The following description relates to processing of integrated circuits (“ICs”). More particularly, the following description relates to techniques for repairing processed substrates.
Semiconductor chips are fabricated on suitable flat substrate wafers, such as GaAs, diamond coated substrates, silicon carbide, silicon wafers, etc. After making the active devices, a series of steps are performed to connect the various devices with highly conducting wiring structures, so they can have communication with each other to perform logic or memory storage operations. These wiring structures or interconnect structures are essentially a skeletal network of conducting materials, typically metals, in a matrix of dielectric materials. In high performance devices and to improve device density and yield, it is desirable to minimize topographic features within the interconnect layers for any given device and across the entire substrate. One common method of forming these high-performance interconnect layers is the damascene process.
Multiple types of damascene structures are known, however single and dual damascene processes are the most common. In single damascene, each metal or via layer is fabricated in a series of operations, while in dual damascene, a metal level and a via level are fabricated in a similar operation. Of these two, the dual damascene technique is often preferred because of lower cost and higher device performance.
In the dual damascene process, a suitable substrate with or without devices is coated with a suitable resist layer. The resist layer is imaged to define desirable patterns by lithographic methods on the substrate. Cavities are etched on the patterned substrates typically by reactive ion etching (RIE) methods. The patterned substrate is then coated with a suitable barrier/seed layer prior to overfilling the cavities with a suitable metal, typically copper, by electro-deposition from super-filling plating bath chemistry. After subjecting the coated substrate to a thermal treatment process, the coated conductive layer on the substrate is planarized to remove any unwanted conductive layers. During the planarization step, portions of the underlying dielectric layer may also be removed.
The damascene process is repeated to form the many layers of interconnects. As a result of the discontinuity in the properties (difference in mechanical properties, polishing rates, etc.) of the interconnect metal and the surrounding insulator material, and their respective interactions with the polishing pad, polishing slurry, and other process parameters, erosion forms in areas of high metal pattern density features and dishing forms in large metal structures. The higher the metal pattern density, the greater the erosion, and similarly, the larger the size (e.g., area) of the metal structure, the greater the dishing defect. These deleterious defects can be problematic for manufacturing complex structures, causing shorting defects in subsequent levels, and reducing device yield.
Similar results are observed in cross section topographic profiles of polished through silicon via (TSV) structures. The centers of the vias are often typically lower than the surface of the insulators, due to the dishing effects described.
One of the consequences of substrate surface dishing is poor flatness of the surface of the substrate and its interconnects. This can cause much higher pressures to be needed for bonding devices, dies, wafers, substrates, or the like, using so called hybrid bonding techniques. For example, dies and/or wafers may be bonded in a stacked arrangement using various bonding techniques, including direct bonding, non-adhesive techniques known as ZiBond® or a hybrid bonding technique, also known as DBI®, both available from Invensas Bonding Technologies, Inc., a Xperi company (see for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,864,585 and 7,485,968, which are incorporated herein in their entirety). These bonding techniques, and other similar techniques, require extremely flat bonding surfaces for the most reliable and the best performing bonds.
Attempts to reduce the impact of these defects have included the incorporation of dummy dielectric or metal features in the layout of the design of device interconnects. This approach has been helpful, but it has also increased mask design complexity and the associated loss of freedom of structure placement on the modified pads.
The detailed description is set forth with reference to the accompanying figures. In the figures, the left-most digit(s) of a reference number identifies the figure in which the reference number first appears. The use of the same reference numbers in different figures indicates similar or identical items.
For this discussion, the devices and systems illustrated in the figures are shown as having a multiplicity of components. Various implementations of devices and/or systems, as described herein, may include fewer components and remain within the scope of the disclosure. Alternately, other implementations of devices and/or systems may include additional components, or various combinations of the described components, and remain within the scope of the disclosure.
Various embodiments of methods and techniques for repairing processed semiconductor substrates, and forming associated devices and assemblies, are disclosed. The embodiments comprise methods to remedy and/or to take advantage of the erosion or “dishing” resulting from chemical mechanical polishing/planarizing (CMP) of the substrates, and particularly at locations where there is a higher density of metallic structures embedded within the substrates. In some embodiments, unique formularies are used to carry out the described methods and techniques.
In various implementations, example processes include dry etching the surface of the substrate, until a preselected portion of the conductive material protrudes from the cavities above the surface of a recessed region in the surface of the substrate. In some embodiments, a first selective etchant (a wet etchant) may also be applied to etch the surface of the substrate, forming a smooth flat surface, without damaging the metallic interconnect structures.
In some implementations, the example processes include selectively wet etching the conductive material protruding from the cavities, including applying a second selective etchant to the conductive material for a preselected period of time or until an end point of the conductive material has a preselected height relative to the surface of the substrate. In various embodiments, the second selective etchant is formulated to remove the conductive material, without roughening the smooth surface of the substrate.
A second substrate with similar interconnect structures may be bonded to the substrate, with the interconnects of each of the substrates making contact and electrically coupling. The coupled interconnects form pass-through conductive interconnections through both substrates.
In an example implementation, the first selective etchant comprises a source of fluoride ions, one or more organic acids, and glycerol, with or without a complexing agent, where a content of the source of fluoride ions is less than 2% of the formulary, a content of the one or more organic acids is less than 2% of the formulary, and a content of the glycerol is less than 10% of the formulary. In another example implementation, the second selective etchant comprises one or more oxidizing agents, one or more organic acids, and glycerol, where the one or more oxidizing agents and the one or more organic acids are each less than 2% of formulary. The oxidizing agent may be organic or inorganic material or both, and in some embodiments, the acidic chemicals may comprise an organic or an inorganic acid or a combination of both. The glycerol or other suitable agent may slow the etch rate of the substrate, interconnect or other layer without roughening some or all of the surfaces. Thus, by controlling the chemistry, different features and surfaces may be selectively etched, e.g. a dielectric may be selectively etched using one chemistry that does not affect a conductive layer, followed by a conductive material being selectively etched using a slightly different chemistry or process condition so as not to materially affect the dielectric layer.
