The present subject matter is generally directed to the field of microelectronic devices and, more particularly, to methods of fluxless micro-piercing of solder balls, and the resulting devices.
Chip-on-board and board-on-chip (BOC) techniques are used to attach semiconductor dies to an interposer or other carrier substrate such as a printed circuit board (PCB). Attachment can be achieved through flip chip attachment, wirebonding, or tape automated bonding (“TAB”). Flip chip attachment typically utilizes ball grid array (BGA) technology. The BGA component (die) includes conductive external contacts, typically in the form of solder balls or bumps, arranged in a grid pattern on the active surface of the die, which permit the die to be flip chip mounted to an interposer or other carrier substrate (e.g., PCB).
In a flip chip attachment, the balls of the BGA component are aligned with terminals on the carrier substrate, and connected by reflowing the solder balls. The solder balls can be replaced with a conductive polymer that is cured. A dielectric underfill is then interjected between the flip chip die and the surface of the carrier substance to embed the solder balls and mechanically couple the BGA component to the carrier substrate.
Wirebonding and TAB attachment generally involve attaching a die by its backside to the surface of a carrier substrate with an appropriate adhesive (e.g., epoxy) or tape. With wirebonding, bond wires are attached to each bond pad on the die and bonded to a corresponding terminal pad on the carrier substrate (e.g., interposer). With TAB, ends of metal leads carried on a flexible insulating tape, such as a polyimide, are attached to the bond pads on the die and to the terminal pads on the carrier substrate. A dielectric (e.g., silicon or epoxy) is generally used to cover the bond wires or metal tape leads to prevent damage.
Flip chip attachment has provided improved electrical performance and allowed greater packaging density. However, developments in ball grid array technology have produced arrays in which the balls are made smaller and with tighter pitches. As the balls become smaller and are set closer together, it poses problems for the mutual alignment of the conductive bumps on the flip chip die with the bond pads on the substrate or interposer. Flip chip attachment can also lead to high costs and process difficulties. For example, a flip chip mounter is required to accurately align the die to the interposer or substrate.
In flip chip packaging, solid-state welding, adhesive bonding and soldering are often used for joining the interconnect system. These bonding techniques face numerous assembly challenges. Soldering is the preferred bonding technique, thanks to its high assembly yield, ability to eliminate the probe mark through reflow, allowance for rework after assembly, electrical stability and high tolerance in placement accuracy because of self-alignment effects. However, some challenges still remain for soldering assembly, such as a long processing time and the need for a flux-based removal of oxides and hydrocarbons for solderability. For example, solder balls typically have an oxide layer formed on the outer surface of the ball due to the manufacturing processes employed to manufacture the solder balls in an ambient environment.
In making conductive connections to such solder balls, a flux is employed due to the presence of the oxide layer, i.e., flux is employed to remove such oxides. Processing time is lengthened by flux application, the vision time required for precise alignment and the need for a reflow process to provide sufficient wetting time for soldering. Flux removal of oxides leaves behind undesirable residues that are deleterious to package reliability. Entrapped residues also cause gross solder voids that can result in premature joint failure. Although chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are effective in removing flux residues, they are environmentally hazardous and do not present a long-term solution. Thus, the use of flux and its cleaning processes erects a barrier to flip chip deployment in the packaging and integration of microelectronic, optoelectronic and microelectromechanical systems. Fluxless soldering processes, on the other hand, rely on a controlled atmosphere for the reduction of oxides for soldering, but this is cumbersome in high-volume implementation. Obviously, a method of instantaneous fluxless soldering in ambient atmosphere for flip chip assembly is highly desirable.
The present subject matter is directed to various methods and devices that may solve, or at least reduce, some or all of the aforementioned problems.
The subject matter disclosed herein may be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:
While the subject matter described herein is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the present subject matter are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
Although various regions and structures shown in the drawings are depicted as having very precise, sharp configurations and profiles, those skilled in the art recognize that, in reality, these regions and structures are not as precise as indicated in the drawings. Additionally, the relative sizes of the various features and doped regions depicted in the drawings may be exaggerated or reduced as compared to the size of those features or regions on fabricated devices. Nevertheless, the attached drawings are included to describe and explain illustrative examples of the subject matter disclosed herein.
In attaching the die 12 to the substrate 14, the device 10 is heated and an illustrative downforce 40 is applied. The magnitude of the downforce 40 may vary depending upon the particular application. In one illustrative embodiment, the downforce 40 may range from approximately 2-12 kg. In some specific applications, a downforce 40 of approximately 8 kg may be employed. The device 10 is heated to a temperature above the melting point of the material of the solder ball 16, e.g., to a temperature ranging from approximately 190-210° C. The downforce 40 may be applied for a duration of 0.5-2 seconds, depending on the particular application. The article entitled “Instantaneous Fluxless Bonding of Au with Pb—Sn Solder in Ambient Atmosphere,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 98, 034904 (2005) is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As shown in
The present subject matter may also be employed to control the offset between the die 12 and the printed circuit board 14. In general, all other things being equal, the greater the downforce 40, the less the distance between the die 12 and the printed circuit board 14. The temperature during the engagement process can also be employed to control the spacing between the die 12 and the printed circuit board 14. In general, the greater the temperature, the less the spacing between the die 12 and the printed circuit board 14.
