The invention relates to the manufacturing of high performance Integrated Circuit (IC's), and, more specifically, to methods of creating high performance electrical components (such as an inductor) on the surface of a semiconductor substrate by reducing the electromagnetic losses that are typically incurred in the surface of the substrate.
The continued emphasis in the semiconductor technology is to create improved performance semiconductor devices at competitive prices. This emphasis over the years has resulted in extreme miniaturization of semiconductor devices, made possible by continued advances of semiconductor processes and materials in combination with new and sophisticated device designs. Most of the semiconductor devices that are at this time being created are aimed at processing digital data. There are however also numerous semiconductor designs that are aimed at incorporating analog functions into devices that simultaneously process digital and analog data, or devices that can be used for the processing of only analog data. One of the major challenges in the creation of analog processing circuitry (using digital processing procedures and equipment) is that a number of the components that are used for analog circuitry are large in size and are therefore not readily integrated into devices that typically have feature sizes that approach the sub-micron range. The main components that offer a challenge in this respect are capacitors and inductors, since both these components are, for typical analog processing circuits, of considerable size.
A typical application for inductors of the invention is in the field of modern mobile communication applications that make use of compact, high-frequency equipment. Continued improvements in the performance characteristics of this equipment has over the years been achieved, further improvements will place continued emphasis on lowering the power consumption of the equipment, on reducing the size of the equipment, on increasing the operational frequency of the applications and on creating low noise levels. One of the main applications of semiconductor devices in the field of mobile communication is the creation of Radio Frequency (RF) amplifiers. RF amplifiers contain a number of standard components, a major component of a typical RF amplifier is a tuned circuit that contains inductive and capacitive components. Tuned circuits form, dependent on and determined by the values of their inductive and capacitive components, an impedance that is frequency dependent, enabling the tuned circuit to either present a high or a low impedance for signals of a certain frequency. The tuned circuit can therefore either reject or pass and further amplify components of an analog signal, based on the frequency of that component. The tuned circuit can in this manner be used as a filter to filter out or remove signals of certain frequencies or to remove noise from a circuit configuration that is aimed at processing analog signals. The tuned circuit can also be used to form a high electrical impedance by using the LC resonance of the circuit and to thereby counteract the effects of parasitic capacitances that are part of a circuit. One of the problems that is encountered when creating an inductor on the surface of a semiconductor substrate is that the self-resonance that is caused by the parasitic capacitance between the (spiral) inductor and the underlying substrate will limit the use of the inductor at high frequencies. As part of the design of such an inductor it is therefore of importance to reduce the capacitive coupling between the created inductor and the underlying substrate.
At high frequencies, the electromagnetic field that is generated by the inductor induces eddy currents in the underlying silicon substrate. Since the silicon substrate is a resistive conductor, the eddy currents will consume electromagnetic energy resulting in significant energy loss, resulting in a low Q capacitor. This is the main reason for a low Q value of a capacitor, whereby the resonant frequency of 1/√ (LC) limits the upper boundary of the frequency. In addition, the eddy currents that are induced by the inductor will interfere with the performance of circuitry that is in close physical proximity to the capacitor.
It has already been pointed out that one of the key components that are used in creating high frequency analog semiconductor devices is the inductor that forms part of an LC resonance circuit. In view of the high device density that is typically encountered in semiconductor devices and the therefrom following intense use of the substrate surface area, the creation of the inductor must incorporate the minimization of the surface area that is required for the inductor, while at the same time maintaining a high Q value for the inductor.
Typically, inductors that are created on the surface of a substrate are of a spiral shape whereby the spiral is created in a plane that is parallel with the plane of the surface of the substrate. Conventional methods that are used to create the inductor on the surface of a substrate suffer several limitations. Most high Q inductors form part of a hybrid device configuration or of Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMIC's) or are created as discrete components, the creation of which is not readily integratable into a typical process of Integrated Circuit manufacturing. It is clear that, by combining the creation on one semiconductor monolithic substrate of circuitry that is aimed at the functions of analog data manipulation and analog data storage with the functions of digital data manipulation and digital data storage, a number of significant advantages can be achieved. Such advantages include the reduction of manufacturing costs and the reduction of power consumption by the combined functions. The spiral form of the inductor that is created on the surface of a semiconductor substrate however results, due to the physical size of the inductor, in parasitic capacitances between the inductor wiring and the underlying substrate and causes electromagnetic energy losses in the underlying resistive silicon substrate. These parasitic capacitances have a serious negative effect on the functionality of the created LC circuit by sharply reducing the frequency of resonance of the tuned circuit of the application. More seriously, the inductor-generated electromagnetic field will induce eddy currents in the underlying resistive silicon substrate, causing a significant energy loss that results in low Q inductors.
The performance parameter of an inductor is typically indicated is the Quality (Q) factor of the inductor. The quality factor Q of an inductor is defined as Q=Es/El, wherein Es is the energy that is stored in the reactive portion of the component while El is the energy that is lost in the reactive portion of the component. The higher the quality of the component, the closer the resistive value of the component approaches zero while the Q factor of the component approaches infinity. For inductors that are created overlying a silicon substrate, the electromagnetic energy that is created by the inductor will primarily be lost in the resistive silicon of the underlying substrate and in the metal lines that are created to form the inductor. The quality factor for components differs from the quality that is associated with filters or resonators.
