 2004 B2
6768190 Yang et al. Jul 2004 B2
6774474 Caletka et al. Aug 2004 B1
6774497 Qi et al. Aug 2004 B1
6780673 Venkateswaran Aug 2004 B2
6780682 Pendse Aug 2004 B2
6787918 Tsai et al. Sep 2004 B1
6798072 Kajiwara et al. Sep 2004 B2
6809262 Hsu Oct 2004 B1
6818545 Lee et al. Nov 2004 B2
6821878 Danvir et al. Nov 2004 B2
6849944 Murtuza et al. Feb 2005 B2
6870276 Moxham et al. Mar 2005 B1
6888255 Murtuza et al. May 2005 B2
6913948 Caletka et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927489 Yaguchi et al. Aug 2005 B1
6943058 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 2005 B2
7005585 Ishizaki Feb 2006 B2
7005743 Iwatsu et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005750 Liu Feb 2006 B2
7019407 Chen et al. Mar 2006 B2
7049705 Huang May 2006 B2
7057284 Chauhan et al. Jun 2006 B2
7064435 Chung et al. Jun 2006 B2
7078819 DiStefano Jul 2006 B2
7098407 Kim et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101781 Ho et al. Sep 2006 B2
7102222 Kuo et al. Sep 2006 B2
7102239 Pu et al. Sep 2006 B2
7112524 Hsu et al. Sep 2006 B2
7164208 Kainou et al. Jan 2007 B2
7173828 Lin et al. Feb 2007 B2
7183493 Garcia et al. Feb 2007 B2
7224073 Kim May 2007 B2
7242099 Lin et al. Jul 2007 B2
7271484 Reiss et al. Sep 2007 B2
7294451 Chiu et al. Nov 2007 B2
7294457 Kukolj et al. Nov 2007 B2
7294929 Miyazaki Nov 2007 B2
7317245 Lee et al. Jan 2008 B1
7361990 Lu et al. Apr 2008 B2
7405484 Usui et al. Jul 2008 B2
7436063 Miyata et al. Oct 2008 B2
7462942 Tan et al. Dec 2008 B2
7488896 Saiki et al. Feb 2009 B2
7521284 Miranda et al. Apr 2009 B2
7642660 Tay et al. Jan 2010 B2
7663248 Hedler et al. Feb 2010 B2
7663250 Jeon et al. Feb 2010 B2
7670939 Topacio et al. Mar 2010 B2
7671454 Seko Mar 2010 B2
7692314 Yang et al. Apr 2010 B2
7700407 Pendse Apr 2010 B2
7732913 Hsieh et al. Jun 2010 B2
7750457 Seko Jul 2010 B2
7790509 Gerber Sep 2010 B2
7791211 Chen et al. Sep 2010 B2
7847399 Masumoto Dec 2010 B2
7847417 Araki et al. Dec 2010 B2
7851928 Gallegos et al. Dec 2010 B2
7898083 Castro Mar 2011 B2
7902660 Lee et al. Mar 2011 B1
7902678 Ohuchi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7902679 Lin et al. Mar 2011 B2
7932170 Huemoeller et al. Apr 2011 B1
7947602 Ito et al. May 2011 B2
7973406 Pendse Jul 2011 B2
8026128 Pendse Sep 2011 B2
8129841 Pendse et al. Mar 2012 B2
8178392 Choi et al. May 2012 B2
8318537 Pendse Nov 2012 B2
20010008309 Iijima et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010013423 Dalal et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020033412 Tung Mar 2002 A1
20020041036 Smith Apr 2002 A1
20020100610 Yasuda et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020121706 Tatsuta et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020155637 Lee Oct 2002 A1
20020179689 Tung Dec 2002 A1
20020192865 Imasu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030049411 Chaudhuri et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030057551 Datta et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030067084 Shintani Apr 2003 A1
20030116866 Cher 'Khung et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030127734 Lee et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030127747 Kajiwara et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030157792 Tong et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030168748 Katagiri et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030175146 Yeh et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030218249 Ho et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040027788 Chiu et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040035909 Yeh et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040046263 Harper et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040046264 Ho et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040056341 Endo et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040105223 Okada et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040108135 Ashida Jun 2004 A1
20040126927 Lin et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040210122 Sieburg Oct 2004 A1
20040232560 Su Nov 2004 A1
20040232562 Hortaleza et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050046041 Tsai Mar 2005 A1
20050082654 Humpston et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050103516 Kaneyuki May 2005 A1
20050224991 Yeo Oct 2005 A1
20050248037 Hung et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060131758 Dao Jun 2006 A1
20060192294 Lee Aug 2006 A1
20060202331 Hu Sep 2006 A1
20060216860 Pendse Sep 2006 A1
20060255473 Pendse Nov 2006 A1
20070200234 Gerber et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070259514 Otremba Nov 2007 A1
