Increased performance of circuit devices including transistors, diodes, resistors, capacitors, and other passive and active electronic devices formed on a semiconductor substrate is typically a major factor considered during design, manufacture, and operation of those devices. For example, during design and manufacture or forming of metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistor semiconductor devices, such as those used in a complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), it is often desired to minimize the parasitic resistance associated with contacts otherwise known as external resistance Rext. Decreased Rext enables higher current from an equal transistor design.
As will be appreciated, the figures are not necessarily drawn to scale or intended to limit the claimed invention to the specific configurations shown. For instance, while some figures generally indicate straight lines, right angles, and smooth surfaces, an actual implementation of a transistor structure may have less than perfect straight lines and/or right angles, and some features may have surface topology or otherwise be non-smooth, given real world limitations of the processing equipment and techniques used. In short, the figures are provided merely to show example structures.
Techniques are disclosed for forming column IV transistor devices having source and drain regions with high concentrations of germanium, and exhibiting reduced parasitic resistance relative to conventional devices. In some example embodiments, the source/drain regions of the resulting transistor structure each include a thin p-type silicon or germanium or silicon germanium (SiGe) liner layer with the remainder of the source/drain material being p-type germanium or a germanium alloy comprising, for instance, germanium and tin, and having a germanium content of at least 80 atomic % (and 20 atomic % or less other components, such as tin and/or other suitable strain inducers). In some example cases, evidence of strain relaxation may be observed in this germanium rich layer including misfit dislocations and/or threading dislocations. Numerous transistor configurations and suitable fabrication processes will be apparent in light of this disclosure, including both planar and non-planar transistor structures (e.g., FinFETs and nanowire transistors), as well as strained and unstrained channel structures. The techniques are particularly well-suited for implementing p-type MOS (PMOS) devices, although other transistor configurations may benefit as well.
General Overview
As previously explained, increased drive current in the transistors can generally be achieved by reducing device external resistance, Rext. However, PMOS transistor performance is a function of various component resistances within the device, as can be seen with reference to
Thus, and in accordance with some embodiments of the present invention, replacing the typical silicon or SiGe alloy materials in the source/drain regions with a p-type thin liner and high content of germanium (with very high p-type doping concentration) minimizes the external resistance components (R2, R3, and R4). In addition, by introducing a highly compressively strained material, the channel hole mobility is maximized or otherwise increased and hence reduces channel resistance (R1). The net impact of decreased channel, tip, source/drain and contact resistance is improved transistor current for a given voltage (relative to threshold voltage, Vt, i.e. V-Vt).
In some example cases, the thin liner is p-type doped silicon or germanium or SiGe alloy, and is generally less than 50% of the total source/drain deposition layer thickness. The remaining source/drain deposition layer thickness is generally greater than 50% of the total source/drain deposition layer thickness and can be, for example, p-type doped germanium or a germanium alloy such as germanium:tin or germanium:tin:x (where x is, for example, silicon or other marginal component or process/diffusion-based artifact) having at least 80 atomic % germanium and 20 atomic % or less of other constituents (e.g., tin and/or any other suitable strain inducer and/or other marginal unintentional components). In some specific such example embodiments, the thickness ratio of the source/drain liner to the high concentration germanium cap is about 1:5 or less (where the liner makes up about 20% or less of the total source/drain deposition layer thickness). In some such example cases, the thickness liner is one to several monolayers.
The techniques can be used to form transistor devices in any number of devices and systems. In some embodiments, such as CMOS devices having both n-type MOS (NMOS) and PMOS transistors, selectivity can be achieved in various ways. In one embodiment, for instance, deposition on NMOS source/drain locations can be avoided by having NMOS regions masked off during PMOS deposition. In other embodiments, selectivity may include natural selectivity. For instance, while boron doped germanium grows on p-type SiGe (or silicon) source drain regions, it does not grow on insulator surfaces such as silicon dioxide (SiO2) or silicon nitride (SiN); nor does it grow on, for instance, exposed heavily phosphorous doped silicon in n-type regions.
The techniques provided herein can be employed to improve device resistance in any number of transistor structures and configurations, including planar, flush or raised source/drain, non-planer (e.g., nanowire transistors and finned transistors such as double-gate and trigate transistor structures), as well as strained and unstrained channel structures. The source/drain areas can be recessed (e.g., using an etch process) or not recessed (e.g., formed on top surface of substrate). In addition, the transistor devices may optionally include source and drain tip regions that are designed, for instance, to decrease the overall resistance of the transistor while improving short channel effects (SCE), but such tip regions are not required. The transistor devices may further include any number of gate configurations, such as poly gates, high-k dielectric metal gates, replacement metal gate (RMG) process gates, or any other gate structure. Any number of structural features can be used in conjunction with low resistance transistor techniques as described herein.
