Semiconductor manufacturing systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10086511
  • Patent Number
    10,086,511
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 30, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 2, 2018
    5 years ago
Abstract
Linear semiconductor handling systems provide more balanced processing capacity using various techniques to provide increased processing capacity to relatively slow processes. This may include use of hexagonal vacuum chambers to provide additional facets for slow process modules, use of circulating process modules to provide more processing capacity at a single facet of a vacuum chamber, or the use of wide process modules having multiple processing sites. This approach may be used, for example, to balance processing capacity in a typical process that includes plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition steps and bevel etch steps.
Description
BACKGROUND

This invention relates to the field of semiconductor manufacturing.


While various process modules and other semiconductor handling and fabrication tools are available, there remains a need for modular systems arranged to balance processing capacity for relatively fast processes such as bevel etching and relatively slow processes such as enhanced plasma chemical vapor deposition. More generally, a need exists for improved semiconductor manufacturing and handling equipment.


SUMMARY

This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/434,582, filed May 9, 2003 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/378,983, 60/379,095 and 60/379,063; all filed May 9, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.


This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/434,582, filed May 9, 2003 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/378,983, 60/379,095 and 60/379,063; all filed May 9, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.


This is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/434,582, filed May 9, 2003 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/378,983, 60/379,095 and 60/379,063; all filed May 9, 2002, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.


Linear semiconductor handling systems provide more balanced processing capacity using various techniques to provide increased processing capacity to relatively slow processes. This may include use of hexagonal vacuum chambers to provide additional facets for slow process modules, use of circulating process modules to provide more processing capacity at a single facet of a vacuum chamber, or the use of wide process modules having multiple processing sites. This approach may be used, for example, to balance processing capacity in a typical process that includes plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition steps and bevel etch steps.


In one aspect, an apparatus described herein includes an equipment front end module that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere; a load lock coupled to the equipment front end module and positioned to receive workpieces therefrom, the load lock providing for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum environment; a first vacuum chamber containing a robot, the first vacuum chamber having four facets, one of the four facets selectively coupled to the load lock by an isolation valve; two process modules that provide a first process, the two process modules coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets in a vacuum-sealed engagement; two wide process modules, each having two entrances, and each providing a second process; and a second vacuum chamber containing two robots and a transfer station, the second vacuum chamber coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber, the two wide process modules positioned on opposing sides of the second vacuum chamber with each of the robots of the second vacuum chamber positioned between an entrance of each of the two wide process modules, the robots further positioned to transfer workpieces between one another; wherein workpieces can be transferred among the load lock, the two process modules, and the two wide process modules in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber, and wherein a processing speed of the two process modules is substantially balanced with the processing speed of the two wide process modules.


In another aspect, an apparatus described herein includes an equipment front end module that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere; a load lock coupled to the equipment front end module and positioned to receive workpieces therefrom, the load lock providing for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum environment; a first vacuum chamber containing a robot, the first vacuum chamber having four facets, one of the four facets selectively coupled to the load lock by an isolation valve; two process modules that provide a first process, the two process modules coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets in a vacuum-sealed engagement; four process modules that provide a second process, the four process modules each having an entrance, and each providing a second process; and a second vacuum chamber containing a second robot, the second vacuum chamber having six facets, the second vacuum chamber coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber, and four of the six facets coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to each of the four process modules respectively, the second robot positioned to transfer workpieces among the four process modules; wherein workpieces can be transferred among the load lock, the two process modules, and the four process modules in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber, and wherein a processing speed of the two process modules is substantially balanced with the processing speed of the four process modules. In another aspect, an apparatus described herein includes an equipment front end module that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere; a load lock coupled to the equipment front end module and positioned to receive workpieces therefrom, the load lock providing for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum environment; a first vacuum chamber containing a robot, the first vacuum chamber having four facets, one of the four facets selectively coupled to the load lock by an isolation valve; two process modules that provide a first process, the two process modules coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets in a vacuum-sealed engagement; two circulating process modules each having an entrance, and each providing a second process; and a second vacuum chamber containing a second robot, the second vacuum chamber having four facets, the second vacuum chamber coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber, and two of the four facets of the second vacuum chambered coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to each of the two circulating process modules respectively, the second robot positioned to transfer workpieces among the two circulating process modules; wherein workpieces can be transferred among the load lock, the two process modules, and the two circulating process modules in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber, and wherein a processing speed of the two process modules is substantially balanced with the processing speed of the two circulating process modules.


As used herein, “robot” shall include any kind of known robot or similar device or facility that includes a mechanical capability and a control capability, which may include a combination of a controller, processor, computer, or similar facility, a set of motors or similar facilities, one or more resolvers, encoders or similar facilities, one or more mechanical or operational facilities, such as arms, wheels, legs, links, claws, extenders, grips, nozzles, sprayers, end effectors, actuators, and the like, as well as any combination of any of the above. One embodiment is a robotic arm.


As used herein “drive” shall include any form of drive mechanism or facility for inducing motion. In embodiments it includes the motor/encoder section of a robot.


As used herein, “axis” shall include a motor or drive connected mechanically through linkages, belts or similar facilities, to a mechanical member, such as an arm member. An “N-axis drive” shall include a drive containing N axes; for example a “2-axis drive” is a drive containing two axes.


As used herein, “arm” shall include a passive or active (meaning containing motors/encoders) linkage that may include one or more arm or leg members, bearings, and one or more end effectors for holding or gripping material to be handled.


As used herein, “SCARA arm” shall mean a Selectively Compliant Assembly Robot Arm (SCARA) robotic arm in one or more forms known to those of skill in the art, including an arm consisting of one or more upper links connected to a drive, one or more lower links connected through a belt or mechanism to a motor that is part of the drive, and one or more end units, such as an end effector or actuator.


As used herein, “turn radius” shall mean the radius that an arm fits in when it is fully retracted.


As used herein, “reach” shall include, with respect to a robotic arm, the maximum reach that is obtained when an arm is fully extended. Usually the mechanical limit is a little further out than the actual effective reach, because it is easier to control an arm that is not completely fully extended (in embodiments there is a left/right singularity at full extension that can be hard to control).


As used herein, “containment” shall mean situations when the arm is optimally retracted such that an imaginary circle can be drawn around the arm/end effector/material that is of minimum radius.


As used herein, the “reach-to-containment ratio” shall mean, with respect to a robotic arm, the ratio of maximum reach to minimum containment.


As used herein, “robot-to-robot” distance shall include the horizontal distance between the mechanical central axis of rotation of two different robot drives.


As used herein, “slot valve” shall include a rectangular shaped valve that opens and closes to allow a robot arm to pass through (as opposed to a vacuum (isolation) valve, which controls the pump down of a vacuum chamber). For example, the SEMI E21.1-1296 standard (a published standard for semiconductor manufacturing) the slot valve for 300 mm wafers in certain semiconductor manufacturing process modules has an opening width of 336 mm, a opening height of 50 mm and a total valve thickness of 60 mm with the standard also specifying the mounting bolts and alignment pins.


As used herein, “transfer plane” shall include the plane (elevation) at which material is passed from a robot chamber to a process module chamber through a slot valve. Per the SEMI E21.1-1296 standard for semiconductor manufacturing equipment the transfer plane is 14 mm above the slot valve centerline and 1100 mm above the plane of the factory floor.


As used herein, “section” shall include a vacuum chamber that has one or more robotic drives in it. This is the smallest repeatable element in a linear system.


As used herein, “link” shall include a mechanical member of a robot arm, connected on both ends to another link, an end effector, or the robot drive.


As used herein, “L1,” “L2”, “L3” or the like shall include the numbering of the arm links starting from the drive to the end effector.


As used herein, “end effector” shall include an element at an active end of a robotic arm distal from the robotic drive and proximal to an item on which the robotic arm will act. The end effector may be a hand of the robot that passively or actively holds the material to be transported in a semiconductor process or some other actuator disposed on the end of the robotic arm.


As used herein, the term “SCARA arm” refers to a robotic arm that includes one or more links and may include an end effector, where the arm, under control, can move linearly, such as to engage an object. A SCARA arm may have various numbers of links, such as 3, 4, or more. As used herein, “3-link SCARA arm” shall include a SCARA robotic arm that has three members: link one (L1), link two (L2) and an end effector. A drive for a 3-link SCARA arm usually has 3 motors: one connected to L1, one to the belt system, which in turn connects to the end effector through pulleys and a Z (lift) motor. One can connect a fourth motor to the end effector, which allows for some unusual moves not possible with only three motors.


As used herein, “dual SCARA arm” shall include a combination of two SCARA arms (such as two 3 or 4-link SCARA arms (typically designated A and B)) optionally connected to a common drive. In embodiments the two SCARA arms are either completely independent or share a common link member L1. A drive for a dual independent SCARA arm usually has either five motors: one connected to L1-A, one connected to L1-B, one connected to the belt system of arm A, one connected to the belt system of arm B, and a common Z (lift) motor. A drive for a dual dependent SCARA arm usually has a common share L1 link for both arms A and B and contains typically four motors: one connected to the common link L1, one connected to the belt system for arm A, one connected to the belt system for arm B, and a common Z (lift) motor.


