This disclosure relates generally to integrated circuits, and more particularly to testing of semiconductor chips with microbumps.
Integrated circuits have experienced continuous rapid growth due to constant improvements in the integration density of various electronic components (i.e., transistors, diodes, resistors, capacitors, etc.). For the most part, this improvement in integration density has come from repeated reductions in minimum feature size, allowing more components to be integrated into a given chip area.
The volume occupied by the integrated components is near the surface of the semiconductor wafer. Although dramatic improvements in lithography have resulted in considerable improvements in two-dimensional (2D) integrated circuit formation, there are physical limitations to the density that can be achieved in two dimensions. One of these limitations is the minimum size needed to make these components. Further, when more devices are put into one chip, more complex designs are required. An additional limitation comes from the significant gains in the number and length of interconnections between devices as the number of devices increases. When the number and length of interconnections increase, both circuit resistive-capacitive (RC) delay and power consumption increase.
Three-dimensional integrated circuits (3DIC) were thus formed to address issues raised by increase in circuit densities. The dies are stacked, with wire-bonding, flip-chip bonding, and/or through-silicon vias (TSV) being used to stack the dies together and to connect the dies to package substrates. Circuit probe (CP) testing of advanced semiconductor chips and 3DIC with high device density becomes challenging.
The present disclosure will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and like reference numerals designate like structural elements.
It is to be understood that the following disclosure provides many different embodiments, or examples, for implementing different features. Specific examples of components and arrangements are described below to simplify the present disclosure. These are, of course, merely examples and are not intended to be limiting. In addition, the present disclosure may repeat reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in itself dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
Modern integrated circuits are made of millions of active devices, such as transistors and capacitors. These devices are initially isolated from each other, but are later interconnected together to form functional circuits. Typical interconnect structures include lateral interconnections, such as metal lines (wirings), and vertical interconnections, such as vias and contacts. Interconnections are increasingly determining the limits of performance and the density of modern integrated circuits. On top of the interconnect structures, bond pads are formed and exposed on the surface of the respective chip. Electrical connections are made through these bond pads to connect the chip to a package substrate or another die. Bond pads can be used for wire bonding or flip-chip bonding. Flip-chip packaging utilizes bumps to establish electrical contact between a chip's I/O pads and the substrate or lead frame of the package.
Conventionally, the sizes of the flip chip bumps are equal to or greater than about 75 μm. The sizes of the conventional flip chip bumps allow the semiconductor chips connected to the bumps to be electrically tested to determine whether the circuits under (or connected) to the bumps pass functional tests. Sometimes such as tests may also called circuit probe (CP), or electronic die sort (EDS).
Conventional bumps, such as bumps 105, can be probed for such tests. Alternatively, test pads can be added to allow functional tests.
As feature size scales down, the number of transistors and interconnects on a chip has increased continuously. As a result, the number of chip to package input/output (I/O) interconnects have also increased significantly. With the increased chip to package I/O interconnects, the sizes of bumps could be reduced to equal to or less than about 50 μm. Such reduced-size bumps are called “microbumps.”
After semiconductor chip 300 is prepared, and before it is placed on substrate 320, it is desirable to perform electrical tests on chip 300 to determine if the circuits on chip 300 meet the specification of functional tests. If the test results show problems with chip 300, chip 300 could be discarded and another good chip could be used instead. Such screening can prevent the entire package shown in
As mentioned above, conventional flip chip bumps, with sizes equal to or greater than about 75 μm, allow circuit probing (or electrical tests). However, the current circuit probes are too large for microbumps (or μbumps). For example, the sizes (or widths) of the tips of probes may be in a range from about 2.5 mil to about 5 mil, which are too large for microbumps. An alternative for testing semiconductor chips with microbumps would be to use test pads, such as those described in
As mentioned above, regular bumps are much larger than microbumps. For example, regular bumps have diameters in a range from about 75 μm to about 150 μm. In contrast, the diameters of microbumps are in a range from about 20 μm to about 50 μm, in accordance with some embodiments. As a result, extra space on the surface of semiconductor may become available due to the usage of microbumps.
Since the microbumps are smaller than regular bumps. The surface space saved from using microbumps, instead of using regular bumps, could be used for the testing pads. Using the surface saved by using microbumps for test pad(s) can minimize the impact of the test pads occupying the real-estate of the surface of a semiconductor chip.
The number of bump pads (or microbumps) could be in a range from 2 to 8, in accordance with some embodiments. For smaller microbumps, the number of bumps can be even higher. Different numbers of microbumps could be connected to the test pads to allow performing functional tests of different devices connected to the same I/O connections and/or under the same input signals. For example, some functions of the semiconductor chip could involve applying or pulling signals (or current) from devices connected to a number of bumps. The different connections show in
Alternatively, the microbumps do not need to be distributed asymmetrically around the testing pads.
In some embodiments, there are a number of test pads with microbumps in some of the arrangements described above on a semiconductor chip. Different combinations could be needed on different chips to complete functional testing of various devices on the chips. For example, different inputs/outputs (I/Os), such as I/Os for signals, power, and ground (or grounding), need different numbers of microbumps due to different current requirement and also the Imax (maximum current) limits of microbumps. Therefore, different combinations of numbers of microbumps are needed to allow testing.
Circuit probing can damage the metal pads, which leads to the copper seed layer coverage and poor bump plating (or formation). Poor bump formation could lead to particle and corrosion issues. However, if the testing pads are covered by a passivation layer after the testing is completed, the risks of such issues are completed resolved or greatly reduced.
