Conductive barrier direct hybrid bonding

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11830838
  • Patent Number
    11,830,838
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 22, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 28, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
A method for forming a direct hybrid bond and a device resulting from a direct hybrid bond including a first substrate having a first set of metallic bonding pads, preferably connected to a device or circuit, capped by a conductive barrier, and having a first non-metallic region adjacent to the metallic bonding pads on the first substrate, a second substrate having a second set of metallic bonding pads capped by a second conductive barrier, aligned with the first set of metallic bonding pads, preferably connected to a device or circuit, and having a second non-metallic region adjacent to the metallic bonding pads on the second substrate, and a contact-bonded interface between the first and second set of metallic bonding pads capped by conductive barriers formed by contact bonding of the first non-metallic region to the second non-metallic region.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to the field of direct bonding, more specifically hybrid direct bonding, preferably at room or low temperature, and more particularly to the bonding of semiconductor materials, devices, or circuits to be utilized in stacked semiconductor device and integrated circuit fabrication and even more particularly to the fabrication of value-added parts in consumer and business products including image sensors in mobile phones, RF front ends in cell phones, 3D memory in high performance graphics products, and 3D memory in servers.


Description of the Related Art

Die, chip, or wafer stacking has become an industry standard practice to the continuing demands of increased functionality in a smaller form factor at lower cost. In general, stacking can be done with electrical interconnections between layers in the stack formed either as part of the stacking process or after the stacking process. An example of electrical interconnections formed after the stacking process is the use of through silicon via (TSV) etching and filling through one layer in the stack and into an adjacent layer in the stack to make electrical interconnections between layers in the stack. Examples of these three dimensional (3D) electrical interconnections formed as part of the stacking process include solder bumps and copper pillar, either with or without underfill, hybrid bonding and direct hybrid bonding. Realization of the 3D electrical interconnections as part of the stacking process is advantageous for a number of reasons including but not limited to eliminating the cost and exclusion requirements of TSV (through silicon via) technology. Direct hybrid bonding, also referred to as Direct Bond Interconnect (DBI®), is advantageous over other forms of stacking for a number of reasons including but not limited to a planar bond over metal and dielectric surface components that provides high strength at low temperature and enables 3D interconnect pitch scaling to submicron dimensions.


The metal and dielectric surface components used for a direct hybrid bond can be comprised of a variety of combinations of metals and dielectrics in a variety of patterns formed with a variety of fabrication techniques. Non-limiting examples of metals include copper, nickel, tungsten, and aluminum. See for example; P. Enquist, “High Density Direct Bond Interconnect (DBI™) Technology for Three Dimensional Integrated Circuit Applications”, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 970, 2007, p. 13-24; P. Gueguen, et. al., “3D Vertical Interconnects by Copper Direct Bonding,” Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 1112, 2009, p. 81; P. Enquist, “Scalability and Low Cost of Ownership Advantages of Direct Bond Interconnect (DBI®) as Drivers for Volume Commercialization of 3-D Integration Architectures and Applications”, Mater, Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 1112, 2009, p. 81; Di Cioccio, et. al., “Vertical metal interconnect thanks to tungsten direct bonding”, 2010 Proceedings 60th ECTC, 1359-1363; H. Lin, et. al., “Direct Al—Al contact using lot temperature wafer bonding for integrating MEMS and CMOS devices,” Microelectronics Engineering, 85, (2008), 1059-1061. Non-limiting examples of dielectrics include silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, and silicon carbon nitride. See for example P. Enquist, “3D Technology Platform—Advanced Direct Bond Technology”, C. S. Tan, K.-N. Chen, and S. J. Koester (Editors), “3D Integration for VLSI Systems,” Pan Stanford, ISBN 978-981-4303-81-1, 2011 and J. A. Ruan, S. K. Ajmera, C. Jin, A. J. Reddy, T. S. Kim, “Semiconductor device having improved adhesion and reduced blistering between etch stop layer and dielectric layer”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,732,324, B2 Non-limiting examples of a variety of patterns include arrays of vias or arrays of metal lines and spaces, for example as found in via and routing layers in CMOS back-end-of-line (BEOL) interconnect fabrication. Within these examples, 3D electrical interconnections may be formed by alignment and bonding of metal vias to metal vias, metal vias to metal lines, or metal lines to metal lines. Non-limiting examples of fabrication techniques to build a surface suitable for a hybrid bond are industry standard single and dual damascene processes adjusted to satisfy a suitable topography specification, if necessary.


There are basically two types of CMOS BEOL fabrication processes. One is typically referred to as an aluminum (Al) BEOL and the other is referred to as a copper (Cu) BEOL. In an Al BEOL process, Al with a suitable conductive barrier layer is typically used as the routing layer and tungsten (W), with a suitable conductive barrier layer is used for a via layer to electrically interconnect between two adjacent Al routing layers. The Al routing layer is typically dry etched and subsequently planarized with a dielectric deposition followed by chemo-mechanical polishing (CMP). The W via layer is typically formed with a single damascene process comprised of dielectric deposition, via patterning and etching to the previous routing layer, via filling with conductive barrier layer physical vapor deposition and W chemical vapor deposition, and CMP of W and conductive barrier layer to isolate W vias, or plugs, within the dielectric matrix. In a Cu BEOL process, Cu with a suitable conductive barrier layer is typically used as the routing and via layer. The Cu routing and via layers are typically formed with a dual damascene process comprised of dielectric deposition, via patterning and etching partially through the dielectric layer, followed by routing patterning that overlaps the via patterning and simultaneous continued etching of the via(s) to the previous routing layer where the routing overlaps the partially etched vias and etching of a trench for routing that connects to the previous routing layer with the via. An alternate dual damascene process is comprised of dielectric deposition, routing patterning and etching partially through the dielectric layer that stops short of the previous routing layer, via patterning and etching to the previous routing layer where the via is within the partially etched routing and the etching completes the via etch to the previous routing layer. Either doubly etched surface is then filled with a conductive barrier layer, for example by physical vapor deposition, followed by Cu filling, for example by electroplating or physical vapor deposition and electroplating, and finally CMP of the Cu and conductive barrier layer to isolate Cu routing within the dielectric matrix.


Use of either the industry standard W and Cu damascene process flows described above can be used to form a surface for hybrid bonding, subject to a suitable surface topography, for example as provided above. However, when these surfaces are used for hybrid bonding, there will typically be a heterogeneous bond component between metal on one surface and dielectric on the other surface, for example due to misalignment of via surfaces. This can result in via fill material from one bond surface in direct contact with dielectric from the other bond surface and without an intervening conductive barrier that is elsewhere between the Cu or W filled via and the surrounding dielectric.


It is preferable to have a wide process window with a low thermal budget for a direct hybrid bond process technology leveraging materials and processes that are currently qualified in a CMOS BEOL foundry to lower the adoption barrier for qualifying a direct hybrid bond process in that foundry. A Cu BEOL process is an example of such a preferable capability due to the Cu damascene process which has been an industry standard for a number of years and the capability of Cu direct hybrid bond technology to leverage this infrastructure. It has been relatively more challenging to leverage an Al BEOL industry standard process because the two primary metals in this process, W and Al, are more challenging materials to develop either a W or Al direct hybrid bond technology due to a combination of factors including high yield strength, coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), native oxide, and hillock formation.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An embodiment of the invention is directed to a method of forming a direct hybrid bond surface including forming a first plurality of metallic contact structures in an upper surface of a first substrate, where a top surface of said structures is below said upper surface; forming a first layer of conductive barrier material over said upper surface and said plurality of metallic contact structures; and removing said first layer of conductive barrier material from said upper surface.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete appreciation of the present invention and many attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of a cross-section of the near surface region of a single or dual damascene process formed conductive layers, with filled vias and/or routing with a conductive barrier between filled vias and/or routing and surrounding dielectric;



FIG. 2 is a schematic depiction of the cross-section in FIG. 1 after removal of the conductive layers from the surface of a surrounding dielectric;



FIG. 3 is a schematic depiction of the cross-section in FIG. 2 after forming a conductive barrier material layer;



FIG. 4 is a schematic depiction of the cross-section in FIG. 3 after removal of the conductive barrier layer material layer from the surface of the surrounding dielectric;



FIG. 5 is a schematic depiction of two hybrid direct bond surfaces being bonded;



FIG. 6 is a schematic depiction of two hybrid direct bond surfaces after contacting the respective dielectric layers;