As used herein, “4-link SCARA arm” shall include an arm that has four members: L1, L2, L3 and an end effector. A drive for a 4-link SCARA arm can have four motors: one connected to L1, one to the belt systems connected to L2 and L3, one to the end effector and a Z motor. In embodiments only 3 motors are needed: one connected to L1, one connected to the belt system that connects to L2, L3 and the end effector, and a Z motor.


As used herein, “Frog-leg style arm” shall include an arm that has five members: L1A, L1B, L2A, L3B and an end effector. A drive for a frog-leg arm can have three motors, one connected to L1A—which is mechanically by means of gearing or the like connected to L1B—, one connected to a turret that rotates the entire arm assembly, and a Z motor. In embodiments the drive contains three motors, one connected to L1A, one connected to L1B and a Z motor and achieves the desired motion through coordination between the motors.


As used herein, “Dual Frog-leg style arm” shall include an arm that has eight members L1A, L1B, L2A-1, L2A-2, L2B-1, L2B-2 and two end effectors. The second link members L2A-1 and L2B-1 form a single Frog-leg style arm, whereas the second link members L2A-2 and L2B-2 also form a single Frog-leg style arm, however facing in an opposite direction. A drive for a dual frog arm may be the same as for a single frog arm.


As used herein, “Leap Frog-leg style arm” shall include an arm that has eight members L1A, L1B, L2A-1, L2A-2, L2B-1, L2B-2 and two end effectors. The first link members L1A and L1B are each connected to one of the motors substantially by their centers, rather than by their distal ends. The second link members L2A-1 and L2B-1 form a single Frog-leg style arm, whereas the second link members L2A-2 and L2B-2 also form a single Frog-leg style arm, however facing in the same direction. A drive for a dual frog arm may be the same as for a single frog arm.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will be appreciated more fully from the following further description thereof, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 shows a linear processing architecture for handling items in a semiconductor fabrication process.



FIG. 2 shows an alternative layout for a system.



FIG. 3 shows an alternative layout for a system.



FIG. 4 shows an alternative layout for a system.



FIG. 5 shows a system using wide process modules.



FIG. 6 shows another system using multiple wide process modules.



FIG. 7 shows another system using multiple wide process modules.



FIG. 8 shows a system employing wide process modules to balance processing capacity.



FIG. 9 shows a system employing wide process modules to balance processing capacity.



FIG. 10 shows a system employing a hexagonal vacuum chamber to balance processing capacity.



FIG. 11 shows a system employing a hexagonal vacuum chamber to balance processing capacity.



FIG. 12 shows a system employing two circulating process modules to balance processing capacity.



FIG. 13 shows a system employing circulating process modules to balance processing capacity.



FIGS. 14A and 14B show a 3-link SCARA arm and a 4-link SCARA arm.



FIG. 15 shows reach and containment characteristics of a SCARA arm.



FIG. 16 shows components of a dual-arm architecture for a robotic arm system for use in a handling system.



FIG. 17A illustrates a vertically arranged load lock assembly in accordance with embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 17B illustrates a vertically arranged load lock assembly at both sides of a wafer fabrication facility in accordance with embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 18 shows a vertically arranged load lock and vertically stacked process modules in accordance with embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 19 shows a linearly arranged, two-level handling architecture with vertically stacked process modules in a cross-sectional side view in accordance with embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 20 shows the handling layout of FIG. 19 in a top view.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 shows a linear processing architecture for handling items in a semiconductor fabrication process. The system 100 may include a number of process modules 102 for various processes such as chemical vapor deposition processes, etching processes, and the like. As semiconductor manufacturing processes are typically extremely sensitive to contaminants, such as particulates and volatile organic compounds, the processes typically take place in a vacuum environment, with one or more process modules 102 that are devoted to specific processes. Semiconductor wafers are moved among the process modules 102 by a handling system that may include one or more robots 104 to produce the end product, such as a chip.



FIGS. 14A and 14B show a 3-link SCARA arm 6002 and a 4-link SCARA arm 6004. The 3-link or 4-link arms 6002, 6004 are driven by a robot drive. The 3-link arm 6002 is commonly used in industry. When the 3-link SCARA arm 6002 is used, the system is not optimized in that the reach-to-containment ratio is not very good. Thus, the vacuum chambers need to be bigger, and since costs rise dramatically with the size of the vacuum chamber, having a 3-link SCARA arm 6002 can increase the cost of the system. Also the overall footprint of the system becomes bigger with the 3-link SCARA arm 6002. Moreover, the reach of a 3-link SCARA arm 6002 is less than that of a 4-link arm 6004. In some cases a manufacturer may wish to achieve a large, deep handoff into a process module, and the 4-link arm 6004 reaches much farther beyond its containment ratio. This has advantages in some non-SEMI-standard process modules. It also has advantages when a manufacturer wants to cover large distances between segments.


The 4-link arm 6004 is advantageous in that it folds in a much smaller containment ratio than a 3-link SCARA arm 6002, but it reaches a lot further than a conventional 3-link SCARA 6002 for the same containment diameter. In combination with the ability to have a second drive and second 4-link arm 6004 mounted on the top of the system, it may allow for a fast material swap in the process module. The 4-link SCARA arm 6004 may be mounted, for example, on top of a stationary drive as illustrated, or on top of a moving cart that provides the transmission of the rotary motion to actuate the arms and belts. In either case, the 4-link arm 6004, optionally together with a second 4-link arm 6004, may provide a compact, long-reach arm that can go through a small opening, without colliding with the edges of the opening.



FIG. 15 shows reach and containment characteristics of a 4-link SCARA arm 7004. In embodiments, the 4-link SCARA arm 7004 link lengths are not constrained by the optimization of reach to containment ratio as in some other systems. Optimization of the reach to containment ratio may lead to a second arm member that is too long. When the arm reaches through a slot valve that is placed as close as practical to the minimum containment diameter, this second arm member may collide with the inside edges of the slot valve. Thus the second (and third) links may be dimensioned based on collision avoidance with a slot valve that the arm is designed to reach through. This results in very different ratios between L1, L2 and L3. The length of L2 may constrain the length of L3. An equation for optimum arm length may be a 4th power equation amenable to iterative solutions.



FIG. 16 shows components of a dual-arm 9002 architecture for a robotic arm system for use in a handling system. One arm is mounted from the bottom 9004 and the other from the top 9008. In embodiments both are 4-link SCARA arms. Mounting the second arm on the top is advantageous. In some other systems arms have been connected to a drive that is mounted through the top of the chamber, but the lower and upper drives are conventionally mechanically coupled. In embodiments, there is no mechanical connection between the two drives in the linear systems disclosed herein; instead, the coordination of the two arms (to prevent collisions) may be done in a software system or controller. The second (top) arm 9008 may optionally be included only if necessary for throughput reasons.


Another feature is that only two motors, just like a conventional SCARA arm, may be needed to drive the 4-link arm. Belts in the arm may maintain parallelism. Parallelism or other coordinated movements may also be achieved, for example, using parallel bars instead of belts. Generally, the use of only two motors may provide a substantial cost advantage. At the same time, three motors may provide a functional advantage in that the last (L4) link may be independently steered, however the additional belts, bearings, connections, shafts and motor may render the system much more expensive. In addition the extra belts may add significant thickness to the arm mechanism, making it difficult to pass the arm through a (SEMI standard) slot valve. Also, the use of fewer motors generally simplifies related control software.


Another feature of the 4-link SCARA arm disclosed herein is that the wrist may be offset from centerline. Since the ideal system has a top-mount 9008 as well as a bottom 9004 mount 4-link arm, the vertical arrangement of the arm members may be difficult to adhere to if the manufacturer also must comply with the SEMI standards. In a nutshell, these standards specify the size and reach requirements through a slot valve 4006 into a process module. They also specify the level above centerline on which a wafer has to be carried. Many existing process modules are compliant with this standard. In systems that are non-compliant, the slot valves 4006 are of very similar shape although the opening size might be slightly different as well as the definition of the transfer plane. The SEMI standard dimensional restrictions require a very compact packaging of the arms. Using an offset wrist allows the top 9008 and bottom 9004 arms to get closer together, making it easier for them to pass through the slot valve 4006. If the wrist is not offset, then the arms need to stay further apart vertically and wafer exchanges may take more time, because the drives need to move more in the vertical direction. The proposed design of the top arm does not require that there is a wrist offset, but a wrist offset may advantageously reduce the turn radius of the system, and allows for a better mechanical arm layout, so no interferences occur.


