This invention relates to the field of semiconductor manufacturing.
While various process modules and other semiconductor handling and fabrication tools are available, there remains a need for modular systems arranged to balance processing capacity for relatively fast processes such as bevel etching and relatively slow processes such as enhanced plasma chemical vapor deposition. More generally, a need exists for improved semiconductor manufacturing and handling equipment.
This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/434,582, filed May 9, 2003 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/378,983, 60/379,095 and 60/379,063; all filed May 9, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/434,582, filed May 9, 2003 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/378,983, 60/379,095 and 60/379,063; all filed May 9, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/434,582, filed May 9, 2003 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/378,983, 60/379,095 and 60/379,063; all filed May 9, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Linear semiconductor handling systems provide more balanced processing capacity using various techniques to provide increased processing capacity to relatively slow processes. This may include use of hexagonal vacuum chambers to provide additional facets for slow process modules, use of circulating process modules to provide more processing capacity at a single facet of a vacuum chamber, or the use of wide process modules having multiple processing sites. This approach may be used, for example, to balance processing capacity in a typical process that includes plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition steps and bevel etch steps.
In one aspect, an apparatus described herein includes an equipment front end module that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere; a load lock coupled to the equipment front end module and positioned to receive workpieces therefrom, the load lock providing for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum environment; a first vacuum chamber containing a robot, the first vacuum chamber having four facets, one of the four facets selectively coupled to the load lock by an isolation valve; two process modules that provide a first process, the two process modules coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets in a vacuum-sealed engagement; two wide process modules, each having two entrances, and each providing a second process; and a second vacuum chamber containing two robots and a transfer station, the second vacuum chamber coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber, the two wide process modules positioned on opposing sides of the second vacuum chamber with each of the robots of the second vacuum chamber positioned between an entrance of each of the two wide process modules, the robots further positioned to transfer workpieces between one another; wherein workpieces can be transferred among the load lock, the two process modules, and the two wide process modules in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber, and wherein a processing speed of the two process modules is substantially balanced with the processing speed of the two wide process modules.
In another aspect, an apparatus described herein includes an equipment front end module that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere; a load lock coupled to the equipment front end module and positioned to receive workpieces therefrom, the load lock providing for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum environment; a first vacuum chamber containing a robot, the first vacuum chamber having four facets, one of the four facets selectively coupled to the load lock by an isolation valve; two process modules that provide a first process, the two process modules coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets in a vacuum-sealed engagement; four process modules that provide a second process, the four process modules each having an entrance, and each providing a second process; and a second vacuum chamber containing a second robot, the second vacuum chamber having six facets, the second vacuum chamber coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber, and four of the six facets coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to each of the four process modules respectively, the second robot positioned to transfer workpieces among the four process modules; wherein workpieces can be transferred among the load lock, the two process modules, and the four process modules in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber, and wherein a processing speed of the two process modules is substantially balanced with the processing speed of the four process modules. In another aspect, an apparatus described herein includes an equipment front end module that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere; a load lock coupled to the equipment front end module and positioned to receive workpieces therefrom, the load lock providing for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum environment; a first vacuum chamber containing a robot, the first vacuum chamber having four facets, one of the four facets selectively coupled to the load lock by an isolation valve; two process modules that provide a first process, the two process modules coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets in a vacuum-sealed engagement; two circulating process modules each having an entrance, and each providing a second process; and a second vacuum chamber containing a second robot, the second vacuum chamber having four facets, the second vacuum chamber coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber, and two of the four facets of the second vacuum chambered coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to each of the two circulating process modules respectively, the second robot positioned to transfer workpieces among the two circulating process modules; wherein workpieces can be transferred among the load lock, the two process modules, and the two circulating process modules in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber, and wherein a processing speed of the two process modules is substantially balanced with the processing speed of the two circulating process modules.
As used herein, “robot” shall include any kind of known robot or similar device or facility that includes a mechanical capability and a control capability, which may include a combination of a controller, processor, computer, or similar facility, a set of motors or similar facilities, one or more resolvers, encoders or similar facilities, one or more mechanical or operational facilities, such as arms, wheels, legs, links, claws, extenders, grips, nozzles, sprayers, end effectors, actuators, and the like, as well as any combination of any of the above. One embodiment is a robotic arm.
As used herein “drive” shall include any form of drive mechanism or facility for inducing motion. In embodiments it includes the motor/encoder section of a robot.
As used herein, “axis” shall include a motor or drive connected mechanically through linkages, belts or similar facilities, to a mechanical member, such as an arm member. An “N-axis drive” shall include a drive containing N axes; for example a “2-axis drive” is a drive containing two axes.
As used herein, “arm” shall include a passive or active (meaning containing motors/encoders) linkage that may include one or more arm or leg members, bearings, and one or more end effectors for holding or gripping material to be handled.
As used herein, “SCARA arm” shall mean a Selectively Compliant Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) robotic arm in one or more forms known to those of skill in the art, including an arm consisting of one or more upper links connected to a drive, one or more lower links connected through a belt or mechanism to a motor that is part of the drive, and one or more end units, such as an end effector or actuator.
As used herein, “turn radius” shall mean the radius that an arm fits in when it is fully retracted.
As used herein, “reach” shall include, with respect to a robotic arm, the maximum reach that is obtained when an arm is fully extended. Usually the mechanical limit is a little further out than the actual effective reach, because it is easier to control an arm that is not completely fully extended (in embodiments there is a left/right singularity at full extension that can be hard to control).
As used herein, “containment” shall mean situations when the arm is optimally retracted such that an imaginary circle can be drawn around the arm/end effector/material that is of minimum radius.
As used herein, the “reach-to-containment ratio” shall mean, with respect to a robotic arm, the ratio of maximum reach to minimum containment.
