The present invention is related to the field of semiconductor packaging. More specifically, the present invention is directed to lead frame land grid array (LLGA).
The art of surface mount technologies for some semiconductor packages, is developing at a rapid pace. For instance, the following set of continuation-in-part and divisional patents describes one such developing lineage. In particular, U.S. Pat. No. 6,072,239 to Yoneda, et al., entitled “Device Having Resin Package with Projection” (Yoneda '239) claims, among other things, a device having a chip, a resin package sealing the chip, metallic films, and connecting parts. The resin package has resin projections that are located on a mount-side surface of the resin package. The resin projections have surfaces that are parallel to the mount-side surface of the resin package. The metallic films are formed on the entire surfaces of the resin projections.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,770 to Tetaka, et al., entitled “Method and Apparatus for Fabricating Semiconductor Device,” (Tetaka '770) claims a method of fabricating the semiconductor device of Yoneda '239. Tetaka '770 is a continuation-in-part of Yoneda '239.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,329,711 to Kawahara, et al., entitled “Semiconductor Device and Mounting Structure,” (Kawahara '711) claims a semiconductor device that has a semiconductor element, a resin package sealing the semiconductor element, resin projections, metallic film parts, connecting members, and connection pads. Each of the metallic film parts has a single point that makes contact with a circuit board. Kawahara '711 is a continuation-in-part of Yoneda '239.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,376,921 to Yoneda, et al., entitled “Semiconductor Device, Method for Fabricating the Semiconductor device, Leadframe and Method for Producing the Leadframe” (Yoneda '921) claims a semiconductor device that has a semiconductor element, a resin package sealing the semiconductor element, resin projections, metallic film portions, and connecting members. The resin projections protrude downward from a mounting surface of the resin package. Yoneda '921 is a continuation-in-part of Yoneda '239.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,573,121 to Yoneda, et al., entitled “Semiconductor Device, Method for Fabricating the Semiconductor Device, Leadframe and Method for Producing the Leadframe,” (Yoneda '121) claims a method of producing a lead frame used to fabricate the semiconductor device of Yoneda '921. Yoneda '121 is a division of Yoneda '921.
However, this patent family lineage describes fabricating semiconductors by using numerous processing steps. Moreover, the packages produced by the patents mentioned above have certain limitations in the art.
Furthermore, current trends in integrated circuit packaging require a greater number of leads or solder bumps in a smaller and thinner form factor. To that end, the applicants have developed IC packaging technology relating to plating desired areas onto a metal substrate thereby forming several plated areas that serve as contacts, leads, die attach pads, or the like in Co Pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/688,602. However, as IC developers produce ICs having a larger number of input/outputs (I/O), a greater number of contacts is required in the corresponding IC package. As the density of the contacts, or leads, are increased, what results is less robust IC packages. In some instances, the plated contacts or other structures peel away from the finished IC package. Such peeling is exacerbated by requirements of more thin packages that in turn require more thin plating.
A carrier, or semiconductor package, for a semiconductor die is provided herein. The carrier generally comprises several contact traces that run underneath the die. The contact traces are plated onto a metal substrate, such as copper, and when the substrate is sacrificed, what are left are the contact traces. Advantageously, the traces can be made extremely thin. In combination with extremely thin semiconductor die backgrinding techniques well known in the semiconductor manufacturing industry, the semiconductor package and method for its manufacture described herein enables packages in the thickness of fractions of a millimeter. Furthermore, support structures for the contact traces are provided. The support structures serve to absorb heat during the process of mounting the package to an end application, absorbing stress applied to the contact, and generally provide structural support to the contact trace. The support structures can be formed in the same manufacturing steps as the contact traces. As one result, the support structures reduce occurrences of traces peeling away from the semiconductor package without adding significant cost or additional manufacturing steps.