As shown in
As shown in
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. For example, the process steps set forth above may be performed in a different order. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/201,031, filed Mar. 7, 2014; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/873,509, filed Apr. 30, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,669,173; which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/827,476, filed Jun. 30, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,436,478; which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/958,842, filed Dec. 18, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,749,887; each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4483720 | Bartlett et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4865245 | Schulte et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4912545 | Go | Mar 1990 | A |
4930001 | Williams | May 1990 | A |
5071787 | Mori et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5134460 | Brady et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5207585 | Byrnes et al. | May 1993 | A |
5326428 | Farnworth et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5341980 | Nishikawa et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5592736 | Akram et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5634267 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5793117 | Shimada et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796163 | Glenn | Aug 1998 | A |
5869903 | Nakatani | Feb 1999 | A |
5877079 | Karasawa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878943 | Nishikawa et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889326 | Tanaka | Mar 1999 | A |
5906312 | Zakel et al. | May 1999 | A |
5929521 | Wark et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5952840 | Farnworth et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6077723 | Farnworth et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083773 | Lake | Jul 2000 | A |
6137184 | Ikegami | Oct 2000 | A |
6179198 | Eifuku et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6214642 | Chen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6291897 | Wark et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6333555 | Farnworth et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335571 | Capote et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6337445 | Abbott et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6426636 | Das et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6497943 | Jimarez | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537482 | Farnworth | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537854 | Chang et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538335 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6562545 | Hembree et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583517 | Jimarez | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6634100 | Akram et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6641406 | Yatskov et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667556 | Moden | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669173 | Dunn | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6813662 | Park | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6849944 | Murtuza et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7015132 | Lahiri et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7115495 | Wark et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7122907 | Lee | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129584 | Lee | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7161237 | Lee | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7190065 | Saimen | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7205661 | Wark et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7271497 | Joshi et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7691675 | Garcia et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7749887 | Lee | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7838954 | Buchwalter et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7969004 | Ohnishi | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8288871 | Shieh | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8294279 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8299368 | Endo | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8586409 | Davoine et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
9070586 | Dang | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9929230 | Liu | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10001508 | Liu | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10132836 | Dang | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10163840 | Lee | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20010003296 | Morimoto et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010048153 | Wark | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010054771 | Wark et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020158655 | Wark | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020185301 | Wark | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196041 | Wark | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030160325 | Yoneda et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030168739 | Huang | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030216023 | Wark et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040155357 | Ho et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164389 | Lee | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166661 | Lei et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040173902 | Kim | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050110163 | Koo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120553 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124181 | Brown et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174134 | Wark | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060019481 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060055034 | Wark et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060968 | Wark et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060177965 | Senda | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070063722 | Wark | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070090855 | Wark | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070123020 | Jungnickel et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132097 | Wark et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148819 | Haba et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070218591 | Chou | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080146071 | Davoine et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150135 | Oyama et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080185705 | Osborn et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090152719 | Lee | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090188706 | Endo et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090236130 | Mok | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100163090 | Liu | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100264541 | Lee | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100330797 | Douriet | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120068335 | Song | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120279287 | Andry | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130234328 | Lee | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130313704 | Souriau | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150008577 | Lee | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150111342 | Lin et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150214162 | Lai et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150241476 | Dang | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150382463 | Kim | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160084882 | Dang | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20180348259 | Dang | Dec 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1622304 | Jun 2005 | CN |
1723551 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1797749 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2002344126 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2006107854 | Apr 2006 | JP |
Entry |
---|
EP Patent Application No. 08862313.7—European Office Action, dated Aug. 3, 2017, 8 pages. |
“Examination Report dated Mar. 19, 2016 in Singapore Application No. 201208986-8, 7 pages.” |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority dated Mar. 13, 2009 in International Application No. PCT/US2008/085433.” |
“Lee, T.K. et al., “Instantaneous fluxless bonding of Au with Pb—Sn solder in ambient atmosphere,” Journal of Applied Physics, 98, 034904, 2005.” |
“Office Action dated Apr. 8, 2013 in P.R.C. Application No. 200880121032.X, 21 pages.” |
“Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2014 in European Application No. 08862313.7, 6 pages.” |
“Office Action dated Dec. 12, 2012 in Taiwan Application No. 097148258, 5 pages.” |
“Office Action dated Jun. 25, 2011 in Republic of Korea Application No. 10-2010-7012500, 6 pages.” |
“Office Action dated May 7, 2012 in Taiwan Application No. 097148258, 7 pages.” |
“Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2011 in P.R.C. Application No. 200880121032.X, 11 pages.” |
“Search Report dated Aug. 14, 2014 in Singapore Application No. 201208986-8, 4 pages.” |
“Written Opinion dated Aug. 31, 2015 in Singapore Application No. 201208986-8, 9 pages.” |
“Written Opinion dated Dec. 22, 2014 in Singapore Application No. 201208986-8, 9 pages.” |
EP Patent Application No. 18183518.2—Extended European Search Report, dated Sep. 3, 2018, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190019774 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12827476 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 13873509 | US | |
Parent | 11958842 | Dec 2007 | US |
Child | 12827476 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14201031 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 16138074 | US | |
Parent | 13873509 | Apr 2013 | US |
Child | 14201031 | US |