For components, the quality factor serves as a measure of the purity of the reactance (or the susceptance) of the component, which can be degraded due to the resistive silicon substrate, the resistance of the metal lines and dielectric losses. In an actual configuration, there are always some physical resistors that will dissipate power, thereby decreasing the power that can be recovered. The quality factor Q is dimensionless. A Q value of greater than 100 is considered very high for discrete inductors that are mounted on the surface of Printed Circuit Boards. For inductors that form part of an integrated circuit, the Q value is typically in the range between about 3 and 10.
In creating an inductor on a monolithic substrate on which additional semiconductor devices are created, the parasitic capacitances that occur as part of this creation limit the upper bound of the cut-off frequency that can be achieved for the inductor using conventional silicon processes. This limitation is, for many applications, not acceptable. Dependent on the frequency at which the LC circuit is designed to resonate, significantly larger values of quality factor, such as for instance 50 or more, must be available. Prior Art has in this been limited to creating values of higher quality factors as separate units, and in integrating these separate units with the surrounding device functions. This negates the advantages that can be obtained when using the monolithic construction of creating both the inductor and the surrounding devices on one and the same semiconductor substrate. The non-monolithic approach also has the disadvantage that additional wiring is required to interconnect the sub-components of the assembly, thereby again introducing additional parasitic capacitances and resistive losses over the interconnecting wiring network. For many of the applications of a RF amplifier, such as portable battery powered applications, power consumption is at a premium and must therefore be as low as possible. By raising the power consumption, the effects of parasitic capacitances and resistive power loss can be partially compensated, but there are limitations to even this approach. These problems take on even greater urgency with the rapid expansion of wireless applications, such as portable telephones and the like. Wireless communication is a rapidly expanding market, where the integration of RF integrated circuits is one of the most important challenges. One of the approaches is to significantly increase the frequency of operation to for instance the range of 10 to 100 GHz. For such high frequencies, the value of the quality factor obtained from silicon-based inductors is significantly degraded. For applications in this frequency range, monolithic inductors have been researched using other than silicon as the base for the creation of the inductors. Such monolithic inductors have for instance been created using sapphire or GaAs as a base. These inductors have considerably lower substrate losses than their silicon counterparts (no eddy current, hence no loss of electromagnetic energy) and therefore provide much higher Q inductors. Furthermore, they have lower parasitic capacitance and therefore provide higher frequency operation capabilities. Where however more complex applications are required, the need still exists to create inductors using silicon as a substrate. For those applications, the approach of using a base material other than silicon has proven to be too cumbersome while for instance GaAs as a medium for the creation of semiconductor devices is as yet a technical challenge that needs to be addressed. It is known that GaAs is a semiinsulating material at high frequencies, reducing the electromagnetic losses that are incurred in the surface of the GaAs substrate, thereby increasing the Q value of the inductor created on the GaAs surface. GaAs RF chips however are expensive, a process that can avoid the use of GaAs RF chips therefore offers the benefit of cost advantage.
A number of different approaches have been used to incorporate inductors into a semiconductor environment without sacrificing device performance due to substrate losses. One of these approaches has been to selectively remove (by etching) the silicon underneath the inductor (using methods of micro machining), thereby removing substrate resistive energy losses and parasitic effects. Another method has been to use multiple layers of metal (such as aluminum) interconnects or of copper damascene interconnects.
Other approaches have used a high resistivity silicon substrate thereby reducing resistive losses in the silicon substrate. Resistive substrate losses in the surface of the underlying substrate form a dominant factor in determining the Q value of silicon inductors. Further, biased wells have been proposed underneath a spiral conductor, this again aimed at reducing inductive losses in the surface of the substrate. A more complex approach has been to create an active inductive component that simulates the electrical properties of an inductor as it is applied in active circuitry. This latter approach however results in high power consumption by the simulated inductor and in noise performance that is unacceptable for low power, high frequency applications. All of these approaches have as common objectives to enhance the quality (Q) value of the inductor and to reduce the surface area that is required for the creation of the inductor. The most important consideration in this respect is the electromagnetic energy losses due to the electromagnetic induced eddy currents in the silicon substrate.
When the dimensions of Integrated Circuits are scaled down, the cost per die is decreased while some aspects of performance are improved. The metal connections which connect the Integrated Circuit to other circuit or system components become of relative more importance and have, with the further miniaturization of the IC, an increasingly negative impact on circuit performance. The parasitic capacitance and resistance of the metal interconnections increase, which degrades the chip performance significantly. Of most concern in this respect is the voltage drop along the power and ground buses and the RC delay of the critical signal paths. Attempts to reduce the resistance by using wider metal lines result in higher capacitance of these wires.