Various configurations exist for handling systems. A prevalent system is a cluster tool, where process modules are positioned radially around a central handling system, such as a robotic arm. In other embodiments, a handling system can rotate items horizontally in a “lazy Susan” facility. Process modules 102 may in general be clustered, stacked, or arranged in a linear fashion as depicted in FIG. 1. A given chip may require chemical vapor deposition of different chemical constituents (e.g., Titanium Nitride, Tungsten, etc.) in different process modules, as well as etching in other process modules. The sequence of the processes in the different process modules may produce a unique end product.


In general, the system 100 may use two or more stationary robots 104 arranged in a linear fashion. The robots 104 may be mounted in the bottom of the system 100 or hang down from the chamber lid or both at the same time. The linear system may use a vacuum chamber 106 around each robot, and may have multiple connected vacuum chambers 106, each containing its own robot 104 arranged in a linear fashion. In general, different forms of robots can be used in semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Possible robots include 3-link Selective Compliant Articulated Robot Arm (“SCARA”) robot, a 4-link SCARA robot, a dual-arm robot, a frog-leg arm robot, and so forth.


In embodiments, a single controller could be set up to handle one or more sections of the system 100. In embodiments vacuum chambers 106 are extensible; that is, a manufacturer can easily add additional sections/chambers 106 and thus add process capacity. Because each section can use independent robot arms and robot drives, the throughput may stay high when additional sections and thus robots 104 are added.


In embodiments the components of the system 100 can be controlled by a software controller, which in embodiments may be a central controller that controls each of the components. In embodiments the components form a linkable handling system under control of the software, where the software controls each robot to hand off a material to another robot, or into a buffer for picking up by the next robot. In embodiments the software control system may recognize the addition of a new component, such as a process module or robot, when that component is plugged into the system, such as recognizing the component over a network, such as a USB, Ethernet, FireWire, Bluetooth, 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g or other network. In such embodiments, as soon as the next robot, process module, or other component is plugged in a software scheduler for the flow of a material to be handled, such as a wafer, can be reconfigured automatically so that the materials can be routed over the new link in the system. In embodiments the software scheduler is based on a neural net, or it can be a rule-based scheduler. In embodiments process modules can make themselves known over such a network, so that the software controller knows what new process modules, robots, or other components have been connected. When a new process module is plugged into an empty facet, the system can recognize it and allow it to be scheduled into the flow of material handling.


In embodiments the software system may include an interface that permits the user to run a simulation of the system. The interface may allow a user to view the linking and configuration of various links, robotic arms and other components, to optimize configuration (such as by moving the flow of materials through various components, moving process modules, moving robots, or the like), and to determine what configuration to purchase from a supplier. In embodiments the interface may be a web interface.


The methods and system disclosed herein can use optional buffer stations 108 between robot drives. Robots could hand off to each other directly, but that is technically more difficult to optimize, and would occupy two robots, because they would both have to be available at the same time to do a handoff, which is more restrictive than if they can deposit to a dummy location 108 in-between them where the other robot can pick up when it is ready. The buffer 108 also allows higher throughput, because the system does not have to wait for both robots to become available. Furthermore, the buffers 108 may also offer a good opportunity to perform some small processing steps on the wafer such as heating, cooling, aligning, inspection, metrology, testing or cleaning.


In embodiments, the methods and systems disclosed herein use optional vacuum isolation valves 110 between robot areas/segments. Each segment can be fully isolated from any other segment. If a robot 104 handles ultra clean and sensitive materials (e.g., wafers) in its segment, then isolating that segment from the rest of the system may prevent cross-contamination from the dirtier segment to the clean segment. Also, the manufacturer can now operate segments at different pressures. The manufacturer can have stepped vacuum levels where the vacuum gets better and better further into the machine. The use of isolation valves 110 may avoid out-gassing from materials or wafers in other parts of the system when handling a wafer in an isolated segment. In embodiments, vacuum isolation between robots 104 is possible, as is material buffering between robots 104.


An equipment front end module 112 or the like may be employed for loading and unloading wafer from the system 100. This may include a variety of robotics, as well as aligners, shelving for wafers and/or wafer carriers, and so forth. Wafers may be transferred between the atmospheric environment of the equipment front end module 112 and the vacuum environment of the process modules 102, robot 104, and so forth through a load lock 114. It should be understood that while in some embodiments a load lock 114 may be positioned at the end of a linear system, as depicted in FIG. 1, the load lock 114 may also or instead be positioned elsewhere, such as in the middle of the system. In such an embodiment, a manufacturing item could enter or exit the system at such another point in the system, such as to exit the system into the air return.


Other features of the system 100 may include an external or air return for moving wafers or groups of wafers in atmosphere, which may optionally be on the top of the linear vacuum chamber. The return system could also be a vacuum return. It should also be understood that while several of the depicted embodiments of linear semiconductor fabrication systems are laid out in a straight line, the linear system could be curvilinear; that is, the system could have curves, a U- or V-shape, an S-shape, or a combination of those or any other curvilinear path, in whatever format the manufacturer desires, such as to fit the configuration of a fabrication facility. In each case, the system optionally includes an entry point and an exit point that is down the line from the entry point. Optionally the air return returns the item from the exit point to the entry point. Optionally the system can include more than one exit point. In each case the robotic arms described herein can assist in efficiently moving items down the line.


In general, the depicted system 100 is arranged to service six process modules (an additional process module may be positioned in the top middle of the depicted system 100, but is omitted here to provide room for element numbers) using three robots 104 with four sided vacuum chambers 106.


It will be further understood that many modifications and additions to the system described above may be usefully employed, including various robot types, various layouts, various process module and robot chamber sizes.



FIG. 2 shows an alternative layout for a system 200 that adds a rear-exit handler 202 which may be, for example, similar to the equipment front end module 112 of FIG. 1. This arrangement permits generally left-to-right processing and handling of wafers as well as various other paths through process modules and entry/exit points.



FIG. 3 shows an alternative layout for a system 300 using a hexagonal vacuum chamber 302 providing six facets for one of the robots 304. By employing a robotic handler with six facets, a number of additional process modules can be added. This may be particularly useful where a process requires numerous, smaller process modules.



FIG. 4 shows an alternative layout for a system 400 using square and hexagonal vacuum chambers, along with a rear-exit handler 402. This arrangement may permit relatively dense clustering of both large and small process modules. In addition, the availability of front and rear access to atmosphere expands options for throughput and scheduling.



FIG. 5 shows a system 500 including wide process modules 502. Each wide process module 502 may have two entrances 503 coupled in a vacuum sealed engagement to a vacuum chamber 506 that contains a number of robots 504. In one embodiment, the robots 504 may be positioned between entrances 503 of opposing wide process modules 502 so that one robot can access an entrance 503 of each one of the process modules. The wide process modules 502 may provide concurrent and/or asynchronous processing of multiple workpieces, which may include, for example, two similar processes that may be accessed independently by the two robots 504 through each of the side-by-side entrances 504. In other embodiments, a wide process module 502 may provide two side-by-side sequential steps or processes, which may be performed entirely within the process module (so that a workpiece enters one entrance and leaves through the other entrance, or by accessing each process through respective entrances with the robots 504. It will be noted that the robots 504 may also affect robot-to-robot handoff among themselves, or transfer workpieces between themselves via a transfer station, buffer station, or the like, so that workpieces may more generally be moved to various facets of the vacuum chamber 506 that contains the robots 504. The robots 504 may thus, for example, transfer a workpiece from a load lock 508 through the vacuum chamber 506 to a process module 510 on an opposing side.



FIG. 6 shows another system 600 using multiple wide process modules. In this embodiment two pairs of wide process modules are arranged on each side of a linear system, with four robots sharing a vacuum environment via an intervening transfer station. Each process module, or each entrance to each process module, may be selectively coupled to the interior of the vacuum chambers by an isolation valve or the like.



FIG. 7 shows another system 700 using multiple wide process modules. It will be noted that wide process modules may be combined with other process modules, which may be selected according to the relative process times thereof to provide balanced capacity between the various processes. Thus in general a wide process module may be provided for processing multiple workpieces where the wide process modules provide a relatively long process, while single-workpiece process modules may be provided for relatively short processes. It will further be noted that a rear-exit handler may be included to add another entry and/or exit point to a vacuum interior of the system 700.


In general, while certain arrangements are depicted, it will be understood that numerous other physical layouts are possible including various placements of wide process modules, other process modules, and the various process modules described below, as well as load locks, front end handlers, and the like, without departing from the scope of this disclosure.



FIG. 8 shows a system employing wide process modules to balance processing capacity.


The system 800 may include an equipment front end module 802 that physically handles workpieces in atmosphere, and assists in transferring workpieces between atmosphere and a vacuum interior of the system 800. The equipment front end module 802 may include buffers, storage shelves, aligners, carrier holders and/or handlers, and so forth.


A load lock 804 may be coupled to the equipment front end module 802 and may be positioned to receive workpieces from the equipment front end module 802. The load lock 804 may in general provide for transfer of workpieces between atmosphere and the vacuum environment within the system 800. Numerous load locks are known in the art, and may be suitably employed with the system 800 as described herein. The load lock 804 may include a preheat station or other processing facility suitable for conditioning workpieces as they enter and/or exit the vacuum environment.


