1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the fabrication of integrated circuit devices, and more particularly, to a method and package for semiconductor devices.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The creation of semiconductor devices, also referred to as Integrated Circuits (IC) has been made possible by the rapid development of supporting technologies such as photolithography and methods of etching. Most of these technologies have over the years had to address concerns created by a continued decrease in device dimensions and increase in device densities. This effort of creating improved performance devices does is not limited in its impact on the device itself but extends into the methods and packages that are used to further interconnect semiconductor devices and to protect these devices from environmental damage. This latter issue has created a packaging technology that is also driven by continuing demands of device miniaturization and denser packaging of devices, this at no penalty to device performance and in a cost-effective manner.
Semiconductor device packaging typically mounts a device on a substrate, such as semiconductor substrates, printed circuit boards, flex circuits, metallized substrates, glass substrates and semiconductor device mounting support. Such a substrate can be a relative complex structure, having multiple payers of interconnect metal distributed throughout the height of the substrate in addition to having interconnect traces created on one or both surfaces of the substrate. In addition, in order to enable the mounting of semiconductor over the surface of the substrate, contact pads such as bond pads are typically provided over at least one of the surfaces of a substrate. For more complex packages, several levels of packaging may be applied whereby a semiconductor device is mounted on a substrate and connected to interconnect metal that is part of the substrate, the first level substrate may be further mounted over the surface of a larger substrate from which the device is interconnected to surrounding circuitry or electrical components. Limitations that are imposed on this method of packaging are typically limitations of electrical performance that is imposed on the device by the packaging interface. For instance, of key concerns are RC delays in the transmission of signals over the various interconnect traces. This places a restraint of size and therefore packaging density on the package. Also of concern are considerations of parasitic capacitance and inductance that are introduced by the package since these parameters have a negative impact on device performance, a more serious impact on high frequency device performance. These parasitic components must therefore be minimized or suppressed to the maximum extent possible.
One or the more conventional methods of connecting a semiconductor device to surrounding points of interconnect is the use of a solder bump. Typically a semiconductor device will be provided on the active surface of the device with points of electrical interconnect which electrically access the device. To connect these points of interconnect to for instance a printer circuit board, solder bumps are provided on the surface of the circuit board that align with the points of electrical contact of the device. The creation of this interface is also subject to requirements imposed by electrical performance of the completed package, by requirements of package miniaturization, reliability, cost performance and the like. The invention provides a package that addresses these packaging concerns in addition to others.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,181,569 (Charkravorty) shows a solder bump process and structure that includes trace formation and bump plating.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,180 (Munroe et al.) shows a bump process using UBM and solder bumps.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,879,964 (Paik et al.) shows a related bump and interconnect process.
A principle objective of the invention is to provide a high-pillar solder bump that sustains a high stand-off of the complete solder bump while maintaining high bump reliability and minimizing damage caused by mismatching of thermal stress factors between the interfacing surfaces.
Another objective of the invention is to provide a method that further improves bump reliability by reducing mechanical and thermal stress.
Yet another objective of the invention is to provide re-distribution bumps which enable the creation of a flip-chip package without requiring a change in the design of the Integrated Circuit and without modifying the pad pitch, the performance of the package is improved and the package size does not need to be modified.
A still further objective of the invention is to provide a chip scale package using one UBM layer of metal, significantly reducing costs of fabrication and materials.
A still further objective of the invention is to provide a chip scale package whereby the solder ball is removed from the semiconductor device, eliminating the need for low-alpha solder, thus reducing fabrication cost and concerns of soft-error occurrence.