Current techniques for building an inductor on the surface of a semiconductor substrate use fine-line techniques whereby the inductor is created under a layer of passivation. This however implies close physical proximity between the created inductor and the surface of the substrate over which the inductor has been created (typically less than 10 μm), resulting in high electro-magnetic losses in the silicon substrate which in turn results in reducing the Q value of the inductor. By increasing the distance between the inductor and the semiconductor surface, the electromagnetic field in the silicon substrate will be reduced in reverse proportion to the distance, the Q value of the inductor can be increased. By therefore creating the inductor overlying the layer of passivation (by a post passivation process) and by, in addition, creating the inductor on the surface of a thick layer of dielectric (such as a polymer) that is deposited or adhered over the surface of a layer of passivation, the Q value of the inductor can be increased. In addition, by using wide and thick metal for the creation of the inductor, the parasitic resistance is reduced. The process of the invention applies these principles of post passivation inductor creation while the inductor is created on a thick layer of dielectric using thick and wide metals.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,212,403 (Nakanishi) shows a method of forming wiring connections both inside and outside (in a wiring substrate over the chip) for a logic circuit depending on the length of the wire connections.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,501,006 (Gehman, Jr. et al.) shows a structure with an insulating layer between the integrated circuit (IC) and the wiring substrate. A distribution lead connects the bonding pads of the IC to the bonding pads of the substrate.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,055,907 (Jacobs) discloses an extended integration semiconductor structure that allows manufacturers to integrate circuitry beyond the chip boundaries by forming a thin film multi-layer wiring decal on the support substrate and over the chip. However, this reference differs from the invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,106,461 (Volfson et al.) teaches a multi layer interconnect structure of alternating polyimide (dielectric) and metal layers over an IC in a TAB structure.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,635,767 (Wenzel et al.) teaches a method for reducing RC delay by a PBGA that separates multiple metal layers.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,764 (Fulcher) shows a flip chip substrate that reduces RC delay by separating the power and I/O traces.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,008,102 (Alford et al.) shows a helix inductor using two metal layers connected by vias.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,372,967 (Sundaram et al.) discloses a helix inductor.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,576,680 (Ling) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,990 (Burghartz et al.) show other helix inductor designs.
It is the primary objective of the invention to improve the RF performance of High Performance Integrated Circuits.
Another objective of the invention is to provide a method for the creation of a high-Q inductor.
Another objective of the invention is to replace the GaAs chip with a silicon chip as a base on which a high-Q inductor is created.
Yet another objective of the invention is to extend the frequency range of the inductor that is created on the surface of a silicon substrate.
It is yet another objective of the invention to create high quality passive electrical components overlying the surface of a silicon substrate.
The above referenced continuation-in-part application adds, in a post passivation processing sequence, a thick layer of dielectric over a layer of passivation and layers of wide and thick metal lines on top of the thick layer of dielectric. The present invention extends the above referenced continuation-inpart application by in addition creating high quality electrical components, such as an inductor, a capacitor or a resistor, on a layer of passivation or on the surface of a thick layer of dielectric. In addition, the process of the invention provides a method for mounting discrete passive electrical components at a significant distance removed from the underlying silicon surface.
a shows a cross section of a simplified version of the substrate and the layers that are created on the surface of the substrate.
b shows the cross section of
a shows a cross section of a substrate on the surface of which has been deposited a layer of passivation, a capacitor has been created on the surface of the layer of passivation.
b shows a three dimensional view of an inductor that has been created on the surface of a layer of passivation by creating vias in a thick layer of polymer.
c shows a three-dimensional view of an inductor that has been created in a thick layer of polymer that has been deposited on the surface of a thick layer of polyimide.
d shows a top view of the layer 20 on the surface of which an inductor has been created.
e shows a cross section of the structure of
f shows a three dimensional view of an inductor that has been created on the surface of a layer of passivation, the inductor has the shape of a solenoid.
g shows a top view of the inductor of
There is teached an Integrated Circuit structure where re-distribution and interconnect metal layers are created in layers of dielectric on the surface of a conventional IC. A layer of passivation is deposited over the dielectric of the re-distribution and interconnection metal layers, a thick layer of polymer is deposited over the surface of the layer of passivation. Under the present invention, a high-quality electrical component is created on the surface of the thick layer of polymer.
The invention addresses, among others, the creation of an inductor whereby the emphasis is on creating an inductor of high Q value on the surface of a semiconductor substrate using methods and procedures that are well known in the art for the creation of semiconductor devices. The high quality of the inductor of the invention allows for the use of this inductor in high frequency applications while incurring minimum loss of power. The invention further addresses the creation of a capacitor and a resistor on the surface of a silicon substrate whereby the main objective (of the process of creating a capacitor and resistor) is to reduce parasitics that are typically incurred by these components in the underlying silicon substrate.
Referring now more specifically to
Layers 14 (two examples are shown) represent all of the metal layers, dielectric layers and conductive vias that are typically created on top of the dielectric layer 12, layers 14 that are shown in
The key steps of the above referenced application begin with the deposition of a thick layer 20 of polyimide that is deposited over the surface of layer 18. Access must be provided to points of electrical contact 16, for this reason a pattern of openings 22, 36 and 38 is etched through the polyimide layer 20 and the passivation layer 18, the pattern of openings 22, 36 and 38 aligns with the pattern of electrical contact points 16. Contact points 16 are, by means of the openings 22/36/38 that are created in the layer 20 of polyimide, electrically extended to the surface of layer 20.
The above referenced material that is used for the deposition of layer 20 is polyimide, the material that can be used for this layer is not limited to polyimide but can contain any of the known polymers (SiClxOy). The indicated polyimide is the preferred material to be used for the processes of the invention for the thick layer 20 of polymer. Examples of polymers that can be used are silicons, carbons, fluoride, chlorides, oxygens, parylene or teflon, polycarbonate (PC), polysterene (PS), polyoxide (PO), poly polooxide (PPO), benzocyclobutene (BCB).