A first vacuum chamber 806 may contain a robot 808 for handling workpieces. The first vacuum chamber 806 may have four facets 810 arranged in a generally square shape, with one of the facets 810 coupled to the load lock 804 by an isolation valve 812 or the like.


Two process modules 814 that provide a first process may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to two opposing ones of the four facets 810 of the first vacuum chamber 806. It will be understood that only one process module 814 is depicted, but that an opposing facet 810 of the vacuum chamber 806 may readily accommodate an additional process module 814 as described herein. Each process module 814 may also be selectively coupled to the first vacuum chamber 806 by an isolation valve or the like. The two process modules 814 may provide a relatively fast process such as a bevel etch process or the like.


Two wide process modules 820 may be provided, each having two entrances 822. Each of the wide process modules 820 may provide a second process. In one aspect, the second process may be a relatively slow process, such as a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition process. By providing processing for multiple workpieces at one time, each wide process module 820 may, even where the second process is relatively slow, balance the capacity of a relatively fast process such as the bevel etch process described above.


A second vacuum chamber 818 may include two or more additional robots and a transfer station 816. The second vacuum chamber 818 may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to one of the four facets of the first vacuum chamber 806. The two wide process modules 820 may be positioned on opposing sides of the second vacuum chamber, with each of the robots in the second vacuum chamber 818 positioned between an entrance of each of the two wide process modules. The robots may further be positioned to transfer workpieces between one another, permitting greater mobility of workpieces within the vacuum environment of the system 800. The transfer station may be adapted to perform one or more of a heating, a cooling, an aligning, an inspection, a metrology, a testing or a cleaning by the addition of suitable hardware and/or software that is generally known in the art.


In the system 800, workpieces may be transferred among the load lock 804, the two process modules 814, and the two wide process modules 820 in vacuum by the robots of the first vacuum chamber and the second vacuum chamber. The processing speed of the two process modules 814 may be substantially balanced with the processing speed of the two wide process modules 820. It will be understood that the reference to balancing here does not require precise equality of processing time. Rather, balancing as used herein refers to the general notion of providing parallel handling as appropriate to balance the processing speed of fast processes, so that utilization of fast process modules is generally improved. In general, any of the components such as the load lock 804, process modules 814, wide process modules 820, vacuum chambers 806, 818 may be selectively coupled to one another using isolation valves or the like.


A typical process flow for the system 800 may, by way of non-limiting example, include the following steps: (a) preheat workpiece for 20-30 seconds (within load lock, or within a separate preheat station between the load lock and the first vacuum chamber), (b) transfer workpiece to a plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PE-CVD) chamber of one of the wide process modules, (c) process for 60-120 seconds, followed by a clean cycle, (d) transfer workpiece from the PE-CVD chamber to a cool-down location such as the transfer station, (e) cool down 20-30 seconds, (f) transfer to bevel etch process chamber, (g) process workpiece with bevel etch process for 30-60 seconds, (h) return workpiece to load lock. It will be appreciated that more generally steps may be added, omitted, modified, or rearranged, and that a variety of different processes may be performed using one or more of the process modules described above.



FIG. 9 shows a system employing wide process modules to balance processing capacity. In general, the system 900 may be similar to the system 800 described above, with differences noted as follows. The system 900 may include a rear-exit handler 902, which may be coupled through a second load lock 904 to the second vacuum chamber. The rear-exit handler 902 may provide a second exit point for workpieces to and from the vacuum interior of the system 900.



FIG. 10 shows a system employing a hexagonal vacuum chamber to balance processing capacity. In general, the system 1000 may include components such as those described above including for example a number of relatively fast process modules, such as bevel etch process modules coupled to a square vacuum chamber, along with a balanced number of relatively slow process modules, such as PE-CVD process modules. However, rather than provide double wide process modules for increased PE-CVD capacity, the system 1000 shown in FIG. 10 uses a hexagonal vacuum chamber 1002 to provide additional facets so that more PE-CVD modules can be coupled to the vacuum system 1000.


Thus in one embodiment the system 1000 may include four process modules 1004 each having an entrance, and each providing a process such as a PE-CVD process. The vacuum chamber 1002 may have six facets, one of which may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to the square vacuum chamber, and four of which may be coupled in a vacuum-sealed engagement to the four process modules. The additional facet may be used, for example, for a heating, cooling, or other buffer or transfer station, or to couple to an additional vacuum chamber for additional process modules, or to couple to any other suitable vacuum processing hardware or the like. The vacuum chamber 1002 may also include a robot positioned to transfer workpieces among the six facets, and thus for example among the four process modules 1004 or any other connected hardware.



FIG. 11 shows a system employing a hexagonal vacuum chamber to balance processing capacity. In general, the system 1100 may employ any of the components and arrangements described above. The system may, for example, be similar to the system 1000 of FIG. 10 with the addition of a rear-exit handler 1102, examples of which are also described above.



FIG. 12 shows a system employing two circulating process modules to balance processing capacity. In general, the system 1200 may employ any of the components and arrangements described above including for example a number of relatively fast process modules, such as bevel etch process modules coupled to a square vacuum chamber, along with a balanced number of relatively slow process modules, such as PE-CVD process modules. However, rather than provide double wide process modules or hexagonal vacuum chambers to balance capacity, the system 1200 provides a number of circulating process modules 1202 to balance capacity.


A circulating process module 1202 may permit deposit of a number of workpieces, which may be loaded serially or the like, into a lazy Susan or similar handler or carousel for processing. Although four discrete locations are depicted in FIG. 12 for each circulating process module 1202, it will be understood that more generally any number of locations may be provided, and that movement of the workpieces within the circulating process module 1202 may follow circular motion or movement through some other rectangular or curvilinear path, and may in certain embodiments include vertical movement in a stack or the like. It will also be understood that while “circulating” suggests a repeating cycle of locations within the circulating process module 1202, in certain embodiments, loading and unloading may be performed in forward or reverse order, or the circulating process module 1202 may provide effectively random access to workpiece locations. It will further be understood that one location within the circulating process module 1202, which may be the load or unload location or any other suitable location, may provide cooling or other thermal management, alignment, or the like for workpieces added to and/or removed from the circulating process module. In one embodiment, the circulating process module 1202 provides a capacity for four workpieces including three PE-CVD processing locations, and one cooling location.



FIG. 13 shows a system employing circulating process modules to balance processing capacity. In general, the system 1300 may employ any of the components and arrangements described above. The system may, for example, be similar to the system 1200 of FIG. 12, with the addition of a rear-exit handler 1302, examples of which are also described above. The addition of a rear-exit handler 1302 may support additional workpiece paths through the system 1300, such as a generally left-to-right flow of workpieces through the system 1300 as illustrated in FIG. 13.



FIG. 17A shows a stacked vacuum load lock 4008, 40004 for entering materials into a vacuum environment. One limiting factor on bringing wafers 31008 into a vacuum system is the speed with which the load lock can be evacuated to high vacuum. If the load lock is pumped too fast, condensation may occur in the air in the load lock chamber, resulting in precipitation of nuclei on the wafer 31008 surfaces, which can result in particles and can cause defects or poor device performance. Cluster tools may employ two load locks side by side, each of which is alternately evacuated. The pumping speed of each load lock can thus be slower, resulting in improved performance of the system. With two load locks 400840004 in a vertical stack, the equipment footprint stays very small, but retains the benefit of slower pumping speed. In embodiments, the load lock 40004 can be added as an option. In embodiments the robotic arms 4004 and 40006 can each access either one of the two load locks 400840004. In embodiments the remaining handoff module 7008 could be a single level handoff module.



FIG. 17B shows another load lock layout. In this figure wafers 31008 can be entered and can exit at two levels on either side of the system, but follow a shared level in the rest of the system.



FIG. 18 details how the previous concept of stacked load locks 400840004 can be also implemented throughout a process by stacking two process modules 41006, 41008. Although such modules would not be compliant with the SEMI standard, such an architecture may offer significant benefits in equipment footprint and throughput.



FIG. 19 shows a system with two handling levels 4008, 40004, 4010, 42004: wafers may be independently transported between modules using either the top link 40006 or the bottom link 4004. Optionally, each handling level may have two load locks to provide the advantage of reduced evacuation speed noted above. Thus a system with four input load locks, two handling levels, and optionally four output load locks, is also contemplated by description provided herein, as are systems with additional load lock and handling levels.



FIG. 20 shows a top view of the system of FIG. 19.


Having thus described several illustrative embodiments, it is to be appreciated that various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to form a part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. While some examples presented herein involve specific combinations of functions or structural elements, it should be understood that those functions and elements may be combined in other ways according to the present invention to accomplish the same or different objectives. In particular, acts, elements, and features discussed in connection with one embodiment are not intended to be excluded from similar or other roles in other embodiments. Accordingly, the foregoing description and attached drawings are by way of example only, and the invention is to be interpreted in the broadest sense allowable by law.

