This specification relates to semiconductor process fabrication, and more particularly to fabricating bumps for integrated circuits, as in die packaging.
During a die packaging process, several conductive layers may be placed between the substrate of a die and the surrounding package. The die package can be soldered with a conductive layer and the soldered layer may contact a lower-level conducting layer. The lower-level conducting layer may be patterned to have one or more conducting bumps, and may be referred to as a “bump” layer. A bump may contact a base layer metal (BLM) that is directly or indirectly connected to the substrate. The bump and the base layer metal may have one or more properties that may result in one or more electromigration issues or degradation of the layers.
The techniques, methods, and structures of one or more exemplary implementations in the present disclosure relate to integrated circuits and die packaging. In particular, one or more exemplary implementations relate to fabricating bumps on a substrate to prevent Cu and Sn intermixing. One or more exemplary implementations in the present disclosure may reduce a number of electromigration issues relating to CuSn intermetallic formation, and may reduce the formation of whiskers in one or more layers.
The details of one or more exemplary implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. In one exemplary implementation, an apparatus comprises a semiconductor substrate and a first conducting layer in contact with the semiconductor substrate. The first conducting layer may comprise a base layer metal, such as Cu. The apparatus further comprises a diffusion barrier in contact with the first conducting layer, a wetting layer on top of the diffusion barrier, and a bump layer on top of the wetting layer. The bump layer may include Sn, and the Sn bump layer may be electroplated. The diffusion barrier may prevent Cu and Sn from diffusing through the diffusion barrier. The diffusion barrier may also be able to suppress a whisker-type formation in the bump layer. Other features and advantages of one or more exemplary implementations will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In semiconductor wafer processing, devices and interconnects are formed on a substrate and are electrically connected to a die package. An electrical connection to a die package may be achieved with a conducting solder layer between the die package and a lower-level conducting interconnect layer on the wafer. The solder layer may oftentimes include Sn or a Sn alloy. The conducting interconnect layer, or an adjacent conducting layer, may oftentimes include Cu. In some cases, the conducting interconnect layer may be the lowest level metal layer or the metal layer that is in closest proximity to the substrate. Such a metal layer may be referred to as a base layer metal (BLM). In some cases, the base layer metal may be used as a diffusion barrier to prevent solder from migrating into a lower-level pad of the die. The pad of the die may include one or more layers of metal, such as an Al layer. In one or more exemplary implementations of the present disclosure, a layer may be formed on top of the base layer metal to serve as a diffusion barrier between Cu in the base layer metal and Sn in a layer above the diffusion barrier.
A die package interconnect structure with Sn in one layer and Cu in a nearby layer may result in one or more detrimental issues for the die package interconnect. Some of these detrimental issues may degrade the electrical and mechanical properties of the die package interconnect, reduce the yield of forming such interconnects, or even form irregular, unintended regions such as whiskers and delaminations. Delamination may involve the degradation or the physical separation of one or more layers. Some of these detrimental issues are exemplified in
Some failures in die package interconnects may be electromigration-related failures and other failures may be due to the properties of the layer materials and the interfacing of layers. Some electromigration-related failures may be due to the metallurgical properties of the layers 125, 110, increased heat and thermal issues, and the growth of one or more voids 120 between the layers 125, 110. Electromigration in region 115 may create higher current densities and increase electromagnetic stress. As described below in one or more exemplary implementations, methods, structures, and techniques are presented to reduce electromigration-related die package interconnect failures.
Certain metallurgical properties of one or more layers of die package interconnects may result in die package interconnect failure. Examples of such metallurgical properties include non-conforming surfaces, phase transitions of materials at different temperatures, and diffusion and intermixing of elements of different layers. For instance, Sn can be a common metal used in one or more die package interconnect layers. However, Sn may exist in two allotropes at different temperatures. Above a temperature of about 13.2° C., the hard, shiny, and conductive alpha Sn (tetragonal structure, α-phase Sn) may be in a stable phase. When the temperature is below 13.2° C., beta Sn (diamond cubic structure, β phase Sn) may be thermodynamically favorable. The alpha phase is a preferred phase in a layer structure. The alpha to beta phase transformation may be accompanied by a 26% volume increase due to different densities of two phases. The change in volume in the phase transition may deform the interface between Sn and other layers. Also, beta Sn is in powder form and does not have the mechanical strength for an interconnect. Hence, when the Sn is in beta phase, the mechanical strength of the Sn layer and the interconnect deteriorates. For at least the above reasons, a Sn layer or interconnect can transition from alpha phase to beta phase during low temperatures and may lead to interconnect failure. As described below in one or more exemplary implementations, methods, techniques, and structures are presented to prevent low temperature phase transition of Sn.