In accordance with the objectives of the invention a new method and chip scale package is provided. The inventions starts with a substrate over which a contact point is provided, the contact point and the surface of the substrate are protected by a layer of passivation, the contact point is exposed through an opening created in the layer of passivation. A layer of polymer or elastomer is deposited over the layer of passivation, an opening is created through the layer of polymer or elastomer that aligns with the contact point (contact pad), exposing the contact pad. A barrier/seed layer is deposited over the surface of the layer of polymer or elastomer, including the inside surfaces of the opening created through the layer of polymer or elastomer and the exposed surface of the contact pad. A first photoresist mask is created over the surface of the barrier/seed layer, the first photoresist mask exposes the barrier/seed layer where this layer overlies the contact pad and, contiguous therewith, over a surface area that is adjacent to the contact pad and emanating in one direction from the contact pad. The exposed surface of the barrier/seed layer is electroplated for the creation of interconnect traces. The first photoresist mask is removed from the surface of the barrier/seed layer, a second photoresist mask is created exposing the surface area of the barrier/seed layer that is adjacent to the contact pad and emanating in one direction from the contact pad. The second photoresist mask defines that solder bump. The solder bump is created in accordance with the second photoresist mask, the second photoresist mask is removed from the surface of the barrier/seed layer, exposing the electroplating and the barrier/seed layer with the metal plating overlying the barrier/seed layer. The exposed barrier/seed layer is etched in accordance with the pattern formed by the electroplating, reflow of the solder bump is optionally performed.
Two prior art applications are shown in the cross sections of
As materials that can be used as a polymer for the deposition of layer 44 can be cited polyimide, parylene or teflon, electron resist, solid organics or inorganics, BCB (bisbenzocyclobutene), PMMA (poly-methyl-methacrylate), teflon which is a polymer made from PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene), also polycarbonate (PC), polysterene (PS), polyoxide (PO) and poly polooxide (PPO).
The semiconductor supporting surface 10 can be semiconductor substrates, printed circuit boards, flex circuits, metallized substrates, glass substrates and semiconductor device mounting support, whereby the semiconductor substrate can selected from the group of substrates consisting of semiconductor substrates, ceramic substrates, glass substrates, gallium arsenide substrates, silicon on insulator (SOI) substrates and silicon on sapphire (SOS) substrates.
A typical barrier layer 46 is deposited using rf. sputtering of titanium nitride, tantalum, tungsten, niobium, molybdenum, Ti/TiN or Ti/W and is more preferably formed from TiN. The barrier layer 46 can also be used to improve the adhesion of a subsequent overlying metal layers. A barrier layer is preferably about 100 and 1000 angstrom thick.
To further enhance the adhesion of a copper interconnect line to the surrounding layer of dielectric or insulation, a seed layer is deposited over the barrier layer. A seed layer can be deposited using a sputter chamber or an Ion Metal Plasma (IMP) chamber at a temperature of between about 0 and 300 degrees C. and a pressure of between about 1 and 100 mTorr, using copper or a copper alloy as the source at a flow rate of between about 10 and 400 sccm and using argon as an ambient gas. The minimum thickness of a seed layer is about 5,000 Angstrom, this thickness is required achieve a reliable gap fill.
The process of deposition and patterning a layer of photoresist uses conventional methods of photolithography and masking. Layer 48 of photoresist can be etched by applying O2 plasma and then wet stripping by using H2SO4, H2O2 and NH4OH solution. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and mixtures of H2SO4 with other oxidizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are widely used in stripping photoresist after the photoresist has been stripped by other means. Wafers to be stripped can be immersed in the mixture at a temperature between about 100 degrees C. and about 150 degrees C. for 5 to 10 minutes and then subjected to a thorough cleaning with deionized water and dried by dry nitrogen. Inorganic resist strippers, such as the sulfuric acid mixtures, are very effective in the residual free removal of highly postbaked resist. They are more effective than organic strippers and the longer the immersion time, the cleaner and more residue free wafer surface can be obtained. The opening 43 that is in this manner created in the layer 48 of photoresist exposes the surface of the layer 44 of barrier/seed material over a surface area where re-routing metal has to be created.
Removal of the first photoresist mask 48 from the surface of the barrier/seed layer 46 results in the cross section that is shown in
The invention continues with the cross section that is shown in
The cross section that is shown in
With the completion of the electroplating of these three layers, the solder bump is essentially complete. The second solder mask 52,
It is good practice and can be of benefit in the creation of the layers 54, 56 and 58 of metal to perform, prior to the electroplating of these layers of metal, an in-situ sputter clean of the exposed surface (exposed through opening 51) of the layer 50 of re-routing metal.