Claims
  • 1. A apparatus comprising: an equipment front end module that forms an ambient atmospheric portion of the apparatus;a substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber that forms, at least in part, a vacuum portion of the apparatus and has four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber connecting a top plane and a bottom plane of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber, each facet having a substrate transport opening configured for sealed communication with substrate holding modules, each transport opening having a sealable valve;a robotic transport arm disposed within the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber, the robotic transport arm having a common substrate holder effecting each substrate transfer of the robotic transfer arm on a common substrate transfer plane through the substrate transport opening on each facet of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber;a load lock connected to a facet of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber for connecting the equipment front end module to the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber; anda second sealed transport chamber that forms, at least in part, the vacuum portion of the apparatus and has more than four facets and being communicably connected to one other facet of three remaining facets of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber through the sealable valve of the other facet of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber, wherein the robotic transport arm is configured to extend through the sealable valve on each facet of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber, each facet of the second sealed transport chamber having a substrate transport opening configured for sealed communication with other substrate holding modules.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the equipment front end module is configured to physically handle substrates in an atmospheric environment.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the robotic transport arm is configured for transferring substrates to and from the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the robotic transport arm comprises unequal length arm links.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the robotic transport arm comprises at least three arm links.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber and the second sealed transport chamber are configured to hold a vacuum atmosphere.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the second sealed transport chamber has six facets.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a transfer station configured to couple the second sealed transport chamber to the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the transfer station is further configured to perform one or more of a heating, a cooling, an aligning, an inspection, a metrology, a testing, or a cleaning operation on a substrate.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a rear exit handler and a second load lock, the second load lock coupling the rear exit handler to the second sealed transport chamber.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a controller arranged to cycle a number of sealable valves on the more than four facets of the second sealed transport chamber wherein a number of facets of the second transport chamber have a number of sealable valves on the more than four facets, cycled by the controller based on and effecting a processing capacity of process modules coupled to the second sealed chamber through the number of sealable valves and wherein the number of sealable valves on the more than four facets is such that cycles thereof balance with cycles of all the sealable valves, coupled to the each of the other two facets of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber, controlled based on and affecting another process capacity of other process modules coupled to the each of the other two facets of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber.
  • 12. An apparatus comprising: an equipment front end module that forms an ambient atmospheric portion of the apparatus;a substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber that forms, at least in part, a vacuum portion of the apparatus and has four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber connecting a top plane and a bottom plane of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber, each facet having a substrate transport opening configured for sealed communication, through a sealable valve, with substrate holding modules;a load lock connected to a facet of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber for connecting the equipment front end module to the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber;a second sealed transport chamber that forms, at least in part, the vacuum portion of the apparatus and has more than four facets and being communicably connected to one of the other three facets of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber through a respective sealable valve, each facet of the second sealed transport chamber having a substrate transport opening configured for sealed communication with other substrate holding modules; andan unequal length arm link compact SCARA robot transfer arm disposed in at least one of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber and the second sealed transport chamber, wherein the unequal length arm link compact SCARA robot transfer arm is configured to extend through the sealable valve between the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber and the second sealed transport chamber, the unequal length arm link compact SCARA robot transfer arm has a common substrate holder effecting each substrate transfer of the unequal length arm link compact SCARA robot transfer arm on a common substrate transfer plane through the sealable valve on each facet of the at least one of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber and the second sealed transport chamber and maintains a balanced processing capacity between the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber and the second sealed transport chamber with the common substrate holder.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the equipment front end module is configured to physically handle substrates in an atmospheric environment.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the unequal length arm link compact SCARA robot transfer arm includes at least three arm links.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the unequal length arm link compact SCARA robot transfer arm includes four arm links.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the unequal length arm link compact SCARA robot transfer arm is configured to hold more than one substrate.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the second sealed transport chamber has six facets.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising a transfer station configured to couple the second sealed transport chamber to the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the transfer station is further configured to perform one or more of a heating, a cooling, an aligning, an inspection, a metrology, a testing, or a cleaning operation on a substrate.
  • 20. The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising a rear exit handler and a second load lock, the second load lock coupling the rear exit handler to the second sealed transport chamber.
  • 21. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein at least one facet of at least one of the four facets of the substantially hexahedron shaped sealed transport chamber and the second sealed transport chamber includes stacked substrate transport openings.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/248,386 filed on Sep. 29, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,523,507 issued on Sep. 3, 2013) which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 12/239,717, filed Sep. 26, 2008 which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/679,829, filed Feb. 27, 2007, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/777,443, filed Feb. 27, 2006, and is also a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/985,834, filed Nov. 10, 2004, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to prior U.S. provisional application Ser. Nos. 60/518,823, filed Nov. 10, 2003, 60/607,649, filed Sep. 7, 2004 and 60/975,350, filed Sep. 26, 2007 the disclosures of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (588)
Number Name Date Kind
3294670 Charschan et al. Dec 1966 A
3310227 Norman Mar 1967 A
3521765 Kauffman et al. Jul 1970 A
3581014 Vogel et al. May 1971 A
3584847 Hammond et al. Jun 1971 A
3740617 Teramoto et al. Jun 1973 A
3796163 Meyer et al. Mar 1974 A
3834555 Bennington et al. Sep 1974 A
3874525 Hassan et al. Apr 1975 A
3925182 Carmichael et al. Dec 1975 A
3932843 Trelut et al. Jan 1976 A
3968018 Lane et al. Jul 1976 A
4015558 Small et al. Apr 1977 A
4184448 Aichert et al. Jan 1980 A
4275978 Brooks et al. Jun 1981 A
4299533 Ohnaka Nov 1981 A
4318767 Hijikata et al. Mar 1982 A
4392776 Shum Jul 1983 A
4398720 Jones et al. Aug 1983 A
4425624 Planche Jan 1984 A
4433951 Koch et al. Feb 1984 A
4529460 Hasegawa et al. Jul 1985 A
4584045 Richards Apr 1986 A
4632624 Mirkovich et al. Dec 1986 A
4664578 Kakehi May 1987 A
4666366 Davis May 1987 A
4682927 Southworth et al. Jul 1987 A
4701096 Fisher, Jr. Oct 1987 A
4702668 Carlisle et al. Oct 1987 A
4712971 Fyler Dec 1987 A
4722298 Rubin et al. Feb 1988 A
4724322 Knowles et al. Feb 1988 A
4727993 Mirkovich et al. Mar 1988 A
4730976 Davis et al. Mar 1988 A
4749465 Flint et al. Jun 1988 A
4763276 Perreirra et al. Aug 1988 A
4775281 Prentakis Oct 1988 A
4809193 Jourjine Feb 1989 A
4813732 Klem Mar 1989 A
4817556 Mears et al. Apr 1989 A
4819167 Cheng et al. Apr 1989 A
4825808 Takahashi et al. May 1989 A
4826360 Iwasawa et al. May 1989 A
4831270 Weisenberger May 1989 A
4836233 Milgate, III Jun 1989 A
4875825 Tullis et al. Oct 1989 A
4884216 Kuperstein Nov 1989 A
4909701 Hardegen et al. Mar 1990 A
4917556 Stark et al. Apr 1990 A
4951601 Maydan et al. Aug 1990 A
5013210 Bond May 1991 A