As used herein, “robot-to-robot” distance shall include the horizontal distance between the mechanical central axis of rotation of two different robot drives.
As used herein, “slot valve” shall include a rectangular shaped valve that opens and closes to allow a robot arm to pass through (as opposed to a vacuum (isolation) valve, which controls the pump down of a vacuum chamber). For example, the SEMI E21.1-1296 standard (a published standard for semiconductor manufacturing) the slot valve for 300 mm wafers in certain semiconductor manufacturing process modules has an opening width of 336 mm, a opening height of 50 mm and a total valve thickness of 60 mm with the standard also specifying the mounting bolts and alignment pins.
As used herein, “transfer plane” shall include the plane (elevation) at which material is passed from a robot chamber to a process module chamber through a slot valve. Per the SEMI E21.1-1296 standard for semiconductor manufacturing equipment the transfer plane is 14 mm above the slot valve centerline and 1100 mm above the plane of the factory floor.
As used herein, “section” shall include a vacuum chamber that has one or more robotic drives in it. This is the smallest repeatable element in a linear system.
As used herein, “link” shall include a mechanical member of a robot arm, connected on both ends to another link, an end effector, or the robot drive.
As used herein, “L1,” “L2”, “L3” or the like shall include the numbering of the arm links starting from the drive to the end effector.
As used herein, “end effector” shall include an element at an active end of a robotic arm distal from the robotic drive and proximal to an item on which the robotic arm will act. The end effector may be a hand of the robot that passively or actively holds the material to be transported in a semiconductor process or some other actuator disposed on the end of the robotic arm.
As used herein, the term “SCARA arm” refers to a robotic arm that includes one or more links and may include an end effector, where the arm, under control, can move linearly, such as to engage an object. A SCARA arm may have various numbers of links, such as 3, 4, or more. As used herein, “3-link SCARA arm” shall include a SCARA robotic arm that has three members: link one (L1), link two (L2) and an end effector. A drive for a 3-link SCARA arm usually has 3 motors: one connected to L1, one to the belt system, which in turn connects to the end effector through pulleys and a Z (lift) motor. One can connect a fourth motor to the end effector, which allows for some unusual moves not possible with only three motors.
As used herein, “dual SCARA arm” shall include a combination of two SCARA arms (such as two 3 or 4-link SCARA arms (typically designated A and B)) optionally connected to a common drive. In embodiments the two SCARA arms are either completely independent or share a common link member L1. A drive for a dual independent SCARA arm usually has either five motors: one connected to L1-A, one connected to L1-B, one connected to the belt system of arm A, one connected to the belt system of arm B, and a common Z (lift) motor. A drive for a dual dependent SCARA arm usually has a common share L1 link for both arms A and B and contains typically four motors: one connected to the common link L1, one connected to the belt system for arm A, one connected to the belt system for arm B, and a common Z (lift) motor.
As used herein, “4-link SCARA arm” shall include an arm that has four members: L1, L2, L3 and an end effector. A drive for a 4-link SCARA arm can have four motors: one connected to L1, one to the belt systems connected to L2 and L3, one to the end effector and a Z motor. In embodiments only 3 motors are needed: one connected to L1, one connected to the belt system that connects to L2, L3 and the end effector, and a Z motor.
As used herein, “Frog-leg style arm” shall include an arm that has five members: L1A, L1B, L2A, L3B and an end effector. A drive for a frog-leg arm can have three motors, one connected to L1A—which is mechanically by means of gearing or the like connected to L1B—, one connected to a turret that rotates the entire arm assembly, and a Z motor. In embodiments the drive contains three motors, one connected to L1A, one connected to L1B and a Z motor and achieves the desired motion through coordination between the motors.
As used herein, “Dual Frog-leg style arm” shall include an arm that has eight members L1A, L1B, L2A-1, L2A-2, L2B-1, L2B-2 and two end effectors. The second link members L2A-1 and L2B-1 form a single Frog-leg style arm, whereas the second link members L2A-2 and L2B-2 also form a single Frog-leg style arm, however facing in an opposite direction. A drive for a dual frog arm may be the same as for a single frog arm.
As used herein, “Leap Frog-leg style arm” shall include an arm that has eight members L1A, L1B, L2A-1, L2A-2, L2B-1, L2B-2 and two end effectors. The first link members L1A and L1B are each connected to one of the motors substantially by their centers, rather than by their distal ends. The second link members L2A-1 and L2B-1 form a single Frog-leg style arm, whereas the second link members L2A-2 and L2B-2 also form a single Frog-leg style arm, however facing in the same direction. A drive for a dual frog arm may be the same as for a single frog arm.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will be appreciated more fully from the following further description thereof, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The 4-link arm 6004 is advantageous in that it folds in a much smaller containment ratio than a 3-link SCARA arm 6002, but it reaches a lot further than a conventional 3-link SCARA 6002 for the same containment diameter. In combination with the ability to have a second drive and second 4-link arm 6004 mounted on the top of the system, it may allow for a fast material swap in the process module. The 4-link SCARA arm 6004 may be mounted, for example, on top of a stationary drive as illustrated, or on top of a moving cart that provides the transmission of the rotary motion to actuate the arms and belts. In either case, the 4-link arm 6004, optionally together with a second 4-link arm 6004, may provide a compact, long-reach arm that can go through a small opening, without colliding with the edges of the opening.
Another feature is that only two motors, just like a conventional SCARA arm, may be needed to drive the 4-link arm. Belts in the arm may maintain parallelism. Parallelism or other coordinated movements may also be achieved, for example, using parallel bars instead of belts. Generally, the use of only two motors may provide a substantial cost advantage. At the same time, three motors may provide a functional advantage in that the last (L4) link may be independently steered, however the additional belts, bearings, connections, shafts and motor may render the system much more expensive. In addition the extra belts may add significant thickness to the arm mechanism, making it difficult to pass the arm through a (SEMI standard) slot valve. Also, the use of fewer motors generally simplifies related control software.