A transmission electron microscopy (TEM) cross-section perpendicular to gate lines or secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) profile can be used to show the germanium concentration in the structure, as profiles of epitaxial alloys of silicon and SiGe can readily be distinguished from high germanium concentration profiles, in accordance with some embodiments. In some such silicon-containing substrate cases, by forgoing the typical requirement to maintain strained (dislocation free) source/drain regions, the lattice dimension mismatch between the source/drain fill material and silicon channel can be increased by at least 2× for pure germanium and even more for germanium-tin alloys. While not 100% of the strain is able to transfer to the channel in cases where dislocations are present in the germanium rich cap layer, post deposition thermal treatments can be used to provide a clear transistor performance (current at a given V-Vt) gain even for relaxed films (as described herein) relative to strained SiGe controls. As will be appreciated, relaxed generally means that the films can have misfit dislocations present, but may also refer to a plastic relaxation mechanism which involves dislocation formation and propagation. A process of elastic relaxation becomes possible in non-planar configurations such as FinFET (e.g., tri-gate) and nanowire structures where the strained material is not fully constrained by the substrate. Thus, the in-plane lattice constant has more flexibility to expand or contract independent of the substrate and this process does not require formation and propagation of misfit dislocations. Going forward herein, the word relaxation is used in the sense of plastic relaxation and not in the sense of elastic relaxation. The use of tin or other suitable strain inducers to alloy the high concentration germanium cap as described herein can optionally be used to increase the strain in the channel region, and thereby further reduce the overall device resistance via reduction in resistance R1 in
Architecture and Methodology
The example method includes forming 202 one or more gate stacks on a semiconductor substrate upon which a MOS device may be formed. The MOS device may comprise, for example, PMOS transistors, or both NMOS and PMOS transistors (e.g., for CMOS devices).
The gate dielectric 302 can be, for example, any suitable oxide such as silicon dioxide (SiO2) or high-k gate dielectric materials. Examples of high-k gate dielectric materials include, for instance, hafnium oxide, hafnium silicon oxide, lanthanum oxide, lanthanum aluminum oxide, zirconium oxide, zirconium silicon oxide, tantalum oxide, titanium oxide, barium strontium titanium oxide, barium titanium oxide, strontium titanium oxide, yttrium oxide, aluminum oxide, lead scandium tantalum oxide, and lead zinc niobate. In some embodiments, an annealing process may be carried out on the gate dielectric layer 302 to improve its quality when a high-k material is used. In some specific example embodiments, the high-k gate dielectric layer 302 may have a thickness in the range of 5 Å to around 100 Å thick (e.g., 10 Å). In other embodiments, the gate dielectric layer 302 may have a thickness of one monolayer of oxide material. In general, the thickness of the gate dielectric 302 should be sufficient to electrically isolate the gate electrode 304 from the source and drain contacts. In some embodiments, additional processing may be performed on the high-k gate dielectric layer 302, such as an annealing process to improve the quality of the high-k material.
The gate electrode 304 material can be, for example, polysilicon, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, or a metal layer (e.g., tungsten, titanium nitride, tantalum, tantalum nitride) although other suitable gate electrode materials can be used as well. The gate electrode 304 material, which may be a sacrificial material that is later removed for a replacement metal gate (RMG) process, has a thickness in the range of about 10 Å to 500 Å (e.g., 100 Å), in some example embodiments.
The optional gate hard mask layer 306 can be used to provide certain benefits or uses during processing, such as protecting the gate electrode 304 from subsequent etch and/or ion implantation processes. The hard mask layer 306 may be formed using typical hard mask materials, such as silicon dioxide, silicon nitride, and/or other conventional insulator materials.
The gate stack can be formed as conventionally done or using any suitable custom techniques (e.g., conventional patterning process to etch away portions of the gate electrode and the gate dielectric layers to form the gate stack, as shown in
The spacers 310 may be formed, for example, using conventional materials such as silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or other suitable spacer materials. The width of the spacers 310 may generally be chosen based on design requirements for the transistor being formed. In accordance with some embodiments, however, the width of the spacers 310 is not subject to design constraints imposed by the formation of the source and drain tip regions, given sufficiently high p-doped germanium content (e.g., boron doped germanium) or SiGe alloy liner in the source/drain tip regions.
Any number of suitable substrates can be used to implement substrate 300, including bulk substrates, semiconductors-on-insulator substrates (XOI, where X is a semiconductor material such as silicon, germanium, or germanium-enriched silicon), and multi-layered structures, including those substrates upon which fins or nanowires can be formed prior to a subsequent gate patterning process. In some specific example cases, the substrate 300 is a germanium or silicon or SiGe bulk substrate, or a germanium or silicon or SiGe on oxide substrate. Although a few examples of materials from which the substrate 300 may be formed are described here, other suitable materials that may serve as a foundation upon which a low resistance transistor device may be built falls within the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.