The barrier/seed layer 46 can now be etched using the patterned layer 50 of interconnect metal as a mask, which leads to the cross section that is shown in
It is further good practice to oxidize the surface of the UBM and pillar metal by chemical or thermal oxidation. The chemical oxidation could be an H2O2 oxidation process, at a temperature in excess of about 150 degrees C. These processing steps can further help prevent wetting of the solder bump to the metal traces.
Reflow can optionally be applied the layer 58 of solder compound, creating a spherical layer 58 of solder which forms the solder bump (not shown). It must be noted in the cross section that is shown in
Layer 56 of UBM may contain multiple layers of metal such as a layer of chrome, followed by a layer of copper, followed by a layer of gold. From the latter it is apparent that layer 56 of UBM may comprise several layers of metal that are successively deposited.
Examples of the application of the package of the invention are shown in cross section in
Shown in cross section in
In order to better highlight the differences between the prior art solder bump, as shown in cross section in
The essential differences between the prior art and the instant invention is provided by the two plating steps and can, for easy reference be summarized as follows:
The advantages of the instant invention can be summarized as follows:
In sum: the invention provides a method to create a solder bump having a high metal pillar and a solder ball. Seed/barrier layer deposition is limited to one deposition, a first metal plating step defines the re-routing metal, a second metal plating step creates the solder bump. The need for additional layers of passivation or solder mask has been removed.
Although the invention has been described and illustrated with reference to specific illustrative embodiments thereof, it is not intended that the invention be limited to those illustrative embodiments. Those skilled in the art will recognize that variations and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended to include within the invention all such variations and modifications which fall within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/136,650, filed on May 24, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,338,890, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/638,454, filed on Aug. 11, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,917,119, which is a division of application Ser. No. 09/953,525, filed on Sep. 17, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,642,136.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3668484 | Greig | Jun 1972 | A |
4087314 | George | May 1978 | A |
4179802 | Joshi | Dec 1979 | A |
4652336 | Andrascek | Mar 1987 | A |
4726991 | Hyatt et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4811237 | Putatunda et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4825276 | Kobayashi | Apr 1989 | A |
4880708 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5046161 | Takada | Sep 1991 | A |
5061985 | Meguro | Oct 1991 | A |
5071518 | Pan | Dec 1991 | A |
5083187 | Lamson | Jan 1992 | A |
5108950 | Wakabayashi | Apr 1992 | A |
5132775 | Brighton | Jul 1992 | A |
5134460 | Brady | Jul 1992 | A |
5137845 | Lochon | Aug 1992 | A |
5223454 | Uda | Jun 1993 | A |
5226232 | Boyd | Jul 1993 | A |
5239447 | Cotues | Aug 1993 | A |
5244833 | Gansauge | Sep 1993 | A |
5261155 | Angulas | Nov 1993 | A |
5268072 | Agarwala | Dec 1993 | A |
5326709 | Moon | Jul 1994 | A |
5418186 | Park | May 1995 | A |
5468984 | Efland | Nov 1995 | A |
5503286 | Nye, III | Apr 1996 | A |
5534465 | Frye | Jul 1996 | A |
5535101 | Miles et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541135 | Pfeifer | Jul 1996 | A |
5547740 | Higdon et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554940 | Hubacher | Sep 1996 | A |
5565379 | Baba | Oct 1996 | A |
5598348 | Rusu et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600180 | Kusaka | Feb 1997 | A |
5629241 | Matloubian | May 1997 | A |
5631499 | Hosomi | May 1997 | A |
5656858 | Kondo et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5656863 | Yasunaga | Aug 1997 | A |
5664642 | Williams | Sep 1997 | A |
5726502 | Beddingfield | Mar 1998 | A |
5736791 | Fujiki | Apr 1998 | A |
5742094 | Ting | Apr 1998 | A |
5756370 | Farnworth | May 1998 | A |
5757074 | Matloubian | May 1998 | A |
5767010 | Mis | Jun 1998 | A |
5780925 | Cipolla | Jul 1998 | A |
5808900 | Buer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5854513 | Kim | Dec 1998 | A |
5866949 | Schueller | Feb 1999 | A |
5874781 | Fogal | Feb 1999 | A |
5877078 | Yanagida | Mar 1999 | A |
5879964 | Paik et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882957 | Lin | Mar 1999 | A |
5883435 | Geffken | Mar 1999 | A |
5892273 | Iwasaki | Apr 1999 | A |
5895947 | Lee et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898222 | Farooq | Apr 1999 | A |
5903343 | Ning | May 1999 | A |
5933358 | Koh et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937320 | Andricacos | Aug 1999 | A |
5943597 | Kleffner | Aug 1999 | A |
5946590 | Satoh | Aug 1999 | A |
5949654 | Fukuoka | Sep 1999 | A |
5977632 | Beddingfield | Nov 1999 | A |
5985765 | Hsiao | Nov 1999 | A |
6013571 | Morrell | Jan 2000 | A |
6015505 | David | Jan 2000 | A |
6028363 | Lin | Feb 2000 | A |
6042953 | Yamaguchi | Mar 2000 | A |
6043672 | Sugasawara | Mar 2000 | A |
6051450 | Ohsawa | Apr 2000 | A |
6075290 | Schaefer | Jun 2000 | A |
6077726 | Mistry | Jun 2000 | A |
6093964 | Saitoh | Jul 2000 | A |
6103552 | Lin | Aug 2000 | A |