FIG. 7 is a schematic depiction of two hybrid direct bond surfaces directly bonded;



FIG. 8 is a schematic depiction of curvature of the upper surface of the conductive barrier material as a result of dishing;



FIG. 9 is a schematic depiction of a pair of substrates, according to the present invention, with misalignment of similar via structures with conductive barriers and alignment of vias with conductive barriers to routing structures with conductive barriers;



FIG. 10 is a schematic depiction of a cross-section of the near surface region of a surface comprised of a patterned metal layer planarized with surrounding dielectric with planarization exposing patterned metal layer, without a conductive barrier layer laterally between metal layer and surrounding dielectric;



FIG. 11 is a schematic depiction of the cross-section in FIG. 10 with the conductive portion of the exposed surface of the patterned metal layer capped with conductive barrier metal according to the present invention;



FIG. 12 is a schematic depiction of a pair of contacted substrates, according to the present invention, with an example of alignment of routing structures without conductive barriers to routing structures without conductive barriers laterally between metal layer and surrounding dielectric;



FIG. 13 is a schematic depiction of another embodiment of the invention having a through silicon via structure;



FIG. 14 is a schematic depiction of the structure of FIG. 13 with a second conductive barrier material layer; and



FIG. 15 is a schematic depiction of another embodiment of the invention having a through silicon via structure with a dielectric layer on the sidewall.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views, and more particularly to FIG. 1 showing a cross-section of a surface of a substrate 30 in a process for direct hybrid bonding according to the invention comprised of conductor 1, conductive barrier 2, dielectric 3, and metal structure 4. Metal structures 4 are formed in dielectric 3. Metal structures 4 are located within dielectric 3 and can be a contact, pad, line, or other metal interconnect structure. Openings are formed in dielectric 3 over metal structures 4 followed by formation of barrier 2 and conductor 1. The sizes and thicknesses of the conductor 1, conductive barrier 2 and metal structure 4 are not to scale but are drawn to illustrate the invention. While the openings and metal structures are shown to be the same size and shape, they can differ in size and shape depending upon design or need.


A wide variety of metals for conductor 1 are possible including but not limited to Cu, and W which are common in Cu and Al BEOL foundries, respectively. Cu can be deposited by physical vapor deposition (PVD) or electroplating (EP) and W can be deposited by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). A wide variety of conductive barriers for conductive barrier material 2 are also possible which are common in Cu and Al BEOL foundries. Conductive barriers in Cu BEOL processes include tantalum (Ta), titanium nitride (TiN), tantalum nitride (TaN), tungsten nitride (WN), ruthenium oxide (RuO2), tantalum silicon nitride (TaSiN), titanium silicon nitride (TiSiN), tungsten boron nitride (TBN), cobalt tungsten boride (CoWB), cobalt tungsten phosphide or combinations thereof, for example Ti/TiN and Ta/TaN, which can be deposited by a variety of techniques including PVD, CVD, and metal organic CVD (MOCVD). A variety of PVD techniques are available including DC magnetron sputtering, collimated sputtering, and ionized metal plasma (IMP). Conductive barriers in Al BEOL processes include Ti/TiN. Other materials are also possible as barriers, for example nickel (Ni).


A wide variety of dielectrics are also possible including but not limited to silicon oxide, silicon nitride, and silicon carbide nitride which are common in Cu and Al BEOL foundries. A common method to create the surface described by the cross-section in FIG. 1 is with the damascene process described above.


The upper surface of FIG. 1 is subjected to CMP to remove the portion of conductor 1 and conductive barrier 2 on top of dielectric 3. FIG. 2 illustrates the structure after CMP. The relative heights of conductor 1 and conductive barrier 2 relative to dielectric 3 can be controlled by the CMP portion of the damascene process.


There are a number of configurations of relative height of the conductor 1 and conductive barrier 2 to dielectric 3. The top surfaces of conductor 1 and barrier 2 can be below, even with, nominally even with or above the surface of dielectric 3. In general, direct hybrid bonding is possible with all configurations. However, a preferred configuration is where the relative heights of conductor 1 and conductive barrier 2 are below dielectric 3 by a distance t1. This configuration is conducive to formation of a void-free bond interface and is more manufacturable with regard to variation of the relative height across the bond surface. An example of variation of relative height across the bond surface of the conductive layers below dielectric 3 for a surface most suitable for direct hybrid bonding is one to ten nanometers below the dielectric 3, although smaller and larger variations are also possible. This recess is typically referred to as dishing. The resulting surface is referred to as a hybrid bond surface without a conductive barrier 2.


A typical amount of dishing compatible with hybrid bonding is 0 to 20 nm, referred to as standard dishing. Standard dishing is increased by an amount that is comparable to the thickness of a subsequent conductive barrier 7 shown in FIG. 3 formed on top of this increased dishing forming openings 5 shown in FIG. 2 resulting in a dishing that is comparable to the standard dishing and compatible with that desired for a direct hybrid bond. An example of an increase in standard dishing is 5-20 nm, resulting in a total dishing t1 of about 5-40 nm. This increase in standard dishing can be formed in a variety of ways, for example by increasing the CMP used to create the standard dishing until the desired increased dishing is achieved. This increase in CMP can be accomplished with an increase in CMP time, the amount of which can be determined by routine calibration and can be a function of CMP pad, slurry, downforce, carrier and table rotation, and pattern of conductor and dielectric on the hybrid surface.


As shown in FIG. 3, a layer of conductive barrier metal 6 is formed over the structure on surface 31 shown in FIG. 2. Barrier 6 can be the same or a different material than conductive barrier 2. Formation of barrier 6 on top of the conductor 1 after increased dishing can be formed in a number of ways, for example by a damascene process including deposition of the conductive barrier over the entire surface followed by CMP to remove the conductive barrier from the higher dielectric surface without removing a significant amount or all of the conductive barrier material of layer 6 from within the recess. The barrier formation may also be formed with a selective process, for example electro-less nickel electroplating. The resulting structure has conductive barrier 7 in each of the openings 5 on top of conductor 1 and conductive barrier 2. This resulting dishing is preferably compatible with that required for a direct hybrid bond, i,e, the surface of conductive barrier 7 is less than 20 nm, and preferably 1-10 nm, below the surface of dielectric 3. The cross-section of the resulting surface shown schematically in FIG. 4 is referred to as a hybrid bond surface with a conductive barrier 7.


The thickness of the layer 6 can be less than the amount of dishing of conductor 1/barrier 2, as shown in FIG. 3, or can be the same as or thicker than this amount of dishing. In the former case, only a portion or none of the layer 6 is removed from the recess. In the case of the layer 6 being the same or thicker than the amount of recess, layer 6 is removed from within the recess by the CMP. Layer 6 is removed in all cases so that the resulting dishing is less than 20 nm, preferably 1-10 nm, in forming barrier 7.


Each hybrid bond surface of substrate 30 can contain devices and/or integrated circuits (not shown) such that these devices and/or integrated circuits can be connected to each other after completion of the hybrid bond. The devices and circuits can contain metal structures 4 or can be connected to metal structures 4 through further unillustrated interconnect structures.


Two hybrid bond surfaces of substrates 30 and 32 each having with a conductive barrier 7 with cross-section schematic such as shown in FIG. 4 can now be direct hybrid bonded to each other as shown in the cross-sections of FIGS. 5 and 6 to form direct hybrid bond 12. Substrates 30 and 32 are aligned (FIG. 5) and placed into direct contact such that the dielectric layers 3 in substrates 30 and 32 contact each other (FIG. 6). The alignment and contacting can be performed at room temperature in either room ambient or under vacuum. Although the figures schematically show a gap between the barriers 7 of substrates 30 and 32, there may be partial or significant contact between barriers 7 following the alignment and contacting. While a one-to-one connection arrangement is shown in FIG. 6, other arrangements are possible such as plural metal structures in one substrate are bonded to a single metal structure in another substrate.


The dielectric surfaces of substrates 30 and 32 are preferably prepared as described in application Ser. Nos. 09/505,283, 10/359,608 and 11/201,321. Briefly, the surfaces may be etched, polished, activated and/or terminated with a desired bonding species to promote and enhance chemical bonding between dielectric 3 on substrates 30 and 32. Smooth surfaces of dielectric 3 with a roughness of 0.1 to 3 nm rms are produced which are activated and/or terminated through wet or dry processes.