In one aspect of the invention, a semiconductor package comprises a plurality of contact traces each having a first and second end, a first semiconductor die, and a resin encapsulant for encapsulating at least a portion of the plurality of contact traces and first semiconductor die, wherein the contact traces are arranged substantially underneath the semiconductor die. The first ends of the contact traces are coupled with wirebonds for forming electrical connections with the semiconductor die, and the second ends are used to form electrical connections with an end application, such as a printed circuit board. In some embodiments, the second ends of the contract traces each comprise a contact pad configured to receive a solder ball. Preferably, each contact pad comprises at least one support structure. The support structure can be of a variety of shapes, having arcuate or linear features, extend outward from the second end of the contact trace, or at least partially circumscribes or surrounds the second end of the contact trace. In some embodiments, The package further comprises a second semiconductor die coupled to the first semiconductor die, wherein the second semiconductor die is coupled to the wirebonding end of at least one contact trace by a bondwire. Alternatively, the second semiconductor die is coupled to the first semiconductor die by a solder bump.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of forming a semiconductor package comprises plating a plurality of contact traces on a metal substrate, each contact trace having a first end and a second end, mounting semiconductor die substantially above the second ends of the contact traces, removing the metal layer, thereby exposing the contact traces, and singulating individual semiconductor die. Preferably, the method further comprises forming at least one support structure about the second end of at least one contact trace. In some embodiments, the step of forming support structures comprises forming at least one plated area extending outward from the second end of the at least one contact trace. Alternatively, the step of forming support structures comprises forming at least one plated area at least partially circumscribing the second end of the at least one contact trace.
In another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor device comprises a semiconductor die having an active surface and an inert surface, a plurality of contact traces routed underneath the inert surface, wherein the contact traces comprise a plurality of plated layers, each contact trace having a first end and a second end, at least one bondwire for electrically coupling the first end of at least one contact trace to the active surface of the semiconductor die, a resin encapsulant encasing at least a portion of the semiconductor die and plurality of contact traces, and a plurality of support structures formed about the second ends of the plurality of contact traces. The support structures can be formed to extend outward from the contact traces, at least partially circumscribe the contact traces, or a combination of both.
The novel features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, for purpose of explanation, several embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following figures.
In particular,
In particular,
In the following description, numerous details and alternatives are set forth for purpose of explanation. However, one of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure will realize that the invention can be practiced without the use of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order not to obscure the description of the invention with unnecessary detail.
I. Method
Once the particular areas on the metal layer 112 are plated, the process 100 transitions to the step 130, where die attach and/or wire bonding occur. As shown in
After die attach and/or wire bonding occur at the step 130, the process 100 transitions to the step 140, where a molding 142 is applied. Typically the molding 142 includes a plastic polymer or resin that encapsulates the die 132, the wire bonds 134, the top surface of the metal layer 112, and the top surface of the plated areas, including the die pad 122 and the contact pads 124.
Once the molding 142 is applied at the step 140, the process 100 transitions to the step 150, where the metal layer 112 is removed. Some embodiments employ a chemical etchant to etch away the metal layer 112 without affecting the plated areas (122 and 124) or the molding 142. In these embodiments, when the metal layer 112 is etched away, the bottom surfaces of the plated areas, including the die pad 122, and the contact pads 124, are typically exposed.
At this point, some embodiments have formed a molded block 300 (see
Regardless of any testing and/or additional process steps after the step 150 of
Also shown in
Also mentioned above, the molded blocks produced during the process 100 have certain advantages for handling and additional processing, over the individual singulated packages illustrated in
The molded block 300 of these embodiments has certain advantages, particularly for the manipulation and testing of semiconductor devices. For instance, the molded block of a particular embodiment has dimensions of approximately 1.77×2.0 inches, and includes approximately 250 to 2,500 semiconductor units. This molded block, due to its molding strength and particular size, is configured for parallel processing of substantially all of the semiconductor devices within the molded block, simultaneously. Conventionally, semiconductor device and/or package processing includes time consuming operations, such as test, for example. However, parallel processing of such operations advantageously enhances the speed and reliability of performing such operations, for bulk quantities.
II. Streamlined Process and Configuration Advantages
The process 100 described above, further includes additional advantages. For instance, due to the direct use of the metal layer and plated areas, and the subsequent removal of the metal layer to expose the plated areas, embodiments of the invention reduce the number of process steps required for semiconductor package formation. This presents cost savings, and time savings, which present additional cost savings, over conventional methods. These and other advantages are discussed in further detail below, in relation to the referenced figures.
