The field relates to direct wafer bonding, and more particularly to the bonding and electrical interconnection of substrates to be utilized in semiconductor device and integrated circuit fabrication.
As the physical limits of conventional CMOS device are being approached and the demands for high performance electronic systems are imminent, system-on-a chip (SOC) is becoming a natural solution of the semiconductor industry. For system-on-a chip preparation, a variety of functions are required on a chip. While silicon technology is the mainstay technology for processing a large number devices, many of the desired circuit and optoelectronic functions can now best be obtained from individual devices and/or circuits fabricated in materials other than silicon. Hence, hybrid systems which integrate non-silicon based devices with silicon based devices offer the potential to provide unique SOC functions not available from pure silicon or pure non-silicon devices alone.
One method for heterogeneous device integration has been the hetero-epitaxial growth of dissimilar materials on silicon. To date, such hetero-epitaxial growth has realized a high density of defects in the hetero-epitaxial grown films, largely due to the mismatches in lattice constants between the non-silicon films and the substrate.
Another approach to heterogeneous device integration has been wafer bonding technology. However, wafer bonding of dissimilar materials having different thermal expansion coefficients at elevated temperature introduces thermal stresses that lead to dislocation generation, debonding, or cracking. Thus, low temperature bonding is desired. Low temperature bonding is also crucial for the bonding of dissimilar materials if the dissimilar materials include materials with low decomposition temperatures or temperature sensitive devices such as, for example, an InP heterojunction bipolar transistor or a processed Si device with ultrashallow source and drain profiles.
The design of processes needed to produce different functions on the same chip containing different materials is difficult and hard to optimize. Indeed, many of the resultant SOC chips (especially those at larger integration size) show a low yield. One approach has been to interconnect fully processed ICs by wafer adhesive bonding and layer transfer. See, for example, Y. Hayashi, S. Wada, K. Kajiyana, K. Oyama, R. Koh, S Takahashi and T. Kunio, Symp. VLSI Tech. Dig. 95 (1990) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,563,084, the entire contents of both references are incorporated herein by reference. However, wafer adhesive bonding usually operates at elevated temperatures and suffers from thermal stress, out-gassing, bubble formation and instability of the adhesive, leading to reduced yield in the process and poor reliability over time. Moreover, the adhesive bond is usually not hermetic.
Wafer direct bonding is a technology that allows wafers to be bonded at room temperature without using any adhesive. The room temperature direct wafer bond is typically hermetic. It is not prone to introduce stress and inhomogeneity as in the adhesive bonding. Further, if the low temperature bonded wafer pairs can withstand a thinning process, when one wafer of a bonded pair is thinned to a thickness less than the respective critical value for the specific materials combination, the generation of misfit dislocations in the layer and sliding or cracking of the bonded pairs during subsequent thermal processing steps can be avoided. See, for example, Q.-Y. Tong and U. Gösele, Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1999), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Moreover, wafer direct bonding and layer transfer is a VLSI (Very Large Scale Integration) compatible, highly flexible and manufacturable technology, and thus suitable for forming three-dimensional system-on-a chip (3-D SOC). The 3-D SOC approach can be seen as the integration of existing integrated circuits to form a system on a chip.
Moreover, as the integration complexity grows, so do the demands on the integration process to robustly unify diverse circuits at low temperature, preferably at room temperature, resulting in lower or no additional stress and more reliable circuits.
Low or room temperature direct wafer bonding of metal between wafers or dies being bonded is desirable for 3D-SOC preparation. Such direct metal bonding can be used in conjunction with direct wafer bonding of non-metal between wafers or dies to result in electrical interconnection between wafers or dies being bonded when they are mechanically bonded. Simultaneous metal and non-metal bonding can eliminate the need to for post-bond processing, like substrate thinning, via etching, and interconnect metallization, to achieve an electrical interconnection between bonded wafers or die. Very small bonding metal pads can be used, resulting in very low parasitic impedance and resulting reduced power and increased bandwidth capability.
Bonding of metals with clean surfaces is well-known phenomenon. For example, thermocompression wire bonding has been applied to wafer-level bonding. Temperature, pressure and low hardness metals are typically employed and usually results in residual stresses. See, for example, M. A. Schmidt, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 86, No. 8, 1575 (1998), Y. Li, R. W. Bower, I. Bencuya, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 37, L1068 (1988). Direct bonding of Pd metal layer covered silicon or III V compound wafers at 250-350° C. has been reported by B. Aspar, E. Jalaguier, A. Mas, C. Locatelli, O. Rayssac, H. Moricean, S. Pocas, A. Papon, J. Michasud and M. Bruel, Electon. Lett., 35, 12 (1999). However, Pd2Si silicide or Pd-III V alloys, not metal Pd, are actually formed and bonded. Bonding of Au and Al at room temperature has been achieved by using ultrasonic and compressive load at flip chip bonding, see, for example, M. Hizukuri, N. Watanabe and T. Asano, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 40, 3044 (2001). Room temperature metal bonding at wafer level has been realized in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) systems with a base pressure lower than 3×10−8 mbar. Usually an ion argon sputtering or fast atom-beam is used to clean the bonding surfaces followed by application of an external pressure to the bonding substrates. See, for example, T. Suga, Proc. The 2nd Intl. Symposium on semiconductor wafer bonding, the Electrochemical Soc. Proc. Vol. 93-29, p. 71 (1993). Room temperature bonding between two Si substrates with thin sputtered Ti, Pt and Au films has also been accomplished using applied force after thin film sputter deposition at 4-40 μbar of Ar pressure in a UHV system with base pressure less than 3×10−8 mbar. See, for example, T. Shimatsu, R. H. Mollema, D. Monsma, E. G. Keim and J. C. Lodder, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16(4), 2125 (1998).
Direct bonding of metal features or contacts and non-metal field regions is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,485,968 and 6,962,835, the disclosures of each of which are expressly incorporated by reference herein. It can be challenging, however, to achieve both alignment of metal features from two substrates and achieve reliable metal bonding while also directly bonding surrounding non-metal regions.
In one embodiment, a bonded structure is disclosed. The bonded structure can include a first semiconductor element comprising a conductive first contact structure and a non-metallic first bonding region proximate the first contact structure, the first contact structure comprising a conductive first elongate contact feature. The bonded structure can also include a second semiconductor element comprising a conductive second contact structure and a non-metallic second bonding region proximate the second contact structure, the second contact structure comprising a conductive second contact feature. The first bonding region can be in contact with and directly bonded to the second bonding region. The first elongate contact feature can be oriented non-parallel with and can directly contact the second contact feature at an intersection between the first elongate contact feature and the second contact feature.
In another embodiment, a bonding method is disclosed. The bonding method can include providing a first semiconductor element comprising a conductive first contact structure and a non-metallic first bonding region proximate the first contact structure, the first contact structure comprising a conductive first elongate contact feature. The method can include providing a second semiconductor element comprising a conductive second contact structure and a non-metallic second bonding region proximate the second contact structure, the second contact structure comprising a conductive second contact feature. The method can include orienting and bringing together the first and second semiconductor elements, such that the first elongate contact feature and the second contact feature are nonparallel. The method can include directly bonding the first bonding region with the second bonding region. The method can include directly bonding the first elongate contact feature and the second contact feature at an intersection between the first elongate contact feature and the second contact feature.