5019233 Blake et al. May 1991 A
5020475 Crabb et al. Jun 1991 A
5036006 Sanford et al. Jul 1991 A
5044871 Davis et al. Sep 1991 A
5058526 Matsushita et al. Oct 1991 A
5064340 Genov Nov 1991 A
5067218 Williams Nov 1991 A
5076205 Vowles et al. Dec 1991 A
5135349 Lorenz et al. Aug 1992 A
5180275 Czech et al. Jan 1993 A
5183547 Ikeda Feb 1993 A
5218709 Fijany et al. Jun 1993 A
5227708 Lowrance Jul 1993 A
5234303 Koyano Aug 1993 A
5256204 Wu Oct 1993 A
5259881 Edwards et al. Nov 1993 A
5280983 Maydan et al. Jan 1994 A
5286296 Sato et al. Feb 1994 A
5286344 Blalock et al. Feb 1994 A
5292393 Maydan et al. Mar 1994 A
5308431 Maher et al. May 1994 A
5314541 Saito et al. May 1994 A
5314986 Ooms et al. May 1994 A
5333986 Mizukami et al. Aug 1994 A
5340261 Oosawa et al. Aug 1994 A
5344365 Scott et al. Sep 1994 A
5344542 Maher et al. Sep 1994 A
5364222 Akimoto et al. Nov 1994 A
5367612 Bozich et al. Nov 1994 A
5372471 Wu Dec 1994 A
5377425 Kawakami et al. Jan 1995 A
5382806 Bacchi et al. Jan 1995 A
5391035 Krueger Feb 1995 A
5399531 Wu Mar 1995 A
5405230 Ono et al. Apr 1995 A
5417537 Miller May 1995 A
5426720 Bozich et al. Jun 1995 A
5426865 Ikeda et al. Jun 1995 A
5431529 Eastman et al. Jul 1995 A
5432887 Khaw Jul 1995 A
5433020 Leech, Jr. Jul 1995 A
5435683 Oosawa et al. Jul 1995 A
5439547 Kumagai Aug 1995 A
5442730 Bigus Aug 1995 A
5447409 Grunes et al. Sep 1995 A
5447431 Muka Sep 1995 A
5448681 Khan Sep 1995 A
5452078 Cheng Sep 1995 A
5467833 Crain Nov 1995 A
5474410 Ozawa et al. Dec 1995 A
5483138 Scmookler et al. Jan 1996 A
5486080 Sieradzki Jan 1996 A
5511005 Abbe et al. Apr 1996 A
5511147 Abdel-Malek Apr 1996 A
5524176 Narita et al. Jun 1996 A
5526254 Sato et al. Jun 1996 A
5534761 Crippa Jul 1996 A
5538390 Salzman Jul 1996 A
5539975 Kukuljan et al. Jul 1996 A
5546179 Cheng Aug 1996 A
5558482 Hiroki et al. Sep 1996 A
5562800 Kawamura et al. Oct 1996 A
5563798 Berken et al. Oct 1996 A
5566275 Kano Oct 1996 A
5571325 Ueyama et al. Nov 1996 A
5577879 Eastman et al. Nov 1996 A
5584647 Uehara Dec 1996 A
5586585 Bonora et al. Dec 1996 A
5606646 Khan et al. Feb 1997 A
5609689 Kato et al. Mar 1997 A
5636960 Hiroki et al. Jun 1997 A
5653894 Ibbotson et al. Aug 1997 A
5654903 Reitman et al. Aug 1997 A
5657553 Tarui et al. Aug 1997 A
5668056 Wu et al. Sep 1997 A
5668452 Villarreal et al. Sep 1997 A
5691897 Brown et al. Nov 1997 A
5695564 Imahashi Dec 1997 A
5700127 Harada et al. Dec 1997 A
5701400 Amado Dec 1997 A
5706201 Andrews Jan 1998 A
5717832 Steimle et al. Feb 1998 A
5720590 Hofmeister Feb 1998 A
5737496 Frye et al. Apr 1998 A
5740062 Berken et al. Apr 1998 A
5751003 Rose et al. May 1998 A
5765982 Martin et al. Jun 1998 A
5765983 Caveney et al. Jun 1998 A
5781432 Keeler et al. Jul 1998 A
5801945 Comer Sep 1998 A
5810549 Wytman Sep 1998 A
5814733 Khoury et al. Sep 1998 A
5820679 Yokoyama et al. Oct 1998 A
5882165 Maydan et al. Mar 1999 A
5882171 Tinner et al. Mar 1999 A
5882413 Beaulieu et al. Mar 1999 A
5888048 Martin et al. Mar 1999 A
5894348 Bacchi et al. Apr 1999 A
5894760 Caveney Apr 1999 A
5895596 Stoddard et al. Apr 1999 A
5897710 Sato et al. Apr 1999 A
5899658 Hofmeister May 1999 A
5900105 Toshima May 1999 A
5917601 Shimazaki et al. Jun 1999 A
5931627 Okada et al. Aug 1999 A
5943659 Giles et al. Aug 1999 A
5944857 Edwards et al. Aug 1999 A
5957651 Takebayashi et al. Sep 1999 A
5982492 Oppenheimer et al. Sep 1999 A
5971584 Iriuchijima et al. Oct 1999 A
5976199 Wu et al. Nov 1999 A
5980194 Freerks et al. Nov 1999 A
5980195 Miyashita Nov 1999 A
5989346 Hiroki Nov 1999 A
5997589 Tien Dec 1999 A
6002840 Hofmeister Dec 1999 A
6006016 Faigon et al. Dec 1999 A
6013920 Gordon et al. Jan 2000 A
6017820 Ting et al. Jan 2000 A
6042623 Edwards Mar 2000 A
6045315 Azumano et al. Apr 2000 A
6048154 Wytman Apr 2000 A
6048162 Molsehi Apr 2000 A
6053686 Kyogoku Apr 2000 A
6053687 Kirkpatrick et al. Apr 2000 A
6053980 Suda et al. Apr 2000 A
6059507 Adams May 2000 A
6062798 Muka May 2000 A
6066210 Yonemitsu et al. May 2000 A
6073366 Aswad Jun 2000 A
6073828 Ma et al. Jun 2000 A
6076652 Head, III Jun 2000 A
6079927 Muka Jun 2000 A
6079928 Theriault et al. Jun 2000 A
6082950 Altwood et al. Jul 2000 A
6103055 Maher et al. Aug 2000 A
6105454 Bacchi Aug 2000 A
6108006 Hoppe Aug 2000 A
6110214 Klimasauskas Aug 2000 A
6119532 Park et al. Sep 2000 A
6122566 Nguyen et al. Sep 2000 A
6122724 Kawasaki et al. Sep 2000 A
6125551 Bushong et al. Oct 2000 A
6126380 Hillman Oct 2000 A
6126381 Bacchi et al. Oct 2000 A
6128016 Coelho et al. Oct 2000 A
6132165 Carducci Oct 2000 A
6135854 Masumura et al. Oct 2000 A
6142722 Genov et al. Nov 2000 A
6146077 Shin et al. Nov 2000 A
6149367 Begin Nov 2000 A
6149379 Shin et al. Nov 2000 A
6155131 Suwa et al. Dec 2000 A
6155768 Bacchi et al. Dec 2000 A
6161051 Hafemann et al. Dec 2000 A
6166509 Wyka et al. Dec 2000 A
6167322 Holbrooks Dec 2000 A
6190037 Das et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190104 Ikeda et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198074 Savas Mar 2001 B1
6203268 Miyashita Mar 2001 B1
6215498 Filo et al. Apr 2001 B1
6224312 Sundar May 2001 B1
6227793 Knighten May 2001 B1
6234107 Tanaka et al. May 2001 B1
6235634 White et al. May 2001 B1
6238161 Kirkpatrick et al. May 2001 B1
6242748 Gallagher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246972 Klimasauskas Jun 2001 B1
6249712 Boiquaye Jun 2001 B1
6250869 Kroeker Jun 2001 B1
6253464 Klebanoff et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256555 Bacchi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6257045 Hosokawa et al. Jul 2001 B1
6257827 Hendrickson et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260144 Pitchenik et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264748 Kuriki et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266634 Buchsbaum et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267546 Oxyer et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267549 Brown et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269351 Black Jul 2001 B1
6270306 Otwell et al. Aug 2001 B1
6277199 Lei et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281651 Haanpaa et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282459 Ballantine et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283355 Ma et al. Sep 2001 B1
6286230 White et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293291 Sperlich et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293749 Raaijmakers et al. Sep 2001 B1
6296735 Marxer et al. Oct 2001 B1
6297611 Todorov Oct 2001 B1
6299404 Muka et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309161 Hofmeister Oct 2001 B1
6312525 Bright et al. Nov 2001 B1
6313596 Wyka et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315512 Tabrizi et al. Nov 2001 B1
6318951 Schmidt et al. Nov 2001 B1
6338626 Saeki Jan 2002 B1
6339730 Matsushima Jan 2002 B1
6345239 Bowman-amuah Feb 2002 B1
6360144 Bacchi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366830 Bacchi et al. Apr 2002 B2
6374144 Viviani et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375746 Stevens et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379095 Elliott et al. Apr 2002 B1
6382895 Konishi et al. May 2002 B1
6390767 Alper et al. May 2002 B1
6393337 Perlov et al. May 2002 B1
6396232 Haanpaa et al. May 2002 B2
6396516 Beatty May 2002 B1
6400115 Yamazoe Jun 2002 B1
6405101 Johanson et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415193 Betawar et al. Jul 2002 B1
6425722 Ueda et al. Jul 2002 B1
6439824 Harris et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440178 Berner et al. Aug 2002 B2
6440261 Tepman et al. Aug 2002 B1
6443686 Wiesler et al. Sep 2002 B1
6446055 Grand Sep 2002 B1
6450750 Heyder et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453214 Bacchi et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456894 Nulman Sep 2002 B1
6460550 Nguyen Oct 2002 B2
6467605 Head, III Oct 2002 B1
6471422 Ueda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477685 Lovelace Nov 2002 B1
6481956 Hofmeister Nov 2002 B1
6485250 Hofmeister Nov 2002 B2
6486444 Fairbairn et al. Nov 2002 B1
6494666 Wu et al. Dec 2002 B2
6494670 Kroeker Dec 2002 B2
6500996 Brown et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501070 Bacchi et al. Dec 2002 B1
6502054 Mooring et al. Dec 2002 B1
6503365 Kim et al. Jan 2003 B1
6506009 Nulman et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514032 Saino et al. Feb 2003 B1
6516244 Yoo et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517304 Matsumoto Feb 2003 B1
6519504 Soraoka et al. Feb 2003 B1
6522942 Kondo et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524051 Nering Feb 2003 B2
6530365 Vanmoor Mar 2003 B2
6530732 Theriault et al. Mar 2003 B1
6533530 Zenpo Mar 2003 B1
6540869 Saeki et al. Apr 2003 B2
6547510 Beaulieu Apr 2003 B1
6549825 Kurata Apr 2003 B2
6558509 Kraus et al. May 2003 B2
6575177 Brown et al. Jun 2003 B1
6575689 Harris et al. Jun 2003 B2
6581048 Werbos Jun 2003 B1
6584369 Patel et al. Jun 2003 B2
6584416 Morford Jun 2003 B2
6585828 Kurita et al. Jul 2003 B1
6586336 Jeong Jul 2003 B2
6592673 Welch et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601888 Mcilwraith et al. Aug 2003 B2
6609876 Mages et al. Aug 2003 B2
6618645 Bacchi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621509 Eiref et al. Sep 2003 B1
6632065 Cameron et al. Oct 2003 B1
6637998 Langan et al. Oct 2003 B2
6640151 Somekh et al. Oct 2003 B1
6641328 Smith et al. Nov 2003 B1
6641348 Schultz et al. Nov 2003 B1
6641746 Houge et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643563 Hosek et al. Nov 2003 B2
6663333 Kinnard et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669434 Namba et al. Dec 2003 B2
6678572 Oh Jan 2004 B1
6684127 Fujita et al. Jan 2004 B2
6694224 Ramanan Feb 2004 B2
6697517 Hunter Feb 2004 B1
6705816 Nguyen et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719516 Kroeker Apr 2004 B2
6719517 Beaulieu et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723172 Mayes Apr 2004 B2
6729824 Lei et al. May 2004 B2
6735482 Erten et al. May 2004 B1
6736582 Mages et al. May 2004 B1
6738682 Pasadyn May 2004 B1
6742977 Okayama et al. Jun 2004 B1
6742980 Saski Jun 2004 B2
6744228 Cahill et al. Jun 2004 B1
6758113 Choy et al. Jul 2004 B2
6760796 Rossmann et al. Jul 2004 B1
6761085 Tan Jul 2004 B1