In an alternate implementation, the first selective etchant and the second selective etchant include a common formulary. In the implementation, combining the common formulary with one or more additives at preselected process stages allows for the etching of dielectric (e.g., the first selective etchant) or the etching of metals (e.g., the second selective etchant) as appropriate for the process stage.
Various implementations and arrangements are discussed with reference to electrical and electronics components and varied carriers. While specific components (i.e., wafers, integrated circuit (IC) chip dies, etc.) are mentioned, this is not intended to be limiting, and is for ease of discussion and illustrative convenience. The techniques and devices discussed with reference to a wafer, die, or any substrate or surface of interest, and the like, are applicable to any type or number of electrical components, circuits (e.g., integrated circuits (IC), mixed circuits, ASICS, memory devices, processors, etc.), groups of components, packaged components, structures (e.g., wafers, panels, glasses, glass-ceramics, boards, PCBs, etc.), and the like, that may be coupled to interface with each other, with external circuits, systems, carriers, and the like. Each of these different components, circuits, groups, packages, structures, and the like, can be generically referred to as a “microelectronic element.” For simplicity, such components will also be referred to herein as a “die” or a “substrate.”
The disclosed processes are illustrated using block flow diagrams. The order in which the disclosed processes are described is not intended to be construed as a limitation, and any number of the described process blocks can be combined in any order to implement the processes, or alternate processes. Additionally, individual blocks may be deleted from the processes without departing from the spirit and scope of the subject matter described herein. Furthermore, the disclosed processes can be implemented in any suitable manufacturing or processing apparatus or system, along with any hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof, without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein.
Implementations are explained in more detail below using a plurality of examples. Although various implementations and examples are discussed here and below, further implementations and examples may be possible by combining the features and elements of individual implementations and examples.
Various embodiments of substrate structure and assembly process techniques and related devices are disclosed. The embodiments comprise process techniques to remedy or to utilize the erosion or “dishing” that can result from chemical mechanical polishing/planarizing (CMP) of substrates, and particularly at locations where there is a higher density of metallic structures within the substrates.
A schematically illustrated flow diagram 100 is shown at
As shown in
A barrier metal layer 108 is applied to the surface of the substrate 102, to serve as an adhesive layer and also to prevent diffusion of conductive material into the substrate 102. An electroplating or electroless process (or a combination of both) may be used to fill the cavities in the substrate 102 with a conductive material (such as copper, for example), to form the interconnect structures 106, vias, trenches, combinations of vias and trenches, or the like. The metal filling step commonly leaves an overfill 110 of the conductive material on the surface of the substrate 102 and barrier layer 108.
As shown at block (B), the conductive overfill 110 can be removed (here, to the barrier layer 108), by chemical mechanical polishing (CMP), for example. At block (C), a CMP process is further used to remove the metallic barrier layer 108. As shown at (C), CMP polishing the substrate 102 can result in dielectric erosion and dishing 112 at the location of the interconnect structures 106. For example, depending on the polishing variables, the erosion 112 may be greater than 20 nm in depth for damascene cavities less than 1 micron in depth. Erosion may further be affected by the proximity of adjacent conductive features and interconnect structures 106.
Bonding techniques, such as a direct bond interconnect (DBI) technique, for example, may use pressure and/or heat to bond a substrate 102 to another similar or dissimilar substrate, including bonding the respective interconnects of the substrates. Bonding a substrate 102 with large erosion 112 to another substrate can result in a gap at the location of the erosion 112. In some cases, the gap can be a source of poor bonding between the substrates, and can also cause discontinuity between bonded interconnect structures 106 (the interconnects 106 may be electrically open after bonding). Additionally, bonded substrates 102 with larger erosion 112 and comparatively high dishing typically exhibit poor interfacial bond strength and interconnect 106 reliability.
Referring to
Referring again to
In an implementation, the first selective etchant comprises glycerated diluted hydrofluoric acid or buffered hydrofluoric acid or ammonium fluoride, organic acid, and deionized water, with or without a stabilizing additive. In some formulary, a first selective etchant for the substrate 102 may comprise an inorganic or organic acid containing a fluoride ion. It is preferable that the content of the fluoride ion be less 2% and preferably less than 0.5% and preferably less than 0.1%. Examples of the sources of fluoride ions may include hydrofluoric acid, buffered oxide etch, ammonium fluoride, or tetrabutylammonium fluoride. The first selective etchant solution may also comprise aliphatic or non-aliphatic organic acids, and more than one organic acid may be used in the formulary. The organic acid content of the first selective etchant may typically be less than 2% and preferably less than 1%, and preferably less than 0.1%. Examples of organic acid may include formic acid, acetic acid, methyl sulfonic acid and their likes. In some embodiments, mineral acids (for example, a very small amount of sulfuric acid) may be used. However, the amount used should not roughen the surface of the etched metallic interconnect 106.
In various embodiments, glycerol is incorporated into the first selective etchant, where the content of glycerol may vary between 0.5 to 25% of the formulary, and preferably under 10%. In other applications, a very small amount of amide, amines, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene, or organic carbonates may be added to the formulary. In other embodiments, the first selective etchant may be mildly alkaline with a pH preferably less than 9.5 and preferably less than 8.5. It is preferable that the total content of these additional additives be less than 5% and preferably less than 1%. It is also desirable that a complexing agent that suppresses the removal or etching or roughening of the surface of the metallic interconnect 106 be incorporated into the formulary. In the case of copper, for example, a suitable copper complexing agent with one or more triazole moieties may be used. The concentration of the complexing agent is desired to be less than 2%, and preferably less than 1%, 0.2%, and less than 100 ppm and less than 5 ppm in some instances. In some applications, after the selective removal of material of the substrate 102, the complexing agent on the surface of the interconnect 106 may be removed with a suitable solvent, for example an alcohol, such as methanol. In other instances, the complexing agent may be removed from the surface of the interconnect 106 by a radiation method or by a thermal treatment to sublime the complexing agent from the surface of the interconnect 106.