With further reference to
In example embodiments where the source/drain regions are etched, source/drain cavities 312/314 result, as best shown in
With further reference to
In accordance with some specific example embodiments where the substrate 300 is a silicon or SiGe bulk substrate, or a semiconductor-on-insulator substrate (XOI, where X is silicon or SiGe), the source and drain cavities 312/314 along with their respective tip areas 312A/314A are filled with in-situ boron doped silicon or SiGe thereby forming the corresponding liners 313/315, and then further filled with in-situ boron doped germanium or germanium rich alloy to provide caps 318/320. In other example embodiments where the substrate 300 is a germanium bulk substrate or a germanium-on-insulator substrate, the source and drain cavities 312/314 along with their respective tip areas 312A/314A can be filled with in-situ boron doped germanium thereby forming the corresponding liners 313/315, and then further filled with in-situ boron doped germanium rich alloy (such as germanium:tin) to provide caps 318/320. As will be appreciated in light of this disclosure, the respective germanium and p-type dopant concentrations of the liners 313/315 and caps 318/320 can vary depending on factors such as the composition of the substrate 300, the use of grading for lattice matching/compatibility, and the overall desired thickness of the total source/drain deposition. Numerous material system and p-type doping configurations can be implemented, as will be appreciated in light of this disclosure.
For instance, in some example embodiments having a silicon or germanium or SiGe substrate, the germanium concentration of the liners 313/315 can be in the range of 20 atomic % to 100 atomic %, and the boron concentration is in the range of 1E20 cm−3 to 2E21 cm−3. To avoid lattice mismatch with an underlying silicon-containing substrate, the germanium concentration of the liners 313/315 can be graded, in accordance with some embodiments. For example, in one such embodiment, the liners 313/315 can be a graded boron doped SiGe layer with the germanium composition graded from a base level concentration compatible with the underlying silicon or SiGe substrate 300 up to 100 atomic % (or near 100 atomic %, such as in excess of 90 atomic % or 95 atomic % or 98 atomic %). In one specific such embodiment, the germanium concentration ranges from 40 atomic % or less to in excess of 98 atomic %. The boron concentration within liners 313/315 can be fixed, for example, at a high level, or alternatively can be graded. For instance, for example, the boron concentration within liners 313/315 can be graded from a base concentration at or otherwise compatible with the underlying substrate 300 up to a desired high concentration (e.g., in excess of 1E20 cm−3, in excess of 2E20 cm−3, or in excess of 5E20 cm−3). In some such embodiments, the boron doped germanium caps 318/320 have a boron concentration in excess of 1E20 cm−3, such as in excess of 2E20 cm−3 or in excess of 2E21 cm−3, or higher. This boron concentration in the caps 318/320 can be graded in a similar fashion as described with reference to the liners 313/315. In a more general sense, the boron concentrations can be adjusted as necessary to provide the desired degree of conductivity, as will be appreciated in light of this disclosure. The germanium concentration of the caps 318/320 can be, for instance, fixed at 100 atomic %. Alternatively, germanium concentration of the caps 318/320 can be graded from a low to high concentration (e.g., from 20 atomic % to 100 atomic %), as will be appreciated in light of this disclosure, to account for lattice mismatch between the liners 313/315 and the desired peak germanium concentration of the caps 318/320. In still other embodiments, the caps 318/320 are implemented with a germanium alloy, where the blend can be, for example, up to 80 atomic % germanium and up to 20 atomic % for the alloying material, which in some embodiments is tin. Note that the tin concentration (or other alloying material) can also be graded, as will be appreciated. In one such case, channel strain is increased with a tin concentration in the range of 3 to 8 atomic % in the caps 318/320 (with the balance atomic percentage of the caps 318/320 substantially being germanium and any gradient material). In spite of relaxation, lattice constants are still relatively large and capable of applying significant strain on the adjacent channel. Other suitable tin concentrations will be apparent, as will other suitable strain inducers.
Note that with a pure germanium substrate, the liners 313/315 can be implemented with germanium and need not be graded. In some such cases, the germanium concentration of the liners 313/315 can be fixed (e.g., 100 atomic %) and the caps 318/320 can be implemented with a germanium alloy (e.g., germanium:tin, or other suitable germanium alloy as previously described). As previously explained, the germanium concentration (or the tin or other alloying material concentration) in the caps 318/320 can be graded to effect desired channel strain. In some such cases, further note that the germanium liners 313/315 can effectively be integrated with the germanium alloy caps 318/320 or otherwise be an undetectable component of the source/drain region deposition.
With respect to gradings, note that compatibility as used herein does not necessitate an overlap in concentration levels (for instance, the germanium concentration of underlying substrate 300 can be 0 to 20 atomic % and initial germanium concentration of the liners 313/315 can be 30 to 40 atomic %). In addition, as used herein, the term ‘fixed’ with respect to a concentration level is intended to indicate a relatively constant concentration level (e.g., the lowest concentration level in the layer is within 10% of the highest concentration level within that layer). In a more general sense, a fixed concentration level is intended to indicate the lack of an intentionally graded concentration level.