As the substrate surfaces contact at room temperature, the dielectric 3 of the substrate surfaces began to form a bond at a contact point or points, and the attractive bonding force between the wafers increases as the chemically bonded area increases. This contact can include barriers 7 or not include barriers 7. If the contact includes barriers 7, the pressure generated by the chemical substrate-to-substrate bonding in dielectric 3 results in a force by which contacting areas of the barriers 7 are strongly joined, and the chemical bonding between the dielectric 3 in substrates 30 and 32 produces electrical connection between metal pads on the two different wafers.


The internal pressure of barriers 7 against each other resulting from the bond between the dielectric 3 of substrates 30 and 32 may not be adequate to achieve an electrical connection with a preferably low resistance due to, for example, a native oxide or other contamination, for example, hydrocarbons. An improved bond or preferably lower resistance electrical connection may be achieved by removing the native oxide on barrier 7. For example, dilute hydrofluoric acid may be used to clean the surface or the surfaces of substrates 30 and 32 may be exposed to an inert ambient, for example nitrogen or argon, after removing the native oxide until bonding is conducted.


The internal pressure also may not be sufficient to contact enough of the surfaces of barriers 7 to each other. Alternatively or in addition, an improved bond or preferably lower resistance electrical connection between barriers 7 can be achieved by heating. Examples of heating include temperatures in the range of 100-400° C. for times between 10 minutes and 2 hours depending upon the materials used for the contact structures 4, barrier 6 and conductor 1. Time and temperature optimization for a given combination of materials is possible. For example, shorter heating times may be possible with higher temperatures and lower temperatures may be possible with longer heating times. The extent to which heating time can be minimized and/or heating temperature can be minimized will depend on the specific structure and materials combination and can be determined with common process optimization practices. For example, if barrier 7 is nickel, a temperature of 300° C. for two hours may be sufficient or a temperature of 350° C. for 15 minutes may be sufficient to improve the bond and improve the electrical connection. Higher and lower temperatures and/or times are also possible depending on barrier 7 material and other materials underneath barrier 7. Temperature increase can result in a preferably low resistance electrical connection by reduction of the native oxide or other contamination or by increasing the internal pressure between barriers 7 due to thermal expansion of conductor 1 and barrier 7. Material 4 and other materials below material 4 (not illustrated) may also increase the thermal expansion of the structure underneath barrier 7 and correspondingly increase pressure between opposed barriers 7. For example, if material 4 is aluminum with associated CTE and Young's modulus, a higher pressure may be generated compared to an alternate material 4 with a lower CTE and/or Young's modulus. Heating may also increase interdiffusion between barriers 7 to produce in a preferable lower-resistance electrical connection.


If the initial bond between the dielectric 3 of substrates 30 and 32 does not include barriers 7, heating can be used to result in contact between barriers 7 due to a higher CTE of barrier 7 than dielectric 3. The amount of heating or temperature rise depends on the separation between barriers 7, the thickness, CTE, and Young's modulus of barriers 7 and conductor 1 and metal structure 4 as these parameters affect the pressure between opposed barriers 7 for a given temperature rise. For example, minimizing the separation between barriers 7, for example less than 10 nm, may reduce the heating compared to a separation of 20 nm. As a further example, the height or thickness of barrier 7 and/or conductor 1 will increase pressure as the thermal expansion of barrier 7 and conductor 1 will increase with thickness. For example, the typical increase of expansion of barrier 7 and conductor 1 is proportional to thickness. As a further example, conductor 1 with higher Young's modulus is expected to generate higher pressure than an alternate conductor 1 with lower Young's modulus as the higher Young's modulus material is less likely to yield when generating pressure. A barrier 7 with lower Young's modulus may not require as much heating as it may facilitate forming a connection by yielding at a lower pressure. Following heating, the thermal expansion of conductor 1 and barrier 7 thus result in intimately contacted low-resistance connections, as shown in FIG. 7 if barriers 7 are not in intimate contact when the surfaces of substrates 30 and 32 are initially contacted.


While the surfaces of conductors 1/barrier 2 and barriers 7 are shown as planar in the above examples, one or both may have some curvature due to the CMP process. A profile is shown in FIG. 8 where both have curvature. In FIG. 8, substrate 33 is shown having barrier 7 and conductor 1/barrier 2 whose surfaces vary. The thickness of barrier 7 is preferably thick enough to accommodate coverage of the roughness of conductor 1 but not too thick to complicate fabrication. Typical thickness ranges can be 5-20 nm. The relative thickness of the barrier at the middle and edge of the curvature can be thicker or thinner depending on the curvature of formation of surface of contact 1 prior to barrier 7 deposition on conductor 1 and curvature of formation of barrier 7, for example due to different characteristics of a CMP process used to form surface of contact 1 and CMP process used to form surface of barrier 7. The center of the barrier 7 is recess less than 20 nm and preferably 1-10 nm below the surface of dielectric 3.



FIG. 9 illustrates the upper portion of two substrates 34 and 35 with hybrid bond surfaces. Hybrid bond surfaces with a conductive barrier can comprise via components 8 that are connected to underlying trace components (not shown) or trace components 9 that are connected to underlying via components (not shown). After bonding, there is typically some amount of misalignment between respective hybrid bond surfaces with a conductive barrier. This misalignment can result in contact of conductive barrier 7 on a first hybrid bond surface with a dielectric surface 6 on a second hybrid bond surface and contact of a dielectric surface 6 on a first hybrid bond surface with a conductive barrier 7 on a second hybrid bond surface as shown by 10 in FIG. 9. This misalignment can also result in contact of conductive barrier 7 on one hybrid bond surface with dielectric surface 6 on another surface and the contact of an entire surface of conductive barrier 7 from one surface with a portion of a surface of a conductive barrier 7 on the other hybrid bond surface as shown by 11 in FIG. 9.


Notwithstanding this misalignment, the surface of dielectric 3 on either first or second hybrid bond surface is in contact with either conductive barrier 7 on the other hybrid bond surface and conductive barrier 7 on either first or second hybrid bond surface is in contact with either conductive barrier 7 or the surface of dielectric 3 on the other hybrid bond surface according to the present invention. The conductive barrier 7 on top of conductor 1 thus prevents contact between conductor 2 and dielectric 3 notwithstanding misalignment. This feature of the subject invention can improve reliability of the direct hybrid bond, for example when Cu is used as conductor 1 with Cu single or dual damascene direct hybrid bond surfaces built in a Cu BEOL for applications where there is a concern, for example, of Cu diffusion into dielectric 3 if Cu was in direct contact with dielectric 3. The feature may also facilitate the formation of an electrical connection across the bond interface for some structures, for example where conductor 1 is a W plug single damascene direct hybrid bond surfaces built in an Al BEOL when making electrical connections between conductor 1 on opposing surfaces is more challenging than making electrical connections between conductive barriers 7 on top of conductors 1 on opposing surfaces.


The amount of dishing shown in FIG. 2 can affect the thermal budget of a subsequent direct hybrid bond using these surfaces with recessed conductive portions. For example, after initially placing direct hybrid bond surfaces into direct contact, the dielectric portions may be in direct contact and all or some of the recessed conductive portions may not be in direct contact due to the recess. Heating of these direct hybrid bonded surfaces with recessed conductive portions can result in expansion of the recessed conductive portions so that they are brought into direct contact at a temperature above that at which the direct hybrid bond surfaces were brought into contact and generate significant pressure to facilitate electrical connection between opposed recessed conductive portions and even higher temperatures. These higher temperatures can facilitate the formation of electrical interconnections between opposed recessed conductive portions and completion of the direct hybrid bond. The temperatures required to bring the recessed portions into direct contact and to generate significant pressure to facilitate electrical connection between opposed recessed conductive portions is a combination of the conductive material, residual or native oxide on the conductive material, yield strength of the conductive material and dishing or recess of the conductive material. For example, less dishing can result in a lower thermal budget required to complete the hybrid bond after initially directly bonding opposed dielectric surfaces at low or room temperature due to less conductor 1 and conductive barrier 7 expansion required to form a metallic bond between opposed conductive barrier 7 surfaces.