In yet another embodiment, a bonded structure is disclosed. The bonded structure can include a first semiconductor element comprising a conductive first contact structure and a non-metallic first bonding region proximate the first contact structure, the first contact structure comprising a conductive first grid pattern of multiple intersecting lines. The bonded structure can include a second semiconductor element comprising a conductive second contact structure and a non-metallic second bonding region proximate the second contact structure, the second contact structure comprising a conductive second grid pattern of multiple intersecting lines. The first bonding region can be in contact with and directly bonded to the second bonding region. The first grid pattern can intersect and directly contact the second grid pattern.
In another embodiment, a bonded structure is disclosed. The bonded structure can include a first semiconductor element comprising a conductive first contact structure and a non-metallic first bonding region surrounding the first contact structure. The first contact structure can include a conductive first elongate contact feature, the first elongate contact feature comprising a heavily doped semiconductor material. The first bonding region can comprise a lightly doped or an undoped semiconductor material. The bonded structure can include a second semiconductor element comprising a conductive second contact structure and a non-metallic second bonding region surrounding the second contact structure, the second contact structure comprising a conductive second contact feature. The first bonding region can be in contact with and directly bonded to the second bonding region. The first elongate contact feature can directly contact and be directly bonded to the second contact feature.
In yet another embodiment, a semiconductor element is disclosed. The semiconductor element can comprise a substrate comprising one or more layers of non-metallic material. The semiconductor element can comprise a plurality of conductive traces embedded in the substrate, the traces extending laterally through the substrate to route electrical signals laterally. The semiconductor element can comprise an elongate contact feature extending along and directly contacting a first trace of the plurality of traces, the contact feature exposed at a top surface of the substrate.
An object is thus to obtain mechanical and electrical contact between wafers and die with a single bonding step.
Another object is to provide a low or room temperature bonding method by which metallic bonding between wafers or die of semiconductor circuits can be formed in ambient without using external pressure.
An additional object is to provide a low or room temperature bonding method by which metallic bonding of layers of any metal between wafers or die of semiconductor circuits can be formed at room temperature at wafer level in ambient without using external pressure by covering metal layers with a thin film of gold or copper or palladium.
Still another object is to provide a room temperature bonding method at wafer level in ambient without using external pressure by which metallic as well as covalent bonds are formed simultaneously at room temperature on bonding surfaces of wafers or die comprised of semiconductor circuits where metal and other non-metal layers co-exist.
Another object is to provide a room temperature bonding method by which different substrates or different materials on different substrates with different thermal expansion coefficients can be bonded together without generation of catastrophic stresses between the different substrates or different materials on different substrates.
Still another object is a room temperature bonding method by which the bond strength between substrates approaches the mechanical fracture strength of the substrates.
Another object is to provide a bonded device structure including devices fabricated individually on separate substrates and bonded on a common substrate.
A still further object is to provide a method and device whereby a reliable mechanical bond can be formed at or near room temperature and a reliable electrical contact can be subsequently formed with a simple low temperature anneal.
These and other objects are achieved by a bonded method and device structure including a first substrate having a first plurality of metallic bonding pads, preferably connected to a device or circuit, and having a first non-metallic region adjacent to the metallic bonding pads on the first substrate, a second substrate having a second plurality of metallic bonding pads, preferably connected to a second device or circuit, aligned or alignable with the first plurality of metallic bonding pads and having a second non-metallic region adjacent to the metallic bonding pads on the second substrate, and a contact-bonded interface between the first and second set of metallic bonding pads.
A more complete appreciation of the disclosed embodiments and many attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views, and more particularly to
Each wafer includes a set of metallic pads 12, 15 and a non-metallic region adjacent to the metallic bonding pads in the surfaces 11, 14. The non-planarity and surface roughness of the metallic bonding pads may be larger than that of the chemical bonding surfaces. Pads 12, 15 may be electrically connected, directly or indirectly, to internal circuits and/or through silicon vias (TSVs), and may be used to route electrical connections to the respective devices and/or circuits pre-fabricated on the wafers. The pads are preferably formed before surface treatment, and VSE is preferably performed after the pads are formed. As shown in
In more detail, as the wafer surfaces including the metal bonding pads contact at room temperature, the contacting non-metal parts of opposing wafer surfaces began to form a bond at the contact point or points, and the attractive bonding force between the wafers increases as the contact chemical bonding area increases. Without the presence of the metal pads, the wafers would bond across the entire wafer surface. The presence of the metal pads, while interrupting the bonding seam between the opposing wafers, does not prohibit chemical wafer to wafer bonding. Due to the malleability and ductility of the metal bonding pads, the pressure generated by the chemical wafer-to-wafer bonding in the non-metal regions may results in a force by which nonplanar and/or rough regions on the metal pads may be deformed resulting in improved planarity and/or roughness of the metal pads and intimate contact between the metal pads. The pressure generated by the chemical bonding is sufficient to obviate external pressure to be applied in order for these metal pads to be intimately contacted to each other. A strong metallic bond can be formed between the intimately contacted metal pads, even at room temperature, due to inter-diffusion or self-diffusion of metal atoms at the mating interface. This diffusion is thermodynamically driven to reduce the surface free energy and is enhanced for metals that typically have high inter-diffusion and/or self-diffusion coefficients. These high diffusion coefficients are a result of a cohesive energy that is typically mostly determined by the mobile free electron gas that is not disturbed by the motion of metal ions during the diffusion. The wafer-to-wafer chemical bonding in the non-metal regions thus effects electrical connection between metal pads on the two different wafers. The geometrical and mechanical constraints governing this effect are described below.
An unbonded area around the bonding pad having a width W will be generated in which the non-metal surfaces of the two wafers are precluded from contacting (see
The formula to calculate the width of the unbonded area as a function of metal film thickness, mechanical properties of the wafer or die, the wafer or die thickness, the bonding energy will be shown below.
W=[2E′tw3)/(3γ)]1/4h1/2 (1)
where E′ is given by E/(1−ν2) with ν being Poisson's ratio.
It has been suggested that with decreasing h, the situation changes drastically. See, for example, U. Goesele and Q.-Y. Tong, Proc. The 2nd Intl. Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding, the Electrochemical Soc. Proc. Vol. 93-29, p. 395 (1993). If W calculated by Eq. (1) leads to values below Wcrit=2tw, corresponding to h<hcrit where hcrit=5(twγ/E′)1/2, then an elastomechanical instability is supposed to occur, leading to an unbonded area with much smaller W that is independent of wafer thickness tw, and is given by:
W≈kh (2)
where k is a dimensionless constant on the order of 1. Experimentally, as shown in
The pressure P on the metal bonding pairs that is generated by the bonding of the surrounding area can be expressed as:
P=(16E′tw3h)/(3W4) (3)
Combining Eq. (3) with Eq. (1) or (2), when W>2 tw, the following is obtained:
P=8γ/3h (4)
and when W<2 tw, the following is obtained:
P=(16E′tw3)/(3k4h3) (5)
For bonded silicon wafers where the metal pads have height h of 500 Å and the bonding energy is 300 mJ/m2, the compressive pressure on the metal bonding pads is about 1.6×108 dynes/cm2, i.e., 160 atmospheres. Since this pressure is sufficiently high for metal bonding, there is no need to apply any external pressure during bonding. When metal height h is 300 Å or less, W<2tw is satisfied and the pressure on the metal pairs is in the order of 5000 atmospheres if k=1 is assumed.