20080088013 Chew et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080093749 Gerber et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080179740 Liao Jul 2008 A1
20080213941 Pendse Sep 2008 A1
20080277802 Tsai et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090045507 Pendse et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090057378 Hwang et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090108445 Liang Apr 2009 A1
20090114436 Chen et al. May 2009 A1
20090146303 Kwon Jun 2009 A1
20090152716 Sohara Jun 2009 A1
20090191329 Wang Jul 2009 A1
20090288866 Tsai et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090308647 Liao Dec 2009 A1
20100139965 Wang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110049703 Hsu et al. Mar 2011 A1
20130214409 Pagaila et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130277830 Yu et al. Oct 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (29)
Number Date Country
H04355933 Dec 1991 JP
04-355933 Sep 1992 JP
2005-28037 Apr 1993 JP
6503687 Apr 1993 JP
9097791 Apr 1997 JP
10-256307 Sep 1998 JP
10-256315 Sep 1998 JP
11145176 May 1999 JP
11233571 Aug 1999 JP
11330162 Nov 1999 JP
2000-031204 Jan 2000 JP
2000133667 Dec 2000 JP
2000349194 Dec 2000 JP
2001156203 Jun 2001 JP
2001332583 Nov 2001 JP
2001351945 Dec 2001 JP
2002270732 Sep 2002 JP
2004-221205 May 2004 JP
2004165283 Jun 2004 JP
2004221205 Aug 2004 JP
2005109187 Apr 2005 JP
2005333166 Dec 2005 JP
1998-79438 Nov 1998 KR
2000-62333 Oct 2000 KR
100817 Jan 2004 SG
530398 May 2003 TW
9306964 Apr 1993 WO
0013228 Mar 2000 WO
03071842 Aug 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
Yamada, Hiroshi et al., “A fine pitch and high aspect ratio bump array for flip-chip interconnection”, Int'l Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, 1992, pp. 288-292, IEEE/CHMT.
Appelt et al., “Fine Pitch Flip Chip Chip Scale Packaging”, pp. 1-4, no date available.
Chen et al., “Advanced Flip-Chip Package Production Solution for 40nm/28nm Technology Nodes”, International Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 768-771, IEEE 2010.
Gerber et al., “Next Generation Fine Pitch Cu Pillar Technology—Enabling Next Generation Silicon Nodes”, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 612-618, 2011.
He et al., “All-Copper Chip-to-Substrate Interconnects Part II. Modeling and Design”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 155(4):D314-D322, 2008.
Heinen, K. Gail et al., “Multichip Assembly with Flipped Integrated Circuits”, IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufactureing Technology, vol. 12 No. 4, 1989, pp. 650-657.
Kawahara, Toshimi, “SuperCSP”, IEEE Transactions on Advanced Packaging, May 2000, pp. 215-219, vol. 23, No. 2.
Lau, John H. et al., “A New Thermal-Fatigue Life Prediction Model For Wafer Level Chip Scale Package (WLCSP) Solder Joints”, Journal of Electronic Packaging, vol. 124, 2002, pp. 212-220.
Love, David et al., “Wire Interconnect Technology, A New High-Reliability Tight-Pitch Interconnect Technology”, Karl Suss, 1999.
Lu, H. et al., “Predicting Optimal Process Conditions for Flip-Chip Assembly Using Copper Column Bumped Dies”, Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, 2002, pp. 338-343.
Pendse et al., “Bon-on-Lead: A Novel Flip Chip Interconnection Technology for Fine Effective Pitch and High I/O Density”, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 16-23, 2006.
Powell, D. O. et al., Flip-Chip on FR-4 Integrated Circuit Packaging, HBN Technology Products, 1993, pp. 182-186.
Schubert, A. et al . . . “Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Large IC Flip Chip Attach”, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2000, pp. 1338-1346.
Son, Ho-Young, “Studies on the Thermal Cycling Reliability of Fine Pitch Cu/SnAg Double-Bump Flip Chip Assembies on Organic Substrates: Experimental Results and Numerical Analysis”, IEEE Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2008, pp. 2035-2043.
Yamada, Hiroshi et al., “Advanced copper column based solder bump for flip-chip interconnection”, International Symposium on Microelectronics, 1997, pp. 417-422, The British Library—“The world's knowledge”.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120273943 A1 Nov 2012 US
Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
60597648 Dec 2005 US
60533918 Dec 2003 US
60518864 Nov 2003 US
60665208 Mar 2005 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11640534 Dec 2006 US
Child 12643180 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12643180 Dec 2009 US
Child 13529794 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 10985654 Nov 2004 US
Child 11640534 US
Parent 11388755 Mar 2006 US
Child 11640534 US