Electrical contact with the contact points 16 can now be established by filling the openings 22/36/38 with a conductive material. The top surfaces 24 of these metal conductors that are contained in openings 22/36/38 can now be used for connection of the IC to its environment, and for further integration into the surrounding electrical circuitry. This latter statement is the same as saying that semiconductor devices that have been provided in the surface of substrate 10 can, via the conductive interconnects contained in openings 22/36/38, be further connected to surrounding components and circuitry. Interconnect pads 26 and 28 are formed on top of surfaces 24 of the metal interconnects contained in openings 22, 36 and 38. These pads 26 and 28 can be of any design in width and thickness to accommodate specific circuit design requirements. A pad can, for instance, be used as a flip chip pad. Other pads can be used for power distribution or as a ground or signal bus. The following connections can, for instance, be made to the pads shown in
The following comments relate to the size and the number of the contact points 16,
There is not imposed any limitation on the number of contact pads that can be included in the design, this number is dependent on package design requirements. Layer 18 in
The most frequently used passivation layer in the present state of the art is plasma enhanced CVD (PECVD) oxide and nitride. In creating layer 18 of passivation, a layer of approximately 0.2 μm PECVD oxide can be deposited first followed by a layer of approximately 0.7 μm nitride. Passivation layer 18 is very important because it protects the device wafer from moisture and foreign ion contamination. The positioning of this layer between the sub-micron process (of the integrated circuit) and the tens-micron process (of the interconnecting metalization structure) is of critical importance since it allows for a cheaper process that possibly has less stringent clean room requirements for the process of creating the interconnecting metalization structure.
Layer 20 is a thick polymer dielectric layer (for example polyimide) that have a thickness in excess of 2 μm (after curing). The range of the polymer thickness can vary from 2 μm to 150 μm, dependent on electrical design requirements.
For the deposition of layer 20 the Hitachi-Dupont polyimide HD 2732 or 2734 can, for example, be used. The polyimide can be spin-on coated and cured. After spin-on coating, the polyimide will be cured at 400 degrees C. for about 1 hour in a vacuum or nitrogen ambient. For a thicker layer of polyimide, the polyimide film can be multiple coated and cured.
Another material that can be used to create layer 20 is the polymer benzocyclobutene (BCB). This polymer is at this time commercially produced by for instance Dow Chemical and has recently gained acceptance to be used instead of typical polyimide application.
The dimensions of openings 22, 36 and 38 have previously been discussed. The dimension of the openings together with the dielectric thickness determine the aspect ratio of the opening. The aspect ratio challenges the via etch process and the metal filling capability. This leads to a diameter for openings 22/36/38 in the range of approximately 0.5 μm to 30 μm, the height for openings 22/36/38 can be in the range of approximately 2 μm to 150 μm. The aspect ratio of openings 22/36/38 is designed such that filling of the via with metal can be accomplished. The via can be filled with CVD metal such as CVD tungsten or CVD copper, with electro-less nickel, with a damascene metal filling process, with electroplating copper, etc.
Extensions can be provided by applying multiple layers of polymer (such as polyimide) and can therefore be adapted to a larger variety of applications. The function of the structure that has been described in
Layer 44 is not limited to being a layer of ferromagnetic material but can also be a layer of a good conductor such as but not limited to gold, copper and aluminum. The overlying inductor 40 that is created on the surface of layer 20 of polyimide can be isolated from the underlying silicon substrate 10 by a layer 44 that comprises either ferromagnetic or a good conductor.
a shows, for reasons of clarity, a simplified cross section of the substrate and the layers that are created on the surface of the substrate under the processes of the invention, the highlighted areas that are shown have previously been identified as:
10, the silicon substrate
12, a layer of dielectric that has been deposited over the surface of the substrate
14, an interconnect layer that contains interconnect lines, vias and contact points
16, contact points on the surface of the interconnect layer 14
18, a layer of passivation into which openings have been created through which the contact points 16 can be accessed
20, a thick layer of polymer, and
21, conductive plugs that have been provided through the layer 20 of polyimide.
The thick layer 20 of polymer can be coated in liquid form on the surface of the layer 18 of passivation or can be laminated over the surface of layer 18 of passivation by dry film application. Vias that are required for the creation of conductive plugs 21 can be defined by conventional processes of photolithography or can be created using laser (drill) technology.
It is clear from previous discussions that the sequence of layers that is shown in cross section in
With respect to the cross section that is shown in
a shows a cross section of a capacitor that has been created on the surface of a substrate 10. A layer 14 of conductive interconnect lines and contact points has been created on the surface of substrate 10. A layer 18 of passivation has been deposited over the surface of layer 14, openings have been created in layer 18 of passivation through which the surface of contact pads 16 can be accessed.
A capacitor contains, as is well known, a lower plate, an upper plate and a layer of dielectric that separates the upper plate from the lower plate. These components of a capacitor can be readily identified from the cross section that is shown in
42 is a conductive layer that forms the lower plate of the capacitor
44 is a conductive layer that forms the upper plate of the capacitor
46 is the dielectric layer that separates the upper plate 44 of the capacitor from the lower plate 42.
It must be noted from the cross section that is shown in
The main points of interest are the various thicknesses to which the three layers 42, 44 and 46 can be deposited, as follows:
layer 18 of passivation between about 0.1 μm and 0.3 μm
layer 42 of conductive material between about 0.5 and 20 μm
layer 46 of dielectric between about 500 and 10,000 Angstrom, and
layer 44 of conductive material between about 0.5 and 20 μm.