For example, when using Ni as a conductive barrier, 10 nm of recess may be accommodated by heating to about 350° C. compared to about 200° C. which can be sufficient if using copper without a capping conductive barrier. In order to reduce the thermal budget it is generally useful to use a higher CTE (coefficient of thermal expansion) material with lower yield strength and less dishing. In general, the CTE and yield strength are given by the barrier chosen and the dishing is a variable that can be varied to achieve a suitable thermal budget. The thermal budget can also be influenced by materials that are underneath the conductor. For example, conductors 1 with higher CTE (i.e., above 15 ppm/° C.) underneath conductor 1, for example metal structure 4 as shown in FIG. 4, may have a lower thermal budget to form hybrid bond electrical connections than conductors 1 and/or metal structures 4 with a lower CTE. Examples of metals with high CTE above 15 ppm/° C. include Cu and Al which are conductors common in Al and Cu BEOL processes.


In a second embodiment according to the invention, a conductive portion 13 surrounded by a dielectric portion 14 comprises a direct hybrid bond surface 15 in substrate 36 as shown in FIG. 10. An example of conductive portion 13 is aluminum and an example of dielectric portion 14 is an inter-layer dielectric, examples of which are silicon oxide and other dielectrics used in Al BEOL, which are examples of typical materials used in Al BEOL. The metal portion 13 may include via and/or routing patterns connected to underlying layers of interconnect. The dielectric portion 14 may be contiguous, for example if the conductive portion is comprised only of vias, or may not be contiguous, for example if the conductive portion is separated by routing patterns. In this embodiment direct hybrid bond surface 15 preferably has a dished conductive portion within a direct hybrid bonding specification. This surface can be formed by a combination of an Al metallization, dielectric deposition, and CMP planarization to form the surface with cross-section shown in FIG. 10. The Al metallization may include a conductive barrier on top, for example Ti. If there is a conductive barrier and it is removed by the CMP planarization, the surface will have a cross-section shown in FIG. 10. If the conductive barrier is sufficiently thick that it is not entirely removed by the CMP planarization, and there is suitable dishing t2, for example 0-20 nm of the conductive barrier portion of the hybrid bond surface for hybrid bonding, then this surface, e.g, as shown in FIG. 11, can be suitable for direct hybrid bonding without additional conductive barrier deposition and CMP.


The dishing t2 described in FIG. 10 is increased by an amount that is comparable to the thickness of a subsequent conductive barrier 16 that is formed on top of this increased dishing resulting in a dishing that is comparable to that in FIG. 10 and compatible with that required for a direct hybrid bond (FIG. 10). This increase in thickness is in the range of about 5-20 nm. This increase in standard dishing can be formed in a variety of ways, for example by increasing the amount of CMP from that used to be compatible with that required for a direct hybrid bond. Formation of the barrier on top of the increased dishing can be formed in a number of ways, for example by a damascene process including deposition of the conductive barrier over the entire surface (similar to FIG. 3) followed by CMP to remove the conductive barrier from the higher dielectric surface 17 without removing a significant amount or all of the conductive barrier from within the recess (FIG. 11). The thickness of the formed barrier can be comparable to, greater than, or less than the increased dishing thickness, for example less than about 40 nm. The final barrier thickness and the dishing can then be controlled by CMP after formation of the barrier.


In this embodiment, this resulting dishing is preferably compatible with that required for a direct hybrid bond. A cross-section of the resulting surface is shown schematically in FIG. 11 illustrating substrate 37 and is referred to as a hybrid bond surface 18 with a conductive barrier 16 not in contact with an underlying conductive barrier. The barrier formation may also be formed with a selective process, for example electro-less nickel electroplating.


Two hybrid bond surfaces of substrates 38 and 39 with a conductive barrier 16 formed as shown in the cross-section schematic of FIG. 11 can now be direct hybrid bonded to each other as shown in the cross-section of FIG. 12 to form direct hybrid bond with conductive barrier 16 without an underlying conductive barrier. Each hybrid bond surface is a surface of a substrate and each substrate can contain devices and/or integrated circuits such that these devices and/or integrated circuits can be connected to each other after completion of the hybrid bond. Hybrid bond surfaces with a conductive barrier can comprise via components that are connected to underlying trace components (not shown) or trace components 19 that are connected to underlying via components (not shown).


After bonding, there is typically some amount of misalignment between respective hybrid bond surfaces with a conductive barrier. This misalignment can result in contact of conductive barrier 16 on a first hybrid bond surface with a dielectric surface 17 on a second hybrid bond surface in substrate 36 and contact of a dielectric surface 17 on a first hybrid bond surface with a conductive barrier 16 on a second hybrid bond surface as shown by 20 in FIG. 12. This misalignment can also result in contact of conductive barrier 16 on one hybrid bond surface with dielectric surface 17 on another surface and the contact of an surface of conductive barrier 16 from one surface with a portion of a surface of a conductive barrier 16 on the other hybrid bond surface as shown by 21 in FIG. 12.


Notwithstanding this misalignment, dielectric surface 17 on either first or second hybrid bond surface is in contact with either conductive barrier 16 on the other hybrid bond surface and conductive barrier 16 on either first or second hybrid bond surface is in contact with either conductive barrier 16 or dielectric surface 17 on the other hybrid bond surface according to the present invention. This feature can facilitate the formation of an electrical connection across the bond interface for some structures, for example where conductor 13 is an Al routing surface built in an Al BEOL, when making electrical connections between conductor 13 on opposing surfaces is more challenging than making electrical connections between conductive barriers 16 on top of conductors 13 on opposing surfaces.


The amount of dishing shown in FIG. 11 can affect the thermal budget of a subsequent direct hybrid bond using these surfaces. For example, less dishing can result in a lower thermal budget required to complete the hybrid bond after initially directly bonding opposed dielectric surfaces at low or room temperature due to less conductor 13 expansion required to form a metallic bond between opposed conductive barrier 16 surfaces.


In a third embodiment according to the invention, a hybrid surface includes a conductive through silicon via (TSV) structures 23 and 35 as shown in FIGS. 13-15. Each figure shows two different structures, with (23) and without (25) a conductive barrier material layer 26, for convenience of illustration, formed in a manner similar to FIGS. 1-4 above. The TSVs extend through substrate 40 to contact metal conductor 4 in substrate 41. The conductive material of TSV 23 and 25 can be comprised of a metal like Cu or W or a non-metal like polysilicon. The conductive material can be adjacent to an insulating material 24 as shown in FIG. 13 or, as shown in FIG. 14 including substrate 42, may have a barrier layer 27 interposed between the conductive material and insulating material.


In another example, TSV 23 and 25 may have an insulating barrier 28 interposed between the conductive material and a semiconductor substrate 43 as shown in FIG. 15. The TSV may be recessed with increased dishing as described in the first and second embodiments and a conductive barrier 26 formed within this increased dishing as described in the first and second embodiments to form a hybrid bond surface with dishing suitable for direct hybrid bonding. These types of surfaces may be direct hybrid bonded to each other resulting in, for example a so-called back-to-back direct hybrid bond if the TSV surface is exposed through the back of a CMOS structure. It is also possible to use one of these hybrid bond surfaces to form a direct hybrid bond to the hybrid bond surface formed on the front of a CMOS structure, for example on top of a Cu BEOL or Al BEOL, to form a so-called front-to-back direct hybrid bond.


In the present invention BEOL via fill metal can be fully encapsulated with a conductive barrier. Further, the present invention allows hybrid bond fabrication to utilize dielectrics and conductive barrier materials for the direct hybrid bonding. The process window for a direct hybrid bond process leveraging materials and/or processes currently qualified in CMOS BEOL foundries can be improved. The present invention also allows for lowering the adoption barrier for manufacturers to qualify direct hybrid bond technology, produces a direct hybrid bond surface using a combination of insulating dielectric and conductive barrier materials that are used in CMOS BEOLs, can provide a method and structure for a direct hybrid bond surface that suppresses hillock formation, and can reduce thermal budgets in direct hybrid bonding.


Applications of the present invention include but are not limited to vertical integration of processed integrated circuits for 3-D SOC, micro-pad packaging, low-cost and high-performance replacement of flip chip bonding, wafer scale packaging, thermal management and unique device structures such as metal base devices. Applications further include but are not limited to integrated circuits like backside-illuminated image sensors, RF front ends, micro-electrical mechanical structures (MEMS) including but not limited to pico-projectors and gyros, 3D stacked memory including but not limited to hybrid memory cube, high bandwidth memory, and DIRAM, 2.5D including but not limited to FPGA tiling on interposers and the products these circuits are used in including but not limited to cell phones and other mobile devices, laptops, and servers.


Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims
  • 1. An element comprising: a first dielectric layer having an upper surface configured to directly bond to a second dielectric layer of another element;a first conductive structure formed in a first portion of the first dielectric layer;a second conductive structure formed in a second portion of the first dielectric layer laterally spaced from the first portion, the second conductive structure having a different lateral dimension from the first conductive structure; anda barrier layer, a first portion of the barrier layer formed at least on an upper surface of the first conductive structure, the barrier layer recessed below the upper surface of the first dielectric layer.
  • 2. The element of claim 1, wherein a second portion of the barrier layer is further disposed on the second conductive structure.
  • 3. The element of claim 1, wherein a lateral dimension of the first conductive structure is greater than the lateral dimension of the second conductive structure.
  • 4. The element of claim 3, wherein the first conductive structure is a trace and the second conductive structure is a via.
  • 5. The element of claim 1, wherein the barrier layer has a contact surface configured to contact and directly bond to a conductive material of the other element.
  • 6. The element of claim 1, wherein the upper surface of the first dielectric layer comprises a polished surface.
  • 7. The element of claim 6, wherein the polished surface has a surface roughness of 0.1 nm rms to 3 nm rms.
  • 8. The element of claim 1, wherein the upper surface of the first dielectric layer comprises an activated surface.
  • 9. The element of claim 1, wherein the barrier layer is further disposed along sides of the first conductive structure.
  • 10. The element of claim 9, wherein the barrier layer completely surrounds the first conductive structure.
  • 11. A bonded structure comprising: a first element including a first dielectric layer having a contact surface, a first conductive structure formed in a first portion of the first dielectric layer, and a second conductive structure formed in a second portion of the first dielectric layer laterally spaced from the first portion;a second element including a second dielectric layer having a contact surface directly bonded to the contact surface of the first dielectric layer, and a third conductive structure formed in a third portion of the second dielectric layer and electrically coupled with the first and second conductive structure; anda barrier layer disposed at least between the first conductive structure and the third conductive structure.
  • 12. The bonded structure of claim 11, wherein the barrier layer is in direct contact with the first conductive structure.
  • 13. The bonded structure of claim 11, wherein the barrier layer is also disposed between the second conductive structure and the third conductive structure.
  • 14. The bonded structure of claim 11, wherein the third conductive structure comprises a conductive trace.
  • 15. The bonded structure of claim 14, wherein the first and second conductive structures comprise conductive vias.
  • 16. The bonded structure of claim 11, wherein the barrier layer comprises a multi-layer structure in which a first barrier layer directly bonded to a second barrier layer.
  • 17. The bonded structure of claim 11, wherein the first dielectric layer, the second dielectric layer, the first conductive structure, the second conductive structure and the barrier layer form part of a direct hybrid bond.
  • 18. The bonded structure of claim 11, wherein a lateral dimension of the first conductive structure is greater than a lateral dimension of the second conductive structure.
  • 19. The bonded structure of claim 11, wherein at least a portion of the barrier layer contact the first dielectric layer.
  • 20. A bonded structure comprising: a first element including a first dielectric layer having a contact surface, a first conductive structure formed in a first portion of the first dielectric layer, and a barrier layer at least disposed over the first conductive structure, at least a portion of the barrier layer being in contact with the first dielectric layer; anda second element including a second dielectric layer having a contact surface directly bonded to the contact surface of the first dielectric layer, and a conductive material disposed at least partially in a second portion of the second dielectric layer and directly bonded to the barrier layer.
  • 21. The bonded structure of claim 20, wherein the conductive material comprises a second conductive feature formed in the second portion of the second dielectric layer.
  • 22. The bonded structure of claim 20, wherein the conductive material comprises a second barrier layer formed on a second conductive feature formed in the second portion of the second dielectric layer, the second barrier layer directly bonded to the barrier layer of the first element.
  • 23. The bonded structure of claim 22, wherein the first element further comprising a third conductive structure laterally spaced from the first conductive structure, the third conductive structure electrically connected to the second conductive feature.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/383,455, filed on Apr. 12, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/947,461, filed on Apr. 6, 2018, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/835,379, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,953,941, filed on Aug. 25, 2015, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated by reference. This application is related to application Ser. Nos. 09/505,283, 10/359,608 and 11/201,321, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (278)
Number Name Date Kind
4612083 Yasumoto et al. Sep 1986 A
4818728 Rai et al. Apr 1989 A
4904328 Beecher et al. Feb 1990 A
4939568 Kato et al. Jul 1990 A
4998665 Hayashi Mar 1991 A
5087585 Hayashi Feb 1992 A
5236118 Bower et al. Aug 1993 A
5322593 Hasegawa et al. Jun 1994 A
5413952 Pages et al. May 1995 A
5419806 Huebner May 1995 A
5442235 Parrillo et al. Aug 1995 A
5489804 Pasch Feb 1996 A
5501003 Bernstein Mar 1996 A
5503704 Bower et al. Apr 1996 A
5504376 Sugahara et al. Apr 1996 A
5516727 Broom May 1996 A
5563084 Ramm et al. Oct 1996 A
5610431 Martin Mar 1997 A
5734199 Kawakita et al. Mar 1998 A
5753536 Sugiyama et al. May 1998 A
5771555 Eda et al. Jun 1998 A
5821692 Rogers et al. Oct 1998 A
5866942 Suzuki et al. Feb 1999 A
5985739 Plettner et al. Nov 1999 A
5998808 Matsushita Dec 1999 A
6008126 Leedy Dec 1999 A
6054363 Sakaguchi et al. Apr 2000 A
6071761 Jacobs Jun 2000 A
6080640 Gardner et al. Jun 2000 A
6097096 Gardner et al. Aug 2000 A
6147000 You et al. Nov 2000 A
6183592 Sylvester Feb 2001 B1
6218203 Khoury et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232150 Lin et al. May 2001 B1
6258625 Brofman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6259160 Lopatin et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265775 Seyyedy Jul 2001 B1
6297072 Tilmans et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316786 Mueller et al. Nov 2001 B1
6322600 Brewer et al. Nov 2001 B1
6333206 Ito et al. Dec 2001 B1
6348709 Graettinger et al. Feb 2002 B1
6359235 Hayashi Mar 2002 B1
6374770 Lee Apr 2002 B1
6399974 Ohtsuki Jun 2002 B1
6423640 Lee et al. Jul 2002 B1
6465892 Suga Oct 2002 B1
6515343 Shroff et al. Feb 2003 B1
6528894 Akram et al. Mar 2003 B1
6552436 Burnette et al. Apr 2003 B2
6555917 Heo Apr 2003 B1
6579744 Jiang Jun 2003 B1
6583515 James et al. Jun 2003 B1
6589813 Park Jul 2003 B1
6593645 Shih et al. Jul 2003 B2
6600224 Farquhar et al. Jul 2003 B1
6624003 Rice Sep 2003 B1
6627814 Stark Sep 2003 B1
6642081 Patti Nov 2003 B1
6656826 Ishimaru Dec 2003 B2
6660564 Brady Dec 2003 B2
6661085 Kellar et al. Dec 2003 B2
6667225 Hau-Riege et al. Dec 2003 B2
6720212 Robl et al. Apr 2004 B2
6759703 Matsuhashi Jul 2004 B1
6828686 Park Dec 2004 B2
6847527 Sylvester et al. Jan 2005 B2
6864172 Noma et al. Mar 2005 B2
6867073 Enquist Mar 2005 B1
6887769 Kellar et al. May 2005 B2
6902987 Tong et al. Jun 2005 B1
6908027 Tolchinsky et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909194 Farnworth et al. Jun 2005 B2
6960492 Miyamoto Nov 2005 B1
6962835 Tong et al. Nov 2005 B2
7045453 Canaperi et al. May 2006 B2
7078811 Suga Jul 2006 B2
7094701 Umemoto et al. Aug 2006 B2
7105980 Abbott et al. Sep 2006 B2
7109063 Jiang Sep 2006 B2
7126212 Enquist et al. Oct 2006 B2
7193239 Leedy Mar 2007 B2
7193423 Dalton et al. Mar 2007 B1
7247948 Hedler et al. Jul 2007 B2
7354798 Pogge et al. Apr 2008 B2
7485968 Enquist et al. Feb 2009 B2
7750488 Patti et al. Jul 2010 B2
7803693 Trezza Sep 2010 B2
8183127 Patti et al. May 2012 B2
8241961 Kim et al. Aug 2012 B2
8314007 Vaufredaz Nov 2012 B2
8349635 Gan et al. Jan 2013 B1
8357931 Schieck et al. Jan 2013 B2
8377798 Peng et al. Feb 2013 B2
8441131 Ryan May 2013 B2
8476146 Chen et al. Jul 2013 B2
8476165 Trickett et al. Jul 2013 B2
8482132 Yang et al. Jul 2013 B2
8501537 Sadaka et al. Aug 2013 B2
8524533 Tong et al. Sep 2013 B2
8620164 Heck et al. Dec 2013 B2
8647987 Yang et al. Feb 2014 B2
8697493 Sadaka Apr 2014 B2
8716105 Sadaka et al. May 2014 B2
8802538 Liu Aug 2014 B1
8809123 Liu et al. Aug 2014 B2
8841002 Tong Sep 2014 B2
8916448 Cheng et al. Dec 2014 B2
8988299 Kam et al. Mar 2015 B2
9093350 Endo et al. Jul 2015 B2
9111763 Kagawa et al. Aug 2015 B2
9142517 Liu Sep 2015 B2
9171756 Enquist et al. Oct 2015 B2
9184125 Enquist et al. Nov 2015 B2