Although bump 110 is shown as a solder bump in 100, the bump may be a bump or a bump layer that is not a solder layer, but a layer adjoining a solder layer. Moreover, the bump 110 may not be directly contacting the die package 105. As described in the figures below, the bump or bump layer could include other materials, such as Cu, and may contact directly to the base layer metal or other layer interconnects.
Some conventional techniques attempt to prevent the intermixing and diffusion of Cu and Sn from different die package interconnect layers. For instance, the use of Pb5Sn bumps may be used to prevent whisker formation. However, the use of Pb5Sn bumps may have electromigration issues that may result from low temperature phase transition of Sn, as described above. Moreover, Pb may contribute to environmental and health issues. In another conventional example, sputtered Ni may be used to prevent Cu diffusing into Sn. However, sputtered Ni has poor diffusion barrier properties and does not adequately prevent Cu and Sn diffusion or intermixing. As described below in one or more exemplary implementations, methods, techniques, and structures are presented to prevent the diffusion and intermixing of Cu and Sn between different die package interconnect layers.
One or more exemplary implementations in the present disclosure also present methods, techniques, and structures to prevent degradation of Sn bumps during etching of the base layer metal. In general, the corrosion and oxidation of the Sn bumps may be prevented during etching of a base layer metal that includes Ti, Al, or NiV.
A diffusion barrier layer 225 can be selectively positioned on top of the base layer metal 230. Selective deposition may mean that some surfaces may have another layer deposited only on a portion of that surface. The electroless diffusion barrier can prevent Cu and Sn from diffusing through the diffusion barrier. The diffusion barrier layer 225 may be electroless and located in a position to prevent the intermixing of Cu from the base layer metal 230 and Sn from the bump layer 215 or solder layer 210. The diffusion barrier layer 225 may prevent CuSn intermetallic formation and whisker formation. The diffusion barrier layer 225 may prevent bump delamination and improve the processing yield of fabricating die package interconnects. The diffusion barrier layer 225 may include, among others, any one of CoBP, CoWP, CoWB, CoWBP, NiBP, NiWP, NiWB, and NiWBP.
Electroless deposits may offer one or more advantages when deposited on irregularly shaped objects, patterns, and recesses. In electroless plating, electrons are supplied by a chemical reducing agent. In general, electroless plating may refer to a reduction of metal ions from a solution containing a reducing agent. The reducing agent can supply electrons by oxidation on a catalytic surface. Electroless deposits may have high uniformity and little to no compressive stress during plating. Electroless deposits tend to be uniform in thickness over all of the shape of the underlying structure, therefore providing more uniform current densities and reducing some electromigration issues. Electroless barriers may also offer the advantages of being low cost, selective, and amorphous.
The diffusion barrier may have other materials that may prevent or inhibit the diffusion of Sn with Cu through the diffusion barrier. For example, platable materials having slow reaction or diffusion with Sn and Cu may be used, such as metals from group VIII (e.g., Co, Ni, Fe, Ru, Rh, Ir, and Os) alloying with Group VI (e.g., W, Mo, and Cr) and metalloid (e.g., B, P, and N).
A wetting layer (not shown) may be placed on top to the diffusion barrier layer 225. The wetting layer may also be selectively deposited on portions of the diffusion barrier layer 225. The wetting layer may include any one of CoB, NiB, and NiP.
A bump layer 215 is placed on top of the wetting layer and a solder layer 210 is placed on top of the bump layer 215. The die package 220 is on top of and electrically connected to the solder layer 210. Electrical connection to the die package 220 may allow current to flow between the die package and devices and interconnects near or on the substrate. Sn may be in the bump layer 215, the solder layer 210, or in both layers 210, 215.