The post-passivation created capacitor that is shown in cross section in
reduced parasitic capacitance between the capacitor and the underlying silicon substrate
allowed for the use of a thick layer of conductive material, reducing the resistance of the capacitor; this is particularly important for wireless applications
allowed for the use of high-dielectric material such as TiO2, Ta2O5 for the dielectric between the upper and the lower plate of the capacitor, resulting in a higher capacitive value of the capacitor.
b shows a three-dimensional view of the solenoid structure of an inductor 19 that has been created on the surface of the layer 18 of passivation. Further highlighted in
23, vias that are created in the thick layer of polymer 20,
25, the bottom metal of the inductor
27, the top metal for the inductor.
c shows a three dimensional view of an inductor that has been created on the surface of a layer 18 of passivation by first depositing a thick layer 29 of polymer over which a layer (not shown) of polymer is deposited, vias 23 are created in the thick layer 20 (
d shows a top view of layer 20 on the surface of which an inductor has been created as previously shown in
e shows a cross section of the structure of
The creation of a toroidal inductor overlying a layer of passivation has been shown in
g shows, for further clarification, a top view of the toroidal 19′ of
Further applications of the post-passivation processing of the invention are shown in
50, contact plugs that have been formed through the thick layer 20 of polymer
52, contact balls that have been formed on the surface of the contact plugs 50 using conventional methods of selective solder deposition,the solder ball is created by electroplating, screen printing, and ball mounting, the application of a flux on the deposited solder and flowing the solder to form the contact balls 52, and
54, a cross section of a discrete electrical component such as an inductor or a discrete capacitor or a resistor.
The methods that have been shown in
the passive component 54 is removed from the surface of substrate 10 by a significant distance, and
instead of mounting the passive, discrete component 54 on the surface of a Printed Circuit Board (PCB), the passive component 54 can be mounted closer to a semiconductor device in the present invention.
Throughout the methods and procedures that have been explained above using the examples that are shown in cross section in the accompanying drawings, the following has been adhered to:
the passive components have been further removed from the silicon substrate, thereby reducing the negative impact that is induced by the substrate due to electromagnetic losses incurred in the substrate the post-passivation process of the invention allows for the selection of discrete component design parameters that result in reduced resistance of the discrete capacitor and the discrete inductor, this is further clear from the following comparison between prior art processes and the processes of the invention.
Prior art requires for the creation of an inductor:
the use of thin metal, which imposes the creation of
wide coils for an inductor resulting in
increased surface area that is required for the inductor which in turn increases the parasitic capacitance of the inductor causing eddy current losses in the surface of the substrate.
The present invention by contrast:
can use thick metal, since the metal of the passive component is (by the thick layer of polymer) removed from the (thin metal) interconnect layer 14, and (as a consequence)
reduces the surface area that is required for the inductor, and
reduces the resistivity of the inductor, thereby increasing the Q value of the inductor.
Although the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated, and that form has been described in detail, it will be readily understood by those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention or from the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/092,379, filed on Mar. 29, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,459,761, which is a division of Ser. No. 10/303,451, filed on Nov. 25, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,897,507, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 10/156,590, filed on May 28, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,489,647, which is a division of Ser. No. 09/970,005, filed on Oct. 3, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,455,885, which is a division of Ser. No. 09/721,722, filed on Nov. 27, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,303,423, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/637,926, filed on Aug. 14, 2000, now abandoned, and also a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/251,183, filed on Feb. 17, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,383,916, both of which are a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 09/216,791, filed on Dec. 21, 1998, now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3855507 | Hoyler | Dec 1974 | A |
4021838 | Warwick | May 1977 | A |
4685998 | Quinn et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4733289 | Tsurumaru | Mar 1988 | A |
4885841 | McNabb | Dec 1989 | A |
5046161 | Takada | Sep 1991 | A |
5055907 | Jacobs | Oct 1991 | A |
5061985 | Meguro et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5095357 | Andoh et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5095402 | Hernandez et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5106461 | Volfson et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108950 | Wakabayashi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5160987 | Pricer | Nov 1992 | A |
5212403 | Nakanishi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5226232 | Boyd | Jul 1993 | A |
5227012 | Brandli et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5244833 | Gansauge et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5258886 | Murayama et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5311404 | Trask | May 1994 | A |
5328553 | Poon | Jul 1994 | A |
5370766 | Desaigoudar et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372967 | Sundaram et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5384274 | Kanehachi | Jan 1995 | A |
5416356 | Staudinger | May 1995 | A |
5446311 | Ewen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5455064 | Chou et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5455885 | Cameron | Oct 1995 | A |
5465879 | La et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5478773 | Dow et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5485038 | Licari et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5501006 | Gehman, Jr. et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5519582 | Matsuzaki | May 1996 | A |
5527998 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5539241 | Abidi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5576680 | Ling | Nov 1996 | A |
5578860 | Costa | Nov 1996 | A |
5608262 | Degani et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614442 | Tserng | Mar 1997 | A |
5629240 | Malladi et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635767 | Wenzel et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656849 | Burghartz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5686764 | Fulcher | Nov 1997 | A |
5714394 | Kadosh | Feb 1998 | A |
5726861 | Ostrem | Mar 1998 | A |
5742100 | Schroeder et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763108 | Chang | Jun 1998 | A |
5767010 | Mis et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767564 | Kunimatsu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786271 | Ohida et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788854 | Desaigoudar et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5789303 | Leung et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818110 | Cronin | Oct 1998 | A |
5827776 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827778 | Yamada | Oct 1998 | A |
5834844 | Akagawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842626 | Bhansali et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874327 | Rostoker | Feb 1999 | A |