The thickness of the liners 313/315 and caps 318/320 can also vary depending on factors such as the composition of the substrate 300, the use of grading for lattice matching/compatibility, and the overall desired thickness of the total source/drain deposition. In general, the liners 313/315 may be thicker in cases where they are configured with a graded germanium content to provide compatibility with a substrate 300 that has no or an otherwise low germanium content. In other cases where the substrate 300 is a germanium substrate or otherwise contains a relatively high concentration of germanium, the liners 313/315 need not be graded, and may therefore be relatively thinner (e.g., one to several monolayers). In yet still other cases where the substrate has no or an otherwise low germanium content, the liners 313/315 can be implemented with a relatively thin layer of silicon or otherwise low germanium content material, and the germanium content of the caps 318/320 can be graded as needed for compatibility. In any such cases, the liners 313/315 generally make up less than 50% of the total source/drain deposition layer thickness, and the remaining source/drain deposition layer thickness is generally greater than 50% of the total source/drain deposition layer thickness. In accordance with some such example embodiments where the liners 313/315 are not graded, the thickness ratio of liners 313/315 to caps 318/320 is about 2:5 or less (i.e., where the liner makes up about 40% or less of the total source/drain deposition layer thickness). In some specific such embodiments, the thickness ratio of liners 313/315 to caps 318/320 is about 1:5 or less (i.e., where the liner makes up about 20% or less of the total source/drain deposition layer thickness). In one such specific example case, the thickness of liners 313/315 is in the range of one-to-several monolayers to about 10 nm, and the total source/drain deposition layer thickness is in the range of 50 to 500 nm. Numerous source/drain liner and cap geometries and material configurations will be apparent in light of this disclosure.
As will be appreciated in light of this disclosure, any number of other transistor features may be implemented with an embodiment of the present invention. For instance, the channel may be strained or unstrained, and the source/drain regions may or may not include tip regions formed in the area between the corresponding source/drain region and the channel region. In this sense, whether a transistor structure has strained or unstrained channels, or source/drain tip regions or no source/drain tip regions, is not particularly relevant to various embodiments of the present invention, and the claimed invention is not intended to be limited to any particular such structural features. Rather, any number of transistor structures and types, and particularly those structures having p-type or both n-type and p-type source/drain transistor regions, can benefit from employing a bi-layer source/drain configuration having a liner and high germanium concentration cap as described herein.
A CVD process or other suitable deposition technique may be used for depositing 208 and 210. For example, depositing 208 and 210 may be carried out in a CVD reactor, an LPCVD reactor, or an ultra high vacuum CVD (UHVCVD). In some example cases, the reactor temperature may fall, for instance, between 600° C. and 800° C. and the reactor pressure may fall, for instance, between 1 and 760 Torr. The carrier gas may include, for example, hydrogen or helium at a suitable flow rate, such as between 10 and 50 SLM. In some specific embodiments, the deposition may be carried out using a germanium source precursor gas such as GeH4 that is diluted in H2 (e.g., the GeH4 may be diluted at 1-20%). For instance, the diluted GeH4 may be used at a 1% concentration and at a flow rate that ranges between 50 and 300 SCCM. For an in situ doping of boron, diluted B2H6 may be used (e.g., the B2H6 may be diluted in H2 at 1-20%). For instance, the diluted B2H6 may be used at a 3% concentration and at a flow rate that ranges between 10 and 100 SCCM. In some example cases, an etching agent may be added to increase the selectivity of the deposition. For instance, HCl or C12 may be added at a flow rate that ranges, for example, between 50 and 300 SCCM.
Numerous variations on the source/drain bi-layer construction will be apparent in light of this disclosure. For instance, in some embodiments, the liners 313/315 are implemented with epitaxially deposited boron doped SiGe, which may be in one or more layers, and have a germanium concentration in the range of 30 to 70 atomic %, or higher. As previously explained, this germanium concentration of the SiGe liner may be fixed or graded so as to increase from a base level (near substrate 300) to a high level (e.g., in excess of 50 atomic %, near a base concentration of the germanium concentration of caps 318/320, which continue with the germanium gradient to 100 atomic %). The boron concentration in some such embodiments can be in excess of 1E20 cm−3, such as higher than 5E20 cm−3 or 2E21 cm−3, and may also be graded so as to increase from a base level near substrate 300 to a high level (e.g., in excess of 1E20 cm−3 or 2E20 cm−3 or 3E20 cm−3, etc, near caps 318/320). In embodiments where the germanium concentration of boron doped SiGe liners 313/315 is fixed, a thin graded buffer may be used to better interface the liners 313/315 with the boron doped caps 318/320. Note this buffer can be an intermediate layer or otherwise integrated into the composition of the caps 318/320. For purposes of this disclosure, such a buffer can be treated as part of the caps 318/320. The thickness of the boron doped SiGe deposited layer (or collection of layers) 313/315 may range, for example, from monolayers to 50 nm, and the layer (or collection of layers) 318/320 may have a thickness in the range, for example, of 51 to 500 nm, in accordance with some specific embodiments, although alternative embodiments may have other liner and cap thicknesses, as will be apparent in light of this disclosure. In some embodiments, note that cavities 312/314 may be created underneath the spacers during cyclical deposition-etch processing, and those cavities 312/314 can be backfilled by an epitaxial cap layer as well (which can have, for example, the same composition as the boron doped germanium caps 318/320).