In one example, 5 mm diameter Au bonding pads with a thickness less than 300 Å and a separation distance of 1 mm were deposited on oxide covered 100 mm silicon wafers. Since the Au bonding pads were formed on the surface of the oxide, they also had a height of 300 Angstroms above the surface of the oxide. However, h can be much smaller than actual metal thickness because metal can be partially buried in oxide or other insulator and h is the height the metal extended above the die surface. A room temperature bonding technology has been developed that cleans and activates the metal and the oxide surfaces compatibly and simultaneously. The Au posts formed a metallic bond by room temperature bonding at wafer level in ambient without using external pressure after storage in air for a period of time, e.g. 60 hr depending on the metal thickness and bonding energy. When the wafer pairs were forcibly separated, by inserting a wedge between the bonded interface, either the Au or the Au/oxide layer peeled from the silicon substrate, indicating that the metal-to-metal bond formed was stronger than the adhesion of the Au pad on the oxide surface or the oxide on the silicon surface. As mentioned above, a strong metallic bond can be formed between the intimately contacted metal pads at room temperature due to inter-diffusion or self-diffusion of metal atoms on the mating interface to reduce the surface free energy. The inter-diffusion or self-diffusion coefficient between metal atoms increases exponentially with temperature, in order to shorten the storage time to achieve full metallic bonding, annealing can be performed after room temperature bonding. The preferred annealing time for metallic bonding between the Au posts shortened as the temperature increased. For this case, 5 hr was preferred for 100° C., 1 hr for 150° C., and 5 min for 250° C. Thinner metals can be bonded at lower temperatures than thicker metals due to higher pressure generated by the bonding of non-metal surrounding areas. The time for the formation of metallic bonds at room temperature and at elevated temperatures becomes longer as the Au thickness (i.e., height) increases. For example, when the thickness of Au pads h is 600 Å, 5 min at 250° C. will form metallic bonds while at h=500 Å, 15 min at the same temperature will form metallic bonds.
In flip-chip bonding of state-of-the art integrated circuits, the solder ball pitch is about 1000 μm. Therefore, an unbonded area width around the bonded metal posts that is comparable or less than 1000 μm is sufficiently small for practical applications. Unbonded area widths substantially less than this amount can be obtained by this method. For example, experimental results show that when h=200 Å, W is 20 μm, and when h=300 Å, W is 30 μm. Because h is the height the metal extended above the die surface, h can be much smaller than actual metal thickness since metal can be partially buried in oxide or other insulator, h less than 200 Å can be readily achieved. In this case the unbonded ring width around the metal pads can be close to zero. The metal pad described above may be formed by processes such as, but not limited to, sputtering, evaporation, laser ablation, chemical vapor deposition, and other techniques know to those skilled in the art in which thickness control in the <100 Å range is typical.
As shown in
In
t1=t2+δ1 and w1=w2+δ2,
where t2 and δ1 are preferred to be the minimum thickness possible for the deposition technology used, and δ2 should be 2W corresponding to the case of 2h=t1. Compared with h=t1 on both dies to be bonded, unbonded area width W is significantly reduced. Thus interconnection between the pads on wafers 30 and 37 is made. If t1 on both dies is less than the critical thickness hcrit then layer 34 can be omitted.
During the initial contacting of the two wafers at room temperature, the metal pads are aligned, and the surfaces of the wafers conform to each other by elastic deformation, when the gap due to the surface topography of bonding wafers is sufficiently small and the bonding energy γ is sufficiently high. Direct bonding occurs between the contacted materials forming the metal interconnects between devices or circuits on adjoining dies and between the wafer surfaces. The bond begins to form on contact and the bond strength increases, at room temperature, to form a metallic bond.
As in the first embodiment, wafer surfaces 32 and 41 including metal pads 33 and 40 contact, the contacting non-metal (e.g., semiconductor or insulator) parts of opposing wafer surfaces 32 and 41 began to form a bond at the contact points, and the bonding force increases as the contact bonding area increases. Without the presence of protruding metal pads 33 and 40, the wafers would bond across the entire wafer surface. The presence of protruding metal pads 33 and 40, while interrupting the bonding seam between the opposing wafers, does not prohibit wafer to wafer bonding. Rather, the pressure generated by the wafer-to-wafer contact in the non-metal regions translates into a force by which metal pads 33 and 40 are contacted even without any external pressure.
The method can be carried out in ambient conditions rather than being restricted to high or ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions. Consequently, the method is a low-cost, mass-production manufacturing technology. The size of metal films to be bonded is flexible and scalable to very small geometries because direct metallic bonding depends only on inter-molecular attraction force.
Direct metal bonding is preferable for better thermal management and power capability of semiconductor devices. The direct metal bonding can replace flip-chip bonding with much smaller bonding pads that are scalable. It is further possible that this metal bonding can be used to realize novel metal base devices (semiconductor-metal-semiconductor devices) see for example, T. Shimatsu, R. H. Mollema, D. Monsma, E. G. Keim and J. C. Lodder, IEEE Tran. Magnet. 33, 3495 (1997).
Further, the process is compatible with VLSI technology. The direct metal-to-metal bonding may be performed when wafers are fully processed. The direct metal-to-metal bonding also utilizes relatively low or room temperature bonding to minimize effects from the difference in thermal expansion, since almost all metals have significantly higher thermal expansion coefficients than semiconductor and insulators, such as those noted above (e.g., silicon or silicon dioxide).
The methods described herein can bond locally or across an entire wafer surface area. The methods, while not limited to the following examples, bond heterogeneous surfaces such that metal/metal, oxide/oxide, semiconductor/semiconductor, semiconductor/oxide, and/or metal/oxide regions can be bonded between two wafers at room temperature.
Numerous advantages are offered. For example, other methods of wafer bonding and electrically interconnected constituent electrical contacts require thinning of bonded substrates, via etching and metal deposition after wafer bonding. The methods described herein allow electrical interconnections even without such post-bond process steps, allowing the elimination of mechanical damage caused by the die thinning. Furthermore, the elimination of deep via etching avoids step coverage problems and allows the electrical connection to be scaled to smaller dimensions, resulting in an electrical interconnection with a smaller footprint and reduced electrical parasitics between bonded wafers. The method is compatible with other standard semiconductor processes, and is VLSI compatible.
As such, the methods described herein are compatible with 3-D SOC (three-dimensional system-on-a chip) fabrication. This vertical metal bonding of metal pads or interconnects using plugs between bonded dies significantly simplifies the SOC fabrication process and improves the SOC speed-power performance. The direct metal-to-metal bonding described herein is scalable and can be applied to multi-die stacking SOC.
Besides generation of force sufficient to form metal-to-metal connections, the methods facilitate low resistance metal bonding by oxide-free or nearly oxide-free surfaces of the metal bonding metal pads. For example, Au surface can be cleaned by ultraviolet/ozone and nitrogen plasma with no oxide left on the surfaces.
In another embodiment, the surfaces of the bonding metal pads (fabricated for example from metals such as Al or Cu) are coated with oxidation resistant metals, such as for example with gold (Au) or platinum (Pt) layer. Since both Au and Pt are inert metals, no oxide will be formed on the surfaces. To ensure that there is a minimum amount of oxide between Au or Pt and the host metal, sputter cleaning and evaporation deposition are employed, preferably immediately prior to the bonding process.
In a modification of the first embodiment, a thin metal overcoat layer may be formed on the metal pad and bonded as described above. For example, a layer as thin as 50 Å of an Au layer on an Al pad produced successful metal pad bonding at room temperature. Therefore, metals such as Au can be used as a bonding layer, enabling almost all metals to be utilized for direct bonding at room temperature by the foregoing methods. When an insulator layer is deposed on a fully processed wafer and contact openings are formed on the metal pads followed by a metal deposition with thickness 100 Å more than the depth of the contact windows, the metal pads now are extended above oxide layer only 100 Å, the pads can be separated each other by a very small distance, e.g. 20 μm.