Another feature of the 4-link SCARA arm disclosed herein is that the wrist may be offset from centerline. Since the ideal system has a top-mount 9008 as well as a bottom 9004 mount 4-link arm, the vertical arrangement of the arm members may be difficult to adhere to if the manufacturer also must comply with the SEMI standards. In a nutshell, these standards specify the size and reach requirements through a slot valve 4006 into a process module. They also specify the level above centerline on which a wafer has to be carried. Many existing process modules are compliant with this standard. In systems that are non-compliant, the slot valves 4006 are of very similar shape although the opening size might be slightly different as well as the definition of the transfer plane. The SEMI standard dimensional restrictions require a very compact packaging of the arms. Using an offset wrist allows the top 9008 and bottom 9004 arms to get closer together, making it easier for them to pass through the slot valve 4006. If the wrist is not offset, then the arms need to stay further apart vertically and wafer exchanges may take more time, because the drives need to move more in the vertical direction. The proposed design of the top arm does not require that there is a wrist offset, but a wrist offset may advantageously reduce the turn radius of the system, and allows for a better mechanical arm layout, so no interferences occur.
Various configurations exist for handling systems. A prevalent system is a cluster tool, where process modules are positioned radially around a central handling system, such as a robotic arm. In other embodiments, a handling system can rotate items horizontally in a “lazy Susan” facility. Process modules 102 may in general be clustered, stacked, or arranged in a linear fashion as depicted in
In general, the system 100 may use two or more stationary robots 104 arranged in a linear fashion. The robots 104 may be mounted in the bottom of the system 100 or hang down from the chamber lid or both at the same time. The linear system may use a vacuum chamber 106 around each robot, and may have multiple connected vacuum chambers 106, each containing its own robot 104 arranged in a linear fashion. In general, different forms of robots can be used in semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Possible robots include 3-link Selective Compliant Articulated Robot Arm (“SCARA”) robot, a 4-link SCARA robot, a dual-arm robot, a frog-leg arm robot, and so forth.
In embodiments, a single controller could be set up to handle one or more sections of the system 100. In embodiments vacuum chambers 106 are extensible; that is, a manufacturer can easily add additional sections/chambers 106 and thus add process capacity. Because each section can use independent robot arms and robot drives, the throughput may stay high when additional sections and thus robots 104 are added.
In embodiments the components of the system 100 can be controlled by a software controller, which in embodiments may be a central controller that controls each of the components. In embodiments the components form a linkable handling system under control of the software, where the software controls each robot to hand off a material to another robot, or into a buffer for picking up by the next robot. In embodiments the software control system may recognize the addition of a new component, such as a process module or robot, when that component is plugged into the system, such as recognizing the component over a network, such as a USB, Ethernet, FireWire, Bluetooth, 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g or other network. In such embodiments, as soon as the next robot, process module, or other component is plugged in a software scheduler for the flow of a material to be handled, such as a wafer, can be reconfigured automatically so that the materials can be routed over the new link in the system. In embodiments the software scheduler is based on a neural net, or it can be a rule-based scheduler. In embodiments process modules can make themselves known over such a network, so that the software controller knows what new process modules, robots, or other components have been connected. When a new process module is plugged into an empty facet, the system can recognize it and allow it to be scheduled into the flow of material handling.
In embodiments the software system may include an interface that permits the user to run a simulation of the system. The interface may allow a user to view the linking and configuration of various links, robotic arms and other components, to optimize configuration (such as by moving the flow of materials through various components, moving process modules, moving robots, or the like), and to determine what configuration to purchase from a supplier. In embodiments the interface may be a web interface.
The methods and system disclosed herein can use optional buffer stations 108 between robot drives. Robots could hand off to each other directly, but that is technically more difficult to optimize, and would occupy two robots, because they would both have to be available at the same time to do a handoff, which is more restrictive than if they can deposit to a dummy location 108 in-between them where the other robot can pick up when it is ready. The buffer 108 also allows higher throughput, because the system does not have to wait for both robots to become available. Furthermore, the buffers 108 may also offer a good opportunity to perform some small processing steps on the wafer such as heating, cooling, aligning, inspection, metrology, testing or cleaning.
In embodiments, the methods and systems disclosed herein use optional vacuum isolation valves 110 between robot areas/segments. Each segment can be fully isolated from any other segment. If a robot 104 handles ultra clean and sensitive materials (e.g., wafers) in its segment, then isolating that segment from the rest of the system may prevent cross-contamination from the dirtier segment to the clean segment. Also, the manufacturer can now operate segments at different pressures. The manufacturer can have stepped vacuum levels where the vacuum gets better and better further into the machine. The use of isolation valves 110 may avoid out-gassing from materials or wafers in other parts of the system when handling a wafer in an isolated segment. In embodiments, vacuum isolation between robots 104 is possible, as is material buffering between robots 104.
An equipment front end module 112 or the like may be employed for loading and unloading wafer from the system 100. This may include a variety of robotics, as well as aligners, shelving for wafers and/or wafer carriers, and so forth. Wafers may be transferred between the atmospheric environment of the equipment front end module 112 and the vacuum environment of the process modules 102, robot 104, and so forth through a load lock 114. It should be understood that while in some embodiments a load lock 114 may be positioned at the end of a linear system, as depicted in
Other features of the system 100 may include an external or air return for moving wafers or groups of wafers in atmosphere, which may optionally be on the top of the linear vacuum chamber. The return system could also be a vacuum return. It should also be understood that while several of the depicted embodiments of linear semiconductor fabrication systems are laid out in a straight line, the linear system could be curvilinear; that is, the system could have curves, a U- or V-shape, an S-shape, or a combination of those or any other curvilinear path, in whatever format the manufacturer desires, such as to fit the configuration of a fabrication facility. In each case, the system optionally includes an entry point and an exit point that is down the line from the entry point. Optionally the air return returns the item from the exit point to the entry point. Optionally the system can include more than one exit point. In each case the robotic arms described herein can assist in efficiently moving items down the line.
