Examples generally relate to multichip packages, and more specifically to creating a multichip package with a dense interconnect using inkjet printing technology.
Semiconductor devices, such as electronic devices, can include substrate routing that is of a lower density than some of the routing in a chip that is attached to the substrate. Such devices can include complex routing schemes especially in areas where the attached chip includes higher density routing than the routing in the substrate.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals may describe similar components in different views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes may represent different instances of similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
Examples in this disclosure relate to apparatuses and systems that include a printed high density interconnect bridge. Examples also relate to techniques of printing a high density interconnect bridge on a substrate.
The following description includes terms, such as upper, lower, first, second, etc. that are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as limiting. The examples of an apparatus or article described herein can be manufactured, used, or shipped in a number of positions and orientations. The terms “die” and “chip” generally refer to the physical object that is the basic workpiece that is transformed by various process operations into the desired integrated circuit device. A die is usually singulated from a wafer and wafers may be made of semiconducting, non-semiconducting, or combinations of semiconducting and non-semiconducting materials.
Current board design can be created by incorporating a number of heterogeneous functions, such as Computer Processing Unit (CPU) logic, graphics functions, cache memory, and other functions to create integrated System on Chip (SoC) designs. Such SoC packages can lower the complexity of a product design and can reduce the number of components required by the product. Picking individual packages that implement these functions and designing the board around the packages chosen can be complex. Using individual packages can increase the system board area, power loss, complexity, component count, or costs over an integrated SoC package solution.
The input/output (IO) density in a package substrate can be a function of a substrate's minimum pad size, minimum trace dimensions, minimum space dimensions, or the capability of the manufacturing process. The routing density in a multichip substrate can be several orders of magnitude lower (e.g., about 100 times) than chip level routing density. This routing density can impact cost, size, and performance of a product.
A way to reduce the size of a product can include utilizing a silicon interposer in a package to provide a high density chip to chip interconnection. Such a solution includes a higher cost due to the cost of the silicon interposer, additional assembly and process steps, and compounding yield loss.
A substrate can include a high density interconnect bridge in a BBUL or other substrate with multiple embedded dice (e.g., chips) embedded, at least partially, therein. Such a solution can eliminate a first level interconnect (FLI) die attach and use panel processing to reduce the overall cost. Such a solution can allow a high density interconnect to be situated where it would be advantageous and allow low density interconnect (e.g., routing with a substrate routing technique) where it would be advantageous, such as for routing power or ground lines.
Substrate routing can take up a significant amount of space and can be a factor in the overall size of a die package. By including typical substrate routing techniques, which can result in less dense routing than chip routing techniques, there may not be enough space to route the die without routing through the die. Integrating a high density interconnect bridge in a package or substrate, such as a BBUL package or substrate, can allow for an increase in overall local routing and interconnect density of a package, thus helping to reduce size and cost. One previous solution included embedding a high density, silicon interconnect bridge in a substrate. Assembly of such a package is challenging due to tight tolerance requirements in the x, y, and z directions. The tight tolerance requirements are due, at least in part, to alignment and fitting issues in connecting the chip interconnect bridge to the substrate. In addition, using a chip interconnect bridge (e.g., a silicon interconnect bridge) requires embedding the interconnect bridge during the substrate fabrication process.
By printing, such as by using an inkjet printer, an interconnect bridge on a substrate and then attaching one or more dies to the interconnect bridge, the tight tolerances and difficulty in assembling the package can be avoided. Also, by inkjet printing the interconnect bridge, routing can be changed after the substrate fabrication process, thus allowing for added flexibility in the routing design. Further, inkjet printing allows for more package warpage than the high density chip interconnect bridge approach, since inkjet printing can be applied to uneven or non-flat surfaces. Also, inkjet printing the interconnect bridge can eliminate the wafer thinning process required for the high density chip interconnect bridge approach, and can also eliminate any precautions needed to ensure the chip bridge is not damaged when handling the thin chip interconnect.
Inkjet printing technology can allow for traces as small as a micrometer, or even smaller. The spaces between the traces can be a micrometer or smaller using inkjet printing technology. The same technology can be used to create 3D structures such as micro-bumps, pads, or vias, among others. Inkjet printing technology can also be used to print dielectric material and fill spaces between traces or routing layers, among others. As used herein “print” means to dispense powder or molten material out of a nozzle. Printing is an additive process, as opposed to a subtractive process.