As will further be appreciated in light of this disclosure, the combination of high germanium concentration (e.g., in excess of 50 atomic % and up to pure germanium) and high boron concentration (e.g., in excess of 1E20 cm−3), as discussed herein, can be used to realize significantly higher conductance in the source and drain regions (R3 in
As further seen with reference to
Once the source and drain regions are filled in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, various conventional MOS processing can be carried out to complete fabrication of a MOS transistor, such as replacement gate oxide processes, replacement metal gate processes, annealing, and salicidation processes, that may further modify the transistor and/or provide the necessary electrical interconnections. For instance, after the epitaxial deposition of the source/drain regions along with their respective tips, and with further reference to
As can be further seen with reference to
With further reference to
The method then continues with depositing 218 contact resistance reducing metal and annealing, and then depositing 220 the source/drain contact plugs.
Non-Planar Configuration
A non-planar architecture can be implemented, for instance, using FinFETs or nanowire configurations. A FinFET is a transistor built around a thin strip of semiconductor material (generally referred to as the fin). The transistor includes the standard field effect transistor (FET) nodes, including a gate, a gate dielectric, a source region, and a drain region. The conductive channel of the device resides on/within the outer sides of the fin beneath the gate dielectric. Specifically, current runs along both sidewalls of the fin (sides perpendicular to the substrate surface) as well as along the top of the fin (side parallel to the substrate surface). Because the conductive channel of such configurations essentially resides along the three different outer, planar regions of the fin, such a FinFET design is sometimes referred to as a tri-gate FinFET. Other types of FinFET configurations are also available, such as so-called double-gate FinFETs, in which the conductive channel principally resides only along the two sidewalls of the fin (and not along the top of the fin).
As will further be appreciated, note that an alternative to the tri-gate configuration as shown is a double-gate architecture, which would include a dielectric/isolation layer on top of the fin 410. Further note that the example shapes of the liner 480 and cap 490 making up the source/drain regions shown in
Example System
The communication chip 1006 enables wireless communications for the transfer of data to and from the computing system 1000. The term “wireless” and its derivatives may be used to describe circuits, devices, systems, methods, techniques, communications channels, etc., that may communicate data through the use of modulated electromagnetic radiation through a non-solid medium. The term does not imply that the associated devices do not contain any wires, although in some embodiments they might not. The communication chip 1006 may implement any of a number of wireless standards or protocols, including but not limited to Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11 family), WiMAX (IEEE 802.16 family), IEEE 802.20, long term evolution (LTE), Ev-DO, HSPA+, HSDPA+, HSUPA+, EDGE, GSM, GPRS, CDMA, TDMA, DECT, Bluetooth, derivatives thereof, as well as any other wireless protocols that are designated as 3G, 4G, 5G, and beyond. The computing system 1000 may include a plurality of communication chips 1006. For instance, a first communication chip 1006 may be dedicated to shorter range wireless communications such as Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and a second communication chip 1006 may be dedicated to longer range wireless communications such as GPS, EDGE, GPRS, CDMA, WiMAX, LTE, Ev-DO, and others.
The processor 1004 of the computing system 1000 includes an integrated circuit die packaged within the processor 1004. In some embodiments of the present invention, the integrated circuit die of the processor includes onboard memory circuitry that is implemented with one or more transistor structures (e.g., PMOS or CMOS) as described herein. The term “processor” may refer to any device or portion of a device that processes, for instance, electronic data from registers and/or memory to transform that electronic data into other electronic data that may be stored in registers and/or memory.
The communication chip 1006 may also include an integrated circuit die packaged within the communication chip 1006. In accordance with some such example embodiments, the integrated circuit die of the communication chip includes one or more circuits implemented with one or more transistor structures as described herein (e.g., on-chip processor or memory). As will be appreciated in light of this disclosure, note that multi-standard wireless capability may be integrated directly into the processor 1004 (e.g., where functionality of any chips 1006 is integrated into processor 1004, rather than having separate communication chips). Further note that processor 1004 may be a chip set having such wireless capability. In short, any number of processor 1004 and/or communication chips 1006 can be used. Likewise, any one chip or chip set can have multiple functions integrated therein.
In various implementations, the computing system 1000 may be a laptop, a netbook, a notebook, a smartphone, a tablet, a personal digital assistant (PDA), an ultra mobile PC, a mobile phone, a desktop computer, a server, a printer, a scanner, a monitor, a set-top box, an entertainment control unit, a digital camera, a portable music player, or a digital video recorder. In further implementations, the system 1000 may be any other electronic device that processes data or employs low resistance transistor devices as described herein (e.g., PMOS and CMOS circuitry).