In general, the depicted system 100 is arranged to service six process modules (an additional process module may be positioned in the top middle of the depicted system 100, but is omitted here to provide room for element numbers) using three robots 104 with four sided vacuum chambers 106.
It will be further understood that many modifications and additions to the system described above may be usefully employed, including various robot types, various layouts, various process module and robot chamber sizes.
In general, while certain arrangements are depicted, it will be understood that numerous other physical layouts are possible including various placements of wide process modules, other process modules, and the various process modules described below, as well as load locks, front end handlers, and the like, without departing from the scope of this disclosure.
The system 800 may include an equipment front end module 802 that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere, and assists in transferring workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum interior of the system 800. The equipment front end module 802 may include buffers, storage shelves, aligners, carrier holders and/or handlers, and so forth.
A load lock 804 may be coupled to the equipment front end module 802 and may be positioned to receive workpieces from the equipment front end module 802. The load lock 804 may in general provide for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and the vacuum environment within the system 800. Numerous load locks are known in the art, and may be suitably employed with the system 800 as described herein. The load lock 804 may include a preheat station or other processing facility suitable for conditioning workpieces as they enter and/or exit the vacuum environment.
A first vacuum chamber 806 may contain a robot 808 for handling workpieces. The first vacuum chamber 806 may have four facets 810 arranged in a generally square shape, with one of the facets 810 coupled to the load lock 804 by an isolation valve 812 or the like.
Two process modules 814 that provide a first process may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets 810 of the first vacuum chamber 806. It will be understood that only one process module 814 is depicted, but that an opposing facet 810 of the vacuum chamber 806 may readily accommodate an additional process module 814 as described herein. Each process module 814 may also be selectively coupled to the first vacuum chamber 806 by an isolation valve or the like. The two process modules 814 may provide a relatively fast process such as a bevel etch process or the like.
Two wide process modules 820 may be provided, each having two entrances 822. Each of the wide process modules 820 may provide a second process. In one aspect, the second process may be a relatively slow process, such as a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition process. By providing processing for multiple workpieces at one time, each wide process module 820 may, even where the second process is relatively slow, balance the capacity of a relatively fast process such as the bevel etch process described above.
A second vacuum chamber 818 may include two or more additional robots and a transfer station 816. The second vacuum chamber 818 may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber 806. The two wide process modules 820 may be positioned on opposing sides of the second vacuum chamber, with each of the robots in the second vacuum chamber 818 positioned between an entrance of each of the two wide process modules. The robots may further be positioned to transfer workpieces between one another, permitting greater mobility of workpieces within the vacuum environment of the system 800. The transfer station may be adapted to perform one or more of a heating, a cooling, an aligning, an inspection, a metrology, a testing or a cleaning by the addition of suitable hardware and/or software that is generally known in the art.
In the system 800, workpieces may be transferred among the load lock 804, the two process modules 814, and the two wide process modules 820 in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber. The processing speed of the two process modules 814 may be substantially balanced with the processing speed of the two wide process modules 820. It will be understood that the reference to balancing here does not require precise equality of processing time. Rather, balancing as used herein refers to the general notion of providing parallel handling as appropriate to balance the processing speed of fast processes, so that utilization of fast process modules is generally improved. In general, any of the components such as the load lock 804, process modules 814, wide process modules 820, vacuum chambers 806, 818 may be selectively coupled to one another using isolation valves or the like.
A typical process flow for the system 800 may, by way of non-limiting example, include the following steps: (a) preheat workpiece for 20-30 seconds (within load lock, or within a separate preheat station between the load lock and the first vacuum chamber), (b) transfer workpiece to a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PE-CVD) chamber of one of the wide process modules, (c) process for 60-120 seconds, followed by a clean cycle, (d) transfer workpiece from the PE-CVD chamber to a cool-down location such as the transfer station, (e) cool down 20-30 seconds, (f) transfer to bevel etch process chamber, (g) process workpiece with bevel etch process for 30-60 seconds, (h) return workpiece to load lock. It will be appreciated that more generally steps may be added, omitted, modified, or rearranged, and that a variety of different processes may be performed using one or more of the process modules described above.
Thus in one embodiment the system 1000 may include four process modules 1004 each having an entrance, and each providing a process such as a PE-CVD process. The vacuum chamber 1002 may have six facets, one of which may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to the square vacuum chamber, and four of which may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to the four process modules. The additional facet may be used, for example, for a heating, cooling, or other buffer or transfer station, or to couple to an additional vacuum chamber for additional process modules, or to couple to any other suitable vacuum processing hardware or the like. The vacuum chamber 1002 may also include a robot positioned to transfer workpieces among the six facets, and thus for example among the four process modules 1004 or any other connected hardware.
A circulating process module 1202 may permit deposit of a number of workpieces, which may be loaded serially or the like, into a lazy Susan or similar handler or carousel for processing. Although four discrete locations are depicted in
Having thus described several illustrative embodiments, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to form a part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. While some examples presented herein involve specific combinations of functions or structural elements, it should be understood that those functions and elements may be combined in other ways according to the present invention to accomplish the same or different objectives. In particular, acts, elements, and features discussed in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from similar or other roles in other embodiments. Accordingly, the foregoing description and attached drawings are by way of example only, and the invention is to be interpreted in the broadest sense allowable by law.