In one or more exemplary implementations in the present disclosure, Sn may be electroplated to suppress whisker formation and related electromigration failures. The electroplating of Sn may also prevent low temperature (e.g., around 13.2° C.) phase transition of Sn and prevent mechanical and electromigration failures related to beta Sn. The electroplating of Sn may include Sn and the alloys of Sn, such as 0.7 Cu, Bi, Sb, and 3.5 Ag. Sn may be electroplated at a constant current (e.g., around 10-100 mA/cm2) or voltage from a solution containing Sn salt (e.g., Sn sulfate, Sn chloride), acid (e.g., sulfuric acid, sulfonic acid), and other additives (e.g., a suppressor, such as polyether glycol or grain refiner and an anti-oxidant).
A photoresist layer may then be deposited and patterned at 316. A diffusion barrier layer 225 can be formed at 318. The diffusion barrier layer 225 may be electroless and may include any one of CoBP, CoWP, CoWB, CoWBP, NiBP, NiWP, NiWB, and NiWBP. Then, a wetting layer can be deposited on the diffusion barrier layer 225 at 320. The wetting layer may include any one of CoB, NiB, CoP, and NiP. Electroplating of Sn or alloys of Sn can be performed at 322. Some alloys of Sn may include any one of 0.7 Cu, Bi, Sb, and 3.5 Ag. The photoresist may then be removed at 324 and the base layer metal 230 may be etched at 326.
Forming the die package interconnect 200 with the diffusion barrier layer 225 may entail using etching to pattern the base layer metal 230. The etching of the base layer metal 230 may reduce the degradation (e.g., corrosion or oxidation) of Sn bumps and polyimide.
A solder layer 410 may be formed above the Sn layer 435 and a package layer 420 may be connected to the solder layer 410. The package layer 420 is electrically connected to all of the other conductive layers 410, 435, 425, 415, 430 in the interconnect 400, allowing current to flow between the die package and devices and interconnects near or on the substrate 405.
At 524, the Sn layer 435 is formed and electroplated on top of the wetting layer. Electroplating the Sn layer 435 may provide similar advantages as described above for electroplating Sn in interconnect 200. Such similar advantages may include suppression of whisker formation and preventing low temperature phase transition of Sn. The photoresist may be removed at 516 and the base layer metal 430 may be etched at 528. A solder layer 410 may be formed above the Sn layer 435 and a package layer 420 may be connected to the solder layer 410. The solder layer 410 may contain Sn and may also be electroplated.
A solder layer 610 may be formed above the electroless diffusion barrier layer 625 and a package layer 620 may be connected to the solder layer 610. The solder layer 610 may include Sn and may be electroplated.
A number of implementations of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the processing order may vary from the processing order shown in
This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 12/973,615 file Dec. 20, 2010 which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 11/894,627, filed Aug. 20, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,580,679 issued Nov. 12, 2013 which is a Divisional application of Ser. No. 10/668,986, filed Sep. 22, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,276,801, Issued on Oct. 2, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4880708 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5346118 | Degani et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5376584 | Agarwala | Dec 1994 | A |
5384283 | Gegenwarth et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5470787 | Greer | Nov 1995 | A |
5530286 | Murakami et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5629564 | Nye et al. | May 1997 | A |
5775569 | Berger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6149122 | Berger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181012 | Edelstein et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6218281 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6285083 | Imai et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6335104 | Sambucetti et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6433427 | Wu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6528409 | Lopatin et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6548898 | Matsuki et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6614590 | Tatoh | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639315 | Kazama et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6689639 | Sakuyama et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716736 | Chen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740577 | Jin et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6797312 | Kong et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827252 | Tong et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6893799 | Danovitch et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
8546756 | Shur et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010008160 | Suzuki | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010012570 | Egitto | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020017790 | Holmes, IV et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020063332 | Yamaguchi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020127790 | Hongo et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030013290 | Greer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025202 | Mikage et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057551 | Datta et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030136814 | Furman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030155406 | Tong et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030219966 | Jin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050156315 | Lee et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070267651 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2007 | A9 |
20120267241 | Fredenberg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1320960 | Nov 2001 | CN |
1 148 548 | Oct 2001 | EP |
4-92432 | Mar 1992 | JP |
2005-175275 | Jul 1993 | JP |
6-140406 | May 1994 | JP |
2008-203020 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2011-219946 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11-340229 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-101014 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-188305 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-252313 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-353703 | Dec 2000 | JP |