9224704 Landru Dec 2015 B2
9230941 Chen et al. Jan 2016 B2
9257399 Kuang et al. Feb 2016 B2
9299736 Chen et al. Mar 2016 B2
9312229 Chen et al. Apr 2016 B2
9331149 Tong et al. May 2016 B2
9337235 Chen et al. May 2016 B2
9368866 Yu Jun 2016 B2
9385024 Tong et al. Jul 2016 B2
9394161 Cheng et al. Jul 2016 B2
9431368 Enquist et al. Aug 2016 B2
9437572 Chen et al. Sep 2016 B2
9443796 Chou et al. Sep 2016 B2
9455182 Edelstein et al. Sep 2016 B2
9461007 Chun et al. Oct 2016 B2
9496239 Edelstein et al. Nov 2016 B1
9536848 England et al. Jan 2017 B2
9559081 Lai et al. Jan 2017 B1
9601371 Edelstein et al. Mar 2017 B2
9620481 Edelstein et al. Apr 2017 B2
9656852 Cheng et al. May 2017 B2
9723716 Meinhold Aug 2017 B2
9728521 Tsai et al. Aug 2017 B2
9741620 Uzoh et al. Aug 2017 B2
9799587 Fujii et al. Oct 2017 B2
9852988 Enquist et al. Dec 2017 B2
9881882 Hsu et al. Jan 2018 B2
9893004 Yazdani Feb 2018 B2
9929050 Lin Mar 2018 B2
9941241 Edelstein et al. Apr 2018 B2
9941243 Kim et al. Apr 2018 B2
9947579 Edelstein et al. Apr 2018 B2
9947581 Edelstein et al. Apr 2018 B2
9953941 Enquist Apr 2018 B2
9960142 Chen et al. May 2018 B2
10002844 Wang et al. Jun 2018 B1
10026605 Doub et al. Jul 2018 B2
10075657 Fahim et al. Sep 2018 B2
10147641 Enquist et al. Dec 2018 B2
10224241 Edelstein et al. Mar 2019 B2
10269756 Uzoh Apr 2019 B2
10276619 Kao et al. Apr 2019 B2
10276909 Huang et al. Apr 2019 B2
10325806 Edelstein et al. Jun 2019 B2
10446456 Shen et al. Oct 2019 B2
11011418 Enquist et al. May 2021 B2
11069734 Katkar Jul 2021 B2
20020000328 Motomura et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020003307 Suga Jan 2002 A1
20020025665 Juengling Feb 2002 A1
20020074670 Suga Jun 2002 A1
20020094661 Enquist et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020113241 Kubota et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020113317 Okushima Aug 2002 A1
20020163079 Awano Nov 2002 A1
20020173120 Enquist Nov 2002 A1
20030040161 Schrenk et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030092220 Akram May 2003 A1
20030109083 Ahmad Jun 2003 A1
20030113976 Hau-Riege et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030129796 Bruchhaus et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030157748 Kim et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030224595 Smith et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030232498 Harada Dec 2003 A1
20040038154 Muramatsu et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040056361 McTeer Mar 2004 A1
20040084414 Sakai et al. May 2004 A1
20040152256 Noguchi et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040157407 Tong et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040217483 Hedler et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040219776 Park Nov 2004 A1
20040222526 Wada et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040227241 Enomoto Nov 2004 A1
20040245630 Huang et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040245636 Cooney, III et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040262772 Ramanathan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050003649 Takao Jan 2005 A1
20050014311 Hayasaka et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050176239 Kronke et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050181542 Enquist Aug 2005 A1
20050266636 Kitamura et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060024950 Choi et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060057945 Hsu et al. Mar 2006 A1
20070096294 Ikeda et al. May 2007 A1
20070111386 Kim et al. May 2007 A1
20070212870 Yang et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070222048 Huang Sep 2007 A1
20070295456 Gudeman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080122092 Hong May 2008 A1
20090197408 Lehr et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090200668 Yang et al. Aug 2009 A1
20110074040 Frank et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110290552 Palmateer et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120211894 Aoyagi Aug 2012 A1
20120212384 Kam et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120319280 Suganuma et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130020704 Sadaka Jan 2013 A1
20130207268 Chapelon Aug 2013 A1
20130221527 Yang et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130285248 Yin et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130320556 Liu et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130328186 Uzoh et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140175655 Chen et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140225795 Yu Aug 2014 A1
20140252635 Tran et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140264948 Chou et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140353828 Edelstein et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150064498 Tong Mar 2015 A1
20150108644 Kuang et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150206823 Lin et al. Jul 2015 A1
20160343682 Kawasaki Nov 2016 A1
20170179029 Enquist et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170194271 Hsu et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170200711 Uzoh et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170338214 Uzoh et al. Nov 2017 A1
20180096931 Huang et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180175012 Wu et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180182639 Uzoh et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180182666 Uzoh et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180190580 Haba et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180190583 DeLaCruz et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180219038 Gambino et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180226375 Enquist et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180286805 Huang et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180323177 Yu et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180323227 Zhang et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180331066 Uzoh et al. Nov 2018 A1
20190096741 Uzoh et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190096842 Fountain, Jr. et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190115247 Tong et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190115277 Yu et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190131277 Yang et al. May 2019 A1
20190147222 Gao et al. May 2019 A1
20190198407 Huang et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190198409 Katkar et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190237419 Enquist Aug 2019 A1
20190265411 Huang et al. Aug 2019 A1
20190333550 Fisch Oct 2019 A1
20190348336 Katkar et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190385966 Gao et al. Dec 2019 A1
20200013637 Haba Jan 2020 A1
20200013765 Fountain, Jr. et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200075534 Gao et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200118973 Wang et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200126906 Uzoh et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200140267 Katkar et al. May 2020 A1
20200140268 Katkar et al. May 2020 A1
20200194396 Uzoh Jun 2020 A1
20200227367 Haba et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200294908 Haba et al. Sep 2020 A1
20200328162 Haba et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200328164 DeLaCruz et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200328165 DeLaCruz et al. Oct 2020 A1
20200365575 Uzoh et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200371154 DeLaCruz et al. Nov 2020 A1
20200395321 Katkar et al. Dec 2020 A1
20210098412 Haba et al. Apr 2021 A1
20210181510 Katkar et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210193603 Katkar et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210193625 DeLaCruz et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210242152 Fountain, Jr. et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210280461 Enquist et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210296282 Gao et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210313225 Enquist et al. Oct 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (44)
Number Date Country
104576518 Apr 2015 CN
0 465 227 Jan 1992 EP
01-168040 Jul 1989 JP
4-259249 Sep 1992 JP
05-029183 Feb 1993 JP
6-13456 Jan 1994 JP
6-260594 Sep 1994 JP
H07-66093 Mar 1995 JP
H7-249749 Sep 1995 JP
7-283382 Oct 1995 JP
8-78645 Mar 1996 JP
8-125121 May 1996 JP
8-186235 Jul 1996 JP
9-120979 May 1997 JP
10-135404 May 1998 JP
10-223636 Aug 1998 JP
10-242383 Sep 1998 JP
11-186120 Jul 1999 JP
2000-100679 Apr 2000 JP
2000-260934 Sep 2000 JP
2000-299379 Oct 2000 JP
2000-311982 Nov 2000 JP
2001-102479 Apr 2001 JP
2001-326326 Nov 2001 JP
2002-026123 Jan 2002 JP
2002-516033 May 2002 JP
2002-353416 Dec 2002 JP
2002-368159 Dec 2002 JP
2003-023071 Jan 2003 JP
2004-200547 Jul 2004 JP
2005-086089 Mar 2005 JP
2005-093486 Apr 2005 JP
2005-135988 May 2005 JP
2012-019148 Jan 2012 JP
2013-033786 Feb 2013 JP
2018-160519 Oct 2018 JP
10-2015-0097798 Aug 2015 KR
10-0580212 May 2016 KR
476145 Feb 2002 TW
WO 0161743 Aug 2001 WO
WO 03054954 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2005043584 May 2005 WO
WO 2006100444 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2017151442 Sep 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (112)
Entry
Amirfeiz et al., “Formation of silicon structures by plasma-activated wafer bonding,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2000, vol. 147, No. 7, pp. 2693-2698.