Numerous embodiments will be apparent, and features described herein can be combined in any number of configurations. One example embodiment of the present invention provides a transistor device. The device includes a substrate having a channel region, a gate electrode above the channel region, and source and drain regions formed on or in the substrate and adjacent to the channel region. Each of the source and drain regions has a total thickness comprising a p-type liner of silicon or germanium or silicon germanium, and a p-type cap having a germanium concentration in excess of 80 atomic %, wherein the liner is less than 50% of the total thickness. In some cases, the device is one of a planar, FinFET, or nanowire PMOS transistor. In some cases, the device further includes metal-germanide source and drain contacts. In some cases, the thickness ratio of liner thickness to cap thickness is 2:5, or less (liner is 40% or less of the total thickness). In some cases, the thickness ratio of liner thickness to cap thickness is 1:5, or less (liner is 20% or less of the total thickness). In some cases, each of the liners has a thickness in the range of about one monolayer to 10 nm, and each of the caps has a thickness in the range of about 50 nm to 500 nm. In some cases, at least one of the liners and/or caps has at least one of a graded concentration of germanium and/or p-type dopant. For instance, in some cases, at least one of the liners has a germanium concentration that is graded from a base level concentration compatible with the substrate to a high concentration in excess of 50 atomic %. In one such case, the high concentration is in excess of 90 atomic %. In some cases, at least one of the liners has a p-type dopant concentration that is graded from a base level concentration compatible with the substrate to a high concentration in excess of 1E20 cm−3. In one such case, the p-dopant of the one or more liners is boron. In some cases, at least one of the caps has a germanium concentration in excess of 95 atomic %. In some cases, at least one of the caps has a germanium concentration that is graded from a base level concentration compatible with the corresponding liner to a high concentration in excess of 80 atomic %. In some cases, at least one of the caps has a p-type dopant concentration that is graded from a base level concentration compatible with the corresponding liner to a high concentration in excess of 1E20 cm−3. In one such case, the p-dopant of the one or more caps is boron. In some cases, at least one of the caps further comprises tin. Numerous variations will be apparent. For instance, in some example cases the substrate is a silicon-containing substrate. In some such cases, the p-type liner comprises silicon or silicon germanium. In other example cases, the substrate is a germanium substrate. In some such cases, the p-type liner is p-type germanium. In some example such cases, each liner is included in the composition of the corresponding cap (such that a distinct and separate liner layer may not be discernible from a distinct and separate cap layer). In some cases, at least one of the caps further comprises misfit dislocations and/or threading dislocations and/or twins, while in other cases, the caps are free of misfit dislocations, threading dislocations, and twins. Another embodiment of the present invention includes an electronic device that includes a printed circuit board having an integrated circuit including one or more transistor devices as variously defined in this paragraph. In one such case, the integrated circuit comprises at least one of a communication chip and/or a processor. In some cases, the electronic device is a computing device.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides an integrated circuit. The circuit includes a substrate (e.g., silicon, SiGe, or germanium) having a channel region, a gate electrode above the channel region, source and drain regions formed on or in the substrate and adjacent to the channel region, and metal-germanide source and drain contacts. Each of the source and drain regions has a total thickness comprising a p-type liner of silicon or germanium or silicon germanium and a p-type cap having a germanium concentration in excess of 80 atomic %, wherein the liner is 40% or less of the total thickness. In some cases, the thickness ratio of liner thickness to cap thickness is 1:5, or less. In some case, at least one of the caps further comprises tin.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method for forming a transistor device. The method includes providing a substrate having a channel region, providing a gate electrode above the channel region, and providing source and drain regions formed on or in the substrate and adjacent to the channel region. Each of the source and drain regions has a total thickness comprising a p-type liner of silicon or germanium or silicon germanium and a p-type cap having a germanium concentration in excess of 80 atomic %, wherein the liner is less than 50% of the total thickness. In some cases, the method includes providing metal-germanide source and drain contacts. In some cases, the thickness ratio of liner thickness to cap thickness is 2:5, or less. In some cases, at least one of the liners and/or caps has at least one of a graded concentration of germanium and/or p-type dopant. In some cases, at least one of the caps further comprises tin (or other suitable strain inducer).
The foregoing description of example embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure. For instance, while some embodiments of the present invention utilize in situ boron doping of germanium, other embodiments may use an intrinsic germanium that after its deposition is subsequently subjected to p-type dopant implantation and annealing processes to provide the desired p-type doping concentration. Moreover, some embodiments may include source and drain regions fabricated as described herein, but still use conventional processing (e.g., implantation and annealing) to form the tips of the source and drain regions. In such embodiments, the tips may have a lower germanium and/or p-type dopant concentration than the main source/drain region, which may be acceptable in some applications. In still other embodiments, only tips of the source and drain regions may be configured with the high germanium and p-type dopant concentrations and the main portions of the source and drain regions may have conventional or otherwise lower germanium/dopant concentrations. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/255,902, filed Sep. 2, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/990,249, filed May 29, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,437,691, which is a U.S. National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/US2011/066129, filed Dec. 20, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 12/975,278 filed Dec. 21, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,901,537.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5089872 | Ozturk et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5216271 | Takagi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5281552 | King et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5296386 | Aronowitz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5296387 | Aronowitz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5312766 | Aronowitz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5644166 | Honeycutt et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6235568 | Murthy et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6274894 | Wieczorek et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6541343 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6605498 | Murthy et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607948 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621131 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6653700 | Chau et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6797556 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812086 | Murthy et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6861318 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885084 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887762 | Murthy et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6933589 | Murthy et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6949482 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952040 | Chau et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6972228 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7060576 | Lindert et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7129139 | Murthy et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135724 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7138320 | Van Bentum et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7138697 | Chu et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7226842 | Murthy et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7244668 | Kim | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7274055 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7338873 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358547 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7391087 | Murthy et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7402872 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7427775 | Murthy et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7436035 | Murthy et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7491643 | Lavoie et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7492017 | Murthy et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7494858 | Bohr et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7518196 | Chau et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7544997 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7662689 | Boyanov et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663192 | Sell et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678631 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682887 | Dokumaci et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682916 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7732285 | Sell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7821044 | Bohr et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7880228 | Yasutake | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8039902 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8354694 | Bedell et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8575652 | Kamata | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8598003 | Murthy et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8901537 | Murthy et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8994104 | Glass et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9117791 | Glass et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9349810 | Glass et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9437691 | Glass et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9484432 | Glass et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9627384 | Murthy et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9722023 | Glass et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
20020168868 | Todd | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020197806 | Furukawa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030057416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20039957416 | Currie et al. | Mar 2003 | |
20030124761 | Baert et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050130454 | Murthy et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145944 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184354 | Chu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060060859 | Joshi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065914 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060125025 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060138398 | Shimamune et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148151 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156080 | Tellkamp et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172511 | Kammier et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199622 | Bhanji et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060237746 | Orlowski et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060255330 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060289856 | Shimamune et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004123 | Bohr et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070053381 | Chacko et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070075378 | Lin et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070122954 | Liu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070187767 | Yasutake | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070235802 | Chong et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238236 | Cook, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070275548 | Lavoie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080054347 | Wang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080135878 | Kim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080135949 | Lo et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080179752 | Yamauchi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080197412 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080230805 | Hokazono et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242037 | Sell et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090075029 | Thomas et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090224369 | Gamble et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090302348 | Adam et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100109044 | Tekleab et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123198 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100148217 | Simonelli et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100197092 | Kim et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100244154 | Yasutake | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295021 | Chang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110062498 | Yang et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110068407 | Yeh et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110147811 | Kavalieros et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147828 | Murthy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110183486 | Chan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120007051 | Bangsaruntip et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120037998 | Bedell | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120153387 | Murthy et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161249 | Kronholz et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130240989 | Glass et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130248999 | Glass | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130264639 | Glass | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140070377 | Yu et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140231914 | Chang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150060945 | Murthy et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150206942 | Glass et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150333180 | Glass et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160322359 | Glass et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160372547 | Glass et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170047419 | Glass et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170221724 | Murthy et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170373147 | Glass et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101087002 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101140948 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101300664 | Nov 2008 | CN |
101677110 | Mar 2010 | CN |
S6313379 | Jan 1988 | JP |
H10261792 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2005183160 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2006186240 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2007036205 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007165665 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2007169958 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2007214481 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007294757 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007294780 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2007318132 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008034650 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008192989 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008533695 | Aug 2008 | JP |
2008218725 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2009514248 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009164281 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009200090 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010519734 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010171337 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2010272859 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2012510720 | May 2012 | JP |
20090118935 | Nov 2009 | KR |
WO 2007053381 | May 2007 | WO |
2008100687 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2010014246 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010068530 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2011084262 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012087403 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012087404 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012087581 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012088097 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/489,569, dated Nov. 19, 2018. 12 pages. |