2001-085390 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-93928 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-168515 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-267356 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001-320013 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-76046 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-203925 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-231855 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003-007755 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-124216 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-197665 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-203941 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-273158 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-330784 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2006-140409 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2010-267996 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2011-510321 | Mar 2011 | JP |
WO 20030009379 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Allowance (3 pages) dated Jan. 4, 2017 from the Japanese Patent Office for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-106328. |
Appeal Decision (16 pages) from the Japan Patent Office dated Nov. 29, 2016 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-9733 and English Translation (3 pages) thereof. |
First Official Action from the Japanese Patent Office dated Apr. 28, 2016, Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-106238 and English Translation thereof. |
First Official Action from the Japanese Patent Office dated Mar. 16, 2016, Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-079553 and English Translation thereof. |
English Translation of Decision to Refuse from the Japan Patent Office dated Jan. 26, 2015, Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-079553 and English Translation thereof. |
Eisenberg, H.R. et al., “Origin and Properties of the Wetting Layer and Early Evolution of Epitaxially Strained Thin Films”, Physical Review B, 66(155429): 1-13, (2002). |
Eisenberg, H.R. et al., “Wetting Layer Thickness and Early Evolution of Epitaxially Strained Thin Films”, Physical Review Letters, 85(6): 1286-1289, Aug. 2002. |
Kariya, Y. et al., “Tin Pest in Sn-0.5 wt.% Cu Lead-Free Solder”, JOM, pp. 39-41, Jun. 2001. |
Smith, R.W., “The White Tin-Grey Tin Transition in Tin-Mercury Alloys”, Canadian Journal of Physics, vol. 38, pp. 588-592 (1960). |
The Farada Society, Discussion of the Faraday Society: Molecular Mechanism of Rate Processes in Solids, The Aberdeen University Press Ltd., No. 23, 1957. |
Office Communication dated Aug. 24, 2004, U.S. Appl. No. 10/668,986, filed Sep. 22, 2003, Valey M. Dubin. |
Office Communication dated Feb. 24, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/668,986, filed Sep. 22, 2003, Valey M. Dubin. |
Office Communication dated Oct. 6, 2005, U.S. Appl. No. 10/668,986, filed Sep. 22, 2003, Valey M. Dubin. |
Office Communication dated Apr. 20, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/668,986, filed Sep. 22, 2003, Valey M. Dubin. |
Office Communication dated Aug. 9, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/668,986, filed Sep. 22, 2003, Valey M. Dubin. |
Office Communication dated Dec. 13, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 10/668,986, filed Sep. 22, 2003, Valey M. Dubin. |
Office Communication dated Feb. 22, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,627, filed Aug. 20, 2007, Valey M. Dubin. |
Office Communication dated Sep. 1, 2010, U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,627, filed Aug. 20, 2007, Valey M. Dubin. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2004/030577, dated Apr. 6, 2006, 9 pages. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200480027161.4 dated Sep. 21, 2007, 14 pages. |
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200480027161.4 dated Jul. 4, 2008, 10 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from Chinese Patent Application No. 200480027161.4 dated Jan. 23, 2009, 4 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-527074, dated Jan. 20, 2009, 7 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-527074, dated Mar. 30, 2010, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-527074, dated Oct. 15, 2010, 3 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-172138, dated Jan. 8, 2013, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance from Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-172138, dated Apr. 30, 2013, 3 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-079553, dated Apr. 15, 2014, 9 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-079553, dated Feb. 3, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-079553, dated Mar. 22, 2016, 22 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-079553, dated Nov. 29, 2016, 19 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-106328, dated May 10, 2016, 4 pages. |
Office Action from Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-106328, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2004/030577, dated Jan. 7, 2007, 9 pages. |
Office Action for Taiwan Patent Application No. 93128593, dated Jun. 17, 2005, 4 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615 dated Oct. 12, 2011, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Aug. 20, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Dec. 2, 2018, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Apr. 8, 2014, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Jul. 30, 2014, 7 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 12 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Oct. 26, 2015, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/973,615, dated Feb. 12, 2016, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,627, dated Feb. 22, 2010, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,627, dated Sep. 1, 2010, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,627, dated Mar. 13, 2012, 6 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,627, dated Jan. 17, 2013, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/894,627, dated Jul. 18, 2011, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for Taiwan Patent Application No. 93128593, dated Jan. 4, 2006, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170084564 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10668986 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 11894627 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12973615 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 15369815 | US | |
Parent | 11894627 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 12973615 | US |