In some embodiments, the application of a complexing agent may not be desirable. In such an embodiment, the first etchant can be de-oxygenated to remove undesirable oxygen content from the fluid. Dissolved gasses in the first selective etchant may be removed by a membrane process, for example, using 3M Corporation® Liqui-Cel™ Membrane Contactor or Contactors, or the like. Removing dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide from the first selective etchant increases the selectivity of the removal rate of the material of the substrate 102 with respect to the interconnect structures 106.
In other embodiments, after the removal of dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide from the first selective etchant, nitrogen gas may be incorporated into the first selective etchant by a suitable inline blending scheme, for example (see
In some embodiments, the first selective etchant may be used as a surface cleaning etchant. For example, after stripping a resist layer from the surface of the substrate 102, the residual resist layer may be ashed in a plasma containing oxygen species, and any remaining residual resist layer and byproducts of the of the ashing step, including particulates, may be cleaned off the substrate 102 by applying the first selective etchant for a period of time, varying from less than 10 seconds to 300 seconds or even more, before rinsing and drying the substrate 102. In some applications, the first selective etchant may be applied to clean the surface of the substrate 102 and also the surface of the interconnect 106, to remove dirty and undesirable metal oxide from the surface of the interconnect 106 prior to the bonding operation.
In some embodiments, the process can include selectively wet etching the metallic interconnects 106 to shape or size the interconnects 106, without roughing the surface of the substrate 102. In an embodiment, a second selective etchant is used for this step in the process. The second selective etchant reduces and/or removes the desired conductive material of the interconnects 106 while maintaining a low surface roughness of the substrate 102.
For example, in the embodiment, the second selective etchant does not substantially affect the surface of the substrate 102, particularly the flatness/smoothness (nano-scale topography) of the surface. In an embodiment, the removal of the conductive material is a function of time, that is, the longer the second selective etchant is allowed to contact the metal of the interconnects 106, the more metal of the interconnects 106 is removed. Accordingly, the selective etchant is applied for a specified period of time.
In one implementation, the second selective etchant comprises a composition that removes the interconnect 106 metal (in the case of copper or copper oxide) at a controlled rate. The removal is such that the roughness (and lack of roughness) of the metal (e.g., copper) remains practically unchanged after the removal step. In one embodiment, after the metal removal step, the roughness of the metallic interconnect 106 is less than 2 nm, and in other cases, the roughness is less 0.5 nm. One unique attribute of the formulary of the second selective etchant is that the roughness of the etched metal of the interconnect(s) 106 is independent of the duration of the etch. Etching with the second selective etchant can be performed until the surfaces of the interconnects 106 are at a desired height above or below the surface of the substrate 102, to prepare the interconnects 106 for bonding.
In an implementation, the second selective etchant comprises a glycerated diluted oxidizing agent, organic acid, and deionized water, with or without a stabilizing additive. In an example, a formulary of the second selective etchant for the metallic interconnects 106 may comprise an inorganic or organic peroxide, typically less than 2% and preferably less than 0.5%. An example of the oxidizing agent may include hydrogen peroxide and urea peroxide. One or more oxidizing agents may be used in the formulary for the second selective etchant. The organic acid may comprise aliphatic or non-aliphatic organic acids, and also more than one organic acid may be used in the formulary. The organic acid content of the second selective etchant may typically be less than 2% and preferably less than 1% and preferably less than 0.1%. Examples of the organic acid may include formic acid, acetic acid, methyl sulfonic acid, and their likes. In some embodiments, mineral acids (for example, a very small amount of sulfuric acid) may be used, however, the amount should not roughen the surface of the etched metallic interconnect 106.
In one embodiment, glycerol is incorporated in the second selective etchant, where the content of glycerol may vary between 0.5 to 25% of the formulary, and preferably under 10%. In other applications, a very small amount of amide, amines, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene, or organic carbonates may be added to the formulary. It is preferable that the total content of these additional additives, apart from glycerol, be less than 5% and preferably less than 1%.
In some embodiments, the first selective etchant may be modified to etch the surface of the interconnect(s) 106. For example, with or without the removal of dissolved oxygen and carbon dioxide from the first selective etchant, a metal oxidizing material (for example oxygen gas) may be incorporated into the first selective etchant by a suitable inline blending scheme, for instance (see
As disclosed in the foregoing, by modifying the oxygen content of the first selective etchant, the first selective etchant may be used to selectively remove the substrate 102, or the interconnect 106, or both, at desirable rates without roughening the surface of the substrate 102.
As described above, the interconnect structures 106 may be partially selectively etched relative to the surface of the substrate 102 and/or the surface of the recess 112 (using the second selective etchant or the oxygenated first selective etchant, for example). Also in alternate embodiments, the surface of the substrate 102 may be patterned to expose the eroded portion of the surface of the substrate 102. Thereafter, the substrate 102 and the interconnect structures 106 in the eroded region are etched using the first and second selective etchants described earlier. For example, the desired metallic interconnect structures 106 may be partially etched with the second selective etchant (or the oxygenated first selective etchant) for 20 nm to up to 10 microns or more, to achieve the desirable height above a surface of the recess 112 without protruding above the surface of the substrate 102. Then the dielectric region adjacent to the etched metal interconnect structure 106 may be etched with the first selective etchant to the desirable depth, if needed. The resist layer is stripped, and the substrate 102 is cleaned and prepared for non-adhesive bonding.