5874770 | Saia et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5883422 | Anand et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884990 | Burghartz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5910020 | Yamada | Jun 1999 | A |
5915169 | Heo | Jun 1999 | A |
5929508 | Delgado et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5949654 | Fukuoka | Sep 1999 | A |
5953626 | Hause | Sep 1999 | A |
5969422 | Ting et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969424 | Matsuki et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972734 | Carichner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5973391 | Bischoff | Oct 1999 | A |
6002161 | Yamazaki | Dec 1999 | A |
6004831 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005466 | Pedder | Dec 1999 | A |
6008102 | Alford et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023407 | Farooq et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025261 | Farrar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030877 | Lee et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031445 | Mary et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040226 | Wojnarowski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040604 | Lauvray et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043430 | Chun | Mar 2000 | A |
6051489 | Young et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057598 | Payne et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075268 | Gardner | Jun 2000 | A |
6075290 | Schaefer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097080 | Nakanishi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097273 | Frye | Aug 2000 | A |
6100548 | Nguyen | Aug 2000 | A |
6130457 | Yu | Oct 2000 | A |
6133079 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140197 | Chu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6146958 | Zhao et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146985 | Wollesen | Nov 2000 | A |
6147857 | Worley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160721 | Kossives | Dec 2000 | A |
6163234 | Kossives | Dec 2000 | A |
6168854 | Gibbs | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169030 | Naik et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169319 | Malinovich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6174803 | Harvey | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178082 | Farooq | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6180445 | Tsai | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184143 | Ohashi et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184159 | Lou et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6184589 | Budnaitis et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6187615 | Kim et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191468 | Forbes et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191495 | Kossives | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221727 | Chan et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228447 | Suzuki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228477 | Klare et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236101 | Erdeljac et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236103 | Bernstein | May 2001 | B1 |
6242791 | Jou | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245594 | Wu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249764 | Kamae et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255714 | Kossives et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259593 | Moriwaki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261944 | Mehta | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261994 | Bourdelais et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272736 | Lee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6274474 | Caletka | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278148 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278264 | Burstein | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287931 | Chen | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288447 | Amishiro et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6303423 | Lin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6329721 | DiGiacomo | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348391 | Fattaruso | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356453 | Juskey | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365480 | Huppert et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6365498 | Chu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376895 | Parrar et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6379982 | Ahn | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383916 | Lin | May 2002 | B1 |
6399997 | Lin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404615 | Wijeyesekera et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410135 | Hamerski | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410414 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410435 | Ryan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416356 | Hutchins et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6417089 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420773 | Liou | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424034 | Ahn | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429764 | Karam et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440750 | Feygenson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441715 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452274 | Hasegawa | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455885 | Lin | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455915 | Wong | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456183 | Basteres et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459135 | Basteres et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475904 | Okoroanyanwu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6478773 | Gandhi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6479341 | Lu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486530 | Sasagawa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489647 | Lin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6489656 | Lin | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495442 | Lin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6500724 | Zurcher et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501169 | Aoki et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501185 | Chow et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504227 | Matsuo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515369 | Lin | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518092 | Kikuchi | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6518165 | Yoon et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544880 | Akram | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545354 | Aoki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559409 | Cadet | May 2003 | B1 |
6559528 | Watase | May 2003 | B2 |
6566731 | Ahn et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6570247 | Eiles et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578754 | Tung | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586309 | Yeo et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6636139 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638844 | Verma et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6644536 | Ratificar et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6649509 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6673690 | Chuang et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683380 | Efland et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6700162 | Lin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716669 | Erikson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6716693 | Chan et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720659 | Akahori | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724474 | Heo et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734563 | Lin et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746898 | Lin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747307 | Vathulya | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6756664 | Yang | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759275 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6764939 | Yoshitaka | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6800534 | Hsieh | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6833285 | Ahn | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6841872 | Ha et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847066 | Tahara | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6852616 | Sahara | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6867499 | Tabrizi | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6897507 | Lin | May 2005 | B2 |