This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/248,386 filed on Sep. 29, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,523,507 issued on Sep. 3, 2013) which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 12/239,717, filed Sep. 26, 2008 which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/679,829, filed Feb. 27, 2007, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/777,443, filed Feb. 27, 2006, and is also a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/985,834, filed Nov. 10, 2004, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/518,823, filed Nov. 10, 2003, 60/607,649, filed Sep. 7, 2004 and 60/975,350, filed Sep. 26, 2007 the disclosures of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3294670 | Charschan et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3310227 | Norman | Mar 1967 | A |
3521765 | Kauffman et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3581014 | Vogel et al. | May 1971 | A |
3584847 | Hammond et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3740617 | Teramoto et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3796163 | Meyer et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3834555 | Bennington et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3874525 | Hassan et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3925182 | Carmichael et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3932843 | Trelut et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3968018 | Lane et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4015558 | Small et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4184448 | Aichert et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4275978 | Brooks et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4299533 | Ohnaka | Nov 1981 | A |
4318767 | Hijikata et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4392776 | Shum | Jul 1983 | A |
4398720 | Jones et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4425624 | Planche | Jan 1984 | A |
4433951 | Koch et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4529460 | Hasegawa et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4584045 | Richards | Apr 1986 | A |
4632624 | Mirkovich et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4664578 | Kakehi | May 1987 | A |
4666366 | Davis | May 1987 | A |
4682927 | Southworth et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4701096 | Fisher, Jr. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702668 | Carlisle et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4712971 | Fyler | Dec 1987 | A |
4722298 | Rubin et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4724322 | Knowles et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4727993 | Mirkovich et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4730976 | Davis et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4749465 | Flint et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4763276 | Perreirra et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4775281 | Prentakis | Oct 1988 | A |
4809193 | Jourjine | Feb 1989 | A |
4813732 | Klem | Mar 1989 | A |
4817556 | Mears et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4819167 | Cheng et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825808 | Takahashi et al. | May 1989 | A |
4826360 | Iwasawa et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831270 | Weisenberger | May 1989 | A |
4836233 | Milgate, III | Jun 1989 | A |
4875825 | Tullis et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4884216 | Kuperstein | Nov 1989 | A |
4909701 | Hardegen et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917556 | Stark et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4951601 | Maydan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5013210 | Bond | May 1991 | A |
5019233 | Blake et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020475 | Crabb et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5036006 | Sanford et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044871 | Davis et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5058526 | Matsushita et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064340 | Genov | Nov 1991 | A |
5067218 | Williams | Nov 1991 | A |
5076205 | Vowles et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5135349 | Lorenz et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5180275 | Czech et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5183547 | Ikeda | Feb 1993 | A |
5218709 | Fijany et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227708 | Lowrance | Jul 1993 | A |
5234303 | Koyano | Aug 1993 | A |
5256204 | Wu | Oct 1993 | A |
5259881 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280983 | Maydan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5286296 | Sato et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5286344 | Blalock et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292393 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5308431 | Maher et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314541 | Saito et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314986 | Ooms et al. | May 1994 | A |
5333986 | Mizukami et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340261 | Oosawa et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344365 | Scott et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5344542 | Maher et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5364222 | Akimoto et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5367612 | Bozich et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372471 | Wu | Dec 1994 | A |
5377425 | Kawakami et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5382806 | Bacchi et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391035 | Krueger | Feb 1995 | A |
5399531 | Wu | Mar 1995 | A |
5405230 | Ono et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417537 | Miller | May 1995 | A |
5426720 | Bozich et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426865 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431529 | Eastman et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5432887 | Khaw | Jul 1995 | A |
5433020 | Leech, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435683 | Oosawa et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439547 | Kumagai | Aug 1995 | A |
5442730 | Bigus | Aug 1995 | A |
5447409 | Grunes et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447431 | Muka | Sep 1995 | A |
5448681 | Khan | Sep 1995 | A |
5452078 | Cheng | Sep 1995 | A |
5467833 | Crain | Nov 1995 | A |
5474410 | Ozawa et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5483138 | Scmookler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5486080 | Sieradzki | Jan 1996 | A |
5511005 | Abbe et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511147 | Abdel-Malek | Apr 1996 | A |
5524176 | Narita et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526254 | Sato et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534761 | Crippa | Jul 1996 | A |
5538390 | Salzman | Jul 1996 | A |
5539975 | Kukuljan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546179 | Cheng | Aug 1996 | A |
5558482 | Hiroki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5562800 | Kawamura et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563798 | Berken et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566275 | Kano | Oct 1996 | A |
5571325 | Ueyama et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577879 | Eastman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584647 | Uehara | Dec 1996 | A |
5586585 | Bonora et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5606646 | Khan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609689 | Kato et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5636960 | Hiroki et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5653894 | Ibbotson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5654903 | Reitman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5657553 | Tarui et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668056 | Wu et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5668452 | Villarreal et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691897 | Brown et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695564 | Imahashi | Dec 1997 | A |
5700127 | Harada et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701400 | Amado | Dec 1997 | A |
5706201 | Andrews | Jan 1998 | A |
5717832 | Steimle et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720590 | Hofmeister | Feb 1998 | A |
5737496 | Frye et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740062 | Berken et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751003 | Rose et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765982 | Martin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765983 | Caveney et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781432 | Keeler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5801945 | Comer | Sep 1998 | A |
5810549 | Wytman | Sep 1998 | A |
5814733 | Khoury et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820679 | Yokoyama et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5882165 | Maydan et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882171 | Tinner et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882413 | Beaulieu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5888048 | Martin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894348 | Bacchi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894760 | Caveney | Apr 1999 | A |
5895596 | Stoddard et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897710 | Sato et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899658 | Hofmeister | May 1999 | A |
5900105 | Toshima | May 1999 | A |
5917601 | Shimazaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931627 | Okada et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943659 | Giles et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944857 | Edwards et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5957651 | Takebayashi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5982492 | Oppenheimer et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971584 | Iriuchijima et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976199 | Wu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980194 | Freerks et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980195 | Miyashita | Nov 1999 | A |
5989346 | Hiroki | Nov 1999 | A |
5997589 | Tien | Dec 1999 | A |
6002840 | Hofmeister | Dec 1999 | A |
6006016 | Faigon et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013920 | Gordon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6017820 | Ting et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6042623 | Edwards | Mar 2000 | A |
6045315 | Azumano et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6048154 | Wytman | Apr 2000 | A |
6048162 | Molsehi | Apr 2000 | A |
6053686 | Kyogoku | Apr 2000 | A |
6053687 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053980 | Suda et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059507 | Adams | May 2000 | A |
6062798 | Muka | May 2000 | A |
6066210 | Yonemitsu et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073366 | Aswad | Jun 2000 | A |
6073828 | Ma et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6076652 | Head, III | Jun 2000 | A |
6079927 | Muka | Jun 2000 | A |
6079928 | Theriault et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082950 | Altwood et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6103055 | Maher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105454 | Bacchi | Aug 2000 | A |
6108006 | Hoppe | Aug 2000 | A |
6110214 | Klimasauskas | Aug 2000 | A |
6119532 | Park et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122566 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122724 | Kawasaki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125551 | Bushong et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6126380 | Hillman | Oct 2000 | A |