Appeal Decision of Rejection dated Apr. 12, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-526104, in 14 pages.
Aspar, B. et al., “The smart-cut process: Status and developments,” Proc. Electrochem Soc., 1999, vol. 99-53, pp. 48-59.
Bower, R. et al., “Low temperature Si3N4 direct bonding,” Appl. Phys. Lett., Jun. 28, 1993, vol. 62, No. 26, pp. 3485-3487.
Canadian Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2013 in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,618,191, 4 pages.
Canadian Office Action, dated May 16, 2012 for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,515,375, with international preliminary report, 2 pages.
Ceramic Microstructures: Control at the Atomic Level, Recent Progress in Surface Activated Bonding, 1998, pp. 385-389.
Chung et al., “Room temperature GaAseu +Si and InPeu +Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activate bonding method,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Jan. 2, 1997, vol. 121, Issues 1-4, pp. 203-206.
Chung et al., “Wafer direct bonding of compound semiconductors and silicon at room temperature by the surface activated bonding method,” Applied Surface Science, Jun. 2, 1997, vols. 117-118, pp. 808-812.
D'Agostino, R., “Plasma etching of Si and SiO2 in SF6−O2 mixtures,” J. Appl. Phys., Jan. 1981, vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 162-167.
Decision—Request for Trail Granted, Inter Partes Review, U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, Case IPR2013-00381, dated Dec. 18, 2013, in 27 pages.
Declaration of Amanda Peil, Civil Action No. 17-7609 (RMB)(KMW), Invensas Bonding Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 99 pages.
Declaration of Richard A. Blanchard in Support of Petition for inter partes review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, dated Jun. 13, 2013, pp. 1-18.
European Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 06789507.8, in 8 pages.
European Search Report dated Sep. 5, 2011 in European Patent Application No. 06789507.8, in 5 pages.
Fan et al., “Copper water bonding,” Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., U.S.A., The Electrochemical Society, Aug. 6, 1999, vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 534-536.
Farrens et al., “Chemical free room temperature wafer to wafer direct bonding,” J. Electrochem. Soc., The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Nov. 1995, vol. 142, No. 11. pp. 3949-3955.
Farrens et al., “Chemical free wafer bonding ofsilicon to glass and sapphire,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings vol. 95-7, 1995, pp. 72-77.
Final Written Decision, Inter PartesReview, U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, Case IPR2013-00381, dated Feb. 27, 2014, in 3 pages.
Gösele et al., “Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: A flexible approach to materials combinations in microelectronics; micromechanics and optoelectronics,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 23-32.
Gösele et al., “Silicon layer transfer by wafer bonding,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 93-29 (1993), pp. 395-409.
Handbook of Thin Film Technology, Maissel and Glang, 1983 Reissue, pp. 12-24.
Harendt, C. et al., “Vertical polysilicon interconnects by aligned wafer bonding,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 501-508.
Hayashi, Y. et al., “Fabrication of three-dimensional IC using cumulatively bonded IC (CUBIC) technology,” VSLI Tech. Dog., 1990, pp. 95-96.
Hizukuri, M. et al., “Dynamic strain and chip damage during ultrasonic flip chip bonding,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 2001, pp. 3044-3048.
Hosoda et al., “Effect of the surface treatment on the room-temperature bonding of Al to Si and SiO2,” Journal of Materials Science, Jan. 1, 1998, vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 253-258.
Hosoda et al., “Room temperature GaAs—Si and InP—Si-wafer direct bonding by the surface activated bonding method,” Nuclear Inst. And Methods in Physics Research B, 1997, vol. 121, Nos. 1-4, pp. 203-206.
Howlader et al., “A novel method for bonding of ionic wafers,” Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2006, IEEE, pp. 7.
Howlader et al., “Bonding of p-Si/n-InP wafers through surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, 2001, IEEE International Conference On, pp. 272-275.
Howlader et al., “Characterization of the bonding strength and interface current of p-Si/ n-InP wafers bonded by surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Journal of Applied Physics, Mar. 1, 2002, vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 3062-3066.
Howlader et al., “Investigation of the bonding strength and interface current of p-SionGaAs wafers bonded by surface activated bonding at room temperature,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2114-2118.
Iida, A. et al., “The study of initial mechanism for Al—Au solid phase diffusion flip-chip bonding,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1997, pp. 3044-3661.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Mar. 8, 2018, PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/048609, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 22, 2019 in International Application No. PCT/US2018/064982, 13 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 7, 2019, in International Application No. PCT/US2018/060044, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2016 in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/048609, 15 pages.
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of fritting contacts utilized for micromachined wafer probe cards,” 2000 American Institute of Physics, AIP Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 71, 2000, pp. 2224.
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of low force contact process for MEMS probe cards,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Apr. 1, 2002, vols. 97-98, pp. 462-467.
Itoh et al., “Development of MEMS IC probe card utilizing fritting contact,” Initiatives of Precision Engineering at the Beginning of a Millennium: 10th International Conference on Precision Engineering (ICPE) Jul. 18-20, 2001, Yokohama, Japan, 2002, Book Part 1, pp. 314-318.
Itoh et al., “Room temperature vacuum sealing using surface activated bonding method,” The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston, Jun. 8-12, 2003, 2003 IEEE, pp. 1828-1831.
Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2015 issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-526104 (with English translation).
Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-246660 (English translation), in 3 pages.
Japanese Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-246782 (English translation), in 2 pages.
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully process-compatible layout design on bond pad to improve wire bond reliability in CMOS lcs,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316.
Kim et al., “Low temperature direct Cu—Cu bonding with low energy ion activation method,” Electronic Materials and Packaging, 2001, IEEE, pp. 193-195.
Kim et al., “Room temperature Cu—Cu direct bonding using surface activated bonding method,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2003 American Vacuum Society, Mar./Apr. 2003, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 449-453.
Kim et al., “Wafer-scale activated bonding of Cu—Cu, Cu—Si, and Cu—SiO2 at low temperature,” Proceedings—Electrochemical Society, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 239-247.
Kissinger, G. et al., “Void-free silicon-wafer-bond stregthening in the 200-400 C range,” Sensors and Actuators A, 1993, vol. 36, pp. 149-156.
Krauter, G. et al., “Low temperature silicon direct bonding for application in micromechanics: bonding energies fordifferent combinations of oxides,” Sensors and Actuators A, 1998, vol. 70, pp. 271-275.
Kunio, Takemitsu, “Three dimensional IC technology, using cubic method,” Journal of the JWS, Japan Welding Society, Apr. 5, 1994, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 185-189.
Li, Y.A. et al., “Low temperature copperto copperdirect bonding,” Jpn. Appl. Phys. 37, 1998, pp. L1068-L1069.
Li, Y.A. et al., “Systematic low temperature silicon bonding using pressure and temperature,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 37, 1998, pp. 737-741.
Matsuzawa et al., “Room-temperature interconnection of electroplated Au microbump by means of surface activated bonding method,” Electornic Components and Technology Confererence, 2001, 51st Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 384-387.
Monsma et al., “Development of the spin-valve transistor,” IEEE Tran. Magnet, vol. 33, No. 5, Sep. 1997, pp. 3495-3499.
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of recent direct wafer bonding advances and applications,” Advances in Natural Sciences—Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 11 pages.
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2—SiO2 bonding with hydrofluoric acid. Room temperature and low stress bonding technique for MEMS,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, vol. 79, pp. 237-244.
Oberhammer, J. et al., “Sealing of adhesive bonded devices on wafer level,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2004, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, see pp. 407-412, and Figures 1(a)-1(I), 6 pages.