6765222 Bacchi et al. Jul 2004 B2
6767170 Kostler et al. Jul 2004 B2
6779962 Poole Aug 2004 B2
6784418 Bacchi et al. Aug 2004 B2
6796400 Ito et al. Sep 2004 B2
6802934 Saeki et al. Oct 2004 B2
6813543 Aalund et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815661 Bacchi et al. Nov 2004 B2
6822413 Simondet Nov 2004 B2
6827788 Takahashi Dec 2004 B2
6837663 Mages et al. Jan 2005 B2
6840732 Minami et al. Jan 2005 B2
6841006 Barnes et al. Jan 2005 B2
6841485 Inoue et al. Jan 2005 B1
6845292 Sha et al. Jan 2005 B2
6852194 Matsushita et al. Feb 2005 B2
6853920 Hsiung et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856858 Kurita Feb 2005 B2
6863485 Mizokawa et al. Mar 2005 B2
6869263 Gilchrist Mar 2005 B2
6877946 Kinnard et al. Apr 2005 B2
6883776 Aggarwal et al. Apr 2005 B2
6889447 Lee et al. May 2005 B2
6898487 Bacchi et al. May 2005 B2
6900459 Farnworth et al. May 2005 B2
6900877 Raaijmakers May 2005 B2
6913243 Tomasch Jul 2005 B1
6918731 Talmer Jul 2005 B2
6924463 Donald et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932558 Wu Aug 2005 B2
6934606 Genetti et al. Aug 2005 B1
6941199 Bottomley et al. Sep 2005 B1
6944584 Tenney et al. Sep 2005 B1
6949143 Kurita et al. Sep 2005 B1
6949844 Cahill et al. Sep 2005 B2
6950716 Ward et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952656 Cordova et al. Oct 2005 B1
6952688 Goldman et al. Oct 2005 B1
6954711 Beinglass et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959225 Logsdon et al. Oct 2005 B1
6960057 Hofmeister Nov 2005 B1
6962644 Paterson et al. Nov 2005 B2
6969227 Kinnard et al. Nov 2005 B2
6976400 Tan Dec 2005 B1
6979165 Larson et al. Dec 2005 B2
6979168 Uchimaki et al. Dec 2005 B2
6985779 Hsiung et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990430 Hosek Jan 2006 B2
6996456 Cordell et al. Feb 2006 B2
7025554 Ozawa et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031778 Hsiung et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032614 Lappen et al. Apr 2006 B2
7047093 Nakamoto et al. May 2006 B2
7047099 Shanmugasundram et al. May 2006 B2
7102124 Bacchi et al. Sep 2006 B2
7194396 Watanabe et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198448 Ozawa et al. Apr 2007 B2
7207766 Kurita et al. Apr 2007 B2
7210246 van der Meulen May 2007 B2
7230441 Carlson-stevermer Jun 2007 B2
7245989 Hosek et al. Jul 2007 B2
7283255 Ramsey et al. Oct 2007 B2
7293950 Bonora et al. Nov 2007 B2
7299104 Tezuka et al. Nov 2007 B2
7316748 Li et al. Jan 2008 B2
7331751 Tamura Feb 2008 B2
7337019 Reiss et al. Feb 2008 B2
7359759 Cheng et al. Apr 2008 B2
7373220 Watanabe et al. May 2008 B2
7376472 Wojsznis et al. May 2008 B2
7383751 Hashimoto Jun 2008 B2
7387484 Ho et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398259 Nugent Jul 2008 B2
7419346 Danna et al. Sep 2008 B2
7422406 van der Meulen Sep 2008 B2
7441219 Perry et al. Oct 2008 B2
7458763 van der Meulen Dec 2008 B2
7461040 Goldman et al. Dec 2008 B1
7467916 Yamagishi et al. Dec 2008 B2
7575406 Hofmeister et al. Aug 2009 B2
7607879 Hall et al. Oct 2009 B2
7619094 Chen et al. Nov 2009 B2
7622006 Ishizawa et al. Nov 2009 B2
7655092 Fairbairn et al. Feb 2010 B2
7665951 Kurita et al. Feb 2010 B2
7748944 Price et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769482 Pannese et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792350 Kiley et al. Sep 2010 B2
7792608 Rice et al. Sep 2010 B2
7815739 Matsuura Oct 2010 B2
7841820 Bonora et al. Nov 2010 B2
7874781 Nozawa et al. Jan 2011 B2
7905960 Choi et al. Mar 2011 B2
7959395 Hofmeister et al. Jun 2011 B2
8398355 Holtkamp et al. Mar 2013 B2
8562271 Hofmeister Oct 2013 B2
8771804 Dordi Jul 2014 B2
9248568 Caveney Feb 2016 B2
9325228 Hudgens Apr 2016 B2
20010002358 Hempel et al. May 2001 A1
20010014269 Hartlage et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010020199 Bacchi et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010038783 Nakashima et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010041120 Hofmeister Nov 2001 A1
20010048867 Lebar et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010053324 Saeki et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002422 Kondo et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020005168 Kraus et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020006323 Yoshida et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020021959 Schauer et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020043274 Mayes Apr 2002 A1
20020048506 Babbs et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020055084 Fischer et al. May 2002 A1
20020068992 Hine et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020094265 Momoki Jul 2002 A1
20020103571 Yoo et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111811 Bares et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020131848 Kurata Sep 2002 A1
20020138175 Fugita et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147534 Delcheccolo et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165636 Hasan Nov 2002 A1
20020192056 Reimer et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020192059 Foster et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030012624 Kinnard et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030053893 Matsunaga et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060922 Schauer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030063965 Langan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030077150 Matsuda et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030082466 del Puerto et al. May 2003 A1
20030083776 Schauer et al. May 2003 A1
20030088530 Ramanan May 2003 A1
20030129045 Bonora et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030130761 Schauer Jul 2003 A1
20030131458 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030167102 Johnson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030168173 Tamura Sep 2003 A1
20030171972 Heskin Sep 2003 A1
20030173512 Bacchi et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030176940 Rangachari et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030035705 Johnson Dec 2003 A1
20040013497 Shirai Jan 2004 A1
20040020601 Zhao Feb 2004 A1
20040052632 Kinnard et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055537 Kurita et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040062627 Aggarwal et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040067127 Hofmeister et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040069225 Fairbairn et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040076505 Kinnard et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040091343 Astegno et al. May 2004 A1
20040107766 Bonne et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040151562 Hofmeister et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040151574 Lu Aug 2004 A1
20040175946 Mayes Sep 2004 A1
20040179933 Huang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040206307 Boroson Oct 2004 A1
20040221871 Fletcher et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040238122 Ishizawa Dec 2004 A1
20040240971 Tezuka et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261944 Wakabayashi et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050095087 Sullivan et al. May 2005 A1
20050105991 Hofmeister et al. May 2005 A1
20050111938 van der Meulen May 2005 A1
20050113964 van der Meulen May 2005 A1
20050113976 van der Meulen May 2005 A1
20050118000 Kasai et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050118009 van der Meulen Jun 2005 A1
20050120578 van der Meulen Jun 2005 A1
20050194096 Price et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203664 Schauer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050222933 Wesby Oct 2005 A1
20050223837 van der Meulen Oct 2005 A1
20050286993 Minami et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060016720 Naito Jan 2006 A1
20060099063 Pietrantonio et al. May 2006 A1
20060156979 Thakur et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060177288 Parker et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060241813 Babu et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060246683 Pan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060250401 Pannese et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263177 van der Meulen Nov 2006 A1
20060279573 Pannese et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279574 Pannese et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279575 Pannese et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060279576 Pannese et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070017445 Takehara Jan 2007 A1
20070067678 Hosek et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070071581 Gilchrist et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073430 Govind et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070093430 Chen et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070135932 Pannese Jun 2007 A1
20070135933 Pannese et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070141748 Rice Jun 2007 A1
20070147979 Rice et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070160447 Amikura et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070264106 van der Meulen Nov 2007 A1
20070269297 van der Meulen et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070282480 Pannese et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070285673 Kiley et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070286710 van der Meulen et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080014055 van der Meulen Jan 2008 A1
20080085173 van der Meulen Apr 2008 A1
20080124193 van der Meulen et al. May 2008 A1
20080124194 van der Meulen et al. May 2008 A1
20080124195 van der Meulen et al. May 2008 A1
20080124196 van der Meulen et al. May 2008 A1
20080124197 van der Meulen et al. May 2008 A1
20080131237 van der Meulen Jun 2008 A1
20080131238 van der Meulen Jun 2008 A1
20080134075 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080134076 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080135788 Fogel Jun 2008 A1
20080138175 Mitchell et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080138178 Ferrara et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080145192 van de Meulen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080145194 Kiley et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147333 van der Meulen et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080147580 Pannese Jun 2008 A1