Reference will now be made to the drawings wherein like structures will be provided with like suffix reference designations. In order to show the structures of various examples clearly, the drawings included herein are diagrammatic representations of integrated circuit structures. Thus, the actual appearance of the fabricated structures, for example in a photomicrograph, may appear different while still incorporating subject matter of the illustrated examples. Moreover, the drawings show the structures to aid in understanding the illustrated examples.
Dielectric 122 can be printed in between, on, or around the traces 124 and vias 120, such as shown in
Sintering printed metals (e.g., traces, vias, pads, or the like) can produce a metal structure with a sintered grain morphology. The sintered grain morphology is a different morphology than a metal formed in a lithographic process (e.g., a sheet metal). The differences between the two morphologies can be seen using an electron microscope, scanning probe microscope, or other microscope. The sintered grain morphology metals can have different properties (e.g., mechanical strength, conductivity, or the like) than the metals formed using a lithographic process. Sintering includes diffusing atoms of a material at a temperature lower than the melting point of the material being sintered so as to fuse atoms together.
The one or more printed traces 124 can be sintered before the via 120 is printed. The via 120 can be sintered before the dielectric 122 is printed. The dielectric 122 can be baked before the pad 116 is printed. The printed pad 116 can be sintered after at least one layer of the pad 116 is printed.
At 306, a first die 126A can be electrically coupled to a second die 126B, such as by coupling the first and the second dies through the interconnect bridge 118. Coupling the first die 126A to the interconnect bridge 118 can include electrically coupling a contact on the first die 126A to the pad 116.
Computer-readable instructions stored on a computer-readable medium are executable by the processing unit 402 of the computer 410. A hard drive, CD-ROM, and RAM are some examples of articles including a non-transitory computer-readable medium. For example, a computer program 425 capable of providing a generic technique to perform access control check for data access and/or for doing an operation on one of the servers in a component object model (COM) based system according to the teachings of the present invention may be included on a CD-ROM and loaded from the CD-ROM to a hard drive. The computer-readable instructions allow computer 410 to provide generic access controls in a COM based computer network system having multiple users and servers.
The present subject matter may be described by way of several examples.
Example 1 can include subject matter (such as a system, apparatus, method, tangible machine readable medium, etc.) that can include a multi-chip electronic package. The example can include creating a multidie substrate, printing an interconnect bridge on the multidie substrate, and electrically coupling a first die to a second die by coupling the first and second dies through the interconnect bridge.
In Example 2, printing the interconnect bridge of Example 1 can include printing one or more traces on the multidie substrate.
In Example 3, printing the interconnect bridge on the multidie substrate of at least one of Examples 1 and 2 includes printing a via on a trace of the one or more traces.
In Example 4, printing the interconnect bridge on the multidie substrate of at least one of Examples 1-3 includes printing a pad on the via.
In Example 5, coupling the first die to the interconnect bridge of at least one of Examples 1-4 includes electrically coupling a contact on the first die to the pad.
In Example 6, printing the interconnect bridge in the cavity of at least one of Examples 1-5 includes printing a dielectric on the via before printing the pad on the via.
In Example 7, the method of at least one of Examples 1-6 can include sintering the one or more printed traces before printer the via.
In Example 8, the method of at least one of Examples 1-7 can include sintering the printed via before printing the dielectric.
In Example 9, the method of at least one of Examples 1-8 can include baking the printed dielectric before printing the pad.
In Example 10, the method of at least one of Examples 1-9 can include sintering the printed pad.
In Example 11, creating the multidie substrate of at least one of Examples 1-10 can include forming a cavity in the multidie substrate during fabrication of the substrate. wherein printing the interconnect bridge includes printing the interconnect bridge in the cavity.
In Example 12, the method of at least one of Examples 1-11 can include creating a cavity in the substrate after fabricating the substrate.
In Example 13, printing the interconnect bridge of at least one of Examples 1-12 can include printing the interconnect bridge in the cavity.
In Example 14, creating the multidie substrate can include creating a bumpless buildup layer substrate.
In Example 15, the first die can be a memory die and the second die can be a processor die.
In Example 16, the pad can be a flip-chip pad.
In Example 17 an integrated circuit package can include a multidie substrate, an interconnect bridge on the multidie substrate, and a first die electrically coupled to a second die through the interconnect bridge.
In Example 18, the interconnect bridge of at least one of Examples 1-17, can include one or more traces, vias, or pads that exhibit a sintered grain morphology.
In Example 19, the first die of at least one of Examples 1-18 can include a memory die.
In Example 20, the second die of at least one of Examples 1-19 can include a processor die.