6903459 | Nakatani | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914331 | Shimoishizaka | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921980 | Nakanishi et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7012339 | Terui | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7087927 | Weaver et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7422941 | Lin | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7459761 | Lin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20010016410 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010017417 | Hideaki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010019168 | Willer et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010028098 | Liou | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010035586 | Hirofumi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010045616 | Yoshitomi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020000665 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020008301 | Liou et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020017672 | Ker | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020017730 | Tahara et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020037434 | Feygenson | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020050626 | Onuma et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064922 | Lin | May 2002 | A1 |
20020089062 | Mukul et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030037959 | Master et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038331 | Aoki | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030071326 | Lin | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076209 | Tsai et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030102551 | Kikuchi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121958 | Ratificar et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124835 | Lin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030150898 | Kossives | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030155570 | Leidy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030183332 | Simila | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197283 | Choi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222295 | Lin | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030224613 | Ramanathan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040016948 | Lin | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029404 | Lin | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040094841 | Matsuzaki | May 2004 | A1 |
20040121606 | Raskin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040166661 | Lei | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183209 | Lin | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040245580 | Lin | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050170634 | Lin | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050250255 | Chen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050275094 | Berry | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070108551 | Lin | May 2007 | A1 |
20070181970 | Lin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202684 | Lin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202685 | Lin | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080001302 | Lin et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080035972 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080035974 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038869 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042238 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042239 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042273 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080042289 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080044977 | Lin | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080050909 | Lin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080093745 | Lin | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080111243 | Lin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080284032 | Lin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090001511 | Lin | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0685857 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0836229 | Apr 1998 | EP |
884783 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0884783 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0986106 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0986106 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0999580 | May 2000 | EP |
0999580 | May 2000 | EP |
1022776 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1039544 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1039544 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1209725 | May 2002 | EP |
2793943 | Jul 2001 | FR |
61236131 | Oct 1986 | JP |
61272950 | Dec 1986 | JP |
01-135043 | May 1989 | JP |
1-183836 | Jul 1989 | JP |
1-184848 | Jul 1989 | JP |
1-184849 | Jul 1989 | JP |
02062069 | Mar 1990 | JP |
03-019358 | Jan 1991 | JP |
403019358 | Jan 1991 | JP |
04-316351 | Nov 1992 | JP |
05055380 | Mar 1993 | JP |
05082736 | Apr 1993 | JP |
08045990 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08172161 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08264592 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10270562 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11017103 | Jan 1999 | JP |
2000-022085 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000022085 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000-022085 | Feb 2000 | JP |
20000188357 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000022085 | Dec 2000 | JP |
364128 | Jul 1999 | TW |
371375 | Oct 1999 | TW |
408452 | Oct 2000 | TW |
WO9917365 | Apr 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Spiral Inductors and Transmission Lines in Silicon Technology using Copper-Damoscene Inter connects and Low-Loss Substrates, by Joachim N. Burghartz et al., XP-000/04848 IEEE 1997, Theary and Technigues, vol. 45, No. 10, Oct. 1997, pp. 1961-1968. |
The Effects of a Ground Shield on Spiral Inductors Fabricated in a Silicon Bipolar Technology, IEEE Berm 9.1 by seang—moyiun et al., pp. 157-160, 2000IEEE. |
Burghartz J N et al. “Spiral Inductors and Transmission Lines in Silicon Technology Using Copper-Damascene Interconnects and Low-Loss Substrates” IEEE Inc. New York, US, vol. 45, No. 10, Part 2, Oct. 1997, pp. 1961-1968, XP000704848 ISSN: 0018-9480. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 2000, No. 4, Aug. 31, 2000 & JP 2000 022085 A (Toshiba Corp), Jan. 21, 2000. |
Soong-Mo Yim et al. “The effects of a ground shield on spiral inductors fabricated in a silicon bipolar technology” Bipolar/BICMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting, 2000. Proceedings of the 2000 Sep. 24-26, 2000, Piscataway, NJ, USA,IEEE, Sep. 24, 2000, pp. 157-160, XP010524195 ISBN: 0-7803-6384-1. |
Burghartz J N. et al., “Spiral Inductors and Transmission Lines in Silicon Technology Using Copper-Damascene Interconnects and Low-Loss Substrates,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, pp. 1961-1968, vol. 45, No. 10, New York, US, IEEE Inc. |