6126381 | Bacchi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128016 | Coelho et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132165 | Carducci | Oct 2000 | A |
6135854 | Masumura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142722 | Genov et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146077 | Shin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149367 | Begin | Nov 2000 | A |
6149379 | Shin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155131 | Suwa et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6155768 | Bacchi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161051 | Hafemann et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166509 | Wyka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167322 | Holbrooks | Dec 2000 | A |
6190037 | Das et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190104 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198074 | Savas | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203268 | Miyashita | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215498 | Filo et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224312 | Sundar | May 2001 | B1 |
6227793 | Knighten | May 2001 | B1 |
6234107 | Tanaka et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235634 | White et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238161 | Kirkpatrick et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242748 | Gallagher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246972 | Klimasauskas | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249712 | Boiquaye | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250869 | Kroeker | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253464 | Klebanoff et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256555 | Bacchi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257045 | Hosokawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257827 | Hendrickson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260144 | Pitchenik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264748 | Kuriki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266634 | Buchsbaum et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267546 | Oxyer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267549 | Brown et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269351 | Black | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270306 | Otwell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277199 | Lei et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281651 | Haanpaa et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282459 | Ballantine et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283355 | Ma et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286230 | White et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293291 | Sperlich et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293749 | Raaijmakers et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296735 | Marxer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297611 | Todorov | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299404 | Muka et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309161 | Hofmeister | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312525 | Bright et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6313596 | Wyka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315512 | Tabrizi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318951 | Schmidt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338626 | Saeki | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339730 | Matsushima | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345239 | Bowman-amuah | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360144 | Bacchi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366830 | Bacchi et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374144 | Viviani et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6375746 | Stevens et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6379095 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382895 | Konishi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390767 | Alper et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393337 | Perlov et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6396232 | Haanpaa et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396516 | Beatty | May 2002 | B1 |
6400115 | Yamazoe | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405101 | Johanson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415193 | Betawar et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425722 | Ueda et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439824 | Harris et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440178 | Berner et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6440261 | Tepman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443686 | Wiesler et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6446055 | Grand | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450750 | Heyder et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453214 | Bacchi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456894 | Nulman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460550 | Nguyen | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6467605 | Head, III | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471422 | Ueda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477685 | Lovelace | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481956 | Hofmeister | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485250 | Hofmeister | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6486444 | Fairbairn et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6494666 | Wu et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6494670 | Kroeker | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500996 | Brown et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501070 | Bacchi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502054 | Mooring et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503365 | Kim et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506009 | Nulman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514032 | Saino et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516244 | Yoo et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517304 | Matsumoto | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519504 | Soraoka et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522942 | Kondo et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6524051 | Nering | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530365 | Vanmoor | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6530732 | Theriault et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533530 | Zenpo | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540869 | Saeki et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6547510 | Beaulieu | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549825 | Kurata | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558509 | Kraus et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575177 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6575689 | Harris et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6581048 | Werbos | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584369 | Patel et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584416 | Morford | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585828 | Kurita et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6586336 | Jeong | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592673 | Welch et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601888 | Mcilwraith et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609876 | Mages et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6618645 | Bacchi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6621509 | Eiref et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632065 | Cameron et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6637998 | Langan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640151 | Somekh et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641328 | Smith et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6641348 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6641746 | Houge et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6643563 | Hosek et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663333 | Kinnard et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669434 | Namba et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678572 | Oh | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684127 | Fujita et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694224 | Ramanan | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697517 | Hunter | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6705816 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719516 | Kroeker | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719517 | Beaulieu et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6723172 | Mayes | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729824 | Lei et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6735482 | Erten et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6736582 | Mages et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738682 | Pasadyn | May 2004 | B1 |
6742977 | Okayama et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6742980 | Saski | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6744228 | Cahill et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6758113 | Choy et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6760796 | Rossmann et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6761085 | Tan | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6765222 | Bacchi et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6767170 | Kostler et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6779962 | Poole | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6784418 | Bacchi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6796400 | Ito et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6802934 | Saeki et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6813543 | Aalund et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815661 | Bacchi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822413 | Simondet | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827788 | Takahashi | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837663 | Mages et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6840732 | Minami et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841006 | Barnes et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6841485 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845292 | Sha et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852194 | Matsushita et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853920 | Hsiung et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6856858 | Kurita | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863485 | Mizokawa et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6869263 | Gilchrist | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877946 | Kinnard et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883776 | Aggarwal et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6889447 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898487 | Bacchi et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900459 | Farnworth et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6900877 | Raaijmakers | May 2005 | B2 |