In Example 21, the multidie substrate of at least one of Examples 1-20 can include a bumpless buildup layer substrate.
In Example 22, the one or more pads of at least one of Examples 1-21 can include a flip-chip pad.
In Example 23, the multidie substrate of at least one of Examples 1-22 can include a cavity and the interconnect bridge can be situated, at least partially, in the cavity.
In Example 24, the integrated circuit package of at least one of Examples 1-23 can include a molding at least partially surrounding the first and second dies.
Each of these non-limiting examples can stand on its own, or can be combined in various permutations or combinations with one or more of the other examples.
The above detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which methods, apparatuses, and systems discussed herein can be practiced. These embodiments are also referred to herein as “examples.” Such examples can include elements in addition to those shown or described. However, the present inventors also contemplate examples in which only those elements shown or described are provided. Moreover, the present inventors also contemplate examples using any combination or permutation of those elements shown or described (or one or more aspects thereof), either with respect to a particular example (or one or more aspects thereof), or with respect to other examples (or one or more aspects thereof) shown or described herein.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of“at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In this document, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, composition, formulation, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-described examples (or one or more aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Other embodiments can be used, such as by one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description as examples or embodiments, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment, and it is contemplated that such embodiments can be combined with each other in various combinations or permutations. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application is a divisional of and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/036,719, filed on Sep. 25, 2013, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5102829 | Cohn | Apr 1992 | A |
5111278 | Eichelberger | May 1992 | A |
5241456 | Marcinkiewicz et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5285352 | Pastore et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5287247 | Smits et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5497033 | Fillion et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5664772 | Auerbach et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5703400 | Wojnarowski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5745984 | Cole, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761044 | Nakajima | Jun 1998 | A |
5838545 | Clocher | Nov 1998 | A |
5859474 | Dordi | Jan 1999 | A |
5903052 | Chen et al. | May 1999 | A |
6011694 | Hirakawa | Jan 2000 | A |
6084297 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6150716 | Macquarrie et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154366 | Ma et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6229203 | Wojnarowski | May 2001 | B1 |
6271469 | Ma et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6495914 | Sekine et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506632 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6545351 | Jamieson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6969640 | Dimaano, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7042081 | Wakisaka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7189596 | Mu | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7659143 | Tang et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7777351 | Berry et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7851894 | Scanlan | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7851905 | Chrysler et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7880489 | Eldridge et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8018072 | Miks et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8064224 | Mahajan et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8093704 | Palmer et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8227904 | Braunisch et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8319338 | Berry et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8345441 | Crisp et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8461036 | Wu et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8482111 | Haba | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8557629 | Kim et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8558395 | Khan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8565510 | Cohn et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8823144 | Khan et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8823158 | Oh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8866308 | Roy et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8883563 | Haba et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
8912670 | Teh et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9136236 | Starkston et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9153552 | Teh et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9159690 | Chiu et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9171816 | Teh et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9190380 | Teh et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9269701 | Starkston et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9349703 | Chiu et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9520376 | Teh et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
20010005047 | Jimarez et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020070443 | Mu et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030144405 | Lewin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030222344 | Hosoyamada et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040173822 | Dutta | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050067688 | Humpston | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050098891 | Wakabayashi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050230835 | Sunohara et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060038278 | Wang | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060046468 | Akram et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087036 | Yang | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060097379 | Wang | May 2006 | A1 |
20060226527 | Hatano et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060286301 | Murata et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070114677 | Kwon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070128855 | Cho et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070138644 | Mcwilliams et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070145564 | Honer | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070148819 | Haba et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070205496 | Haba et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080054448 | Lu et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080315398 | Lo et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090045524 | Mohammed et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089466 | Cunningham | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090212407 | Foster et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100072263 | Gruber et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072598 | Oh et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110210443 | Hart et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227209 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228464 | Guzek et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110233764 | Chang et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120161331 | Gonzalez et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130119536 | Hada et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130249116 | Mohammed et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140091445 | Teh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140091474 | Starkston et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140159228 | Teh et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140264791 | Manusharow et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140332946 | Oh et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140367848 | Chi et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150084192 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150084210 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150104907 | Teh et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150194406 | Teh et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236681 | We et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150340353 | Starkston et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160027757 | Teh et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160043049 | Chiu et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160079196 | Teh et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160197037 | Starkston et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104025289 | Sep 2014 | CN |