Notice of Preliminary Rejection received for KR Application No. 10-2017-7027385, dated Jul. 25, 2018, 7 pages. |
Korean Notice of Final Rejection received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7016008, dated Dec. 22, 2014, 6 pages. |
Office Action received for Taiwan Patent Application No. 101148097, dated Oct. 13, 2014, 27 pages of Office Action including 13 pages of English Translation. |
Lin Ting Yu, “Silicon Nanowire Field Effect Transistor,” date of thesis Aug. 5, 2009. English abstract with original retrieved online at URL: http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=zh-TW&u=http://ir.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/309250000Q/75302&prev=search. Nov. 19, 2014, 23 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,387, filed Nov. 7, 2014, 64 pages. |
“Metal/Semiconductor Ohmic Contacts Technology or Gate length Series Resistance (ohms),” URL: http://web.standford.edu/class/ee311/NOTES/Ohmic_Contacts.pdf. Retrieved Jul. 8, 2014 (1997) 25 pages. |
European Patent Office Search Report received for EP Application No. 11852027.9, dated Aug. 14, 2014. 14 pages. |
JP Notification of Reason(s) for Refusal, Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-546134, dated Aug. 26, 2014. 4 pages of English Translation and 3 pages of Office Action. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection issued by JP Patent Office for JP Application No. 2013-546135, dated Aug. 26, 2014. 7 pages (including Organized Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection). |
Taiwan Office Action issued for TW Application No. 100145538, dated Sep. 12, 2014. 23 pages (including Translation of Notice). |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection issued by JP Patent Office for JP Application No. 2013-546324, dated Aug. 22, 2014. 8 pages (including Organized Translation of Notice of Reasons for Rejection). |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7016008, dated May 23, 2014, 4 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Office Action. |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7016371, dated May 23, 2014, 5 pages of English Translation and 6 pages of Office Action. |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 2013-7015944, dated May 23, 2014, 4 pages of English Translation. |
Office Action received for Korean Patent Application No. 2013-7016072, dated May 23, 2014, 4 pages English Translation. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection issued by JP Patent Office for JP Application No. 2013-543323, dated Aug. 5, 2014. 7 pages (including Organized Translation of Notice of Reason for Rejection). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/058199, dated Jul. 13, 2011, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/058199, dated Jul. 5, 2012, 2 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/054198, dated Apr. 19, 2012, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/063813, dated Jul. 23, 2012, 10 pages. |
Zhu et al., “Germanium pMOSFETs With Schottky-Barrier Germanide S/D, High-K Gate Dielectric and Metal Gate”, IEEE electron Device Letters, vol. 26, Issue No. 2, Feb. 2005, pp. 81-83. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/066129, dated Aug. 24, 2012, 11 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/063813, dated Jul. 4, 2013, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/054198, dated Jun. 25, 2013, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/054202, dated Jun. 25, 2013, 9 pages. |
Datta et al., “Advanced Si and SiGe Strained Channel NMOS and PMOS Transistors with High-K/Metal-GareStack”, IEEE Xplore, Downloaded: Nov. 14, 2009, pp. 194-197. |
Taiwan Decision of Rejection dated Dec. 26, 2014 for Taiwan Patent Application No. 100145538. 22 pages. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office Notice of Final Rejection for KR Application No. 10-2013-7016371, dated Nov. 14, 2014; 6 pages with 3 pages of English Translation. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/066129, dated Jun. 25, 2013, 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,249, filed May 29, 2013, 35 pages. |
European Patent Office Search Report received for EP Application No. 11850136.0, dated Aug. 14, 2014, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/054202, dated Apr. 19, 2012, 13 pages. |
Taiwan Decision of Final Rejection received for Taiwan Patent Application No. 101148097, dated Feb. 12, 2015, 28 pages. |
Korean Notice of Final Rejection received for Korean Patent Application No. 2013-7015944, dated Dec. 22, 2014, 7 pages. |
European Patent Office Search Report received for EP Application No. 11850136.0, dated Oct. 9, 2015, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office Search Report received for EP Application No. 11850350.7, dated Oct. 6, 2015, 8 pages. |
European Patent Office Search Report received for EP Application No. 11851579.0, dated Nov. 2, 2015, 5 pages. |
European Patent Office Search Report received for EP Application No. 11852027.9, dated Oct. 12, 2015, 4 pages. |
Taiwan Decision of Rejection dated Apr. 15, 2016 for Taiwan Patent Application No. 101148097. 30 pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection received for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2016-7036162, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 8 pages, including English translation. |
Hellings, et al., “High Performance 70-nm Germanium pMOSFETs With Boron LDD Implants,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 30, No. 1, Jan. 2009. pp. 88-90. |
EP Office Action received for EP Application No. 11 850 350.7-1552, dated May 10, 2017. 5 pages. |
Korean Notice of Preliminary Rejection received for Korean Patent Application No. 2015-7012262, dated Jan. 18, 2017, 15 pages, including English translation. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201610340122.4, dated Jun. 28, 2018, 17 pgs. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 201610340122.4, dated Jun. 30, 2015, 5 pgs. |
Search Report from European Patent Application No. 18164957.5, dated Jul. 4, 2018, 7 pgs. |
Office Action from European Patent Application No. 18164957.5, dated Oct. 17, 2019, 5 pgs. |
Notice of allowance from Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-546324, dated Feb. 10, 2015, 3 pgs. |
Notice of allowance from Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-7036360, dated Feb. 7, 2019, 3 pgs. |
Office Action from Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-7036360, dated Sep. 14, 2018, 7 pgs. |
Office Action from Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7012262, dated Aug. 7, 2107, 7 pgs. |
Office Action from Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7015944, dated Feb. 12, 2015, 5 pgs. |
Notice of allowance from Taiwan Patent Application No. 101148097, dated Jul. 19, 2016, 2 pgs. |
Notice of allowance from Taiwan Patent Application No. 105122618, dated Aug. 14, 2018, 3 pgs. |
Office Action from Taiwan Patent Application No. 105122618, dated Apr. 12, 2018, 30 pgs. |
Notice of allowance from Taiwan Patent Application No. 107102233, dated Dec. 19, 2019, 3 pgs. |
Notice of allowance from Korean Patent Application No. 10-2015-7012262, dated Sep. 19, 2017, 3 pgs. |
Office Action from Korean Patent Application No. 10-2017-7036360, dated Mar. 8, 2018, 6 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/255,902, filed Sep. 2, 2016, Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,249, filed May 29, 2013, Patented. |
PCT/US2011/066129, filed Dec. 20, 2011, Expired. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,275, filed Dec. 21, 2010, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,238, filed May 29, 2013, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/990,224, filed May 29, 2013, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/975,278, filed Dec. 21, 2010, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,387, filed Nov. 7, 2014, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/673,143, filed Mar. 30, 2015, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/807,285, filed Jul. 23, 2015, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/162,551, filed May 23, 2016, Patented. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/339,308, filed Oct. 21, 2016, Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/489,569, filed Apr. 17, 2017, Pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/640,966, filed Jul. 3, 2017, Pending. |
Search Report from European Patent Application No. 20177754.7, dated Jul. 3, 2020, 7 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180342582 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15255902 | Sep 2016 | US |
Child | 16037728 | US | |
Parent | 13990249 | US | |
Child | 15255902 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12975278 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13990249 | US |