In various embodiments, as illustrated at blocks (B) and (C) of
At block (B), the interconnects 106 and 116 form pass-through conductors, which also pass through the gap formed between the substrates 102 and 114, due to the erosion of one or both of the substrates 102, 114. Because the dielectric at the surfaces of the substrates 102 and/or 114 was reduced following the process 200, as described with respect to
At block (C), the interconnects 106 and 116 form pass-through conductors, which also pass through the gap formed between the substrates 102 and 114. Additionally, interconnects 304 embedded within substrate 102 bond to interconnects 306 embedded within substrate 114. Note that there is less or no gap due to erosion at the bonding locations of interconnects 304 and 306. For example, interconnects 304 and 306 may have a coarser pitch or be more isolated from adjacent interconnects as compared to the plurality of interconnects 106 and 116, which may be more densely placed.
The interconnects 106 and 116 at block (C) of
The example device 308 illustrated at block (D) of
In various embodiments, the device 308 can be used in the illustrated configuration as a sensing device (such as a micro electro-mechanical (MEMS) device), or the like. In an example, a membrane 312 can be positioned across the void in the second substrate 310 and over the protruding metal interconnects 106 (which act as sensing conductors in this configuration). The membrane 312 may permit or prohibit light, gas, or liquid to pass through the opening in the second substrate 310.
In addition, as illustrated, the device 308 can include one or more pass-through interconnects 304 (passing through the substrate 102) which can bond to vias 314 (or the like) embedded within the second substrate 310, or may otherwise connect to circuitry outside of the substrate 102.
In some embodiments, one or more of the metallic layer in the via 314 or trench may be selectively or completely removed to form an open channel (not shown). In this form the open channel may be used or formed for non-electrical communication, for example for optical communication or optical sensing. In other applications, the device 308 may be applied or formed for electro-optical applications.
As discussed above, a degassing unit 404 may be used to remove oxygen and/or carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide from the formulary. Dissolved gasses in the formulary may be removed by a membrane process, for example, using 3M Corporation® Liqui-Cel™ Membrane Contactor or Contactors, or the like. The liquid formulary is passed through the membrane, removing the unwanted gasses (e.g., oxygen and carbon dioxide) from the formulary. This allows for control of the selectivity of the formulary, according to the selective etching desired. For example, oxygen and/or nitrogen may be added from the oxygen source 406 and/or the nitrogen source 408 as desired after the degassing. In alternate embodiments, other techniques may be used to remove unwanted gasses from the formulary that do not include a membrane.
A gas composition analyzer 410 may be employed after degassing and/or after adding and blending (for example at blending unit 412) oxygen and/or nitrogen to the formulary to observe and ensure that the formulary includes the desired concentration (or lack of) gasses of interest (e.g., oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, etc.). Adjustments or corrections may be made at the degassing unit 404, the oxygen source 406, and/or the nitrogen source 408 as desired.
As discussed above, a lower concentration of oxygen (or a lack of oxygen) in the formulary (the first selective etchant, for instance) allows for etching the substrate 102 without etching or corroding the metallic interconnect(s) 106. Also, any copper oxide of the interconnect(s) 106 is etched with a reduced oxygen concentration in the formulary, cleaning the interconnect(s) 106. Increasing the concentration of oxygen in the formulary allows the formulary to etch (e.g., dissolve) the metallic interconnect(s) 106 faster than etching the substrate 102, particularly if the interconnect(s) 106 are comprised of copper and copper oxide, or the like. Accordingly, the interconnect(s) 106 can be etched without damaging the substrate 102, using a predetermined increased oxygen concentration of the formulary, and applying this formulary for a predetermined time duration.
Increasing the volume of nitrogen from the nitrogen source 408 can be used to reduce the concentration of oxygen in the formulary, as well as reducing or stopping the flow of oxygen from the oxygen source 406. Contrarily, the flow of oxygen can be increased and/or the flow of nitrogen decreased to increase the oxygen concentration of the formulary. The pH of the formulary can be controlled in like manner, for acidic or alkaline etching as desired. For instance, in some cases (e.g., to etch copper without etching copper oxide), an alkaline etching formulary is desired.
The desired formulary is applied to the substrate 102 and/or the interconnect(s) 106, for instance while the substrate 102 is on a spinning surface 414, or the like. A blanket nitrogen source 416 may be used to reduce oxygen or other gasses from the application area of the spinning surface 414, to better control the concentration blend of the formulary as it is applied to the substrate 102 and/or the interconnect(s) 106.
In alternate implementations, other techniques may be included in the processes disclosed in various combinations, and remain within the scope of the disclosure.
Although the implementations of the disclosure have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the implementations are not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as representative forms of implementing example devices and techniques.