6107180 | Munroe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6144100 | Shen | Nov 2000 | A |
6144102 | Amagai | Nov 2000 | A |
6144390 | Ensor | Nov 2000 | A |
6157080 | Tamaki | Dec 2000 | A |
6159837 | Yamaji et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162652 | Dass | Dec 2000 | A |
6166444 | Hsuan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177731 | Ishida et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180265 | Erickson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181569 | Chakravorty | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187680 | Costrini | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6194309 | Jin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197613 | Kung | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198169 | Kobayashi | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198619 | Fujioka | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207467 | Vaiyapuri | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229220 | Saitoh | May 2001 | B1 |
6229711 | Yoneda | May 2001 | B1 |
6250541 | Shangguan | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258705 | Chien | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268662 | Test | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271107 | Massingill | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287893 | Elenius et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294406 | Bertin | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311147 | Tuan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319830 | Yamaguchi | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319846 | Lin et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332988 | Berger, Jr. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348401 | Chen | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362087 | Wang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372619 | Huang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372622 | Tan | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380061 | Kobayashi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383916 | Lin | May 2002 | B1 |
6405357 | Chao et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406967 | Chung | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6426281 | Lin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426556 | Lin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429531 | Mistry | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446245 | Xing et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452270 | Huang | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457157 | Singh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462426 | Kelkar et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467674 | Mihara | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6479900 | Shinogi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6495397 | Kubota | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501169 | Aoki | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6518092 | Kikuchi | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518651 | Hashimoto | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6523154 | Cohn et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538331 | Masuda | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6541847 | Hofstee | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555296 | Jao et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6558978 | McCormick | May 2003 | B1 |
6573598 | Ohuchi | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6578754 | Tung | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592019 | Tung | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600234 | Kuwabara | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6617655 | Estacio et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620728 | Lin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627988 | Andoh | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6642136 | Lee et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6642610 | Park | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653563 | Bohr | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661100 | Anderson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675139 | Jetton et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683380 | Efland et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6707159 | Kumamoto et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6709985 | Goruganthu | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6731003 | Joshi | May 2004 | B2 |
6732913 | Alvarez | May 2004 | B2 |
6756664 | Yang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762122 | Mis | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765299 | Takahashi | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774475 | Blackshear | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791178 | Yamaguchi | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6806578 | Howell et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809020 | Sakurai | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815324 | Huang | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6841872 | Ha et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6853076 | Datta | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861742 | Miyamoto | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6864165 | Pogge | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6917106 | Datta | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917119 | Lee et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6940169 | Jin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963136 | Shinozaki | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6977435 | Kim | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6991961 | Hubbard et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6998710 | Kobayashi | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6998711 | Farrar | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7008867 | Lei | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7034402 | Seshan | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7043389 | Plusquellic | May 2006 | B2 |