6913243 | Tomasch | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6918731 | Talmer | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6924463 | Donald et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6932558 | Wu | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934606 | Genetti et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941199 | Bottomley et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944584 | Tenney et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949143 | Kurita et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6949844 | Cahill et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950716 | Ward et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952656 | Cordova et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6952688 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6954711 | Beinglass et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959225 | Logsdon et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6960057 | Hofmeister | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6962644 | Paterson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6969227 | Kinnard et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6976400 | Tan | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6979165 | Larson et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979168 | Uchimaki et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985779 | Hsiung et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990430 | Hosek | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996456 | Cordell et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025554 | Ozawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031778 | Hsiung et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032614 | Lappen et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047093 | Nakamoto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047099 | Shanmugasundram et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7102124 | Bacchi et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7194396 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7198448 | Ozawa et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207766 | Kurita et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210246 | van der Meulen | May 2007 | B2 |
7230441 | Carlson-stevermer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7245989 | Hosek et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7283255 | Ramsey et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293950 | Bonora et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299104 | Tezuka et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316748 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7331751 | Tamura | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337019 | Reiss et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359759 | Cheng et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373220 | Watanabe et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376472 | Wojsznis et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383751 | Hashimoto | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387484 | Ho et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398259 | Nugent | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419346 | Danna et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7422406 | van der Meulen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7441219 | Perry et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7458763 | van der Meulen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7461040 | Goldman et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7467916 | Yamagishi et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7575406 | Hofmeister et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7607879 | Hall et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7619094 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622006 | Ishizawa et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7655092 | Fairbairn et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665951 | Kurita et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7748944 | Price et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769482 | Pannese et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7792350 | Kiley et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7792608 | Rice et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7815739 | Matsuura | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7841820 | Bonora et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7874781 | Nozawa et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7905960 | Choi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7959395 | Hofmeister et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8398355 | Holtkamp et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8562271 | Hofmeister | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8771804 | Dordi | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9248568 | Caveney | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9325228 | Hudgens | Apr 2016 | B2 |
20010002358 | Hempel et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010014269 | Hartlage et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020199 | Bacchi et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010038783 | Nakashima et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041120 | Hofmeister | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048867 | Lebar et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053324 | Saeki et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002422 | Kondo et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020005168 | Kraus et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020006323 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020021959 | Schauer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020043274 | Mayes | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048506 | Babbs et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020055084 | Fischer et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068992 | Hine et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094265 | Momoki | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103571 | Yoo et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111811 | Bares et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131848 | Kurata | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138175 | Fugita et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147534 | Delcheccolo et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165636 | Hasan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192056 | Reimer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020192059 | Foster et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012624 | Kinnard et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030053893 | Matsunaga et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060922 | Schauer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063965 | Langan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030077150 | Matsuda et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082466 | del Puerto et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083776 | Schauer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088530 | Ramanan | May 2003 | A1 |
20030129045 | Bonora et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130761 | Schauer | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131458 | Wang et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167102 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030168173 | Tamura | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171972 | Heskin | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030173512 | Bacchi et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176940 | Rangachari et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030035705 | Johnson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040013497 | Shirai | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040020601 | Zhao | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052632 | Kinnard et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055537 | Kurita et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040062627 | Aggarwal et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040067127 | Hofmeister et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069225 | Fairbairn et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040076505 | Kinnard et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091343 | Astegno et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040107766 | Bonne et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040151562 | Hofmeister et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040151574 | Lu | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040175946 | Mayes | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040179933 | Huang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206307 | Boroson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221871 | Fletcher et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040238122 | Ishizawa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040240971 | Tezuka et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261944 | Wakabayashi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050095087 | Sullivan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050105991 | Hofmeister et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050111938 | van der Meulen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113964 | van der Meulen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113976 | van der Meulen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118000 | Kasai et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050118009 | van der Meulen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050120578 | van der Meulen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050194096 | Price et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203664 | Schauer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222933 | Wesby | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223837 | van der Meulen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050286993 | Minami et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060016720 | Naito | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060099063 | Pietrantonio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060156979 | Thakur et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177288 | Parker et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241813 | Babu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246683 | Pan et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250401 | Pannese et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060263177 | van der Meulen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279573 | Pannese et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279574 | Pannese et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279575 | Pannese et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060279576 | Pannese et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070017445 | Takehara | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070067678 | Hosek et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071581 | Gilchrist et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073430 | Govind et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093430 | Chen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070135932 | Pannese | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135933 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141748 | Rice | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147979 | Rice et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070160447 | Amikura et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070264106 | van der Meulen | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070269297 | van der Meulen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282480 | Pannese et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070285673 | Kiley et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070286710 | van der Meulen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080014055 | van der Meulen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080085173 | van der Meulen | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080124193 | van der Meulen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124194 | van der Meulen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124195 | van der Meulen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124196 | van der Meulen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124197 | van der Meulen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131237 | van der Meulen | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080131238 | van der Meulen | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134075 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134076 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080135788 | Fogel | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080138175 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080138178 | Ferrara et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080145192 | van de Meulen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080145194 | Kiley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147333 | van der Meulen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147580 | Pannese | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155442 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155443 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155444 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155445 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155446 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155447 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155448 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155449 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155450 | Pannese et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080163094 | Pannese et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080163095 | Pannese et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080163096 | Pannese et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080167890 | Pannese et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175694 | Park et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187417 | van de Meulen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080187418 | van de Meulen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208372 | Pannese | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080219806 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219807 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219808 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219809 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219810 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219811 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080219812 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226429 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231866 | Fogel | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232933 | Kiley | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232947 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080232948 | van der Meulen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080253868 | Talmer | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255798 | Buzan | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20120213614 | Bonora et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4333820 | Apr 1994 | DE |
0506045 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0597637 | May 1994 | EP |
6338555 | Dec 1994 | JP |
7099224 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7172578 | Nov 1995 | JP |
7211762 | Nov 1995 | JP |
2000177842 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002270672 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003150219 | May 2003 | JP |
200593807 | Apr 2005 | JP |
WO 03017354 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2004114739 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005048313 | May 2005 | WO |
2005091337 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2006121931 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2007070812 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007101228 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007103870 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007103887 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007103896 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008030637 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Walsh, et al., “An Automated System for Loading Atomoscan Process Tubes Using Intrabay Material Handling Technologies”, IEEE, (1992) 18 pages. |
Gardner, “Semiconductor Factory Automation: Designing for Phased Automation”, IEEE, (1996), pp. 207-213. |
USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,904. |
Supplementary European Search Report; Application No. EP04818697; dated Apr. 4, 2011. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 1, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/832,491. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Jun. 10, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,491. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 19, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,491. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 16, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/846,290. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 25, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/846,290. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Jan. 31, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,834. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 2, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,834. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,839. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 30, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,839. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 5, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,382. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 17, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,382. |
Kumar, Rajeev: “A Neural Net Complier System for Hierarchical Organization,” ACM SIGPLAN Notices vol. 36(2), (Feb. 2001), pp. 26-36. |
Harper, et al. “Flexible Material Handling Automation in Wafer Fabrication”, Solid State Technology, Veeco Integrated Automation, Inc., Dallas, TX, (Jul. 1994), pp. 89-94. |
Weiss, Mitchell. “The Automated Semiconductor Fabricator Circa 2020”, PRI Automation, Inc. Billerica, MA. |
ITRS Factory Integration TWG. “ITRS 2001 Factory Integration Chapter Material: Handling Backup Section”, (Oct. 20, 2005). |
International Search Report, PCT/US2006/061960, (dated Jul. 11, 2008). |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/427,723. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 23, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,966. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 23, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,136. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2006/017543, (dated Sep. 25, 2007). |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, (2003), p. 360. |
Baglivo, et al. “An Integrated Hardware/Software Platform for Both Simulation and Real-Time Autonomous Guided Vehicle Navigation”, ECMS, 19th European Conference on Modeling and Simulation, (Jun. 2005), pp. 1-6. |
Gholkar, et al. “Hardware-in-Loop Simulator for Mini Aerial Vehicle”, Center for Aerospace Systems Design and Engineering, (2004), pp. 1-6. |
Hong, et al. “A PC-Based Open Robot Control System: PC-ORC”, Science Direct, (Jun. 2001), pp. 1901-1906. |
Samaka, M. “Robot Task-Level Programming Language and Simulation”, PWASET vol. 9, (Nov. 2005), pp. 99-103. |
Morandini, et al. “A Real-Time Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulator for Robotics Applications”, Mulitbody Dynamics 2005, ECCOMAS Thematic Conference, (Jun. 2005), pp. 1-11. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Jul. 10, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,966. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,463. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 18, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,405. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 3, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,730. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 9, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,844. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 18, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,854. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 18, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,865. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,886. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,887. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2006/061960, dated Sep. 4, 2008. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,966. |
Baglivo, et al. “An Integrated Hardware/Software Platform for Both Simulation and Real-Time Autonomous Guided Vehicles Navigation”, ECMS 2005, 19th European Conference on Modeling and Simluation, (Jun. 2005), pp. 1-6. |
USPTO Notice of Alloance, dated Jun. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,839. |
Grabowski, Ralph. “Using AutoCAD 2005: Basics”, Autodesk Press, (Aug. 17, 2004), p. 213. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 28, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,834. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Jun. 20, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,869. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 27, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,876. |
USPTO Office Action, dated May 23, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,896. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 2, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,915. |
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 3, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,902. |
USPTO Final Office Action, dated May 25, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,516. |
USPTO Final Office Action, dated Jun. 2, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,541. |
USPTO Final Office Action, dated Dec. 24, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,582. |
West, et al. “Design Issues Associated with Neural Network Systems Applied Within the Electronics Manufacturing Domain”, Sep. 2000, Journal of Electronics Manufacturing, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 19-48. |
Maimon, et al. “A Neural Network Approach for a Robot Task Sequencing Problem”, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 14 (2000), pp. 175-189. |
Zhou, et al. “Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Scheduling, and Control of Semiconductor Manufacturing Systems: A Petri Net Approach”, Aug. 1998, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 333-357. |
Westkamper, et al. “Chapter 28: Production, Planning and Control with Learning Technologies: Simulation and Optimization of Complex Production Processes in Knowledge-Based Systems”, Academic Press, vol. 3, (2000) pp. 839-887. |
International Search Report, PCT/US2007/067965, dated Oct. 1, 2008. |
Hesselroth, et al. “Neural Network Control of a Pneumatic Robot Arm”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 24, No. 1, (Jan. 1994) pp. 28-38. |
“PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration, PCT/US04/37672”, International Searching Authority dated Dec. 19, 2005. |
USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,910. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130343841 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60777443 | Feb 2006 | US | |
60518823 | Nov 2003 | US | |
60607649 | Sep 2004 | US | |
60975350 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12239717 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13248386 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13248386 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14014910 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11679829 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 12239717 | US | |
Parent | 10985834 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 11679829 | US |