Onodera et al., “The effect of prebonding heat treatment on the separability of Au wire from Ag-plated Cu alloy substrate,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions, Jan. 2002, vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 5-12.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,485,968, IPR 2013-00381, filed Jun. 21, 2013, pp. 1-49.
Plobi, A. et al., “Wafer direct bonding: tailoring adhesion between brittle materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, R25, 88 pages.
Reiche et al., “The effect of a plasma pretreatment on the Si/Si bonding behaviouir,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 437-444.
Roberds et al., “Low temperature , in situ, plasma activated wafer bonding,” Electrochecmical Society Proceedings, 1997, vol. 97-36, pp. 598-606.
Schmidt, Martin A., Wafer-To-Wafer Bonding for Microstructure Formation, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, No. 8, 1998, pp. 1575-1586.
Shigetou et al., “Cu—Cu direct bonding for bump-less interconnect,” Research Center for Advanced Science and Technolog., University of Tokyo, Optoelectronic Packaging and Solder Bumps, (2002), pp. 628-639.
Shigetou et al., “Room temperature bonding of ultra-fine pitch and low-profiled Cu electrodes for bump-less interconnect,” 2003 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 848-852.
Shigetou et al., “Room-temperature direct bonding of CMP-Cu film for bumpless interconnection,” Electronic Components and Technology Confererence, 51st Proceedings, 2001, IEEE, pp. 755-760.
Shigetou et al., “Room-temperature direct bonding of CMP-Cu for bumpless interconnection,” Research Center forAdvanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, 2001 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 1-6.
Shimatsu et al., IEEE Tran. Magnet. 33, 3495 (1997).
Shimatsu, T. et al., “Metal bonding during sputter film deposition,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16(4), 1998, pp. 2125-2131.
Shingo et al., “Design and fabrication of an electrostatically actuated MEMS probe card,” Tranducers, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference, Jun. 8-12, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1522-1525.
Steinkirchner, J. et al., “Silicon wafer bonding via designed monolayers,” Advanced Materials, 1995, vol. 7, No. 7, 7 pages.
Suga et al., “A new approach to Cu—Cu direct bump bonding,” IEMT/IMC Symposium, 1997, Joint International Electronic Manufacturing Symposium and the International Microelectronics Conference, Apr. 16-18, 1997, IEEE, pp. 146-151.
Suga et al., “A new bumping process using lead-free solder paste,” Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 25, Issue 4), IEEE, Oct. 2002, pp. 253-256.
Suga et al., “A new wafer-bonder of ultra-high precision using surface activated bonding (SAB) concept,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1013-1018.
Suga et al., “Bump-Less Interconnect For Next Generation System Packaging,” Electronic Components And Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1003-1008.
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding—an approach to joining at room temperature,” Ceramic Transactions: Structural Ceramics Joining II, The American Ceramic Society, 1993, pp. 323-331.
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding for new flip chip and bumpless interconnect systems,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 105-111.
Suga, “UHV room temperature joining by the surface activated bonding method,” Advances in science and technology, Techna, Faenza, Italie, 1999, pp. C1079-C1089.
Suga, T., “Feasibility of surface activated bonding for ultra-fine pitch interconnection—A new concept of bump-less direct bonding for system level packaging,” The University of Tokyo, Research Center for Science and Technology, 2000 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2000 IEEE, pp. 702-705.
Suga, T., “Room-temperature bonding on metals and ceramics,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 93-29 (1993), pp. 71-80.
Taiwanese Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2015 in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 095129638 (with English translation).
Taiwanese Office Action dated Jan. 25, 2018 in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 105126081 (with English translation), 20 pages.
Takagi et al, “Wafer-scale room-temperature bonding between silicon and ceramic wafers by means of argon-beam surface activation,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2001, MEMS 2001, The 14th IEEE International Conference, Jan. 25, 2001, IEEE, pp. 60-63.
Takagi et al., “Effect of surface roughness on room-temperature wafer bonding by Ar beam surface activation,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1998, vol. 37, Part 1, No. 1, pp. 4197.
Takagi et al., “Low temperature direct bonding of silicon and silicon dioxide by the surface activation method,” Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1997, Transducers '97 Chicago, 1997 International Conference, vol. 1, pp. 657-660.
Takagi et al., “Room temperature silicon wafer direct bonding in vacuum by Ar beam irradiation,” Micro Electro Mehcanical Systems, MEMS '97 Proceedings, 1997, IEEE, pp. 191-196.
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature bonding of lithium niobate and silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999. vol. 74, pp. 2387.
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of Si to LiNbO3, LiTaO3 and Gd3Ga5O12 by Ar-beam surface activation,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2001, vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 348.
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of silicon and lithium niobate by means of arbon-beam surface aotivation,” Integrated Ferroelectrics: An International Journal, 2002, vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 53-59.
Takagi et al., “Surface activated bonding silicon wafers at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2222 (1996).
Takagi et al., “Wafer-scale spontaneous bonding of silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation at room temperature,” Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Jun. 15, 2003, vol. 105, Issue 1, pp. 98-102.
Tong et al., “Low temperature wafer direct bonding,” Journal of Microelectomechanical systems, Mar. 1994, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 29-35.
Tong et al., “Low temperature wafer direct bonding,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1, 1994, pp. 29-35, XP-000885425, ISSN 1057-7157.
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, R25, 1999, 239 pages (exerpts).
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding: recent developments,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 37, 1994, pp. 101-127.
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding: science and technology,” 1999, 120 pages.
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Semiconductor wafer bonding: science and technology,” 1999, 159 pages.
Tong, Q.Y. et al., “Wafer bonding and layer splitting for microsystems,” Advanced Materials, 1999, vol. 11, No. 17, pp. 1409-1425.
Topol et al., “Enabling technologies forwafer-level bonding of 3D MEMS and integrated circuit structures,” 2004 Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2004 IEEE, pp. 931-938.
Tsau et al., “Fabrication process and plasticity of gold-gold thermocompression bonds,” Mater. Soc. Symp. Proc. 605, 171 (1999).
Tsau, C.H. et al., “Characterization of low temperature wafer-level gold-gold thermocompression bonds,” Mater. Soc. Symp. Proc. 605, 1999, pp. 171-176.
Vossen, J. et al., “Thin Film Processes II,” Academic Press, 1991, 62 pages.
Vossen, J. et al., “Thin Film Processes,” Academic Press, 1978, 62 pages.
Wang et al., “Reliability and microstructure of Au—Al and Au—Cu direct bonding fabricated by the Surface Activated Bonding,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 915-919.
Wang et al., “Reliability of Au bump—Cu direct interconnections fabricated by means of surface activated bonding method,” Microelectronics Reliability, May 2003, vol. 43, Issue 5, pp. 751-756.
Warner, K. et al., “Low-temperature oxide-bonded three-dimensional integrated circuits,” IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 2012, pp. 123-125.
Weldon et al., “Physics and chemistry of silicon wafer bonding investigated by infrared absorption spectroscopy,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Jul./Aug. 1996, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 3095-3106.
Wikipedia, “Chemical bond,” URL http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/chemical_bond, accessed on Mar. 31, 2010, 10 pages.
Wikipedia, “Van der Waals force,” URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_der_Waals_force, originally accessed on Mar. 31, 2010, 7 pages.
Xu et al., “New Au—Al interconnect technology and its reliability by surface activated bonding,” Electronic Packaging Technology Proceedings, Oct. 28-30, 2003, Shanghai, China, pp. 479-483.
Yablonovitch et al., Pd layer as a bonding layer on GaAs wafers for bonding GaAs/GaAs at 200° C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3159 (1991).
Yablonovitch, E. et al., “Van der Waals bonding of GaAs on Pd leads to a permanent, solid-phase-topotaxial metallurgical bond,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1991, pp. 3159-3161.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220254746 A1 Aug 2022 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14835379 Aug 2015 US
Child 15947461 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16383455 Apr 2019 US
Child 17677161 US
Parent 15947461 Apr 2018 US
Child 16383455 US