7045899 | Yamane | May 2006 | B2 |
7074050 | Bartley | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7084660 | Ackaret | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7095105 | Cherukuri | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7098127 | Ito | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111265 | Tan et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7119002 | Lin | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135766 | Costa | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7135770 | Nishiyama | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7196001 | Datta | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220657 | Ihara | May 2007 | B2 |
7224056 | Burtzlaff | May 2007 | B2 |
7246432 | Tanaka | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7265440 | Zilber | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7268438 | Nishiyama | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7314819 | Hua | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335536 | Lange | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338890 | Lee et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7355288 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7449406 | Nishiyama | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7456089 | Aiba | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462942 | Tan | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7479398 | Zilber | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7479690 | Shiraishi | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7495341 | Zilber | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505284 | Offrein | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20010000080 | Nozawa | Mar 2001 | A1 |
20010026021 | Honda | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010026954 | Takao | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010039642 | Anzai | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010040290 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016079 | Dykstra et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020043723 | Shimizu | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020079576 | Seshan | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020100975 | Kanda | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020105092 | Coyle | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121709 | Matsuki | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030006062 | Stone | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030008133 | Paik et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020163 | Hung et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030052409 | Matsuo et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030080416 | Jorger et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127734 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151047 | Corbett et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162383 | Yamaya et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030168733 | Hashimoto | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030218246 | Abe | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030219966 | Jin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040007779 | Arbuthnot | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040048202 | Lay et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040088443 | Tran et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040163054 | Frank et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040268281 | Dotson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050050502 | Kurihara et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090916 | Aghababazadeh et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060080630 | Lin | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060239102 | Saita et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080099928 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113503 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080113504 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080284037 | Andry | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1536469 | Jun 2005 | EP |
60217646 | Oct 1985 | JP |
62160744 | Jul 1987 | JP |
1061038 | Mar 1989 | JP |
03022437 | Jan 1991 | JP |
4278543 | Oct 1992 | JP |
4318935 | Nov 1992 | JP |
1961221 | Aug 1995 | JP |
1985660 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8013166 | Jan 1996 | JP |
2785338 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2000260803 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002016096 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2003133477 | May 2003 | JP |
2003234367 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003282788 | Oct 2003 | JP |
2006128662 | May 2006 | JP |
2006147810 | Jun 2006 | JP |
3829325 | Oct 2006 | JP |
3850261 | Nov 2006 | JP |
3856304 | Dec 2006 | JP |
393709 | Jun 2000 | TW |
396419 | Jul 2000 | TW |
396419 | Jul 2000 | TW |