Besides Au or Pt, palladium (Pd) has been utilized in the direct bonding described herein as an overcoat layer because Pd has good oxidation resistance. The surface diffusivity of Pd on Pd is very high resulting in a significant mass transport of Pd even at room temperature, especially given the contacting pressures exerted on the metal bonding pads by the bonding of the non-metal wafer surface regions. The native oxide between the two Pd bonding layers, if any, will be mechanically dispersed allowing complete coverage with Pd of the physical interface between the two contacted metal bonding pads.
In another modification of the first embodiment, a UV/ozone cleaning exposes the surfaces of the metal bonding pads to high ozone concentrations under a UV light to remove hydrocarbon contamination. Residual hydrocarbons on the surfaces of the metal bonding pads degrade metal bonding, and are nucleation sites for bubble formation between the bonding interfaces, resulting in out-gassing between the contacted surfaces.
Experiments have shown that UV/ozone treatments can prevent interface bubble formation. An HF dip of silicon wafers leads to hydrophobic surfaces that are terminated mostly by H. The hydrophobic silicon wafers are treated with 4.77 g/m3 of ozone concentration combined with 1850 Å and 2540 Å UV irradiation from two 235 W UV lamps at room temperature for 15 min. followed by a second HF dip and bonding. The bonded pairs of HF dipped hydrophobic silicon wafers generated no interface bubbles upon annealing from 300° C. to 700° C. for 15 hrs at each temperature clearly indicating the effective removal of hydrocarbons from the wafer surfaces.
For Au and Pt, it is adequate to use UV/ozone cleaning before bonding without formation of metal oxide on the metal surfaces. For other metals that can be oxidized by ozone, a thin layer of Au on the metals can prevent oxidation, or the oxide can be removed by, for example, immersion in NH4OH before bonding. In addition, plasma treatment with inert and/or nitrogen-containing gases, for example plasma treatments in a reactive ion etch mode (RIE) with gasses such as nitrogen and argon in the plasma chamber, can clean metal surfaces and enhance the bonding energy at room temperature for both metal/metal and oxide/oxide bonds. Further, an oxygen plasma can be used to remove contamination from the surface of metals such as Au and Pt.
While numerous surface preparation treatments and metal/metal and oxide/oxide and semiconductor/semiconductor examples have been described, other surfaces and preparation procedures could be used in which the corresponding metal, insulator, and semiconductor surfaces are sufficiently cleaned prior to contact such that the formation of room temperature bonding is not inhibited. In the case of Au protection or Au bonding, the process is metal and silicon dioxide compatible. After CMP and surface planarization and smoothing of the oxide surfaces, metal bonding pads are formed on bonding wafers as described above, a modified RCA 1 (H2O:H2O2:NH4OH=5:1:0.25), UV/ozone, and plasma treatment clean the surfaces of both metal and oxide without roughening the bonding surfaces. A room temperature standard 29% NH4OH dip removes particles and oxide on the metal surfaces if any without degrading the silicon dioxide surfaces. After spin-drying and room temperature bonding and storage, strong covalent bonds and metallic bonds are formed spontaneously at bonding interfaces between oxide layers and between metal surfaces, respectively. Besides the near planar bonding structures shown in
Following forming an insulating layer 58 on both dies of a material such as silicon dioxide, a standard via etch and metal fill, followed by chemical mechanical polish and surface treatment are used to prepare the layers 58 for bonding.
Here, as before, the bonding of the non-metal regions generates the requisite forces to form the metal-to-metal interconnections across the dies. As depicted in
In the metal-to-metal direct bonding of the first and second embodiments, the thickness of bonding metal films extended above die surface is preferably thin to minimize the unbonded ring area around the metal posts. Further, the thickness of bonding metal pads is scaleable, and VLSI compatible size metal posts or pads can be made and bonded. When the metal film thickness is below a certain value, the width of the unbonded ring area is significantly reduced so that the spacing between metal posts permits small spacing (e.g. <10 μm) between the metal bonding pads to be used.
A third embodiment allows a significant increase in the metal height above the non-metal surface and/or significant reduction in non-bonded area near the metal while maintaining an acceptable electrical connection between metal portions formed on separate wafers. In this embodiment, deformation of material in the vicinity of the metal material that forms the electrical contact is designed to result from the pressure at the metal surfaces from the wafer-to-wafer chemical bonding of the non-metal portions. This deformation may result in less pressure applied to the metal after the bonding process is complete, but adequate pressure to form an acceptable electrical connection between the metal portions. This deformation allows the gap near the metal surfaces to be significantly reduced or eliminated.
The object of the deformable material in the vicinity of the metal material forming the electrical contact is to allow the pressure generated by the chemical bonding of the non-metal surfaces to be sufficient to recess the metal material sufficiently into its respective surface so that the gap near the metal surface can be significantly reduced or eliminated. In general, the deformable material is comprised of non-metal portions because the pressure generated by the wafer-to-wafer chemical bonding is typically about one part in 10,000 or 1% of 1% of that required to deform typical metals. The recess of the metal into its respective surface allows the starting height of the metal surface above the non-metal surface to be substantially higher than after the recess. This significantly increases the tolerances of the metal surface required to prepare the wafers for bonding and subsequently the manufacturability of the embodiment. The deformation also substantially reduces or eliminates the non-bonded region around the metal allowing a substantial increase in the number of connections that can be made in a given area and increasing the bond strength of the bonded and interconnected parts.
The deformation can be facilitated by the inclusion of a non-metal region underneath the metal surface, as illustrated in
Region 83 may also be a void containing a vacuum or compressible gas like air, or it may be a compressible non-gas solid material with a sufficiently low compressibility that the pressure generated by the bonding will deform the metal into the region. The void may be formed in a manner similar to that used to fabricate metallic air bridges common in compound semiconductor integrated circuit fabrication. One example of this fabrication is as follows: 1) etch a recess in a planar, non-metal surface, 2) fill the recess with a removable material like photoresist such that the removable material is in the recess, but not outside the recess. This may, for example, be done by conventional spin coating of photoresist, resulting in a thicker photoresist in the recess than outside the recess, followed by blanket (non-patterned) etching of the photoresist of an amount sufficient to remove the material outside the recess but not sufficient to remove the material in the recess, 3) patterning a metal feature that transverses the recess but does not entirely cover the recess, leaving an exposed portion of the recess, and 4) removal of the removal material in the recess by accessing the exposed portion of the recess. An example of a compressible non-gas solid material is a low K dielectric used in semiconductor manufacturing. The depth of this region is typically comparable to or greater than the desired height of metal above the non-metal surface. Another die to which the die of
In this embodiment, when the wafers are bonded, the metal surfaces are contacted and deformation with respect to each other occurs during the chemical bonding process. The deformation relieves some of the pressure applied by the bonding process, but sufficient pressure remains to maintain the metal surfaces in contact and maintain an acceptable minimum contact resistance between the two metal surfaces on the two separate wafers. As the metal deforms into the region under the metal, the bonding surfaces are allowed to come into contact in a lateral annulus very close or immediately adjacent to the metal, resulting in a maximum bonding area between the non-metal surfaces. A minimum chemically-non-bonded region of 1-10 microns, or less, adjacent to the metal contact, can thus be formed by the disclosed embodiments.
The deformable region is designed to have a minimum width to maximize the number of possible electrical interconnections. The deformable region width primarily depends on the metal thickness and the metal height above the non-metal surface. These parameters are approximately determined by the following relations.
Stress=(2/3)*(Young's Modulus of Metal)(1/1−Metal Poisson's Ratio)*(metal height above surface/half width of region)2
and
Pressure=Stress*4*metal thickness*metal height above surface/(half width of region)2
Where the pressure is that generated by the bonding process. A reference for these relations can be found in the “Handbook of Thin Film Technology”, Maissel and Glang, 1983 Reissue, pp. 12-24.
For example, for a metal thickness of about 0.1 micron and a metal height above the region of about 0.1 micron above the surface and a region width of about 1 micron, the pressure generated during bonding is approximately sufficient to deform the metal into the region (assuming compressibility of the region can be neglected). Note that this 0.1 micron metal height would have resulted in an unbonded annulus or ring width around the metal of about 1 mm if the metal was not deformable. The manufacturability is thus increased substantially by requiring less control of the metal height above the non-metal surface. Furthermore, the non-bonded area is substantially decreased allowing a significant increase in the number of metal to metal contacts that can be made and resulting in an increase in the chemical bonding energy. If the compressibility of the region cannot be neglected, then the thickness of the metal should be reduced accordingly and/or the metal height above the non-metal surface should be reduced accordingly and/or the width of the region should be increased accordingly. Note that the percentage amount the width of the region should be increased is less than the percentage amount the metal height above the non-metal surface, or the metal thickness, should be reduced.
A fourth embodiment further relaxes the mechanical design constraints in the vicinity of the metal contacts described in the first, second, and third embodiments by relying on a low temperature, post-bond reflow anneal to form reliable electrical interconnections between chemically bonded wafers. A description of this embodiment is provided with reference to
After the surfaces in
After the chemical bond in
In a fifth embodiment, similar to the fourth embodiment, one of the surfaces in
Hence, the embodiments described herein offer numerous advantages and distinctions from prior low temperature wafer bonding techniques. The metal to metal direct bonding is spontaneous and requires no external forces at room temperature. The pressure applied on the metal posts that is required for metal-to-metal bonding is generated by bonding process itself, and not external forces. The metal-to-metal direct bonding described above can be performed under ambient conditions and the following are realized: wafer level or die size bonds, strong metallic Au—Au, Cu—Cu or metal-to-metal bonds formed at room temperature, and strong metallic bond of metals other than Au and Cu can be formed at room temperature by covering the metals with a ˜50 Å Au layer. Thus, simultaneous bonding of metal/metal, oxide/oxide and metal/oxide can be achieved. The metal-to-metal direct bonding is compatible with standard VLSI processing and therefore, is a manufacturable technology. The metal to metal direct bonding is compatible with bonding of materials covered with silicon oxides, silicon, or silicon nitride. In various embodiments, the metal to metal direct bonding is compatible with bonding of materials covered with at least one of glass, silicon-on-insulator, silicon carbide, sapphire, germanium, gallium arsenide, gallium nitride, polymers, indium phosphide, or any other suitable material.
Facilitating the metal-to-metal direct bonding is the direct bonding of the non-metal regions proximate to the metal bonding pads. As previously discussed, it is the direct bonding in these regions that generates the resultant force on the opposing metal bonding pads. The direct bonding of the non-metallic regions covalently bonds in air silicon dioxide or other insulator covered wafers, e.g., wafers covered with at least one of glass, silicon-on-insulator, silicon carbide, sapphire, germanium, gallium arsenide, gallium nitride, polymers, indium phosphide, or any other suitable material. Other materials can be utilized, for example, fluorinated oxide surface layers that may also be dipped in an ammonia solution prior to bonding. More generically, any material with an open structure surface that can be terminated by OH, NH or FH groups, and porous low k materials when brought into contact at room temperature can form a covalent bond.
Silicon dioxide formed by any method such as deposition, thermally or chemically oxidation, and spin-on glass, can be used in pure or doped states.
Applications include but are not limited to vertical integration of processed integrated circuits for 3-D SOC, micro-pad packaging, low-cost and high-performance replacement of flip chip bonding, wafer scale packaging, thermal management and unique device structures such as metal base devices.
The contact features 103a, 103b can comprise any conductive materials suitable for the embodiment of
As shown in
The distance below the bonding regions 106a, 106b of the semiconductor elements 101a, 101b can be less than 20 nm and preferably less than 10 nm. Bonding followed by temperature increase may increase the internal pressure between contact features 103a, 103b as described above and can result in improved metal bonding, metal contact, metal interconnect, or conductance between contact structures 102. The slight distance of contact features 103a, 103b below the respective bonding regions 106a, 106b can be an average distance over the extent of the contact structures 102. The topography of the contact structures 102 may also include locations equal, above, and below the average distance. The total height variation of the contact structures 102, given by the difference between the maximum and minimum height, may be substantially greater than the root-mean-square (RMS) variation. For example, a contact structure with a RMS of 1 nm may have a total height variation of 10 nm.
Accordingly, although contact features 103a, 103b may be slightly below the bonding regions 106a, 106b, a portion of contact features 103a, 103b may extend above the bonding regions 106a, 106b, resulting in a mechanical connection between the contact features 103a, 103b after bonding of the non-metal bonding region 106a to non-metal bonding region 106b. This mechanical connection may not result in an adequate electrical connection between contact features 103a, 103b due to an incomplete mechanical connection or native oxide or other contamination on contact features 103a, 103b. Subsequent temperature increase may improve the metal bonding, metal contact, metal interconnect, and/or conductance between contact features 103a, 103b as described above.
Alternatively, the temperature increase may result in mechanical contact and/or desired electrical interconnection between contact features 103a, 103b if the highest portion of contact features 103a, 103b is below bonding regions 106a, 106b and there is not a mechanical contact between contact features 103a, 103b after bonding.
Alternatively, contact features 103a may be below the surface of bonding region 106a and contact features 103b may be above bonding region 106b, or contact features 103a may be above the surface of bonding region 106a and contact features 103b may be below the surface of bonding region 106b. The difference between the distances of contact features 103a, 103b below bonding regions 106a, 106b (or vice versa) can be slightly positive. Alternatively, the difference between the distances of contact features 103a, 103b below bonding regions 106a, 106b can be nominally zero or slightly negative and a post-bond temperature increase may improve the metal bonding, metal contact, metal interconnect, conductance between contact features 103a, 103b as described above.
The height or depth of contact features 103a, 103b relative to the bonding regions 106a, 106b of elements 101a, 101b can be controlled with a polishing process that forms the surfaces of elements 101a, 101b, for example using chemical mechanical polishing (CMP). The CMP process typically may have a number of process variables including but not limited to the type of polishing slurry, rate of slurry addition, polishing pad, polishing pad rotation rate, and polish pressure. The CMP process can be further dependent on the specific non-metal and metal materials comprising the semiconductor elements 101a, 101b, relative polishing rates of non-metal and metal materials (similar polishing rates are preferred, for example nickel and silicon oxide), size, pitch and grain structure of the contact features 103a, 103b, and non-planarity of bonding regions 106a, 106b. Alternate polishing techniques, for example slurry-less polishing, may also be used.
The height or depth of contact features 103a, 103b relative to the bonding regions 106a, 106b may also be controlled with a slight dry etch of the material around contact features 103a, 103b on the surfaces of semiconductor elements 101a, 101b, for example using a plasma or reactive ion etch using a mixture of CF4 and O2, for the surfaces comprised of certain dielectric materials, for example silicon oxide, silicon nitride, or silicon oxynitride, preferably such that an increase in surface roughness, that would significantly decrease the bond energy between said surfaces, results. Alternatively, the height of contact features 103a, 103b may be controlled by the formation of a very thin metal layer on the contact features 103a, 103b. For example, electroless plating of some metals, for example gold, can be self-limiting to a very thin layer, for example approximately 5-50 nm. This method may have the additional advantage of terminating an oxidizing metal with very thin non-oxidizing metal, for example gold on nickel, to facilitate the formation of electrical connections.
Thus, in the bonding sequence, for embodiments such as those of
In some arrangements, it may be challenging to align the contact pads of one semiconductor element with the corresponding contact pads of another semiconductor element. Some contact pads (such as the metallic pads 12, 15 of
In some arrangements, the overall size of the contact pad may be increased so as to improve the alignment of corresponding pads from two bonded semiconductor elements. However, increasing the size of the contact pads may take up valuable real estate on the semiconductor elements. Moreover, increasing the size of the contact pads may also increase parasitic capacitance, thereby increasing power consumption and/or reducing the bandwidth of the semiconductor elements. In addition, larger contact pads may also increase the effect of dishing on polished surfaces of the respective semiconductor elements. The resulting large dishing effect may cause the non-conductive bonding and/or conductive regions to bond in a non-uniform manner. For direct bonding of metal (or conductively-doped semiconductor) and non-metal regions as described herein, the height of contacts above or depth of contacts below the substrate surface can be critical to achieving the desired contact bonds.
Accordingly, there remains a continuing need to provide improved alignment accuracy between corresponding contact pads while maintaining relatively small feature sizes during bonding. In various embodiments disclosed herein, a first semiconductor element can comprise a conductive first contact structure and a non-metallic first bonding region proximate the first contact structure. The first contact structure can include a conductive first elongate contact feature. A second semiconductor element can comprise a conductive second contact structure and a non-metallic second bonding region proximate the second contact structure. The second contact structure can include a conductive second contact feature. The first bonding region can be in contact with and directly bonded to the second bonding region. The first elongate contact feature can be oriented non-parallel with and can directly contact the second contact feature at an intersection between the first elongate contact feature and the second contact feature. The second contact feature can also be an elongate contact feature.
Because at least one of the contact features is elongated, greater misalignments can be tolerated when the two semiconductor elements are brought together. Furthermore, the use of an elongate contact feature can enable the use of relatively small feature sizes, such as relatively narrow lines relative to the larger contact regions. For example, even though the contact feature may be much longer along its length than its width in order to facilitate alignment, the relatively thin width of the elongate contact feature significantly reduces contact height or depth variations due to dishing during polishing. Furthermore, the narrow feature width facilitates a relatively small parasitic capacitance and a relatively low footprint on the element.
The contact structure 102 includes contact features from each of the opposing or bonded pair of semiconductor elements 101. The contact structure 102 of a first semiconductor element 101 can include a first elongate contact feature 103a, and the contact structure 102 of a second semiconductor element (not shown in
The first elongate contact feature 103a of the first semiconductor element 101 can be disposed over and can be at least partially aligned with an underlying interconnect 105, such as a through-silicon via (TSV). Internal metallization (not shown) may connect the interconnect 105 with the contact structure 102 (e.g., first elongate contact structure 103a) of the first semiconductor element 101. For example, internal metallization or traces can be disposed laterally and/or vertically in the semiconductor element 101 to provide communication between the interconnect 105 and the contact structures 102. Moreover, in some embodiments, a conductive barrier (not shown) can be provided between the contact structure 102 and the interconnect 105 or intervening internal metallization. For example, in some embodiments, the conductive barrier can line a trench of a damascene structure. Additional metallization may also be provided at or near the surface of the semiconductor elements 101 to route signals laterally across the width of the element. As shown in
To bond the two semiconductor elements, as explained above, the semiconductor elements 101 can be oriented relative to one another such that the first elongate contact feature 103a of one of the opposing elements 101 is nonparallel with the second elongate contact feature 103b of the other of the opposing elements 101. The two semiconductor elements 101 can be brought together such that at least the first and second non-metallic bonding regions 106 are in contact. As explained above, the surfaces of the bonding regions 106 can be prepared such that, when the bonding regions 106 of two semiconductor elements 101 are brought into contact, the non-metallic bonding regions 106 directly bond with one another to form a chemical bond without an intervening adhesive. Thus, the portion of the non-metallic bonding region 106 disposed on a first side of the first contact feature 103a can be directly bonded with corresponding portions of the non-metallic bonding region 106 disposed on both sides of the second contact feature 103b.
For example, in various embodiments, the bonding regions 106 can be polished and then very-slightly etched to create a smooth bonding surface. In various embodiments, the etched surfaces can be terminated with a nitrogen-containing species by, for example, exposing the etched surfaces to a plasma comprising nitrogen (such as nitrogen gas) or dipping the etched surfaces in a nitrogen-containing solution (such as an ammonia-containing solution). In other embodiments, other terminating species can facilitate the chemical, covalent bonding of the non-metallic bonding regions 106a, 106b. In various embodiments, the bonding regions 106 can be directly bonded together at room temperature. The bonding regions 106 can also be directly bonded together without applying external pressure to the semiconductor elements 101.
The first and second elongate contact features 103a, 103b can intersect one another at a contact intersection 104. As with the embodiments explained above with respect to
Advantageously, providing at least one elongate contact feature 103a and/or 103b can significantly increase the alignment tolerances for directly bonding conductive contact structures 102 together. Because at least one of the contact features 103a and/or 103b is elongated with a path length longer than its width in the bonding plane, the two semiconductor elements 101 can be misaligned by relatively large amounts while still facilitating direct bonding between the contact features 103a, 103b. For example, in bonded structures which utilize smaller or non-elongated contact features, the alignment tolerance of conventional pick-and-place machines may be in a range of 1 micron to 5 microns, or in a range of 1 micron to 10 microns.
By contrast, for an interconnect pitch p of 40 microns, the elongate contact features 103a, 103b can have a length l of about 20 microns, or about half the pitch of the interconnect pitch p. Because the length l of each contact feature 103a, 103b is large relative to the interconnect pitch p, it is easier for the pick-and-place machinery to achieve overlap or intersection between the two contact features 103a, 103b, which results in a larger tolerance for misalignments. For example, in the example of a 40 micron interconnect pitch, the misalignment tolerance (i.e., the degree to which the semiconductor elements 101 may be misaligned relative to one another laterally) can be in a range of 5 microns to 10 microns.
It should be appreciated that, in other embodiments, other suitable lengths l may be used. For example, the length l of the elongate contact features 103a, 103b shown in
Although both contact features 103a, 103b shown in
The contact features 103a, 103b can comprise protruded contacts extending above the bonding regions 106. For example, the contact features 103a, 103b can comprise protruded contacts similar to the metallic pads 12, 15 shown in the embodiment of
The grid patterns of the contact features 103a, 103b of
The length l of the grid pattern can have the same lengths l as the lines of the embodiment of
Advantageously, the use of grid patterns as the contact features 103a, 103b can enable for an intersecting region 104 that has multiple electrical, direct bonded contacts. Because the grid pattern comprises multiple intersecting lines, the embodiment of
The grid pattern shown in
In conventional bonding arrangements, a separate metallic layer (e.g., an aluminum pad) may be created near the top surface of the semiconductor element so as to enable electrical communication between two bonded semiconductor elements 101a, 101b. Moreover, the metallic contact pad may be relatively large so as to accommodate the corresponding contacts or bumps on the opposing semiconductor element, which can increase parasitic capacitance. In such conventional arrangements, vertical connections, such as vias or TSVs extend from the contact pads into the semiconductor element(s) to connect with corresponding traces for signal routing. In such arrangements, therefore, the contact pads are relatively large, and multiple trace layers may be used to ensure that the signals are routed properly. The vertical connections occupy layers that could otherwise be employed for lateral routing.
As shown in
As shown in
The length l of the elongate contact features 103a, 103b shown in
As shown in
Advantageously, the embodiment illustrated in
The pattern of the contact structure 102 may comprise any suitable shape. For example, as shown in
Thus, the elongate contact features 103a, 103b disclosed herein can define any suitable pattern. Beneficially, the contact features 103a, 103b can improve lateral and/or rotational misalignments, while providing electrical interconnection between directly bonded semiconductor elements.
Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/853,085, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,269,708, filed on Dec. 22, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/379,942, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,852,988, filed on Dec. 15, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/269,412, filed Dec. 18, 2015, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4998665 | Hayashi | Mar 1991 | A |
5087585 | Hayashi | Feb 1992 | A |
5322593 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5408053 | Young | Apr 1995 | A |
5471090 | Deutsch et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771555 | Eda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5985739 | Plettner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5998808 | Matsushita | Dec 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6080640 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115264 | Nosaka | Sep 2000 | A |
6265775 | Seyyedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300161 | Goetz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6374770 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6418029 | McKee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423640 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465892 | Suga | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6638808 | Ochi | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6713871 | Searls et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6759692 | Ochi | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908027 | Tolchinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7045453 | Canaperi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7078811 | Suga | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7105980 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126212 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7193423 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7339798 | Chakravorty | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7354798 | Pogge et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7355836 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7705691 | Lu et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7741724 | Morikawa et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746663 | Hashimoto | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7750488 | Patti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7803693 | Trezza | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8183127 | Patti et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8241961 | Kim et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8314007 | Vaufredaz | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8349635 | Gan et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8357931 | Schieck et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8377798 | Peng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8441131 | Ryan | May 2013 | B2 |
8476146 | Chen et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8476165 | Trickett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482132 | Yang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501537 | Sadaka et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524533 | Tong et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8620164 | Heck et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647987 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8697493 | Sadaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698323 | Mohammed et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716105 | Sadaka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8802538 | Liu | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8809123 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8841002 | Tong | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8916448 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8988299 | Kam et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9142517 | Liu | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171756 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184125 | Enquist et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224704 | Landru | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230941 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9257399 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9263186 | Li et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299736 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312229 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331149 | Tong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9337235 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9368866 | Yu | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385024 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9391143 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394161 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9431368 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437572 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443796 | Chou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461007 | Chun et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496202 | Hashimoto | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9496239 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9536848 | England et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9537199 | Dang et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559081 | Lai et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9620481 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656852 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9723716 | Meinhold | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9728521 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9799587 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9852988 | Enquist | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9881882 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9893004 | Yazdani | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929050 | Lin | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941241 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941243 | Kim et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960142 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002844 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026605 | Doub et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10075657 | Fahim et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10204893 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10269756 | Uzoh | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276619 | Kao et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276909 | Huang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
20020000328 | Motomura et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003307 | Suga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040084414 | Sakai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040155692 | Ochi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050135041 | Kang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050190808 | Yonekura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231303 | Chang et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060012966 | Chakravorty | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017144 | Uematsu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060057945 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060145778 | Pleva et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070045814 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070096294 | Ikeda et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070147014 | Chang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070222048 | Huang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070295456 | Gudeman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080124835 | Chen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090206962 | Chou et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090242252 | Tanaka | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110115579 | Rofougaran | May 2011 | A1 |
20110290552 | Palmateer et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120013499 | Hayata | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120147516 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120168217 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120212384 | Kam et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130009325 | Mori et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130063863 | Timler et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130105943 | Lai et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130207234 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130265733 | Herbsommer et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286544 | Azais | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140001568 | Wang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140048908 | Chen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140116761 | Lee et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145338 | Fujii et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175629 | Sun et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140184351 | Bae et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140225795 | Yu | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140252635 | Tran et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264751 | Chen et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264948 | Chou | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140370658 | Tong et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140377946 | Cha et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150064498 | Tong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150097298 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150194379 | Chen et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150206902 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150221571 | Chaparala et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150235952 | Pan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150270209 | Woychik et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150318618 | Chen et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160077294 | Jou et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160111404 | Sanders et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160155677 | Bonart et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160197630 | Kawasaki | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160233195 | Nagai | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160254345 | Singh et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160309578 | Park | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160343682 | Kawasaki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160372449 | Rusu et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170019086 | Dueweke | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170062366 | Enquist | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170062409 | Basker et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170179029 | Enquist et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170194271 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170200711 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170338214 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170343498 | Kalnitsky et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180096931 | Huang et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180174995 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182639 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182666 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190580 | Haba et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190583 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180191047 | Huang et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219038 | Gambino et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226375 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180286805 | Huang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180323177 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180323227 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331066 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190096741 | Uzoh et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190096842 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190115277 | Yu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131277 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190198407 | Huang et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190198409 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 441 410 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2000-100679 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-102479 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-353416 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-043281 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2008-258258 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2013-33786 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2018-160519 | Oct 2018 | JP |
10-2006-0105797 | Oct 2006 | KR |
10-2015-0097798 | Aug 2015 | KR |
WO 2005043584 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064646 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2006100444 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2012125237 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2017151442 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amirfeiz et al., “Formation of silicon structures by plasma-activated wafer bonding,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2000, vol. 147, No. 7, pp. 2693-2698. |
Ceramic Microstructures: Control at the Atomic Level, Recent Progress in Surface Activated Bonding, 1998, pp. 385-389. |
Chung et al., “Room temperature GaAseu + Si and InPeu + Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activate bonding method,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Jan. 2, 1997, vol. 121, Issues 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Chung et al., “Wafer direct bonding of compound semiconductors and silicon at room temperature by the surface activated bonding method,” Applied Surface Science, Jun. 2, 1997, vols. 117-118, pp. 808-812. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free room temperature wafer to wafer direct bonding,” J. Electrochem. Soc., The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Nov. 1995, vol. 142, No. 11. pp. 3949-3955. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free wafer bonding of silicon to glass and sapphire,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings vol. 95-7, 1995, pp. 72-77. |
Gösele et al., “Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: A flexible approach to materials combinations in microelectronics; micromechanics and optoelectronics,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 23-32. |
Hosoda et al., “Effect of the surface treatment on the room-temperature bonding of Al to Si and SiO2,” Journal of Materials Science, Jan. 1, 1998, vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 253-258. |
Hosoda et al., “Room temperature GaAs—Si and InP—Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activated bonding method,” Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research B, 1997, vol. 121, Nos. 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Howlader et al., “A novel method for bonding of ionic wafers,” Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2006, IEEE, pp. 7-pp. |
Howlader et al., “Bonding of p-Si/n-InP wafers through surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, 2001, IEEE International Conference on, pp. 272-275. |
Howlader et al., “Characterization of the bonding strength and interface current of p-Si/ n-InP wafers bonded by surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Journal of Applied Physics, Mar. 1, 2002, vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 3062-3066. |
Howlader et al., “Investigation of the bonding strength and interface current of p-SionGaAs wafers bonded by surface activated bonding at room temperature,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2114-2118. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 23, 2018, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2017/068788, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 9, 2018, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2017/052409, 19 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 17, 2018, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2018/025241, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 29, 2017, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2016/067182, 14 pages. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of fritting contacts utilized for micromachined wafer probe cards,” 2000 American Institute of Physics, AIP Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 71, 2000, pp. 2224. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of low force contact process for MEMS probe cards,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Apr. 1, 2002, vols. 97-98, pp. 462-467. |
Itoh et al., “Development of MEMS IC probe card utilizing fritting contact,” Initiatives of Precision Engineering at the Beginning of a Millennium: 10th International Conference on Precision Engineering (ICPE) Jul. 18-20, 2001, Yokohama, Japan, 2002, Book Part 1, pp. 314-318. |
Itoh et al., “Room temperature vacuum sealing using surface activated bonding method,” The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston, Jun. 8-12, 2003, 2003 IEEE, pp. 1828-1831. |
Jeon, Y. et al., “Design of an on-interposer passive equalizer for high bandwidth memory (HBM) with 30Gbps data transmission,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), 2016 IEEE 66th, Aug. 18, 2016. |
Kim et al., “Low temperature direct Cu—Cu bonding with low energy ion activation method,” Electronic Materials and Packaging, 2001, IEEE, pp. 193-195. |
Kim et al., “Room temperature Cu—Cu direct bonding using surface activated bonding method,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2003 American Vacuum Society, Mar./Apr. 2003, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 449-453. |
Kim et al., “Wafer-scale activated bonding of Cu—Cu, Cu—Si, and Cu—SiO2 at low temperature,” Proceedings—Electrochemical Society, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 239-247. |
Kim, H. et al., “A wideband on-interposer passive equalizer design for chip-to-chip 30-Gb/s serial data transmission,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Jan. 2015, vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 28-39. |
Lee, H. et al., “Signal integrity of bump-less high-speed through silicon via channel for terabyte/s bandwidth 2.5D IC,” 2016 IEEE 66th Electronic Components and Technology Conference, Aug. 18, 2016. |
Matsuzawa et al., “Room-temperature interconnection of electroplated Au microbump by means of surface activated bonding method,” Electornic Components and Technology Confererence, 2001, 51st Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 384-387. |
Onodera et al., “The effect of prebonding heat treatment on the separability of Au wire from Ag-plated Cu alloy substrate,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions, Jan. 2002, vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 5-12. |
Reiche et al., “The effect of a plasma pretreatment on the Si/Si bonding behaviouir,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 437-444. |
Roberds et al., “Low temperature , in situ, plasma activated wafer bonding,” Electrochecmical Society Proceedings, 1997, vol. 97-36, pp. 598-606. |
Shigetou et al., “Room temperature bonding of ultra-fine pitch and low-profiled Cu electrodes for bump-less interconnect,” 2003 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 848-852. |
Shigetou et al., “Room-temperature direct bonding of CMP-Cu film for bumpless interconnection,” Electronic Components and Technology Confererence, 51st Proceedings, 2001, IEEE, pp. 755-760. |
Shingo et al., “Design and fabrication of an electrostatically actuated MEMS probe card,” Tranducers, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference, Jun. 8-12, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1522-1525. |
Suga et al., “A new approach to Cu—Cu direct bump bonding,” IEMT/IMC Symposium, 1997, Joint International Electronic Manufacturing Symposium and the International Microelectronics Conference, Apr. 16-18, 1997, IEEE, pp. 146-151. |
Suga et al., “A new bumping process using lead-free solder paste,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 25, Issue 4), IEEE, Oct. 2002, pp. 253-256. |
Suga et al., “A new wafer-bonder of ultra-high precision using surface activated bonding (SAB) concept,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1013-1018. |
Suga et al., “Bump-less interconnect for next generation system packaging,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1003-1008. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding—an approach to joining at room temperature,” Ceramic Transactions: Structural Ceramics Joining II, The American Ceramic Society, 1993, pp. 323-331. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding for new flip chip and bumpless interconnect systems,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 105-111. |
Suga, “UHV room temperature joining by the surface activated bonding method,” Advances in science and technology, Techna, Faenza, Italie, 1999, pp. C1079-C1089. |
Suga, T., “Feasibility of surface activated bonding for ultra-fine pitch interconnection—A new concept of bump-less direct bonding for system level packaging,” The University of Tokyo, Research Center for Science and Technology, 2000 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2000 IEEE, pp. 702-705. |
Suga, T., “Room-temperature bonding on metals and ceramics,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 93-29 (1993), pp. 71-80. |
Takagi et al, “Wafer-scale room-temperature bonding between silicon and ceramic wafers by means of argon-beam surface activation,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2001, MEMS 2001, The 14th IEEE International Conference, Jan. 25, 2001, IEEE, pp. 60-63. |
Takagi et al., “Effect of surface roughness on room-temperature wafer bonding by Ar beam surface activation,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1998, vol. 37, Part 1, No. 1, pp. 4197. |
Takagi et al., “Low temperature direct bonding of silicon and silicon dioxide by the surface activation method,” Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1997, Transducers '97 Chicago, 1997 International Conference, vol. 1, pp. 657-660. |
Takagi et al., “Room temperature silicon wafer direct bonding in vacuum by Ar beam irradiation,” Micro Electro Mehcanical Systems, MEMS '97 Proceedings, 1997, IEEE, pp. 191-196. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature bonding of lithium niobate and silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999. vol. 74, pp. 2387. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of Si to LiNbO3, LiTaO3 and Gd3Ga5O12 by Ar-beam surface activation,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2001, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 348. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of silicon and lithium niobate by means of arbon-beam surface activation,” Integrated Ferroelectrics: an International Journal, 2002, vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 53-59. |
Takagi et al., “Surface activated bonding silicon wafers at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2222 (1996). |
Takagi et al., “Wafer-scale spontaneous bonding of silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation at room temperature,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Jun. 15, 2003, vol. 105, Issue 1, pp. 98-102. |
Tong et al., “Low temperature wafer direct bonding,” Journal of Microelectomechanical systems, Mar. 1994, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 29-35. |
Topol et al., “Enabling technologies for wafer-level bonding of 3D MEMS and integrated circuit structures,” 2004 Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2004 IEEE, pp. 931-938. |
Wang et al., “Reliability and microstructure of Au—Al and Au—Cu direct bonding fabricated by the Surface Activated Bonding,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 915-919. |
Wang et al., “Reliability of Au bump—Cu direct interconnections fabricated by means of surface activated bonding method,” Microelectronics Reliability, May 2003, vol. 43, Issue 5, pp. 751-756. |
Weldon et al., “Physics and chemistry of silicon wafer bonding investigated by infrared absorption spectroscopy,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Jul./Aug. 1996, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 3095-3106. |
Westphal, W.B. et al., “Dielectric constant and loss data,” Air Force Materials Laboratory, Apr. 1972. |
Xu et al., “New Au—Al interconnect technology and its reliability by surface activated bonding,” Electronic Packaging Technology Proceedings, Oct. 28-30, 2003, Shanghai, China, pp. 479-483. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 22, 2018, issued in International Application No. PCT/US2017/064735, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2018/060044, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 22, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2018/064982, 13 pages. |
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully process-compatible layout design on bond pad to improve wire bond reliability in CMOS lcs,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316. |
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of recent direct wafer bonding advances and applications,” Advances in Natural Sciences-Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 11 pages. |
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2—SiO2 bonding with hydrofluoric acid. Room temperature and low stress bonding technique for MEMS,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, vol. 79, pp. 237-244. |
Oberhammer, J. et al., “Sealing of adhesive bonded devices on wafer level,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2004, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, see pp. 407-412, and Figures 1(a)-1(I), 6 pages. |
Plobi, A. et al., “Wafer direct bonding: tailoring adhesion between brittle materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, R25, 88 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190244899 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62269412 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15853085 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16388692 | US | |
Parent | 15379942 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 15853085 | US |