Each claim of this document constitutes a separate embodiment, and embodiments that combine different claims and/or different embodiments are within the scope of the disclosure and will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing this disclosure.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/842,233 filed Apr. 7, 2020, which is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/849,325 filed Dec. 20, 2017 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,672,654, and also claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(1) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/439,762, filed Dec. 28, 2016, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/439,746, filed Dec. 28, 2016, the disclosures of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5341979 | Gupta | Aug 1994 | A |
5753536 | Sugiyama et al. | May 1998 | A |
5771555 | Eda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6080640 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6423640 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6465892 | Suga | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6887769 | Kellar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908027 | Tolchinsky et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7045453 | Canaperi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7105980 | Abbott et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7193423 | Dalton et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7385283 | Wu et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7566634 | Beyne et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7750488 | Patti et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7790578 | Furui | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803693 | Trezza | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8026181 | Arita et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8147630 | George | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8183127 | Patti | May 2012 | B2 |
8349635 | Gan et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8377798 | Peng et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8441131 | Ryan | May 2013 | B2 |
8476165 | Trickett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8482132 | Yang et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501537 | Sadaka et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513088 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513810 | Tago | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8524533 | Tong et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8620164 | Heck et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8647987 | Yang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8697493 | Sadaka | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8716105 | Sadaka et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8802538 | Liu | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8809123 | Liu et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8841002 | Tong | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8901736 | Shen et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8975163 | Lei et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9029242 | Holden et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9076860 | Lei et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9076929 | Katsuno et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9093350 | Endo et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9142517 | Liu et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9171756 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9184125 | Enquist et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9224704 | Landru | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230941 | Chen et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9257399 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299736 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9312229 | Chen | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331149 | Tong et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9337235 | Chen et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9373527 | Yu et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9385024 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9391143 | Tong et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394161 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9431368 | Enquist et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9437572 | Chen et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443796 | Chou et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9461007 | Chun et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9496239 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9524959 | Yeh et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9536848 | England et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9559081 | Lai et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9564414 | Enquist et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9620481 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9656852 | Cheng et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9673096 | Hirschler et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9674939 | Scannell | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9704827 | Huang et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9716033 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9723716 | Meinhold | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9728521 | Tsai et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9741620 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9768133 | Wu et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9799587 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9852988 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9893004 | Yazdani | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9899442 | Katkar | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9929050 | Lin | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9941241 | Edelstein et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9941243 | Kim et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9953941 | Enquist | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9960142 | Chen et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10002844 | Wang et al. | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10026605 | Doub et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10075657 | Fahim et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10204893 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10269756 | Uzoh | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276619 | Kao et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10276909 | Huang et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10410976 | Asano et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10418277 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10434749 | Tong | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446456 | Shen et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446487 | Huang et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10446532 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10508030 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10522499 | Enquist et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10707087 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10727219 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10784191 | Huang et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790262 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10840135 | Uzoh | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10840205 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10854578 | Morein | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10879212 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10886177 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10892246 | Uzoh | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10923408 | Huang et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10923413 | DeLaCruz | Feb 2021 | B2 |
10950547 | Mohammed et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10964664 | Mandalapu et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985133 | Uzoh | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10985204 | Von Kanel | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10991804 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10998292 | Lee et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11004757 | Katkar et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011494 | Gao et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11011503 | Wang et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11031285 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11037919 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11056348 | Theil | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11056390 | Uzoh et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11069734 | Katkar | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11088099 | Katkar et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
11127738 | DeLaCruz et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
11158573 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11158606 | Gao et al. | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11169326 | Huang et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11171117 | Gao et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11176450 | Teig et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
11195748 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11205625 | DeLaCruz et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11222863 | Hua et al. | Jan 2022 | B2 |
11244920 | Uzoh | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11256004 | Haba et al. | Feb 2022 | B2 |
11264357 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2022 | B1 |
11276676 | Enquist et al. | Mar 2022 | B2 |