397933 | Jul 2000 | TW |
418470 | Jan 2001 | TW |
419764 | Jan 2001 | TW |
419764 | Jan 2001 | TW |
419765 | Jan 2001 | TW |
423081 | Feb 2001 | TW |
434857 | May 2001 | TW |
434860 | May 2001 | TW |
452950 | Sep 2001 | TW |
Entry |
---|
Mistry, K. et al. “A 45nm Logic Technology with High-k+ Metal Gate Transistors, Strained Silicon, 9 Cu Interconnect Layers, 193nm Dry Patterning, and 100% Pb-free Packaging,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (2007) pp. 247-250. |
Edelstein, D.C., “Advantages of Copper Interconnects,” Proceedings of the 12th International IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference (1995) pp. 301-307. |
Theng, C. et al. “An Automated Tool Deployment for ESD (Electro-Static-Discharge) Correct-by-Construction Strategy in 90 nm Process,” IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (2004) pp. 61-67. |
Gao, X. et al. “An improved electrostatic discharge protection structure for reducing triggering voltage and parasitic capacitance,” Solid-State Electronics, 27 (2003), pp. 1105-1110. |
Yeoh, A. et al. “Copper Die Bumps (First Level Interconnect) and Low-K Dielectrics in 65nm High Volume Manufacturing,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference (2006) pp. 1611-1615. |
Hu, C-K. et al. “Copper-Polyimide Wiring Technology for VLSI Circuits,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings VLSI V (1990) pp. 369-373. |
Roesch, W. et al. “Cycling copper flip chip interconnects,” Microelectronics Reliability, 44 (2004) pp. 1047-1054. |
Lee, Y-H. et al. “Effect of ESD Layout on the Assembly Yield and Reliability,” International Electron Devices Meeting (2006) pp. 1-4. |
Yeoh, T-S. “ESD Effects on Power Supply Clamps,” Proceedings of the 6th International Sympoisum on, Physical & Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (1997) pp. 121-124 |
Edelstein, D. et al. “Full Copper Wiring in a Sub-0.25 pm CMOS ULSI Technology,” Technical Digest IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (1997) pp. 773-776 |
Venkatesan, S. et al. “A High Performance 1.8V, 0.20 pm CMOS Technology with Copper Metallization,” Technical Digest IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (1997) pp. 769-772 |
Jenei, S. et al. “High Q Inductor Add-on Module in Thick Cu/SiLK™ single damascene,” Proceedings from the IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (2001) pp. 107-109. |
Groves, R. et al. “High Q Inductors in a SiGe BiCMOS Process Utilizing a Thick Metal Process Add-on Module,” Proceedings of the Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (1999) pp. 149-152. |
Sakran, N. et al. “The Implementation of the 65nm Dual-Core 64b Merom Processor,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 5, Microprocessors, 5.6 (2007) pp. 106-107, p. 590. |
Kumar, R. et al. “A Family of 45nm IA Processors,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 3, Microprocessor Technologies, 3.2 (2009) pp. 58-59. |
Bohr, M. “The New Era of Scaling in an SoC World,” International Solid-State Circuits Conference (2009) Presentation Slides 1-66. |
Bohr, M. “The New Era of Scaling in an SoC World,” International Solid-State Circuits Conference (2009) pp. 23-28. |
Ingerly, D. et al. “Low-K Interconnect Stack with Thick Metal 9 Redistribution Layer and Cu Die Bump for 45nm High Volume Manufacturing,” International Interconnect Technology Conference (2008) pp. 216-218. |
Kurd, N. et al. “Next Generation Intel® Micro-architecture (Nehalem) Clocking Architecture,” Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers (2008) pp. 62-63. |
Maloney, T. et al. “Novel Clamp Circuits for IC Power Supply Protection,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part C, vol. 19, No. 3 (Jul. 1996) pp. 150-161. |
Geffken, R. M. “An Overview of Polyimide Use in Integrated Circuits and Packaging,” Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Ultra Large Scale Integration Science and Technology (1991) pp. 667-677. |
Luther, B. et al. “Planar Copper-Polyimide Back End of the Line Interconnections for ULSI Devices,” Proceedings of the 10th International IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference (1993) pp. 15-21. |
Master, R. et al. “Ceramic Mini-Ball Grid Array Package for High Speed Device,” Proceedings from the 45th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (1995) pp. 46-50. |
Maloney, T. et al. “Stacked PMOS Clamps for High Voltage Power Supply.Protection,” Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings (1999) pp. 70-77 |
Lin, M.S. et al. “A New System-on-a-Chip (SOC) Technology—High Q Post Passivation Inductors,” Proceedings from the 53rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (May 30, 2003) pp. 1503-1509. |
Megic Corp. “MEGIC way to system solutions through bumping and redistribution,” (Brochure) (Feb. 6, 2004) pp. 1-3. |
Lin, M.S. “Post Passivation Technology™—MEGIC® Way to System Solutions,” Presentation given at TSMC Technology Symposium, Japan (Oct. 1, 2003) pp. 1-32. |
Lin, M.S. et al. “A New IC Interconnection Scheme and Design Architecture for.High Performance ICs at Very Low Fabrication Cost—Post Passivation Interconnection,” Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (Sep. 24, 2003) pp. 533-536. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080111236 A1 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09953525 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 10638454 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11136650 | May 2005 | US |
Child | 11930213 | US | |
Parent | 10638454 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 11136650 | US |