20080155442 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155443 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155444 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155445 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155446 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155447 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155448 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155449 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080155450 Pannese et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080163094 Pannese et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080163095 Pannese et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080163096 Pannese et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080167890 Pannese et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080175694 Park et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080187417 van de Meulen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080187418 van de Meulen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208372 Pannese Aug 2008 A1
20080219806 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219807 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219808 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219809 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219810 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219811 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219812 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080226429 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080231866 Fogel Sep 2008 A1
20080232933 Kiley Sep 2008 A1
20080232947 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080232948 van der Meulen et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080253868 Talmer Oct 2008 A1
20080255798 Buzan Oct 2008 A1
20120213614 Bonora et al. Aug 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
4333820 Apr 1994 DE
0506045 Sep 1992 EP
0597637 May 1994 EP
6338555 Dec 1994 JP
7099224 Nov 1995 JP
7172578 Nov 1995 JP
7211762 Nov 1995 JP
2000177842 Jun 2000 JP
2002270672 Sep 2002 JP
2003150219 May 2003 JP
200593807 Apr 2005 JP
WO 03017354 Feb 2003 WO
2004114739 Dec 2004 WO
2005048313 May 2005 WO
2005091337 Sep 2005 WO
2006121931 Nov 2006 WO
2007070812 Jun 2007 WO
2007101228 Sep 2007 WO
2007103870 Sep 2007 WO
2007103887 Sep 2007 WO
2007103896 Sep 2007 WO
2008030637 Mar 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (61)
Entry
Walsh, et al., “An Automated System for Loading Atomoscan Process Tubes Using Intrabay Material Handling Technologies”, IEEE, (1992) 18 pages.
Gardner, “Semiconductor Factory Automation: Designing for Phased Automation”, IEEE, (1996), pp. 207-213.
USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,904.
Supplementary European Search Report; Application No. EP04818697; dated Apr. 4, 2011.
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 1, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/832,491.
USPTO Office Action, dated Jun. 10, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,491.
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 19, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/382,491.
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 16, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 11/846,290.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 25, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/846,290.
USPTO Office Action, dated Jan. 31, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,834.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 2, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,834.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,839.
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 30, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,839.
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 5, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,382.
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 17, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 12/206,382.
Kumar, Rajeev: “A Neural Net Complier System for Hierarchical Organization,” ACM SIGPLAN Notices vol. 36(2), (Feb. 2001), pp. 26-36.
Harper, et al. “Flexible Material Handling Automation in Wafer Fabrication”, Solid State Technology, Veeco Integrated Automation, Inc., Dallas, TX, (Jul. 1994), pp. 89-94.
Weiss, Mitchell. “The Automated Semiconductor Fabricator Circa 2020”, PRI Automation, Inc. Billerica, MA.
ITRS Factory Integration TWG. “ITRS 2001 Factory Integration Chapter Material: Handling Backup Section”, (Oct. 20, 2005).
International Search Report, PCT/US2006/061960, (dated Jul. 11, 2008).
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 28, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/427,723.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 23, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,966.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 23, 2007; U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,136.
International Search Report, PCT/US2006/017543, (dated Sep. 25, 2007).
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, (2003), p. 360.
Baglivo, et al. “An Integrated Hardware/Software Platform for Both Simulation and Real-Time Autonomous Guided Vehicle Navigation”, ECMS, 19th European Conference on Modeling and Simulation, (Jun. 2005), pp. 1-6.
Gholkar, et al. “Hardware-in-Loop Simulator for Mini Aerial Vehicle”, Center for Aerospace Systems Design and Engineering, (2004), pp. 1-6.
Hong, et al. “A PC-Based Open Robot Control System: PC-ORC”, Science Direct, (Jun. 2001), pp. 1901-1906.
Samaka, M. “Robot Task-Level Programming Language and Simulation”, PWASET vol. 9, (Nov. 2005), pp. 99-103.
Morandini, et al. “A Real-Time Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulator for Robotics Applications”, Mulitbody Dynamics 2005, ECCOMAS Thematic Conference, (Jun. 2005), pp. 1-11.
USPTO Office Action, dated Jul. 10, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,966.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 6, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,463.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 18, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/032,405.
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 3, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,730.
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 9, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,844.
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 18, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,854.
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 18, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,865.
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,886.
USPTO Office Action, dated Sep. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,887.
International Search Report, PCT/US2006/061960, dated Sep. 4, 2008.
USPTO Office Action, dated Aug. 27, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,966.
Baglivo, et al. “An Integrated Hardware/Software Platform for Both Simulation and Real-Time Autonomous Guided Vehicles Navigation”, ECMS 2005, 19th European Conference on Modeling and Simluation, (Jun. 2005), pp. 1-6.
USPTO Notice of Alloance, dated Jun. 19, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,839.
Grabowski, Ralph. “Using AutoCAD 2005: Basics”, Autodesk Press, (Aug. 17, 2004), p. 213.
USPTO Notice of Allowance, dated Sep. 28, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 10/985,834.
USPTO Office Action, dated Jun. 20, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,869.
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 27, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,876.
USPTO Office Action, dated May 23, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,896.
USPTO Office Action, dated Dec. 2, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,915.
USPTO Office Action, dated Apr. 3, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,902.
USPTO Final Office Action, dated May 25, 2012, U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,516.
USPTO Final Office Action, dated Jun. 2, 2011, U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,541.
USPTO Final Office Action, dated Dec. 24, 2008, U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,582.
West, et al. “Design Issues Associated with Neural Network Systems Applied Within the Electronics Manufacturing Domain”, Sep. 2000, Journal of Electronics Manufacturing, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 19-48.
Maimon, et al. “A Neural Network Approach for a Robot Task Sequencing Problem”, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 14 (2000), pp. 175-189.
Zhou, et al. “Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Scheduling, and Control of Semiconductor Manufacturing Systems: A Petri Net Approach”, Aug. 1998, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 333-357.
Westkamper, et al. “Chapter 28: Production, Planning and Control with Learning Technologies: Simulation and Optimization of Complex Production Processes in Knowledge-Based Systems”, Academic Press, vol. 3, (2000) pp. 839-887.
International Search Report, PCT/US2007/067965, dated Oct. 1, 2008.
Hesselroth, et al. “Neural Network Control of a Pneumatic Robot Arm”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 24, No. 1, (Jan. 1994) pp. 28-38.
“PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration, PCT/US04/37672”, International Searching Authority dated Dec. 19, 2005.
USPTO Office Action dated Jul. 3, 2008; U.S. Appl. No. 11/876,910.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130343841 A1 Dec 2013 US
Provisional Applications (4)
Number Date Country
60777443 Feb 2006 US
60518823 Nov 2003 US
60607649 Sep 2004 US
60975350 Sep 2007 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12239717 Sep 2008 US
Child 13248386 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13248386 Sep 2011 US
Child 14014910 US
Continuation in Parts (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 11679829 Feb 2007 US
Child 12239717 US
Parent 10985834 Nov 2004 US
Child 11679829 US