11296044 | Gao et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11296053 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11329034 | Tao et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11348898 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2022 | B2 |
11355404 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11355443 | Huang et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11367652 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11373963 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
11380597 | Katkar et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11385278 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11387202 | Haba et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11387214 | Wang et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11393779 | Gao et al. | Jul 2022 | B2 |
11437423 | Takachi | Sep 2022 | B2 |
11462419 | Haba | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11476213 | Haba et al. | Oct 2022 | B2 |
11515291 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
11626363 | Haba et al. | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11631647 | Haba | Apr 2023 | B2 |
11652083 | Uzoh et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11664357 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | May 2023 | B2 |
11721653 | DeLaCruz et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11728273 | Haba | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11735523 | Uzoh | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11742314 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11749645 | Gao et al. | Sep 2023 | B2 |
11762200 | Katkar et al. | Sep 2023 | B2 |
11764177 | Haba | Sep 2023 | B2 |
11842894 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2023 | B2 |
11876076 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jan 2024 | B2 |
20020003307 | Suga | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030071106 | Bendat et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030148591 | Guo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040084414 | Sakai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050101130 | Lopatin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050161795 | Tong et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050161808 | Anderson | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060057945 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123061 | Evertsen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070148912 | Morita et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070262468 | Nasu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080006938 | Patti et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080064189 | Daubenspeck et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080268614 | Yang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090029274 | Olson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090095399 | Zussy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100096699 | Miyata | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110084403 | Yang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110308738 | Maki et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120068355 | Aoki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120119258 | Liang | May 2012 | A1 |
20120238070 | Libbert et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130009321 | Kagawa et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140015088 | Chapelon | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140145338 | Fujii et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140175655 | Chen et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140187040 | Enquist et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140264948 | Chou et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140319656 | Marchena et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150064498 | Tong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150145140 | Haba et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150364434 | Chen et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013099 | Tanida | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160071770 | Albermann et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160181228 | Higuchi et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160197055 | Yu | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160233175 | Dubey et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160343682 | Kawasaki | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170154768 | Zhao | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170200756 | Kao et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170250172 | Huang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180102286 | Uzoh | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180175012 | Wu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182639 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180182666 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180190580 | Haba et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180190583 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180219038 | Gambino et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180226371 | Enquist | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180323177 | Yu et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180323227 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180331066 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190088527 | Uzoh | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190115277 | Yu et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190131277 | Yang et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190148336 | Chen et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190152773 | Herbsommer et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190198409 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190371763 | Agarwal et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385935 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190385966 | Gao et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200013637 | Haba | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200013765 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200035641 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200043910 | Uzoh et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200058617 | Wu et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200075520 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075533 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075534 | Gao et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200075553 | DeLaCruz et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200118973 | Wang et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200227367 | Haba et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200279821 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200294908 | Haba et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200328162 | Haba et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328164 | DeLaCruz et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200335408 | Gao et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200371154 | DeLaCruz et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200395321 | Katkar et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20200411483 | Uzoh et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210098412 | Haba et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210118864 | DeLaCruz et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210143125 | DeLaCruz et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210181510 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193603 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193624 | DeLaCruz et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210193625 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210242152 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210296282 | Gao et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210305202 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
20210366820 | Uzoh | Nov 2021 | A1 |
20210407941 | Haba | Dec 2021 | A1 |
20220077063 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220077087 | Haba | Mar 2022 | A1 |
20220139867 | Uzoh | May 2022 | A1 |
20220139869 | Gao et al. | May 2022 | A1 |
20220208650 | Gao et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208702 | Uzoh | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220208723 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220246497 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220246564 | Gao et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220285303 | Mirkarimi et al. | Sep 2022 | A1 |
20220319901 | Suwito et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320035 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20220320036 | Gao et al. | Oct 2022 | A1 |
20230005850 | Fountain, Jr. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230019869 | Mirkarimi et al. | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230036441 | Haba et al. | Feb 2023 | A1 |
20230067677 | Lee et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230069183 | Haba | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230100032 | Haba et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
20230115122 | Uzoh et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230122531 | Uzoh | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230123423 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230125395 | Gao et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230130259 | Haba et al. | Apr 2023 | A1 |
20230132632 | Katkar et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230140107 | Uzoh et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230142680 | Guevara et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154816 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230154828 | Haba et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230187264 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187317 | Uzoh | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187398 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230187412 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197453 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197496 | Theil | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197559 | Haba et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197560 | Katkar et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230197655 | Theil et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207402 | Fountain, Jr. et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207437 | Haba | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207474 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230207514 | Gao et al. | Jun 2023 | A1 |
20230215836 | Haba et al. | Jul 2023 | A1 |
20230245950 | Haba et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230268300 | Uzoh et al. | Aug 2023 | A1 |
20230282610 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230299029 | Theil et al. | Sep 2023 | A1 |
20230343734 | Uzoh et al. | Oct 2023 | A1 |
20230360950 | Gao | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230361074 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230369136 | Uzoh et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20230375613 | Haba et al. | Nov 2023 | A1 |
20240038702 | Uzoh | Feb 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103681646 | Mar 2014 | CN |
2 339 614 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2 685 491 | Jan 2014 | EP |
04-337694 | Nov 1992 | JP |
2000-100679 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001-102479 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2002-353416 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2004-193493 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2009-135348 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2010-073964 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2013-033786 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2017-130610 | Jul 2017 | JP |
2018-160519 | Oct 2018 | JP |
10-0386954 | Jun 2003 | KR |
10-2004-0020827 | Mar 2004 | KR |
10-2015-0097798 | Aug 2015 | KR |
WO 2005043584 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2009005898 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2010024678 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2014052445 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2015134227 | Sep 2015 | WO |
WO 2017151442 | Sep 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Fukushima, Takafumi et al., “Oxide-oxide thermocompression direct bonding technologies with capillary self-assembly for multichip-to-wafer heterogeneous 3D system integration,” Micromachines, Oct. 2016, vol. 7, No. 184, pp. 18 pages. |
Ker, Ming-Dou et al., “Fully process-compatible layout design on bond pad to improve wire bond reliability in CMOS ICS,” IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, Jun. 2002, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 309-316. |
Moriceau, H. et al., “Overview of recent direct wafer bonding advances and applications,” Advances in Natural Sciences-Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2010, 11 pages. |
Nakanishi, H. et al., “Studies on SiO2—SiO2 bonding with hydrofluoric acid. Room temperature and low stress bonding technique for MEMS,” Sensors and Actuators, 2000, vol. 79, pp. 237-244. |
Oberhammer, J. et al., “Sealing of adhesive bonded devices on wafer level,” Sensors and Actuators A, 2004, vol. 110, No. 1-3, pp. 407-412, see pp. 407-412, and Figures 1 (a)-1 (I), 6 p. |
Plobi, A. et al., “Wafer direct bonding: tailoring adhesion between brittle materials,” Materials Science and Engineering Review Journal, 1999, R25, 88 pages. |
Suga et al., “Bump-less interconnect for next generation system packaging,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1003-1008. |
Suga, T., “Feasibility of surface activated bonding for ultra-fine pitch interconnection—A new concept of bump-less direct bonding for system level packaging,” The University of Tokyo, Research Center for Science and Technology, 2000 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2000 IEEE, pp. 702-705. |
Bush, Steve, “Electronica: Automotive power modules from on Semi,” ElectronicsWeekly.com, indicating an Onsemi AR0820 product was to be demonstrated at a Nov. 2018 trade show, https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/products/power-supplies/electronica-automotive-power-modules-semi-2018-11/ (published Nov. 8, 2018; downloaded Jul. 26, 2023). |
Leissa, A.W., “Vibration of Plates,” NASA SP-160, 1969, 362 pages. |
Lim, K. et al., “Design and simulation of symmetric wafer-to-wafer bonding compensating a gravity effect,” 2020 IEEE 70th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), doi: 10.1109/ECTC32862.2020.00234 (2020), 6 pages. |
Morrison, Jim et al., “Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Teardown,” Tech Insights (posted Apr. 24, 2016), includes description of hybrid bonded Sony IMX260 dual-pixel sensor, https://www.techinsights.com/blog/samsung-galaxy-s7-edge-teardown, downloaded Jul. 11, 2023, 9 pages. |
Onsemi AR0820 image, cross section of a CMOS image sensor product. The part in the image was shipped on Sep. 16, 2021. Applicant makes no representation that the part in the image is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference Bush, Nov. 8, 2018, ElectronicsWeekly.com (“Bush article”); however, the imaged part and the part shown in the Bush article share the part number “Onsemi AR0820.”. |
Sony IMX260 image, cross section of Sony dual-pixel sensor product labeled IMX260, showing peripheral probe and wire bond pads in a bonded structure. The part in the image was shipped in Apr. 2016. Applicant makes no representation that the part in the image is identical to the part identified in the separately submitted reference Morrison et al. (Tech Insights article dated Apr. 24, 2016), describing and showing a similar sensor product within the Samsung Galaxy S7; however the imaged part and the part shown in the Morrison et al. article share the part name “Sony IMX260.”. |
Zgheib, Elia. et al., “Multilayered models for determining the Young's modulus of thin films by means of Impulse Excitation Technique,” https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167663619304752, Manuscript_68d36734cad5d1ad97e7c65bfb45f5d1, 2019, 39 pages. |
“Die-to-Wafer Fusion and Hybrid Bonding,” EV Group, https://www.evgroup.com/technologies/die-to-wafer-fusion-and-hybrid-bonding/, printed Sep. 21, 2022, 8 pages. |
“Photo Etching DBC for Power Circuits—Direct Bond Copper (DBC) on Ceramic Used for Power Circuits,” Conard Corporation, 2021, downloaded Nov. 9, 2021, https://www.conardcorp.com/photo-etching-dbc-for-power-circuits/, 2 pages. |
“The effects of edge trimming—Engineering R&D Division, Operation V,” Disco Technical Review Mar. 2016, 3 pages. |
“Lecture 29: Productivity and process yield,” National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL), MM5017: Electronic materials, devices, and fabrication, 16 pages. |
Amirfeiz et al., “Formation of silicon structures by plasma-activated wafer bonding,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2000, vol. 147, No. 7, pp. 2693-2698. |
Ceramic Microstructures: Control at the Atomic Level, Recent Progress in Surface Activated Bonding, Abstract, 1998, pp. 385-389. |
Chang, T.C. et al., “A method for fabricating a superior oxide/nitride/oxide gate stack,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 2004, vol. 7, No. 7, pp. G138-G140. |
Chung et al., “Room temperature GaAs—Si and InP—Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activate bonding method,” Abstract, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Jan. 2, 1997, vol. 121, Issues 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Chung et al., “Wafer direct bonding of compound semiconductors and silicon at room temperature by the surface activated bonding method,” Abstract, Applied Surface Science, Jun. 2, 1997, vol. 117-118, pp. 808-812. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free room temperature wafer to wafer direct bonding,” J. Electrochem. Soc., The Electrochemical Society, Inc., Nov. 1995, vol. 142, No. 11. pp. 3949-3955. |
Farrens et al., “Chemical free wafer bonding of silicon to glass and sapphire,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings vol. 95-7, 1995, pp. 72-77. |
Frumusanu, Andrei, “TSMC's version of EMIB is ‘LSI’: Currently in pre-qualification,” AnandTech, https://www.anandtech.com/show/16031/tsmcs-version-of-emib-Isi-3dfabric, Aug. 25, 2020, 6 pages. |
Gao, G. et al., “Low temperature hybrid bonding for die to wafer stacking applications,” 2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), IEEE, Jun. 1, 2021-Jul. 4, 2021. |
Gösele et al., “Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: A flexible approach to materials combinations in microelectronics; micromechanics and optoelectronics,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 23-32. |
Hooper, A. et al. “Review of wafer dicing techniques for via-middle process 3DI/TSV ultrathin silicon device wafers,” 2015 IEEE 65th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC). |
Hosoda et al., “Effect of the surface treatment on the room-temperature bonding of AI to Si and SiO2,” Abstract, Journal of Materials Science, Jan. 1, 1998, vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 253-258. |
Hosoda et al., “Room temperature GaAs—Si and InP—Si wafer direct bonding by the surface activated bonding method,” Abstract, Nuclear Inst. And Methods in Physics Research B, 1997, vol. 121, Nos. 1-4, pp. 203-206. |
Howlader et al., “A novel method for bonding of ionic wafers,” Abstract, Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2006, IEEE, pp. 7-pp. |
Howlader et al., “Bonding of p-Si/n-InP wafers through surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Abstract, Indium Phosphide and Related Materials, 2001, IEEE International Conference On, pp. 272-275. |
Howlader et al., “Characterization of the bonding strength and interface current of p-Si/ n-InP wafers bonded by surface activated bonding method at room temperature,” Journal of Applied Physics, Mar. 1, 2002, vol. 91, No. 5, pp. 3062-3066. |
Howlader et al., “Investigation of the bonding strength and interface current of p-SionGaAs wafers bonded by surface activated bonding at room temperature,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2114-2118. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of fritting contacts utilized for micromachined wafer probe cards,” Abstract, 2000 American Institute of Physics, AIP Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 71, 2000, pp. 2224. |
Itoh et al., “Characteristics of low force contact process for MEMS probe cards,” Abstract, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Apr. 1, 2002, vols. 97-98, pp. 462-467. |
Itoh et al., “Development of MEMS IC probe card utilizing fritting contact,” Abstract, Initiatives of Precision Engineering at the Beginning of a Millennium: 10th International Conference on Precision Engineering (ICPE) Jul. 18-20, 2001, Yokohama, Japan, 2002, Book Part 1, pp. 314-318. |
Itoh et al., “Room temperature vacuum sealing using surface activated bonding method,” The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, Boston, Jun. 8-12, 2003, 2003 IEEE, pp. 1828-1831. |
Jin, H. et al., “Silicon / Silicon Oxide / LPCVD Silicon Nitride Stacks: The Effect of Oxide Thickness on Bulk Damage and Surface Passivation,” Centre for Sustainable Energy Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia, 3 pages. |
Kim et al., “Low temperature direct Cu—Cu bonding with low energy ion activation method,” Abstract, Electronic Materials and Packaging, 2001, IEEE, pp. 193-195. |
Kim et al., “Room temperature Cu—Cu direct bonding using surface activated bonding method,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 2003 American Vacuum Society, Mar./Apr. 2003, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 449-453. |
Kim et al., “Wafer-scale activated bonding of Cu—CU, Cu—Si, and Cu—SiO2 at low temperature,” Abstract, Proceedings—Electrochemical Society, 2003, vol. 19, pp. 239-247. |
Lei, W.S. et al., “Die singulation technologies for advanced packaging: A critical review,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 30(4), Apr. 6, 2012, Jul./Aug. 1012, pp. 040801-1-040801-27. |
Marinov, Val et al., “Laser-enabled advanced packaging of ultrathin bare dice in flexible substrates,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, Apr. 2012, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 569-577. |
Matsuzawa et al., “Room-temperature interconnection of electroplated Au microbump by means of surface activated bonding method,” Abstract, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, 51st Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 384-387. |
NASA SBIR/STTR Technologies, Proposal No. 09-1 S5.05-9060—Reliable Direct Bond Copper Ceramic Packages for High Temperature Power Electronics, Contract No. NNX10CE23P, PI: Ender Savrun, PhD, Sienna Technologies, Inc.—Woodinville, WA, 1 page. |
Onodera et al., “The effect of prebonding heat treatment on the separability of Au wire from Ag-plated Cu alloy substrate,” Abstract, Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions, Jan. 2002, vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 5-12. |
Reiche et al., “The effect of a plasma pretreatment on the Si/Si bonding behaviour,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1998, vol. 97-36, pp. 437-444. |
Roberds et al., “Low temperature , in situ, plasma activated wafer bonding,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 1997, vol. 97-36, pp. 598-606. |
Shigetou et al., “Room temperature bonding of ultra-fine pitch and low-profiled Cu electrodes for bump-less interconnect,” Abstract, 2003 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 848-852. |
Shigetou et al., “Room-temperature direct bonding of CMP-Cu film for bumpless interconnection,” Abstract, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 51st Proceedings, 2001, IEEE, pp. 755-760. |
Shingo et al., “Design and fabrication of an electrostatically actuated MEMS probe card,” Abstract, Tranducers, Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 12th International Conference, Jun. 8-12, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1522-1525. |
Suga et al., “A new approach to Cu—Cu direct bump bonding,” Abstract, IEMT/IMC Symposium, 1997, Joint International Electronic Manufacturing Symposium and the International Microelectronics Conference, Apr. 16-18, 1997, IEEE, pp. 146-151. |
Suga et al., “A new bumping process using lead-free solder paste,” Abstract, Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on (vol. 25, Issue 4), IEEE, Oct. 2002, pp. 253-256. |
Suga et al., “A new wafer-bonder of ultra-high precision using surface activated bonding (SAB) concept,” Abstract, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001, IEEE, pp. 1013-1018. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding—an approach to joining at room temperature,” Ceramic Transactions: Structural Ceramics Joining II, The American Ceramic Society, 1993, pp. 323-331. |
Suga et al., “Surface activated bonding for new flip chip and bumpless interconnect systems,” Abstract, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 105-111. |
Suga, “UHV room temperature joining by the surface activated bonding method,” Abstract, Advances in science and technology, Techna, Faenza, Italie, 1999, pp. C1079-C1089. |
Suga, T., “Room-temperature bonding on metals and ceramics,” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semiconductor Wafer Bonding: Science, Technology and Applications, The Electrochemical Society Proceedings, vol. 93-29 (1993), pp. 71-80. |
Takagi et al., “Wafer-scale room-temperature bonding between silicon and ceramic wafers by means of argon-beam surface activation,” Abstract, Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2001, MEMS 2001, The 14th IEEE International Conference, Jan. 25, 2001, IEEE, pp. 60-63. |
Takagi et al., “Effect of surface roughness on room-temperature wafer bonding by Ar beam surface activation,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1998, vol. 37, Part 1, No. 1, pp. 4197-4203. |
Takagi et al., “Low temperature direct bonding of silicon and silicon dioxide by the surface activation method,” Abstract, Solid State Sensors and Actuators, 1997, Transducers '97 Chicago, 1997 International Conference, vol. 1, pp. 657-660. |
Takagi et al., “Room temperature silicon wafer direct bonding in vacuum by Ar beam irradiation,” Abstract, Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS '97 Proceedings, 1997, IEEE, pp. 191-196. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature bonding of lithium niobate and silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation,” Abstract, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1999. vol. 74, p. 2387. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of Si to LiNbO3, LiTaO3 and Gd3Ga5012 by Ar-beam surface activation,” Abstract, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2001, vol. 11, No. 4, p. 348. |
Takagi et al., “Room-temperature wafer bonding of silicon and lithium niobate by means of arbon-beam surface activation,” Abstract, Integrated Ferroelectrics: An International Journal, 2002, vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 53-59. |
Takagi et al., “Surface activated bonding silicon wafers at room temperature,” Abstract, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2222 (1996). |
Takagi et al., “Wafer-scale spontaneous bonding of silicon wafers by argon-beam surface activation at room temperature,” Abstract, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Jun. 15, 2003, vol. 105, Issue 1, pp. 98-102. |
Tong et al., “Low temperature wafer direct bonding,” Journal of Microelectomechanical systems, Mar. 1994, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 29-35. |
Topol et al., “Enabling technologies for wafer-level bonding of 3D MEMS and integrated circuit structures,” 2004 Electronics Components and Technology Conference, 2004 IEEE, pp. 931-938. |
Uhrmann, T. et al., “Heterogeneous integration by collective die-to-wafer bonding,” Chip Scale Review, Nov./Dec. 2018, vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 10-12. |
Urteaga, M. et al., “THz bandwidth InP HBT technologies and heterogeneous integration with Si |CMOS,” 2016 IEEE Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (BCTM), 2016, pp. 35-41, doi:10.1109/BCTM.2016.7738973. |
Wang et al., “Reliability and microstructure of Au—AI and Au—Cu direct bonding fabricated by the Surface Activated Bonding,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2002, IEEE, pp. 915-919. |
Wang et al., “Reliability of Au bump—Cu direct interconnections fabricated by means of surface activated bonding method,” Abstract, Microelectronics Reliability, May 2003, vol. 43, Issue 5, pp. 751-756. |
Weldon et al., “Physics and chemistry of silicon wafer bonding investigated by infrared absorption spectroscopy,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Jul./Aug. 1996, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 3095-3106. |
Xu et al., “New Au—AI interconnect technology and its reliability by surface activated bonding,” Abstract, Electronic Packaging Technology Proceedings, Oct. 28-30, 2003, Shanghai, China, pp. 479-483. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220285213 A1 | Sep 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62439762 | Dec 2016 | US | |
62439746 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15849325 | Dec 2017 | US |
Child | 16842233 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16842233 | Apr 2020 | US |
Child | 17825405 | US |