The structures of microbumps and the processes of forming the microbumps could be similar to regular bumps.
An opening is formed in passivation layer 630, with metal pad 628 exposed. A diffusion barrier layer 640 and a thin seed layer 642 are formed to cover the opening with the diffusion barrier layer 640 in contact with the metal pad 628, in accordance with some embodiments. Diffusion barrier layer 640 may be a titanium layer, a titanium nitride layer, a tantalum layer, or a tantalum nitride layer. The materials of seed layer 642 may include copper or copper alloys, and hence is referred to as copper seed layer 642 hereinafter. However, other metals, such as silver, gold, aluminum, and combinations thereof, may also be included. In some embodiments, diffusion barrier layer 640 and copper seed layer 642 are formed using sputtering.
A copper layer 650 may be deposited or plated on the exposed surface of copper seed layer 642, in accordance with some embodiments. A metal layer 652 may be optionally formed on the copper layer 650. In some embodiments, metal layer 652 is a nickel-containing layer comprising, for example, a nickel layer or a nickel alloy layer by plating. A solder layer 660 is formed on nickel layer 652, for example, by plating. Solder layer 660 may be a lead-free pre-solder layer formed of, for example, SnAg, or a solder material, including alloys of tin, lead, silver, copper, nickel, bismuth, or combinations thereof. A solder reflowing process is performed to form solder bump 660a, as shown in
In alternative embodiments, as shown in
The embodiments described above provide mechanisms for performing functional tests on devices connected to microbump pads under microbumps. Test pads that are larger than microbumps are formed to allow such testing. Due to the surface areas saved by using microbumps, the effect of test pads on surface real-estate of semiconductor chips could be reduced to minimum or none. The test pad can be connected to one or more microbump pads during testing. These one or more microbumps may be distributed symmetrically or asymmetrically around the test pads. The test pads could be damaged due to circuit probing and could be covered by a passivation layer after probing to protect the damaged surface.
In one embodiment, a test structure for performing electrical tests of devices under one or more microbumps is provided. The test structure includes at least one device, and a metal pad connected to an interconnect for the at least one device. The metal pad includes a first portion forming at least one microbump pad, and a width of the at least one microbump pad is equal to or less than about 50 μm. The metal pad also includes a second portion forming a test pad connected to the at least one microbump pad, and the test pad has a size large enough to allow circuit probing of the at least first device. A width of the test pad is greater than the at least one microbump pad.
In another embodiment, a test structure for performing electrical tests of devices under one or more microbumps is provided. The test structure includes at least one microbump pad, and the at least one microbump pad is a part of a metal pad connected to an interconnect for at least a first device. A width of the at least one microbump pad is equal to or less than about 50 μm. The test structure also includes a test pad connected to the at least one microbump pad, and the test pad has a size large enough to allow circuit probing involving at least the first device. The test pad is another part of the metal pad, and a width of the test pad is greater than the at least one microbump pad. The test pad is covered after circuit probe by a passivation material to prevent particle and corrosion issues.
In yet another embodiment, a method of forming and testing a test structure for electrical tests of devices under one or more microbumps is provided. The method includes depositing a first passivation layer over a metal pad on a semiconductor substrate and defining at least one microbump pad connected to a test pad by patterning the first passivation layer. The at least one microbump pad is connected to an interconnect of a first device. The method also includes performing circuit probing on the test pad to electrically testing devices connected to the at least one microbump pad, and forming a second passivation layer to cover the test pad and to expose the at least one microbump pad. The method further includes forming a microbump in each of the at least one microbump pad.
Various modifications, changes, and variations apparent to those of skill in the art may be made in the arrangement, operation, and details of the methods and systems disclosed. Although the foregoing embodiments have been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the disclosure is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4811082 | Jacobs et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4990462 | Sliwa, Jr. | Feb 1991 | A |
5075253 | Sliwa, Jr. | Dec 1991 | A |
5380681 | Hsu | Jan 1995 | A |
5406210 | Pedder | Apr 1995 | A |
5481133 | Hsu | Jan 1996 | A |
5554940 | Hubacher | Sep 1996 | A |
5726075 | Farnworth et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6002177 | Gaynes et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016060 | Akram et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6187678 | Gaynes et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6229216 | Ma et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236115 | Gaynes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271059 | Bertin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279815 | Correia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6355501 | Fung et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6434016 | Zeng et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6437990 | Degani et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448661 | Kim et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461895 | Liang et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6562653 | Ma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570248 | Ahn et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6600222 | Levardo | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6607938 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6661085 | Kellar et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6762076 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790748 | Kim et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908565 | Kim et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908785 | Kim | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924551 | Rumer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943067 | Greenlaw | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946384 | Kloster et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6975016 | Kellar et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7037804 | Kellar et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056807 | Kellar et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7087538 | Staines et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7151009 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157787 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215033 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7276799 | Lee et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7279795 | Periaman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7307005 | Kobrinsky et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7317256 | Williams et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320928 | Kloster et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7345350 | Sinha | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7402442 | Condorelli et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402515 | Arana et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410884 | Ramanathan et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7432592 | Shi et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494845 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7528494 | Furukawa et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531890 | Kim | May 2009 | B2 |
7557597 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7576435 | Chao | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7834450 | Kang | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20060195020 | Martin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090218571 | Chen et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20110092064 | Liu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Noice, Dave ; Gerousis, Vassilios, Physical Design Implementation for 3D IC—Methodology and Tools, Mar. 6, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120206160 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |