CTE compensation for wafer-level and chip-scale packages and assemblies

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10847469
  • Patent Number
    10,847,469
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 17, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 24, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A microelectronic structure having CTE compensation for use in wafer-level and chip-scale packages, comprising a plurality of substrate tiles each having a generally planar upper surface, the upper surfaces of the tiles disposed within a common plane to provide a generally planar grid of the tiles, each respective pair of adjacent tiles having a gap disposed therebetween.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to the field of microelectronics, and more particularly to methods for compensating for differences in the coefficient of thermal expansion (“CTE”) in different materials used in wafer-level and chip scale packaging of semiconductor devices, especially high frequency (RF) semiconductor devices.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Regardless of the method used to realize semiconductor devices such as those disclosed herein, CTE mismatch between the semiconductor substrate and passive materials, such as dielectrics and metals, is a major issue. Traditional or current approaches to integrate antennas directly with microchips involve planar circuits, multi-layer glass stacks, BCB, polyimide or other technologies either bonded to or directly integrated on the semiconductor substrate. These options may create their own CTE challenges.


In cases where dissimilar microelectronic substrates are to be joined together at large die format or wafer-to-wafer level format, the CTE mismatch between adjacent substrates can render this effort either impossible or create significant additional cost due to part damage or failure including substrate deformation. Similarly, for a sequential build of metallic circuitry on a low CTE semiconductor wafer or substrate, such as a PolyStrata® coaxial transmission line build, this CTE mismatch is problematic.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one of its aspects the present invention relates to methods and structures to allow cost effective wafer level packaging of semiconductor die to turn the structures into chip scale packages at the wafer level. In addition, the present invention can address the CTE mismatch problem that occurs in applications ranging from wafer level packaging for memory or other chips, to antenna circuitry made in a primarily copper PolyStrata® process that is formed on, or attached to, semiconductors, such as to SiGe circuits on silicon substrates, at scales normally not possible due to the CTE mismatch between these two relatively rigid formations. (Examples of PolyStrata® processing/technology are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,948,335, 7,405,638, 7,148,772, 7,012,489, 7,649,432, 7,656,256, 7,755,174, 7,898,356 and/or U.S. Application Pub. Nos. 2010/0109819, 2011/0210807, 2010/0296252, 2011/0273241, 2011/0123783, 2011/0181376, 2011/0181377, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety, hereinafter the “incorporated PolyStrata® art”). This may be achieved by applying flexible CTE compensating regions between unit cells into the primarily copper formations to reduce the propagation of stress across large CTE mismatched areas of two or more bonded regions. This approach may work independent of the structures being formed separately and joined, or formed one upon the other. A three-dimensional copper spring structure is envisaged by using PolyStrata® fabrication technology and other manufacturing techniques.


In another of its aspects, the present invention may provide an microelectronic structure having CTE compensation for use in wafer-level and chip-scale packages. The microelectronic structure may include a plurality of substrate tiles each having a generally planar upper surface, the upper surfaces of the tiles disposed within a common plane to provide a generally planar grid of the tiles. Each respective pair of adjacent tiles may have a gap disposed therebetween and a spring structure spanning the gap and connecting the adjacent tiles. The spring structure may be configured to permit movement of the adjacent tiles relative to one another to provide compensation for thermal expansion or contraction of the tiles. The substrate tiles may comprise a semiconductor material and/or metal. The spring structure may comprise metal, and may be provided in the form of a membrane and/or a 2-dimensional serpentine structure. In one particular configuration, the spring structure may be a u-shaped membrane having a longitudinal axis that is disposed parallel to an edge of the upper surface of the selected tile to which the u-shaped membrane is attached. In addition, a dielectric material may be disposed on the common plane and within the gap. A device layer may be attached to the common plane, and the layer may include one or more of resistors, capacitors, inductors, and three-dimensional metal/dielectric structures. The three-dimensional metal/dielectric structures may include one or more of coaxial waveguides, antennas, Wilkinson combiner/dividers, Gysel combiner/dividers, and filters. The plurality of tiles may each comprise multiple layers of metal disposed parallel to the upper surface, which may result from formation using a multilayer build process, such as the PolyStrata® process. Microelectronic structures of the present invention may include antenna arrays having a plurality of antenna radiator structures disposed above the upper surfaces of the tiles.


In yet another of its aspects, the present invention may provide a method of forming a three-dimensional microstructure by a sequential build process, comprising disposing a plurality of layers over a substrate, wherein the layers comprise one or more layers of a conductive material and one or more layers of a sacrificial material, thereby forming a structure above the substrate. The structure may include a plurality of conductive tiles formed of the conductive material, each tile having a generally planar upper surface, the upper surfaces of the tiles disposed within a common plane to provide a generally planar grid of the tiles, each respective pair of adjacent tiles having a gap disposed therebetween and a spring structure spanning the gap and connecting the adjacent tiles. The spring structure may be configured to permit movement of the adjacent tiles relative to one another to provide compensation for thermal expansion or contraction of the tiles. In addition the method may include removing the sacrificial material and/or the substrate. The step of disposing a plurality of layers over a substrate may include disposing one or more layers of a dielectric material. In addition, the method may include electrically connecting a device layer to the common plane. The device layer may comprise one or more of resistors, capacitors, inductors, and three-dimensional metal/dielectric structures, such as coaxial waveguides, antennas, Wilkinson combiner/dividers, Gysel combiner/dividers, and filters.


In still a further of its aspects, the present invention may provide a method of forming a three-dimensional microstructure by a sequential build process, such as the PolyStrata® process. The method may include providing a substrate having opposing upper and lower surfaces, with a trench extending from the lower surface to a region proximate the upper surface; providing a stretcher layer on the trench and lower surface of the substrate; expanding the stretcher layer linearly along a direction parallel to the lower surface of the substrate to separate the substrate into first and second substrate portions divided at the location of the trench providing an expanded trench region; and providing a dielectric material in the expanded trench region. The step of providing a dielectric material may include providing the dielectric material on the upper surface of the first and second substrate portions. A plurality of conductive vias may be provided through the dielectric material, and the vias may be in electrical communication with the upper surface of at least one of the first and second substrate portions. A device layer may be provided over the dielectric material, the device layer including at least one electronic component in electrical communication with a selected one of the vias.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing summary and the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be further understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a simplified top-isometric view of a three-by-three array of ground plane tiles connected by U-shaped spring features and a detailed view of the U-shaped spring structures in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a bottom isometric view of the array of ground plane tiles of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a top view of the array of ground plane tiles of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 schematically illustrates a cross-sectional view of an antenna array joined using CTE-decoupling features in accordance with the present invention, and associated FIGS. 4A-4O schematically illustrate cross-sectional views of an exemplary method in accordance with the present invention for creating the structure of FIG. 4;



FIG. 5 schematically illustrates the antenna array of FIG. 4 attached to a semiconductor chip or wafer;



FIG. 6 schematically illustrates a top view of two-dimensional-spring connected ground plane tiles in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 7 schematically illustrates cross-sectional views of a version of the structure of FIG. 4 with staggered features to increase overall radiation shielding effectiveness; and



FIGS. 8A, 8B schematically illustrate cross-sectional views of a singulation technique in accordance with the present invention showing its use in creating an antenna array similarly structured to that of FIG. 4.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring now to the figures, wherein like elements are numbered alike throughout, in one of its aspects the present invention provides structures and methods for alleviating CTE mismatch between semiconductor substrates or wafers and components mounted or formed thereon. For example, Applicant has recognized that there is a serious need for structures and methods to decouple the stress and strain in such devices. Such a solution is important to both wafer level packaging and chip scale and wafer scale solutions, e.g., for applications such as phased arrays, which often need complex antenna solutions and distribution networks that are interconnected down to pads and/or active devices formed in or on the semiconductor wafer. FIGS. 1-3 schematically illustrate an exemplary structure in accordance with the present invention—an array 1100 of ground plane tiles 1102 forming an electrically continuous ground plane with signal conductors 1104 that pass through each ground plane tile 1102 and one or more ground conductors 1106 mounted on, and electrically connected to, the ground plane tiles 1102. The signal conductors 1104 may be suspended using dielectric supports 1108 which may be a thermally conductive ceramic and may be embedded into the ground plane tiles 1102, FIG. 3. The dielectric supports 1108 may be strips partially embedded in the signal conductor 1104, but could be membranes or shaped differently. FIG. 2 shows a bottom isometric view of the array 1100 of ground plane tiles 1102 with the ground connections 1106 for connection to a semiconductor chip (e.g., a chip having a significantly lower CTE than copper). There could be as many as eight or more ground connections 1106 around each signal conductor 1104, or there could be as few as one or two, depending on the required impedance matching, design rules and other possible factors. In addition, the unit cells 1102 could house other circuits (whether passive or active) therein.


The ground plane tiles 1102 (collectively the ground plane) of the three-by-three array 1100 may be electrically connected by CTE-decoupling membranes 1112, in this case formed as U-shaped springs 1112. The gap between the ground plane tiles 1102 and signal line feedthrough, as well as the dimensions of the conductors 1104, can be electromagnetically designed, simulated and optimized with software such as HFSS™ or CST™ to ensure the signals or RF power may move from structures above the ground plane tiles 1102, such as antennas, to structures below the ground plane tiles 1102, such as semiconductor devices on or in or even below a wafer/chip region connected to these structures. Creating designs with such software can minimize impedance mismatch causing reflections and power loss. The ground plane tiles 1102 may be formed by PolyStrata® technology, comprising beam forming passives, that may include couplers, baluns, filters, splitters, combiners, and so on.


Although one signal conductor 1104 is shown centered in each ground plane tile 1102, multiple signal conductors 1104 could pass through each ground plane tile 1102, such as a pair of differential lines for a single polarization antenna or four feeds for a pair of differentially fed orthogonal polarizations. While the U-shaped spring regions 1112 cause local deviations from the flat conductive ground plane, by minimizing their electrical length, the antenna ground plane can look like an electrically-continuous ground plane operating to high frequencies. In addition to U-shaped spring regions 1112 extending into the positive Z direction, the spring regions 1112 could extend into the negative Z direction. Also, the spring regions 1112 could be ‘V’ shaped, or repeat in sequence, or use different suitable shapes. Thus, the present invention allows one to join two otherwise-CTE-mismatched structures, because at least one of the structures is comprised of unit cells 1102 that are connected by regions 1112 that behave as springs. If the thickness of the metal membranes 1112 is chosen properly, the membranes 1112 will contract and expand against the thermal expansion of copper, thus decoupling all or most of the thermal expansion induced stress from adjacent terminals, e.g., signal conductor 1104 and ground connections 1106, on each array element 1102. That is, the CTE mismatched structure(s) (for example a semiconductor wafer and PolyStrata® passives) mounted on the array of unit cells 1102 no longer behave as rigid bulk slab(s) of different CTE being bonded together.


An exemplary use of the ground plane array 1100 of the present invention is a wafer-scale phased array. FIG. 4 schematically illustrates a cross-sectional view of an antenna array 1800 comprising the ground plane array 1100 of FIG. 1 with the addition of antenna emitters 2015.


In general, wafer-scale phased arrays include electronic circuitry behind each antenna element to provide beam steering and signal amplification and are of roughly the same size as the unit cell of the antenna element, which is generally approximately half of a wavelength at the upper end of the frequency of operation, but may be less or more depending on the electronic scanning requirements of the particular application. Such an architecture eliminates some levels of packaging and testing and may be a best method of making phased arrays at upper millimeter-wave frequencies. For wafer-scale arrays, precision definition of metal features, including an electrically continuous ground plane across an area of a few wavelengths or more on a side at the top end of the frequency of operation may be required.


Copper is an excellent electrical conductor at the frequencies of interest for wafer-scale phased array antennas, such as in the millimeter-wave frequency range, but copper has a significantly different CTE compared to that of a semiconductor wafer or reticle to which the copper is connected. Because of the size of the interconnected metal and semiconductor materials, the size of the ground plane required makes it difficult to have a metal with a thickness greater than 25 microns bonded to the semiconductor wafer or reticle for structures more than a few millimeters. As such, a method to decouple the mechanical interface between the two materials will reduce the CTE mismatch stress induced as the assembly is subjected to a variety of temperatures.


Because of electrical skin depth limiting the penetration of electric fields into the conductors at higher frequencies, copper thicker than 25 microns may not be required to pass RF signals, but other factors (such as required height above a ground plane of the radiating structure of an antenna for radiation efficiency or bandwidth considerations, or protection of circuits from damage caused by ionizing radiation in space based applications) may mean that thicker metal may be more interesting than common thin-film or printed circuit board metal thickness values. In such cases, there is a desire to make an antenna that provides radiation shielding to an integrated circuit, while also limiting the front-end loss of the system. This is used to limit single-event upset-type failures from occurring in a space-based electronic system.


The PolyStrata® process may be a good way of creating such an antenna because copper is a high-density material; however, copper may not be the best way of doing this because it has a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) that is different than the bulk CTE of most integrated circuits. The idea of using tungsten, molybdenum or other metals that have a low coefficient of thermal expansion to create these antennas may solve the thermal expansion problem, but these metals may not be as easily formed as copper by a process such as the PolyStrata® process due to, for example, limitations of electroplating such metals. One advantage of including tungsten is that it has a density twice that of copper, which means that it can roughly provide the same shielding properties in half the thickness. This can decrease the overall height of an antenna assembly on an integrated circuit. Three-dimensional copper spring structures made using PolyStrata® fabrication technology can address the CTE problems present in applications ranging from wafer level packaging to wafer level phased array constructions.


If the passive PolyStrata® ground plane circuitry of the antenna array behaves mechanically as a continuous copper slab, the thermal stress induced by different rates of expansion between the semiconductor chip or wafer and PolyStrata® circuitry may cause the terminal connections to either fail or cause the semiconductor wafer to crack due to thermal expansion mismatch between the metal and semiconductor. The proposed disclosure attempts to solve this problem by mechanically isolating each elements of the array with membranes (or springs) 1112, FIGS. 1-3, while keeping the electrical and high frequency performance intact. A typical two dimensional spring will result in RF scattering and unwanted antenna behavior. Other fields of use for this technique and such structures may include any focal plane array where a two-dimensional pattern of pixels with a transducer and processing electronics at every pixel is required (at microwave or millimeter-wave frequencies these transducers are antennas, but these could be ultrasound transducers or infrared detectors, among other things). Although not a phased array, passive millimeter-wave imaging arrays also have repeating unit cells with electronics for each pixel and an antenna as a transducer. Alternatively, the CTE-compensating features in accordance with the present invention may be used to conform the array across a surface that has some amount of non planarity where electrical connections must be maintained across a wide area. Hence the spring-like features joining unit cells or die can operate not only in one plane, but compensate for non planarity or curvature in the axis orthogonal to the plane in which they are formed.



FIG. 4 shows a completed antenna array with antenna radiators 2015 connected to the signal conductors 1104 of the ground plane array 1100 of FIG. 1. Although the signal conductors 1104 are shown to connect to the center of the antenna radiators 2015, the signal conductors 1104 could be located in different positions or multiple signal conductors could be attached to the antenna radiators 2015. The antenna unit cells can extend in X and Y beyond what is shown, even if they are connected to something with a dissimilar CTE because of the CTE decoupling provided by the membranes or springs 1112.


An exemplary process flow for fabricating the ground plane array 1100 shown in FIGS. 1-3 is provided in a step-by-step fashion in FIGS. 4A-4L, and an exemplary process flow for fabricating an antenna array 1800 is shown in FIGS. 4M-4O. The build steps are illustrated in an X-Z plane cross section. FIGS. 4A-4B show a photoimageable photoresist 2002 either laminated or spin coated over a temporary carrier substrate 2001. The photoresist 2002 is exposed to UV light, and a pattern is developed/formed by removing regions of photoresist using a photo-developer liquid. Electrode terminals 2003 are plated in locations where the photoresist 2002 has been removed. FIGS. 4C and 4D depict similar process steps to deposit or plate more metal and routing circuits. In FIG. 4C, photoresist is deposited in a relatively thicker layer, patterned, and non-desired portions removed to provide cavities defined by the remaining photoresist 2004. Metal 2005 is then deposited in the regions between the remaining photoresist 2004 to provide a ground plane structure, FIG. 4D. Dielectric supports 2006 are deposited to support the signal conductor on the ground plane metal 2004, FIG. 4E, in anticipation of future removal of the remaining photoresist 2004. In the PolyStrata® process, the supports 2006 are photopatternable.



FIGS. 4F-4G depict similar process steps of photoresist application, UV exposure, photo imaging, removal of non-desired portions of the photoresist to provide the remaining photoresist 2007, FIG. 4F, with the spaces in between the remaining photoresist 2004, 2007 plated with a metal 2008, FIG. 4G. Using similar techniques of photoresist application, UV exposure, photo imaging, and selective removal of photoresist, a ridge of photo resist 2009 is formed over remaining photoresist 2004, FIG. 4H. A conformal conductive seed layer 2010 is applied over the upper surface as shown in FIG. 4I in preparation for the deposition of additional metal. Additional photoresist 2011 may be provided in areas where metal plating is not desired by selectively depositing photoresist application, UV exposure, photo imaging, and selective removal, FIG. 4J. A conformal, thin membrane 2012 of copper may be applied in the areas where the seed layer 2010 is exposed and not covered by masking photoresist 2011, FIG. 4K. The thin copper membrane 2012 can provide a flexible three-dimensional membrane spring once the underlying photoresist 2009, 2004 is removed. Were the remaining photoresist 2004, 2007, 2009 and carrier substrate 2001 removed from the structure shown in FIG. 4K, the resulting structure would resemble ground plane array 1100 of FIGS. 1-3. However, the exemplary process of FIGS. 4A-4O continues in FIGS. 4L-4O to create the antenna array.


Specifically, FIGS. 4L-4N show a further set of photoresist coating, UV exposure, resist removal to provide photoresist 2013, 2014, after which a metal 2015 is provided in the gaps therebetween, where the shape of the metal 2015 is provided in the shape of antenna radiators 2015, FIG. 4O. All of the remaining photoresist 2004, 2007, 2009, 2013, 2014 and carrier substrate 2001 may be removed to provide the antenna array structure with ground plane array 2100 as shown in FIG. 4O. Instances of membranes or springs 2012 are shown as being flush with the top surface of the ground plane tiles 1102, but this is not necessary for all embodiments of the invention.


The antenna array 1800 may also be attached to a semiconductor chip or wafer 1900 using epoxy, solder or other suitable means, FIG. 5. The semiconductor chip or wafer 1900 could also be a ceramic or glass substrate, printed circuit board or other medium with an effective coefficient of thermal expansion that may be different from that of the antenna array 1800. In addition, although the steps shown in FIGS. 4A-4O indicate that the temporary carrier substrate 2001 may be removed to produce the antenna array 1800, by making the carrier substrate 2001 permanent, the full device shown in FIG. 5 may be created monolithically. In this case, semiconductor chip or wafer 1900 may be an active wafer, reticle or chip with integrated circuits or it may be a handle that provides rigidity and a known coefficient of thermal expansion that is set by the semiconductor chip or wafer 1900. If electrical through vias are put into the semiconductor chip or wafer 1900, the device of FIG. 5 could then be assembled into a larger system with antenna-element-level electrical connections to amplifiers or other electronics in an antenna system, whether an electronically-scanned phased array or otherwise. In addition, the semiconductor chip or wafer 1900 could serve as a barrier to prevent underfill material from penetrating the rest of the device or to provide a solder wick stop if the apparatus of FIG. 5 is bonded into a higher level assembly, to deter the flow of solder or other materials that may flow due to wicking back toward the antenna leads or connection points. An underfill material may be used to improve the reliability of the connections from the device of FIG. 5 to another package, but such materials may flow into regions they are not intended to penetrate.


Additionally, using multiple layers for the springs 2012 may suppress unwanted electromagnetic modes that may be supported in regions of air or vacuum between the membranes springs 2012 and semiconductor chip or wafer 1900. These modes may come from energy that leaks through the membranes or springs 2012, as it may not be physically continuous, although it is designed to be electrically continuous. The effect of these undesirable modes may appear or disappear depending on the electronic scanning conditions of the antenna array. This can effectively increase the frequency at which these electromagnetic modes are supported beyond the frequency band of interest for a given application.


In addition, the three-dimensional membrane 2012 formation, comprising the steps of FIGS. 4H-4L for example, two-dimensional springs 1112-2 may be provided between ground plane tiles 1102-2 with center conductors 1104-2, which springs 1112-2 may not be as efficient either mechanically or electrically, but nevertheless represents another embodiment of the present invention for providing mechanical decoupling while maintaining electrical connections, FIG. 6. The 2-dimensional springs 1112-2 having a serpentine shape and can provide similar methods of CTE decoupling can be provided as has been described in FIGS. 1-5; however, the aspect ratio of the metal and gap definition attainable using a particular fabrication process may constrain the ability of the designer to create springs 1112-2 with minimal impact on the overall performance of the antenna array or circuit. This is due to the additional inductance inherent in the springs 1112-2 compared to the springs 1112.


In addition, the ground plane tiles 1102-2 and springs 1112-2 can serve a dual purpose. First, the ground plane tiles 1102-2 and springs 1112-2 may provide an essentially electrically continuous ground plane over the frequencies of interest. The features of the springs 1112-2 and the gaps may be sized to be electrically small compared to the operating wavelength, so the ground plane of tiles 1102-2 appears continuous to the antenna elements. An electrically continuous ground plane can be important to the antenna's electrical performance. Second, the spring features allow for thermal expansion mismatch between a mainly-copper part (e.g., Poly Strata® part) and a substrate with significantly different thermal expansion, e.g., silicon, SiC, alumina, Low Temperature Cofired Ceramic (LTCC), etc. The springs 1112-2 may allow a part and/or a substrate adjoined thereto to thermally expand in-plane with different rates. The springs 1112-2 can flex to allow the individual ground plane tiles 1102-2 to move relative to one another without putting undue stress either within the ground plane itself. Additionally, the springs 1112-2 can flex to deter stress between the ground plane and attached structures, including, for example: a metal part (e.g., PolyStrata® part); the bonded electrical junction between the part and a substrate below, e.g., a wafer; and/or, an antenna radiator structure. The effect of the springs 1112-2 on a bonded electrical joint, such as that to a semiconductor wafer, can have a negligible effect on the joint's fatigue life, and can survive the required number of thermal cycles that would be expected during qualification testing and on-orbit lifetime for a typical spacecraft mission.



FIG. 7 schematically illustrates a modification to the apparatus shown in FIG. 4 to improve radiation shielding across the entire device surface. By making a jog 1120 along the path of the center conductor 1104, the regions of lowest line-of-sight radiation shielding have higher shielding levels. Item 1122 is a shield staggering feature in the CTE decoupling structure region. This lowers the effective shielding in those areas where the staggering occurs, but if the gaps between material of adjacent unit cells can be minimized, the reduction of shielding is minimized. With reference to FIG. 5, if the radiation shielding capability of the antenna array for the circuits on 1900 is important, it is possible to ensure those circuits most sensitive to ionizing radiation damage are not placed directly under the U-shaped spring regions 1112 or other areas with less shielding.


In yet a further aspect of the present invention, an array of antenna radiators may be provided using a singulation technique as illustrated in FIGS. 8A, 8B. A continuous array 2200 of antenna radiators may be provided that may include a bottom-side metal pattern 2220, a top-side metal pattern 2230, and circuit board 2240, FIG. 8A. The bottom-side and top-side metal patterns 2220, 2230 may be generally periodic and repeat on the antenna unit cell pitch. It is possible to not have a pattern on one or both sides of the board 2240, and there could be multiple pads on one side of the board (for instance in a case where two pads from the bottom-side metal pattern are capacitively coupling through the board 2240 to the topside metal pattern 2230). The continuous radiator array 2200 may be bonded to the ground plane array 1100 shown in FIG. 1 or the ground plane 1810 of FIG. 4, FIG. 8B. The individual unit cells may be separated from each other by laser ablation or using a dicing saw to decrease the amount of continuous circuit board material to reduce stress induced by CTE differences over the entire length of the continuation array 2200, as the antenna circuit board material is broken into unit-cell-sized pieces, FIG. 8B. By bonding a single continuous radiator array 2200 to the rest of the structure before singulation of the unit-cell-size pieces, there are fewer assembly steps than if each unit-cell-sized piece were assembled individually. As the size of the gap between adjacent unit cells can be small (on the order of 25 microns), the overall electrical effect of making the circuit board material discontinuous can be minimal.


These and other advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing specification. Accordingly, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that changes or modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing from the broad inventive concepts of the invention. For example, while fabrication via PolyStratax technology has been mentioned, other methods of photolithography-based fabrication, 3d printing or other fabrication techniques could be employed in accordance with the present invention. Alternatively, the previous discussion has focused on the spring-like features being included in the material that has the higher CTE; however, through bulk micromachining (or other methods), the spring features could be integrated into the lower-CTE device bonded (such as silicon). It should therefore be understood that this invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is intended to include all changes and modifications that are within the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A microelectronic structure having CTE compensation for use in wafer-level and chip-scale packages, comprising: a plurality of substrate tiles each having a generally planar upper surface, the upper surfaces of the tiles disposed within a common plane to provide a generally planar grid of the tiles, each respective pair of adjacent tiles having a gap disposed therebetween;a spring structure spanning the gap and connecting the adjacent tiles, the spring structure configured to permit movement of the adjacent tiles relative to one another to provide compensation for thermal expansion or contraction of the tiles;a respective opening extending through each substrate tile from the upper surface to an opposing lower surface;an electrically conductive post extending through each opening from the upper surface to the lower surface; anda device layer attached above the upper surfaces of the common plane, the device layer comprising a three-dimensional metal structure which includes a plurality of antenna radiators each disposed on a respective one of the conductive posts, with each antenna radiator suspended above the common plane.
  • 2. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the substrate tiles comprise a semiconductor material.
  • 3. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the substrate tiles comprise metal.
  • 4. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure comprises a membrane.
  • 5. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure comprises a 2-dimensional serpentine structure.
  • 6. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure comprises a metal.
  • 7. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure comprises a U-shaped membrane having a longitudinal axis that is disposed parallel to an edge of the upper surface of the selected tile to which the U-shaped membrane is attached.
  • 8. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure comprises a non-planar structure having a central region that extends upward above the common plane.
  • 9. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure is attached to the upper surfaces of the adjacent tiles.
  • 10. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, comprising a dielectric material disposed on the common plane and disposed within the gap.
  • 11. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the device layer comprises one or more of resistors, capacitors, and inductors.
  • 12. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the three-dimensional metal/dielectric structures include one or more of coaxial waveguides, Wilkinson combiner/dividers, Gysel combiner/dividers, and filters.
  • 13. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the device layer is attached to the upper surfaces with a dielectric material disposed therebetween.
  • 14. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of tiles each comprise multiple adjacent layers of metal disposed in direct contact to one another parallel to the upper surface.
  • 15. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of tiles is electrically continuous.
  • 16. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, comprising a semiconductor chip or wafer attached to the lower surface and electrically connected to the conductive posts to electrically connect the chip or wafer to the antenna radiators.
  • 17. The microelectronic structure of claim 16, wherein the wafer comprises one or more of ceramic substrate, a glass substrate, and a printed circuit board.
  • 18. A method of forming a three-dimensional microstructure by a sequential build process, comprising: disposing a plurality of layers over a substrate, wherein the layers comprise one or more layers of a conductive material and one or more layers of a sacrificial material, thereby forming a structure above the substrate, the structure comprising the microelectronic structure of claim.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the spring structure is formed of the conductive material.
  • 20. The method of claim 18, comprising removing the sacrificial material.
  • 21. The method of claim 18, comprising removing the substrate.
  • 22. The method of claim 18, wherein the spring structure comprises a membrane.
  • 23. The method of claim 18, wherein the spring structure comprises a 2-dimensional serpentine structure.
  • 24. The method of claim 18, wherein the spring structure comprises a U-shaped membrane having a longitudinal axis that is disposed parallel to an edge of the upper surface of the selected tile to which the u-shaped membrane is attached.
  • 25. The method of claim 18, wherein the spring structure comprises a non-planar structure having a central region that extends upward above the common plane.
  • 26. The method of claim 18, wherein the spring structure is attached to the upper surfaces of the adjacent tiles.
  • 27. The method of claim 18, wherein the step of disposing a plurality of layers over a substrate comprises disposing one or more layers of a dielectric material.
  • 28. The method of claim 18, wherein the substrate comprises one or more of ceramic substrate, a glass substrate, and a printed circuit board.
  • 29. The method of claim 18, wherein the device layer comprises one or more of resistors, capacitors, inductors, and the three-dimensional metal/dielectric structures.
  • 30. The microelectronic structure of claim 29, wherein the three-dimensional metal/dielectric structures include one or more of coaxial waveguides, antennas, Wilkinson combiner/dividers, Gysel combiner/dividers, and filters.
  • 31. The method of claim 18, wherein the tiles each comprise a lower surface opposing the upper surface and comprising electrically connecting a semiconductor chip or wafer to the lower surface.
  • 32. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure includes a sheet of material that extends across, and is flush with, the upper surfaces of the plurality of substrate tiles.
  • 33. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, wherein the spring structure includes a membrane of metal disposed conformally over the upper surfaces of the plurality of substrate tiles to provide a flexible three-dimensional membrane spring.
  • 34. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, comprising a sacrificial material disposed in the gaps between each pair of adjacent tiles, the sacrificial material extending upward above the uppers surfaces of the tiles to provide a spring support, wherein the spring structure is conformally disposed over the spring support.
  • 35. The microelectronic structure of claim 34, wherein the sacrificial material comprises photoresist.
  • 36. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, comprising a radiator gap between adjacent antenna radiators and wherein the radiator gap is disposed above, and in registration with, the gap between adjacent tiles.
  • 37. The microelectronic structure of claim 1, comprising a radiator gap between adjacent antenna radiators and wherein the radiator gap is disposed above, and in registration with, the spring structure.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation in part of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/498,188, filed on Apr. 27, 2017, the entire contents of which application are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (269)
Number Name Date Kind
2743505 George May 1956 A
2812501 Sommers Nov 1957 A
2914766 Butler Nov 1959 A
2997519 Hines Aug 1961 A
3309632 Trudeau Mar 1967 A
3311966 Henry Apr 1967 A
3335489 Grant Aug 1967 A
3352730 Murch Nov 1967 A
3464855 Quintana Sep 1969 A
3517847 Williams Jun 1970 A
3526867 Keeler Sep 1970 A
3537043 Smith Oct 1970 A
3560896 Essinger Feb 1971 A
3577105 Jones, Jr. May 1971 A
3598107 Ishikawa Aug 1971 A
3760306 Spinner Sep 1973 A
3775844 Parks Dec 1973 A
3789129 Ditscheid Jan 1974 A
3791858 Mcpherson Feb 1974 A
3884549 Wang May 1975 A
3925883 Cavalear Dec 1975 A
3963999 Nakajima Jun 1976 A
4021789 Furman May 1977 A
4033656 Freehauf Jul 1977 A
4075757 Malm Feb 1978 A
4275944 Sochor Jun 1981 A
4348253 Subbarao Sep 1982 A
4365222 Lampert Dec 1982 A
4414424 Mizoguchi Nov 1983 A
4417393 Becker Nov 1983 A
4437074 Cohen Mar 1984 A
4521755 Carlson Jun 1985 A
4539534 Hudspeth Sep 1985 A
4581301 Michaelson Apr 1986 A
4591411 Reimann May 1986 A
4641140 Heckaman Feb 1987 A
4647878 Landis Mar 1987 A
4663497 Reimann May 1987 A
4673904 Landis Jun 1987 A
4684181 Massit Aug 1987 A
4700159 Jones Oct 1987 A
4717064 Popielarski Jan 1988 A
4729510 Landis Mar 1988 A
4771294 Wasilousky Sep 1988 A
4808273 Hua Feb 1989 A
4832461 Yamagishi May 1989 A
4853656 Guillou Aug 1989 A
4856184 Doeling Aug 1989 A
4857418 Schuetz Aug 1989 A
4859806 Smith Aug 1989 A
4876322 Budde Oct 1989 A
4880684 Boss Nov 1989 A
4909909 Florjancic Mar 1990 A
4915983 Lake Apr 1990 A
4969979 Appelt Nov 1990 A
4975142 Iannacone et al. Dec 1990 A
5069749 Gutierrez Dec 1991 A
5072201 Devaux Dec 1991 A
5089880 Meyer Feb 1992 A
5100501 Blumenthal Mar 1992 A
5119049 Heller Jun 1992 A
5168348 Chu Dec 1992 A
5191699 Ganslmeier Mar 1993 A
5213511 Sobhani May 1993 A
5227013 Kumar Jul 1993 A
5235208 Katoh Aug 1993 A
5274484 Mochizuki Dec 1993 A
5280409 Selna Jan 1994 A
5299939 Walker Apr 1994 A
5312456 Reed May 1994 A
5334956 Leding Aug 1994 A
5381157 Shiga Jan 1995 A
5391881 Jeuch Feb 1995 A
5406235 Hayashi Apr 1995 A
5406423 Hayashi Apr 1995 A
5430257 Lau Jul 1995 A
5454161 Beilin Oct 1995 A
5529504 Greenstein Jun 1996 A
5622895 Frank Apr 1997 A
5633615 Quan May 1997 A
5682062 Gaul Oct 1997 A
5682124 Suski Oct 1997 A
5712607 Dittmer Jan 1998 A
5724012 Teunisse Mar 1998 A
5746868 Abe May 1998 A
5793272 Burghartz Aug 1998 A
5814889 Gaul Sep 1998 A
5860812 Gugliotti Jan 1999 A
5872399 Lee Feb 1999 A
5903059 Bertin May 1999 A
5925206 Boyko Jul 1999 A
5940674 Sachs Aug 1999 A
5961347 Hsu Oct 1999 A
5977842 Brown Nov 1999 A
5990768 Takahashi Nov 1999 A
6008102 Alford Dec 1999 A
6020750 Berger Feb 2000 A
6027630 Cohen Feb 2000 A
6054252 Lundy Apr 2000 A
6180261 Inoue Jan 2001 B1
6183268 Consoli Feb 2001 B1
6207901 Smith Mar 2001 B1
6210221 Maury Apr 2001 B1
6228466 Tsukada May 2001 B1
6232669 Khoury May 2001 B1
6294965 Merrill Sep 2001 B1
6329605 Beroz Dec 2001 B1
6350633 Lin Feb 2002 B1
6388198 Bertin May 2002 B1
6457979 Dove Oct 2002 B1
6465747 DiStefano Oct 2002 B2
6466112 Kwon Oct 2002 B1
6479744 Tsuzuki Nov 2002 B1
6514845 Eng Feb 2003 B1
6518165 Yoon Feb 2003 B1
6535088 Sherman Mar 2003 B1
6589594 Hembree Jul 2003 B1
6600395 Handforth Jul 2003 B1
6603376 Handforth Aug 2003 B1
6648653 Huang Nov 2003 B2
6662443 Chou Dec 2003 B2
6677248 Kwon Jan 2004 B2
6730933 Shimizu May 2004 B1
6735009 Li May 2004 B2
6746891 Cunningham Jun 2004 B2
6749737 Cheng Jun 2004 B2
6800360 Miyanaga Oct 2004 B2
6800555 Test Oct 2004 B2
6827608 Hall Dec 2004 B2
6850084 Hembree Feb 2005 B2
6888427 Sinsheimer May 2005 B2
6889433 Enomoto May 2005 B1
6914513 Wahlers Jul 2005 B1
6917086 Cunningham Jul 2005 B2
6923249 Porter Aug 2005 B1
6943452 Bertin Sep 2005 B2
6971913 Chu Dec 2005 B1
6975267 Stenger Dec 2005 B2
6981414 Knowles Jan 2006 B2
7005750 Liu Feb 2006 B2
7012489 Sherrer Mar 2006 B2
7030712 Brunette Apr 2006 B2
7064449 Lin Jun 2006 B2
7077697 Kooiman Jul 2006 B2
7084722 Goyette Aug 2006 B2
D530674 Ko Oct 2006 S
7116190 Brunker Oct 2006 B2
7129163 Sherrer Oct 2006 B2
7148141 Shim Dec 2006 B2
7148722 Cliff Dec 2006 B1
7148772 Sherrer Dec 2006 B2
7165974 Kooiman Jan 2007 B2
7217156 Wang May 2007 B2
7222420 Moriizumi May 2007 B2
7239219 Brown Jul 2007 B2
7252861 Smalley Aug 2007 B2
7259640 Brown Aug 2007 B2
7383632 Dittmann Jun 2008 B2
7388388 Dong Jun 2008 B2
7400222 Kwon Jul 2008 B2
7405638 Sherrer Jul 2008 B2
7449784 Sherrer Nov 2008 B2
7478475 Hall Jan 2009 B2
7508065 Sherrer Mar 2009 B2
7532163 Chang May 2009 B2
7555309 Baldor Jun 2009 B2
7575474 Dodson Aug 2009 B1
7579553 Moriizumi Aug 2009 B2
7602059 Nobutaka Oct 2009 B2
7619441 Rahman Nov 2009 B1
7628617 Brown Dec 2009 B2
7645147 Dittmann Jan 2010 B2
7645940 Shepherd Jan 2010 B2
7649432 Sherrer Jan 2010 B2
7656256 Houck Feb 2010 B2
7658831 Mathieu Feb 2010 B2
7683842 Engel Mar 2010 B1
7705456 Hu Apr 2010 B2
7741853 Blakely Jun 2010 B2
7748440 Michel Jul 2010 B2
7755174 Rollin et al. Jul 2010 B2
7755895 Ikeda Jul 2010 B2
7898356 Sherrer Mar 2011 B2
7948335 Sherrer May 2011 B2
8004296 Di Stefano Aug 2011 B2
8011959 Tsai Sep 2011 B1
8031037 Sherrer Oct 2011 B2
8188932 Worl May 2012 B2
8210716 Lerman Jul 2012 B2
8232709 Betsuda Jul 2012 B2
8264297 Thompson Sep 2012 B2
8304666 Ko Nov 2012 B2
8339232 Lotfi Dec 2012 B2
8441118 Hua May 2013 B2
8508053 Chumakov Aug 2013 B2
8522430 Kacker Sep 2013 B2
8542079 Sherrer Sep 2013 B2
8641428 Light Feb 2014 B2
8674872 Billaud Mar 2014 B2
8742874 Sherrer Jun 2014 B2
8814601 Sherrer Aug 2014 B1
8866300 Sherrer Oct 2014 B1
8888504 Pischler Nov 2014 B2
9000863 Sherrer Apr 2015 B2
9024417 Rollin et al. May 2015 B2
9165906 Mohammed Oct 2015 B2
9306254 Hovey Apr 2016 B1
9312589 Sherrer et al. Apr 2016 B2
9325044 Reid Apr 2016 B2
9360959 Perlin Jun 2016 B2
9505613 Sherrer Nov 2016 B2
9583856 Sherrer Feb 2017 B2
9786975 Kocurek Feb 2017 B2
9633976 Bernstein Apr 2017 B1
9888600 Hovey Feb 2018 B2
10002818 Rollin et al. Jun 2018 B2
10128601 Beroz Oct 2020 B1
20010040051 Lipponen Nov 2001 A1
20010045361 Boone Nov 2001 A1
20020075104 Kwon Jun 2002 A1
20020127768 Badir Sep 2002 A1
20030029729 Cheng Feb 2003 A1
20030052755 Barnes Mar 2003 A1
20030117237 Niu Jun 2003 A1
20030221968 Cohen Dec 2003 A1
20030222738 Brown Dec 2003 A1
20040000701 White Jan 2004 A1
20040004061 Merdan Jan 2004 A1
20040007468 Cohen Jan 2004 A1
20040007470 Smalley Jan 2004 A1
20040038586 Hall Feb 2004 A1
20040076806 Miyanaga Apr 2004 A1
20040124961 Aoyagi Jul 2004 A1
20040196112 Welbon Oct 2004 A1
20040263290 Sherrer Dec 2004 A1
20050000561 Baret Jan 2005 A1
20050030124 Okamoto Feb 2005 A1
20050042932 Mok Feb 2005 A1
20050045484 Smalley Mar 2005 A1
20050156693 Dove Jul 2005 A1
20050230145 Ishii Oct 2005 A1
20050250253 Cheung Nov 2005 A1
20070158859 Hierholzer Jul 2007 A1
20080191817 Sherrer Aug 2008 A1
20080197946 Houck Aug 2008 A1
20080199656 Nichols Aug 2008 A1
20080240656 Rollin Oct 2008 A1
20090004385 Blackwell Jan 2009 A1
20090051476 Tada Feb 2009 A1
20090127702 Dekker May 2009 A1
20090154972 Tanaka Jun 2009 A1
20100007016 Oppermann Jan 2010 A1
20100015850 Stein Jan 2010 A1
20100109819 Houck May 2010 A1
20100225435 Li Sep 2010 A1
20100296252 Rollin Nov 2010 A1
20100323551 Eldridge Dec 2010 A1
20110123783 Sherrer May 2011 A1
20110123794 Hiller May 2011 A1
20110181376 Vanhille Jul 2011 A1
20110181377 Vanhille Jul 2011 A1
20110210807 Sherrer Sep 2011 A1
20110273241 Sherrer Nov 2011 A1
20120233849 Smeys Sep 2012 A1
20130050055 Paradiso Feb 2013 A1
20130127577 Lotfi May 2013 A1
20140231815 Railkar Aug 2014 A1
20160054385 Suto Feb 2016 A1
20160268967 Webb Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (33)
Number Date Country
2055116 May 1992 CA
3623093 Jan 1988 DE
0398019 Nov 1990 EP
0485831 May 1992 EP
0845831 Jun 1998 EP
0911903 Apr 1999 EP
2086327 Dec 1971 FR
2265754 Oct 1993 GB
H027587 Jan 1990 JP
3027587 Feb 1991 JP
H041710 Jan 1992 JP
H0685510 Mar 1994 JP
H06302964 Oct 1994 JP
H07060844 Mar 1995 JP
H07235803 Sep 1995 JP
H10041710 Feb 1998 JP
1998163711 Jun 1998 JP
2002533954 Oct 2002 JP
2003032007 Jan 2003 JP
2003249731 Sep 2003 JP
200667621 Mar 2006 JP
2007253354 Oct 2007 JP
2008211159 Sep 2008 JP
I244799 Dec 2005 TW
0007218 Feb 2000 WO
0039854 Jul 2000 WO
0206152 Jan 2002 WO
02080279 Oct 2002 WO
2004004061 Jan 2004 WO
2005112105 Nov 2005 WO
2009013751 Jan 2009 WO
2010111455 Sep 2010 WO
WO2015188226 Dec 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (182)
Entry
“Multiplexer/LNA Module using PolyStrata®,” GOMACTech-15, Mar. 26, 2015.
“Shiffman phase shifters designed to work over a 15-45GHz range,” phys.org, Mar. 2014. [online: http://phys.org/wire-news/156496085/schiffman-phase-shifters-designed-to-work-over-a-15-45ghz-range.html].
A. Boryssenko, J. Arroyo, R. Reid, M.S. Heimbeck, “Substrate free G-band Vivaldi antenna array design, fabrication and testing” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, Tucson, Sep. 2014.
A. Boryssenko, K. Vanhille, “300-GHz microfabricated waveguide slotted arrays” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, Tucson, Sep. 2014.
A.A. Immorlica Jr., R. Actis, D. Nair, K. Vanhille, C. Nichols, J.-M. Rollin, D. Fleming, R. Varghese, D. Sherrer, D. Filipovic, E. Cullens, N. Ehsan, and Z. Popovic, “Miniature 3D micromachined solid state amplifiers,” in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas, and Electronic Systems, Tel-Aviv, Israel, May 2008, pp. 1-7.
Ali Darwish et al.; Vertical Balun and Wilkinson Divider; 2002 IEEE MTT-S Digest; pp. 109-112. NPL_30.
B. Cannon, K. Vanhille, “Microfabricated Dual-Polarized, W-band Antenna Architecture for Scalable Line Array Feed,” 2015 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2015.
Brown et al., ‘A Low-Loss Ka-Band Filter in Rectangular Coax Made by Electrochemical Fabrication’, submitted to Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, date unknown {downloaded from www.memgen.com, 2004). NPL_1.
Chance, G.I. et al., “A suspended-membrane balanced frequency doubler at 200GHz,” 29th International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, pp. 321-322, Karlsrube, 2004.
Chwomnawang et al., ‘On-chip 3D Air Core Micro-Inductor for High-Frequency Applications Using Deformation of Sacrificial Polymer’, Proc. SPIE, vol. 4334, pp. 54-62, Mar. 2001. NPL_2.
Colantonio, P., et al., “High Efficiency RF and Microwave Solid State Power Amplifiers,” pp. 380-395, 2009.
Cole, B.E., et al., Micromachined Pixel Arrays Integrated with CMOS for Infrared Applications, pp. 64-64 (2000). NPL_3.
D. Filipovic, G. Potvin, D. Fontaine, C. Nichols, Z. Popovic, S. Rondineau, M. Lukic, K. Vanhille, Y. Saito, D. Sherrer, W. Wilkins, E. Daniels, E. Adler, and J. Evans, “Integrated micro-coaxial Ka-band antenna and array,” GomacTech 2007 Conference, Mar. 2007.
D. Filipovic, G. Potvin, D. Fontaine, Y. Saito, J.-M. Rollin, Z. Popovic, M. Lukic, K. Vanhille, C. Nichols, “Ã?Âμ-coaxial phased arrays for Ka-Band Communications,” Antenna Applications Symposium, Monticello, IL, Sep. 2008, pp. 104-115.
D. Filipovic, Z. Popovic, K. Vanhille, M. Lukic, S. Rondineau, M. Buck, G. Potvin, D. Fontaine, C. Nichols, D. Sherrer, S. Zhou, W. Houck, D. Fleming, E. Daniel, W. Wilkins, V. Sokolov, E. Adler, and J. Evans, “Quasi-planar rectangular μ-coaxial structures for mm-wave applications,” Proc. GomacTech., pp. 28-31, San Diego, Mar. 2006.
D. Sherrer, “Improving electronics' functional density,” MICROmanufacturing, May/Jun. 2015, pp. 16-18.
D.S. Filipovic, M. Lukic, Y. Lee and D. Fontaine, “Monolithic rectangular coaxial lines and resonators with embedded dielectric support,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 740-742, 2008.
De Los Santos, H.J., Introduction to Microelectromechanical (MEM) Microwave Systems {pp. 4, 7-8, 13) (1999). NPL_4.
Derwent Abstract Translation of WO-2010-011911 A2 (published 2010).
Deyong, C, et al., A Microstructure Semiconductor Thermocouple for Microwave Power Sensors, 1997 Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, pp. 917-919. NPL_5.
E. Cullens, “Microfabricated Broadband Components For Microwave Front Ends,” Thesis, 2011.
E. Cullens, K. Vanhille, Z. Popovic, “Miniature bias-tee networks integrated in microcoaxial lines,” in Proc. 40th European Microwave Conf., Paris, France, Sep. 2010, pp. 413-416.
E. Cullens, L. Ranzani, E. Grossman, Z. Popovic, “G-Band Frequency Steering Antenna Array Design and Measurements,” Proceedings of the XXXth URSI General Assembly, Istanbul, Turkey, Aug. 2011.
E. Cullens, L. Ranzani, K. Vanhille, E. Grossman, N. Ehsan, Z. Popovic, “Micro-Fabricated 130-180 GHz frequency scanning waveguide arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Aug. 2012, vol. 60, No. 8, pp. 3647-3653.
Ehsan, N. et al., “Microcoaxial lines for active hybrid-monolithic circuits,” 2009 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave.Symp. Boston, MA, Jun. 2009.
Ehsan, N., “Broadband Microwave Litographic 3D Components,” Doctoral Dissertation 2010.
Elliott Brown/MEMGen Corporation, ‘RF Applications of EFAB Technology’, MTT-S IMS 2003, pp. 1-15. NPL_6.
Engelmann et al., ‘Fabrication of High Depth-to-Width Aspect Ratio Microstructures’, IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Feb. 1992), pp. 93-98.
European Examination Report dated Mar. 21, 2013 for EP Application No. 07150463.3.
European Examination Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Apr. 6, 2010.
European Examination Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Feb. 22, 2012.
European Examination Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Nov. 10, 2008.
European Examination Report of EP App. No. 07150463.3 dated Feb. 16, 2015.
European Search Report for corresponding EP Application No. 07150463.3 dated Apr. 23, 2012.
European Search Report of corresponding European Application No. 08 15 3138 dated Jul. 15, 2008.
European Search Report of Corresponding European Application No. 07 15 0467 dated Apr. 28, 2008.
European Search Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Jul. 2, 2008.
Extended EP Search Report for EP Application No. 12811132.5 dated Feb. 5, 2016.
Filipovic et al.; ‘Modeling, Design, Fabrication, and Performance of Rectangular .mu.-Coaxial Lines and Components’; Microwave Symposium Digest, 2006, IEEE; Jun. 1, 2006; pp. 1393-1396.
Filipovic, D. et al., “Monolithic rectangular coaxial lines. Components and systems for commercial and defense applications,” Presented at 2008 IASTED Antennas, Radar, and Wave Propagation Conferences, Baltimore, MD, USA, Apr. 2008.
Filipovic, D.S., “Design of microfabricated rectangular coaxial lines and components for mm-wave applications,” Microwave Review, vol. 12, No. 2, Nov. 2006, pp. 11-16.
Franssila, S., Introduction to Microfabrication, (pp. 8) (2004). NPL_7.
Frazier et al., ‘M ET ALlic Microstructures Fabricated Using Photosensitive Polyimide Electroplating Molds’, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 2, No. 2, Jun. 1993, pp. 87-94. NPL_8.
Ghodisian, B., et al., Fabrication of Affordable M ET ALlic Microstructures by Electroplating and Photoresist Molds, 1996, pp. 68-71. NPL_9.
H. Guckel, ‘High-Aspect-Ratio Micromachining Via Deep X-Ray Lithography’, Proc. Of IEEE, vol. 86, No. 8 (Aug. 1998), pp. 1586-1593. NPL_10.
H. Kazemi, “350mW G-band Medium Power Amplifier Fabricated Through a New Method of 3D-Copper Additive Manufacturing,” IEEE 2015.
H. Kazemi, “Ultra-compact G-band 16way Power Splitter/Combiner Module Fabricated Through a New Method of 3D-Copper Additive Manufacturing,” IEEE 2015.
H. Zhou, N. A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “Surface micromachined millimeter-wave log-periodic dipole array antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Oct. 2012, vol. 60, No. 10, pp. 4573-4581.
H. Zhou, N. A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “Wideband W-band patch antenna,” 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation , Rome, Italy, Apr. 2011, pp. 1518-1521.
H. Zhou, N.A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “W-band endfire log periodic dipole array,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Spokane, WA, Jul. 2011, pp. 1233-1236.
Hawkins, C.F., The Microelectronics Failure Analysis, Desk Reference Edition (2004). NPL_11.
Horton, M.C., et al., “The Digital Elliptic Filter-A Compact Sharp-Cutoff Design for Wide Bandstop or Bandpass Requirements,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, (1967) MTT-15:307-314.
Immorlica, Jr., T. et al., “Miniature 3D micro-machined solid state power amplifiers,” COMCAS 2008.
Ingram, D.L. et al., “A 427 mW 20% compact W-band InP HEMT MMIC power amplifier,” IEEE RFIC Symp. Digest 1999, pp. 95-98.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 24, 2012 for corresponding PCT/US2011/022173.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 19, 2006 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/011789 dated Apr. 10, 2015.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/063192 dated May 20, 2016.
International Search Report corresponding to PCT/US12/46734 dated Nov. 20, 2012.
International Search Report dated Aug. 29, 2005 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665.
J. M. Oliver, J.-M. Rollin, K. Vanhille, S. Raman, “A W-band micromachined 3-D cavity-backed patch antenna array with integrated diode detector,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Feb. 2012, vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 284-292.
J. M. Oliver, P. E. Ralston, E. Cullens, L. M. Ranzani, S. Raman, K. Vanhille, “A W-band Micro-coaxial Passive Monopulse Comparator Network with Integrated Cavity—Backed Patch Antenna Array,” 2011 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Baltimore, MD, Jun. 2011.
J. Mruk, “Wideband Monolithically Integrated Front-End Subsystems and Components,” Thesis, 2011.
J. Mruk, Z. Hongyu, M. Uhm, Y. Saito, D. Filipovic, “Wideband mm-Wave Log-Periodic Antennas,” 3rd European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, pp. 2284-2287, Mar. 2009.
J. Oliver, “3D Micromachined Passive Components and Active Circuit Integration for Millimeter-Wave Radar Applications,” Thesis, Feb. 10, 2011.
J. R. Mruk, H. Zhou, H. Levitt, D. Filipovic, “Dual wideband monolithically integrated millimeter-wave passive front-end sub-systems,” in 2010 Int. Conf. on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves , Sep. 2010, pp. 1-2.
J. R. Mruk, N. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “Micro-coaxial fed 18 to 110 GHz planar log-periodic antennas with RF transitions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, No. 2, Feb. 2014, pp. 968-972.
J. Reid, “PolyStrata Millimeter-wave Tunable Filters,” GOMACTech-12, Mar. 22, 2012.
J.M. Oliver, H. Kazemi, J.-M. Rollin, D. Sherrer, S. Huettner, S. Raman, “Compact, low-loss, micromachined rectangular coaxial millimeter-wave power combining networks,” 2013 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Seattle, WA, Jun. 2013.
J.R. Mruk, Y. Saito, K. Kim, M. Radway, D. Filipovic, “A directly fed Ku- to W-band 2-arm Archimedean spiral antenna,” Proc. 41st European Microwave Conf., Oct. 2011, pp. 539-542.
J.R. Reid, D. Hanna, R.T. Webster, “A 40/50 GHz diplexer realized with three dimensional copper micromachining,” in 2008 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp., Atlanta, GA, Jun. 2008, pp. 1271-1274.
J.R. Reid, J.M. Oliver, K. Vanhille, D. Sherrer, “Three dimensional metal micromachining: A disruptive technology for millimeter-wave filters,” 2012 IEEE Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems, Jan. 2012.
Jeong, I., et al., “High Performance Air-Gap Transmission Lines and Inductors for Milimeter-Wave Applications”, Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2002.
Jeong, Inho et al., ‘High-Performance Air-Gap Transmission Lines and Inductors for Millimeter-Wave Applications’, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Dec. 2002, pp. 2850-2855, vol. 50, No. 12. NPL_12.
K. J. Vanhille, D. L. Fontaine, C. Nichols, D. S. Filipovic, and Z. Popovic, “Quasi-planar high-Q millimeter-wave resonators,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 2439-2446, Jun. 2006.
K. M. Lambert, F. A. Miranda, R. R. Romanofsky, T. E. Durham, K. J. Vanhille, “Antenna characterization for the Wideband Instrument for Snow Measurements (WISM),” 2015 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2015.
K. Vanhille, “Design and Characterization of Microfabricated Three-Dimensional Millimeter-Wave Components,” Thesis, 2007.
K. Vanhille, M. Buck, Z. Popovic, and D.S. Filipovic, “Miniature Ka-band recta-coax components: analysis and design,” presented at 2005 AP-S/URSI Symposium, Washington, DC, Jul. 2005.
K. Vanhille, M. Lukic, S. Rondineau, D. Filipovic, and Z. Popovic, “Integrated micro-coaxial passive components for millimeter-wave antenna front ends,” 2007 Antennas, Radar, and Wave Propagation Conference, May 2007.
K. Vanhille, T. Durham, W. Stacy, D. Karasiewicz, A. Caba, C. Trent, K. Lambert, F. Miranda, “A microfabricated 8-40 GHz dual-polarized reflector feed,” 2014 Antenna Applications Symposium, Monticello, IL, Sep. 2014. pp. 241-257.
Katehi et al., ‘MEMS and Si Micromachined Circuits for High-Frequency Applications’, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, No. 3, Mar. 2002, pp. 858-866. NPL_13.
Kenneth J. Vanhille et al.; Micro-Coaxial Imedance Transformers; Journal of Latex Class Files; vol. 6; No. 1; Jan. 2007. NPL_29.
Kwok, P.Y., et al., Fluid Effects in Vibrating Micromachined Structures, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 14, No. 4, Aug. 2005, pp. 770-781. NPL_14.
L. Ranzani, D. Kuester, K. J. Vanhille, A Boryssenko, E. Grossman, Z. Popovic, “G-Band micro-fabricated frequency-steered arrays with 2Ã?Â∘/GHz beam steering,” IEEE Trans. on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 3, No. 5, Sep. 2013.
L. Ranzani, E. D. Cullens, D. Kuester, K. J. Vanhille, E. Grossman, Z. Popovic, “W-band micro-fabricated coaxially-fed frequency scanned slot arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, No. 4, Apr. 2013.
L. Ranzani, I. Ramos, Z. Popovic, D. Maksimovic, “Microfabricated transmission-line transformers with DC isolation,” URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO, Jan. 2014.
L. Ranzani, N. Ehsan, Z. Popovic, “G-band frequency-scanned antenna arrays,” 2010 IEEE APS-URSI International Symposium, Toronto, Canada, Jul. 2010.
Lee et al., ‘Micromachining Applications of a High Resolution Ultrathick Photoresist’, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 (6), Nov./Dec. 1995, pp. 3012-3016. NPL_15.
Loechel et al., ‘Application of Ultraviolet Depth Lithography for Surface Micromachining’, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 (6), Nov./Dec. 1995, pp. 2934-2939. NPL_16.
Lukic, M. et al., “Surface-micromachined dual Ka-band cavity backed patch antennas,” IEEE Trans. AtennasPropag., vol. 55, pp. 2107-2110, Jul. 2007.
M. Lukic, D. Filipovic, “Modeling of surface roughness effects on the performance of rectangular Ã?Âμ-coaxial lines,” Proc. 22nd Ann. Rev. Prog. Applied Comp. Electromag. (ACES), pp. 620-625, Miami, Mar. 2006.
M. Lukic, D. Fontaine, C. Nichols, D. Filipovic, “Surface micromachined Ka-band phased array antenna,” Presented at Antenna Applic. Symposium, Monticello, IL, Sep. 2006.
M. Lukic, K. Kim, Y. Lee, Y. Saito, and D. S. Filipovic, “Multi-physics design and performance of a surface micromachined Ka-band cavity backed patch antenna,” 2007 SBMO/IEEE Int. Microwave and Optoelectronics Conf., Oct. 2007, pp. 321-324.
M. Lukic, S. Rondineau, Z. Popovic, D. Filipovic, “Modeling of realistic rectangular Ã?Âμ-coaxial lines,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 2068-2076, May 2006.
M. V. Lukic, and D. S. Filipovic, “Integrated cavity-backed ka-band phased array antenna,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Jun. 2007, pp. 133-135.
M. V. Lukic, and D. S. Filipovic, “Modeling of 3-D Surface Roughness Effects With Application to Ã?Âμ-Coaxial Lines,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Mar. 2007, pp. 518-525.
M. V. Lukic, and D. S. Filipovic, “Surface-micromachined dual Ka-and cavity backed patch antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 2107-2110, Jul. 2007.
Madou, M.J., Fundamentals of Microfabrication: The Science of Miniaturization, 2d Ed., 2002 (Roadmap; pp. 615-668). NPL_17.
Mruk, J.R., Filipovic, D.S, “Micro-coaxial V-/W-band filters and contiguous diplexers,” Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, IET, Jul. 17, 2012, vol. 6, issue 10, pp. 1142-1148.
Mruk, J.R., Saito, Y., Kim, K., Radway, M., Filipovic, D.S., “Directly fed millimetre-wave two-arm spiral antenna,” Electronics Letters, Nov. 25, 2010, vol. 46 , issue 24, pp. 1585-1587.
N. Chamberlain, M. Sanchez Barbetty, G. Sadowy, E. Long, K. Vanhille, “A dual-polarized metal patch antenna element for phased array applications,” 2014 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Memphis, Jul. 2014. pp. 1640-1641.
N. Ehsan, “Broadband Microwave Lithographic 3D Components,” Thesis, 2009.
N. Ehsan, K. Vanhille, S. Rondineau, E. Cullens, Z. Popovic, “Broadband Wilkinson Dividers,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Nov. 2009, pp. 2783-2789.
N. Ehsan, K.J. Vanhille, S. Rondineau, Z. Popovic, “Micro-coaxial impedance transformers,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Nov. 2010, pp. 2908-2914.
N. Jastram, “Design of a Wideband Millimeter Wave Micromachined Rotman Lens,” IEEE Transactions On Antennas And Propagation, vol. 63, No. 6, Jun. 2015.
N. Jastram, “Wideband Millimeter-Wave Surface Micromachined Tapered Slot Antenna,” IEEE Antennas And Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 13, 2014.
N. Jastram, “Wideband Multibeam Millimeter Wave Arrays,” IEEE 2014.
N. Jastram, D. Filipovic, “Monolithically integrated K/Ka array-based direction finding subsystem,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Chicago, IL, Jul. 2012, pp. 1-2.
N. Jastram, D. S. Filipovic, “Parameter study and design of W-band micromachined tapered slot antenna,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Orlando, FL, Jul. 2013, pp. 434-435.
N. Jastram, D. S. Filipovic, “PCB-based prototyping of 3-D micromachined RF subsystems,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, No. 1, Jan. 2014. pp. 420-429.
N. Sutton, D.S. Filipovic, “Design of a K- thru Ka-band modified Butler matrix feed for a 4-arm spiral antenna,” 2010 Loughborough Antennas and Propagation Conference, Loughborough, UK, Nov. 2010, pp. 521-524.
N.A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “V-band monolithically integrated four-arm spiral antenna and beamforming network,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Chicago, IL, Jul. 2012, pp. 1-2.
N.A. Sutton, J. M. Oliver, D. S. Filipovic, “Wideband 15-50 GHz symmetric multi-section coupled line quadrature hybrid based on surface micromachining technology,” 2012 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2012.
N.A. Sutton, J.M. Oliver, D.S. Filipovic, “Wideband 18-40 GHz surface micromachined branchline quadrature hybrid,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Sep. 2012, vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 462-464.
Oliver, J.M. et al., “A 3-D micromachined W-band cavity backed patch antenna array with integrated rectacoax transition to wave guide,” 2009 Proc. IEEE International Microwave Symposium, Boston, MA 2009.
P. Ralston, K. Vanhille, A. Caba, M. Oliver, S. Raman, “Test and verification of micro coaxial line power performance,” 2012 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2012.
P. Ralston, M. Oliver, K. Vummidi, S. Raman, “Liquid-metal vertical interconnects for flip chip assembly of GaAs C-band power amplifiers onto micro-rectangular coaxial transmission lines,” IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Oct. 2011.
P. Ralston, M. Oliver, K. Vummidi, S. Raman, “Liquid-metal vertical interconnects for flip chip assembly of GaAs C-band power amplifiers onto micro-rectangular coaxial transmission lines,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Oct. 2012, vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 2327-2334.
Park et al., ‘Electroplated Micro-Inductors and Micro-Transformers for Wireless application’, IMAPS 2002, Denver, CO, Sep. 2002. NPL_18.
PwrSoC Update 2012: Technology, Challenges, and Opportunities for Power Supply on Chip, Presentation (Mar. 18, 2013).
Rollin, J.M. et al., “A membrane planar diode for 200GHz mixing applications,” 29th International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, pp. 205-206, Karlsrube, 2004.
Rollin, J.M. et al., “Integrated Schottky diode for a sub-harmonic mixer at millimetre wavelengths,” 31st International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, Paris, 2006.
S. Huettner, “High Performance 3D Micro-Coax Technology,” Microwave Journal, Nov. 2013. [online: http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/21004-high-performance-3d-micro-coax-technology].
S. Huettner, “Transmission lines withstand vibration,” Microwaves and RF, Mar. 2011. [online: http://mwrf.com/passive-components/transmission-lines-withstand-vibration].
S. Scholl, C. Gorle, F. Houshmand, T. Liu, H. Lee, Y. Won, H. Kazemi, M. Asheghi, K. Goodson, “Numerical Simulation of Advanced Monolithic Microcooler Designs for High Heat Flux Microelectronics,” InterPACK, San Francisco, CA, Jul. 2015.
S. Scholl, C. Gorle, F. Houshmand, T. Verstraete, M. Asheghi, K. Goodson, “Optimization of a microchannel geometry for cooling high heat flux microelectronics using numerical methods,” InterPACK, San Francisco, CA, Jul. 2015.
Saito et al., “Analysis and design of monolithic rectangular coaxial lines for minimum coupling,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 55, pp. 2521-2530, Dec. 2007.
Saito, Y., Fontaine, D., Rollin, J-M., Filipovic, D., ‘Micro-Coaxial Ka-Band Gysel Power Dividers,’ Microwave Opt Technol Lett 52: 474-478, 2010, Feb. 2010.
Sedky, S., Post-Processing Techniques for Integrated MEMS (pp. 9, 11, 164) (2006). NPL_19.
Sherrer, D, Vanhille, K, Rollin, J.M., ‘PolyStrata Technology: A Disruptive Approach for 3D Microwave Components and Modules,’ Presentation (Apr. 23, 2010).
T. Durham, H.P. Marshall, L. Tsang, P. Racette, Q. Bonds, F. Miranda, K. Vanhille, “Wideband sensor technologies for measuring surface snow,” Earthzine, Dec. 2013, [online: http://www.earthzine.org/2013/12/02/wideband-sensor-technologies-for-measuring-surface-snow/].
T. E. Durham, C. Trent, K. Vanhille, K. M. Lambert, F. A. Miranda, “Design of an 8-40 GHz Antenna for the Wideband Instrument for Snow Measurements (WISM),” 2015 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2015.
T. Liu, F. Houshmand, C. Gorle, S. Scholl, H. Lee, Y. Won, H. Kazemi, K. Vanhille, M. Asheghi, K. Goodson, “Full-Scale Simulation of an Integrated Monolithic Heat Sink for Thermal Management of a High Power Density GaN-SiC Chip,” InterPACK/ICNMM, San Francisco, CA, Jul. 2015.
T.E. Durham, “An 8-40GHz Wideband Instrument for Snow Measurements,” Earth Science Technology Forum, Pasadena, CA, Jun. 2011.
Tian, et al.; Fabrication of multilayered SU8 structure for terahertz waveguide with ultralow transmission loss; Aug. 18, 2013; Dec. 10, 2013; pp. 13002-1 to 13002-6.
Tummala et al.; ‘Microelectronics Packaging Handbook’; Jan. 1, 1989; XP002477031; pp. 710-714. NPL_31.
Vanhille, K. et al., ‘Balanced low-loss Ka-band -coaxial hybrids,’ IEEE MTT-S Dig., Honolulu, Hawaii, Jun. 2007.
Vanhille, K. et al., “Ka-Band surface mount directional coupler fabricated using micro-rectangular coaxial transmission lines,” 2008 Proc. IEEE International Microwave Symposium, 2008.
Vanhille, K., ‘Design and Characterization of Microfabricated Three-Dimensional Millimeter-Wave Components,’ Dissertation, 2007.
Vanhille, K.J. et al., “Ka-band miniaturized quasi-planar high-Q resonators,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1272-1279, Jun. 2007.
Vyas R. et al., “Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP): The ultimate solution for low-cost RF flexible electronics and antennas,” Antennas and Propagation Society, International Symposium, p. 1729-1732 (2007).
Wang, H. et al., “Design of a low integrated sub-harmonic mixer at 183GHz using European Schottky diode technology,” From Proceedings of the 4th ESA workshop on Millimetre-Wave Technology and Applications, pp. 249-252, Espoo, Finland, Feb. 2006.
Wang, H. et al., “Power-amplifier modules covering 70-113 GHz using MMICs,” IEEE Trans Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 39, pp. 9-16, Jan. 2001.
Written Opinion corresponding to PCT/US12/46734 dated Nov. 20, 2012.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 29, 2005 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665.
Y. Saito, D. Fontaine, J.-M. Rollin, D.S. Filipovic, “Monolithic micro-coaxial power dividers,” Electronic Letts., Apr. 2009, pp. 469-470.
Y. Saito, J.R. Mruk, J.-M. Rollin, D.S. Filipovic, “X- through Q- band log-periodic antenna with monolithically integrated u-coaxial impedance transformer/feeder,” Electronic Letts. Jul. 2009, pp. 775-776.
Y. Saito, M.V. Lukic, D. Fontaine, J.-M. Rollin, D.S. Filipovic, “Monolithically Integrated Corporate-Fed Cavity-Backed Antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, No. 9, Sep. 2009, pp. 2583-2590.
Yeh, J.L., et al., Copper-Encapsulated Silicon Micromachined Structures, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 9, No. 3, Sep. 2000, pp. 281-287. NPL_20.
Yoon et al., ‘3-D Lithography and M ET AL Surface Micromachining for RF and Microwave MEMs’ IEEE MEMS 2002 Conference, Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 2002, pp. 673-676. NPL_21.
Yoon et al., ‘CMOS-Compatible Surface Micromachined Suspended-Spiral Inductors for Multi-GHz Sillicon RF Ics’, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, No. 10, Oct. 2002, pp. 591-593. NPL_22.
Yoon et al., ‘High-Performance Electroplated Solenoid-Type Integrated Inductor (SI2) for RF Applications Using Simple 3D Surface Micromachining Technology’, Int'l Election Devices Meeting, 1998, San Francisco, CA, Dec. 6-9, 1998, pp. 544-547. NPL_23.
Yoon et al., ‘High-Performance Three-Dimensional On-Chip Inductors Fabricated by Novel Micromachining Technology for RF MMIC’, 1999 IEEE MTT-S Int'l Microwave Symposium Digest, vol. 4, Jun. 13-19, 1999, Anaheim, California, pp. 1523-1526. NPL_24.
Yoon et al., ‘Monolithic High-Q Overhang Inductors Fabricated on Silicon and Glass Substrates’, International Electron Devices Meeting, Washington D.C. (Dec. 1999), pp. 753-756. NPL_25.
Yoon et al., ‘Monolithic Integration of 3-D Electroplated Microstructures with Unlimited Number of Levels Using Planarization with a Sacrificial M ET ALlic Mole (PSMm)’, Twelfth IEEE Int'l Conf. on Micro Electro mechanical systems, Orlando Florida, Jan. 1999, pp. 624-629. NPL_26.
Yoon et al., ‘Multilevel Microstructure Fabrication Using Single-Step 3D Photolithography and Single-Step Electroplating’, Proc. Of SPIE, vol. 3512, (Sep. 1998), pp. 358-366. NPL_27.
Yoon et al., “High-Performance Electroplated Solenoid-Type Integrated Inductor (S12) for RF Applications Using Simple 3D Surface Micromachining Technology”, Int'l Election Devices Meeting, 1998, San Francisco, CA, Dec. 6-9, 1998, pp. 544-547.
Z. Popovic, “Micro-coaxial micro-fabricated feeds for phased array antennas,” in IEEE Int. Symp. on Phased Array Systems and Technology, Waltham, MA, Oct. 2010, pp. 1-10. (Invited).
Z. Popovic, K. Vanhille, N. Ehsan, E. Cullens, Y. Saito, J.-M. Rollin, C. Nichols, D. Sherrer, D. Fontaine, D. Filipovic, “Micro-fabricated micro-coaxial millimeter-wave components,” in 2008 Int. Conf. on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves, Pasadena, CA, Sep. 2008, pp. 1-3.
Z. Popovic, S. Rondineau, D. Filipovic, D. Sherrer, C. Nichols, J.-M. Rollin, and K. Vanhille, “An enabling new 3D architecture for microwave components and systems,” Microwave Journal, Feb. 2008, pp. 66-86.
Complaint in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division State of North Carolina, County of Wake; Masud Beroz and Componentzee, LLCV. Nuvotronics, Inc.; Nov. 16, 2017.
Answer and Counter Claim in the General Court of Justice Superior Court Division State of North Carolina, County of Wake; Masud Beroz and Componentzee, LLCV. Nuvotronics, Inc.; Jan. 18, 2018.
Assignments of U.S. Appl. No.62/327,807. Apr. 26, 2016.
Preliminary Amendment, Office Action, Response to Office Action and Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 15/895,794. dated Mar. 22, 2018, Feb. 14, 2018.
USDC Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division; Nuvotronics, Inc. v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Civil Action; Case No. 5:19-cv-00072; Feb. 28, 2019; pp. 1-16.
USDC Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division; Nuvotronics, Inc.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Case 5:19-cv-00072-FL; Apr. 26, 2019; pp. 1-3.
USDC Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division; Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Nuvotronics, Inc. v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Case 5:19;v-00072-FL; Apr. 26, 2019; pp. 1-15.
USDC Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division; Plaintiff'S Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Nuvotronics, Inc. v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Case 5:19-cv-00072-FL; May 31, 2019; pp. 1-17.
USDC Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division; Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff'S Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismisscomponentzee LLC et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; case 5:19-cv-00072-FL; Jun. 14, 2019; pp. 1-7.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Verified Complaint; Civil Action; Nov. 16, 2017; pp. 1-68.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Amended Answer & COUNTERCLAIM; Case No2017CVS13984 ECF No. 57; Apr. 22, 2019; Pgs. 1-53.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Reply Brief in Support of Defendant'S Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fifth Claim for Relief; Case No. 2017CVS13984 ECF No. 26; Feb. 20, 2018; pp. 1-53.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Defendant'S Response Brief in opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Nuvotronics' Counterclaims; Case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 29; Mar. 12, 2018; pp. 1-13.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Answer and Counterclaim; Case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 14; Jan. 18, 2018; pp. 1-34.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim; Case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 24; Feb. 19, 2018.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Reply in Support of plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim; Case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 32; Mar. 22, 2018; pp. 1-13.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Plaintiffs'/Counterclaim. Defendants' Reply to Counterclaim of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Nuvotronics, Inc.; Case No. 2017CVS13984 ECF No. 25; Feb. 19, 2018; pp. 1-13.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Response in Opposition to Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintff'S Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fifth Claim for Relief; Case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 21; Feb. 12, 2018; pp. 1-10.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Memorandum of Law in Support.Df Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff'S Fifth Claim for Relief; Case No. 2017CVS13984 ECF Vo. 13; Jan. 18, 2018; pp. 1-9.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Memorandum of Law in Support Df Defendants Motion to Dismiss; Case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 60; May 28, 2019; pp. 1-24.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Answer to Defendants Counterclaim; Case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 58; May 7, 2019; pp. 1-13.
N.C. Business Court; Masud Beroz et al.v. Componentzee LLC et al.; Verified Amended Complaint; 2, case No.2017CVS13984 ECF No. 56; Apr. 8, 2019; pp. 1-31.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170330836 A1 Nov 2017 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 15498188 Apr 2017 US
Child 15651531 US