104952838 | Sep 2015 | CN |
102011053161 | Mar 2012 | DE |
112013000494 | Oct 2014 | DE |
102014003462 | Sep 2015 | DE |
20110123297 | Nov 2011 | KR |
20120014099 | Feb 2012 | KR |
20130007049 | Jan 2013 | KR |
200409324 | Jun 2004 | TW |
343241 | Oct 2008 | TW |
201535667 | Sep 2015 | TW |
I550822 | Sep 2016 | TW |
WO-0215266 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-2014051714 | Apr 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 15/049,500, filed Feb. 22, 2016, Localized High Density Substrate Routing. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/875,247, filed Oct. 5, 2015, Bumpless Build-Up Layer Package Including an Integrated Heat Spreader. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, filed Oct. 9, 2015, Tall Solders for Through-Mold Interconnect. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,297, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 3, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,297, Notice of Allowance mailed May 8, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,297, Response filed Apr. 22, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 3, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,297, Response filed Nov. 12, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 12, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/630,297, Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 12, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/631,205, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 1, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/631,205, Preliminary Amendment filed Dec. 12, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/631,205, Response filed Jun. 30, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Apr. 29, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/631,205, Restriction Requirement mailed Apr. 29, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,159, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,159, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 20, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,159, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 10, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,159, Response filed Jan. 19, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,159, Response filed Aug. 19, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 19, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/707,159, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 19, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,719, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Dec. 9, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,719, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,719, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 25, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,719, Respnse filed Jul. 2, 2015 to Restriction Requirement mailed May 7, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,719, Response Filed Dec. 3, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,719, Restriction Requirement mailed May 7, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Feb. 5, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Examiner Interview Summary mailed May 20, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2015”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2014”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Notice of Allowability mailed Aug. 24, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 5, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Response filed Feb. 6, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Response filed May 15, 2015 to Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Response filed Sep. 17, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 17, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Restriction Requirement mailed Jul. 17, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Jul. 15, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,755, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Sep. 3, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,785, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,785, Notice of Allowance mailed May 28, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/570,785, Response May 14, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/663,689, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 24, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/663,689, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 23, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/663,689, Response filed Jun. 4, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 24, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/818,902, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 15, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/818,902, Preliminary Amendment filed Aug. 6, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/875,247, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 26, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,425, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 20, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,425, Preliminary Amendment filed Dec. 4, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/049,500, Preliminary Amendment filed Mar. 23, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380004635.2, Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“German Application Serial No. 102014003462.3, Response filed Apr. 8, 2015 Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2014”, W/ English Claims, 22 pgs. |
“Germany Application Serial No. 102014003462.3, Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2014”, W/ English Translation, 19 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/044001, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Apr. 9, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/044001, International Search Report mailed Aug. 27, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/044001, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 27, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2014-0030620, Office Action mailed by May 7, 2015”, W/ English Translation, 9 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 2014-0030620, Response filed Jul. 7, 2015 to Office Action mailed by May 7, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 31 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 103107035, Office Action mailed Oct. 23, 2015”, w/ English Translation, 7 pgs. |
“Taiwanese Application Serial No. 103107035, Response filed Jan. 12, 2016 to Office Action mailed Oct. 23, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 15 pgs. |
Braunisch, Henning, et al., “High-speed performance of Silicon Bridge die-to-die interconnects”, Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems (EPEPS), IEEE 20th Conference, (Oct. 23, 2011), 95-98. |
Kumagai, K, et al., “A silicon interposer BGA package with Cu-filled TSV and multi-layer Cu-plating interconnect”, Proc. IEEE Electronic Components and Technol. Conf. (ECTC), Lake Buena Vista, FL, (May 27-30, 2008), 571-576. |
Sunohara, M, et al., “Silicon Interposer with TSVs (through silicon vias) and fine multilayer wiring”, Proc. IEEE Electronic Components and Technol. Conf. (ECTC), (May 27-30, 2008), 847-852. |
Towle, Steven N., et al., “Bumpless Build-Up Layer Packaging”, (2001), 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/875,247, Response filed Jul. 1, 2016 to Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 1, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/875,247, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 2, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2016”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Response filed Sep. 8, 2016 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 23, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 27, 2017”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Reponse filed Nov. 4, 2016 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/879,418, Response filed Dec. 19, 2016 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2016”. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/049,500, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/049,500, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 9, 2017”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/049,500, Response filed Jan. 3, 2017 to Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 4, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380004635.2, Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2016”, W/ Machine Translation, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380004635.2, Response filed Aug. 8, 2016 to Office Action mailed Mar. 23, 2016”, W/ English Translation of Claims, 48 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160247763 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14036719 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 15147411 | US |