Soong-Mo Yim et al. “The effects of a ground shield on spiral inductors fabricated in a silicon bipolar technology,” Bipolar/Bicmos Circuits and Technology Meeting, 2000. Proceedings of the 2000 Sep. 24-26, 2000, Sep. 24, 2000, pp. 157-160, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE. |
Mistry, K. et al. “A 45nm Logic Technology with High-k+ Metal Gate Transistors, Strained Silicon, 9 Cu Interconnect Layers, 193nm Dry Patterning, and 100% Pb-free Packaging,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (2007) pp. 247-250. |
Edelstein, D.C., “Advantages of Copper Interconnects,” Proceedings of the 12th International IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference (1995) pp. 301-307. |
Theng, C. et al. “An Automated Tool Deployment for ESD (Electro-StaticDischarge) Correct-by-Construction Strategy in 90 nm Process,” IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics (2004) pp. 61-67. |
Gao, X. et al. “An improved electrostatic discharge protection structure for reducing triggering voltage and parasitic capacitance,” Solid-State Electronics, 27 (2003), pp. 1105-1110. |
Yeoh, A. et al. “Copper Die Bumps (First Level Interconnect) and Low-K Dielectrics in 65nm High Volume Manufacturing,” Electronic Components and Technology Conference (2006) pp. 1611-1615. |
Hu, C-K. et al. “Copper-Polyimide Wiring Technology for VLSI Circuits,” Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings VLSI V (1990) pp. 369-373. |
Roesch, W. et al. “Cycling copper flip chip interconnects,” Microelectronics Reliability, 44 (2004) pp. 1047-1054. |
Lee, Y-H. et al. “Effect of ESD Layout on the Assembly Yield and Reliability,” International Electron Devices Meeting (2006) pp. 1-4. |
Yeoh, T-S. “ESD Effects on Power Supply Clamps,” Proceedings of the 6th International Sympoisum on Physical & Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (1997) pp. 121-124. |
Edelstein, D. et al. “Full Copper Wiring in a Sub-0.25 pm CMOS ULSI Technology,” Technical Digest IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (1997) pp. 773-776. |
Venkatesan, S. et al. “A High Performance 1.8V, 0.20 pm CMOS Technology with Copper Metallization,” Technical Digest IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (1997) pp. 773-776. |
Jenei, S. et al. “High Q Inductor Add-on Module in Thick Cu/SiLK™ single damascene,” Proceedings from the IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference (2001) pp. 107-109. |
Groves, R. et al. “High Q Inductors in a SiGe BiCMOS Process Utilizing a Thick Metal Process Add-on Module,” Proceedings of the Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting (1999) pp. 149-152. |
Sakran, N. et al. “The Implementation of the 65nm Dual-Core 64b Merom Processor,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Session 5, Microprocessors, 5.6 (2007) pp. 106-107, p. 590. |
Kumar, R. et al. “A Family of 45nm IA Processors,” IEEE International Solid-.State Circuits Conference, Session 3, Microprocessor Technologies, 3.2 (2009) pp. 58-59. |
Bohr, M. “The New Era of Scaling in an SoC World,” International Solid-State Circuits Conference (2009) Presentation Slides 1-66. |
Bohr, M. “The New Era of Scaling in an SoC World,” International Solid-State Circuits Conference (2009) pp. 23-28. |
Ingerly, D. et al. “Low-K Interconnect Stack with Thick Metal 9 Redistribution.Layer and Cu Die Bump for 45nm High Volume Manufacturing,” International Interconnect Technology Conference (2008) pp. 216-218. |
Kurd, N. et al. “Next Generation Intel® Micro-architecture (Nehalem) Clocking Architecture,” Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers (2008) pp. 62-63. |
Maloney, T. et al. “Novel Clamp Circuits for IC Power Supply Protection,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part C, vol. 19, No. 3 (Jul. 1996) pp. 150-161. |
Geffken, R. M. “An Overview of Polyimide Use in Integrated Circuits and Packaging,” Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Ultra Large Scale Integration Science and Technology (1991) pp. 667-677. |
Luther, B. et al. “Planar Copper-Polyimide Back End of the Line Interconnections for ULSI Devices,” Proceedings of the 10th International IEEE VLSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference (1993) pp. 15-21. |
Master, R. et al. “Ceramic Mini-Ball Grid Array Package for High Speed Device,” Proceedings from the 45th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (1995) pp. 46-50. |
Maloney, T. et al. “Stacked PMOS Clamps for High Voltage Power Supply Protection,” Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings (1999) pp. 70-77. |
Lin, M.S. et al. “A New System-on-a-Chip (SOC) Technology—High Q Post Passivation Inductors,” Proceedings from the 53rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (May 30, 2003) pp. 1503-1509. |
Megic Corp. “MEGIC way to system solutions through bumping and redistribution,” (Brochure) (Feb. 6, 2004) pp. 1-3. |
Lin, M.S. “Post Passivation Technology™- MEGIC® Way to System Solutions,” Presentation given at TSMC Technology Symposium, Japan (Oct. 1, 2003) pp. 1-32. |
Lin, M.S. et al. “A New IC Interconnection Scheme and Design Architecture for High Performance ICs at Very Low Fabrication Cost—Post Passivation Interconnection,” Proceedings of the IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (Sep. 24, 2003) pp. 533-536. |
Kuchoulkov et al., “Patterning of Polyimide and Metal in Deep Trenches”, Physical 2001, A92, pp. 208-213. |
Davis, P.; “Silicon-on-Silicon Integration of a GSM Tranceiver with VCO Resonator”, IEEE 1998, pp. 248-249. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 10012711.7 dated Mar. 28, 2011. |
Wolf, Stanley; “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 2: Process Integration”, 1990, Lattice Press; Chap. 4.4.5; “Polyimides As Intermetal Dielectrics, ” pp. 214-217. |
Examination and Search Report for Singapore application No. SG200805202-9 dated Jul. 21, 2011. |
Search Report for European application No. EP10012703.1 dated Jul. 20, 2011. |
Search Report for European application No. EP10012699.4 dated Jul. 20, 2011. |
Search Report for European Application No. 01480078.3 dated Aug. 24, 2005. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings in EP Application 01480078.3, dated May 31, 2011. |
Written Opinion and Search Report for Singapore Application No. 200100488-6 dated Oct. 20, 2004. |
Examination Report for Singapore Application No. 200100488-6 dated Oct. 31, 2005. |
Search Report for Singapore Application No. 200502934-3 dated Feb. 20, 2009. |
Wolf, Stanley; “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era vol. 2: Process Integration”, 1990 Lattice Press; Chap. 4.4.5 Polymides as Intermetal Dielectrics, pp. 214-217. |
Burghartz et al., “Spiral Inductors and Transmission Lines in Silicon Technology Using Copper-Damoscene Inter Connects and Low-Loss Substrates”, IEEE 1997, Theory and Techniques, vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 1961-1968, Oct. 1997. |
Decision for European Patent Application No. 01480078.3 dated Nov. 7, 2011. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan vol. 2000, No. 4, Aug. 31, 2000. |
Yim et al., “The Effects of a Ground Shield on Spiral Inductors Fabricated in a Silicon Bipolar Technology”, IEEE Berm. 9.1., by Soong-Mo Yim, pp. 157-160, 2000. |
Office Action for Japan Patent Application No. 2001-028283 dated Oct. 3, 2011. |
Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-267522 dated Mar. 6, 2012 with English summary translation. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080042239 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09970005 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10156590 | US | |
Parent | 09721722 | Nov 2000 | US |
Child | 09970005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11092379 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 11877649 | US | |
Parent | 10303451 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 11092379 | US | |
Parent | 10156590 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 10303451 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09637926 | Aug 2000 | US |
Child | 09721722 | US | |
Parent | 09251183 | Feb 1999 | US |
Child | 09637926 | US | |
Parent | 09216791 | Dec 1998 | US |
Child | 09251183 | US |