(1) For instance, as mentioned above, the process 100 has fewer steps of fabrication than conventional methods known in the art. Because the process 100 has fewer steps, it is less expensive than the processes known in the art. Moreover, because the process 100 has fewer steps, it is also generally faster than other processes, or, in other words, has a higher throughput.
(2) The process 100 is capable of yielding package sizes that are close to the dimension of the packaged die inside the package. The advantages of reductions in package size are understood by those of ordinary skill. For example, a package having a footprint that is approximately its die size will require a mounting area on a circuit board that is not much greater than approximately the size of the die. Thus, this advantage allows the placement of many more semiconductor devices on a board, or the use of a smaller circuit board, which further typically results in smaller form factor applications, and additional size and/or cost savings, such as from reduced shipping and manufacturing costs, for example.
(3) Further, a package having a thickness close to the die thickness encapsulated inside the package allows for lower profile implementations that use such small outline and/or low profile packages.
(4) Because the critical factor regarding height for the packages formed by the process 100, is typically the height of the die, or another factor, the height of the contact pads has no or negligible impact on the height of the package. Effectively, the contact pads have a zero, or almost zero, height in relation to the height of the package and/or the die.
(5) Additionally, because the process 100 has fewer steps, and its products are typically close in size to the small encapsulated die, the packages illustrated and described herein provide savings in the volume of construction materials consumed over time, or, in other words, provide a higher yield. Moreover, the various many possible package configurations enabled by the process 100 described above, yield further advantages, as discussed below.
III. Side (“Cross Section”) Views of Exemplary Package Designs
Some embodiments have various additional configurations for the contact pads and the die pad that vary, in some aspects, in relation to the die. For instance,
These plated areas 523 between the die pad 522 and the contact pads 524 provide additional plated areas for electrical contact and/or heat transfer for the package 500. Some embodiments, for instance, couple the die to the plated ring, particularly where the die overhangs the die pad, while some embodiments forego the die pad altogether in favor of the plated ring of these embodiments. More specifically, the purpose of the plated ring of particular embodiments is that some die designs, such as the “ground bond” design, require a connection between a top surface of the die, and a ground of the printed circuit board. In these embodiments, the plated ring 523 provides the grounding point for the printed circuit board. Some designs require a connection between a top surface of the die, and both the plated ring area 523 and a contact pad 524. These designs, often referred to as “down bond” designs, typically include a wire bond between the plated ring 523, and the contact pad 524 (not shown).
In additional embodiments, when the die overhangs the die pad, the die is attached to the die pad and is also advantageously attached to a portion of one or more contact pads.
In some of the embodiments described above, or in other embodiments, the dimensions of the die approaches the size of the package. In other words, for very small packages, or for large die in relation to the size of the package, it is advantageous to optionally omit the die pad altogether.
However, in some embodiments, it is often still desirable to provide external contact to the die pad, such as for electrical contact and/or heat dissipation, for example.
Stacked Die
The packages of the embodiments described above further allow for a “stacked die” package configuration. Multiple and/or stacked die significantly increase the number of alternative configurations.
More specifically,
IV. Bottom (“Floor Plan”) Views
More specifically,
The guard band 1725 and/or guard ring 1726 of these embodiments take advantage of and/or enable reduced contact pad height. As mentioned above, the contact pad height of some embodiments is zero, or almost zero. Some applications in the security field require an “unable” to test signal from the bottom of the package after installing the package on a PCB. The security guard band and/or ring is an additional (double) security measure that protects against having an open space, and/or separation of the package from the PCB during the insertion of a test signal probe between the (bottom of the) package and the PCB upon which the package is typically (surface) mounted. More specifically, the additional plated and/or metal soldering area for securing the package to the PCB, protects the contact pads and/or die pad of the package from undesirably separating from the PCB during handling, test, or another similar type of operation.
V. Plated Ball Grid Array
In some embodiments, the process moves on to
In
VII. Support Structures
As discussed above, current technologies require a large number of I/O available for a semiconductor device. Semiconductor packages having a greater number of I/O, or contact points, have been developed. However, with increased number of I/O comes an increase in the form factor. To that end, a high density plated pattern of contact traces per an embodiment of this invention is shown in
To that end,
In general, end manufacturers that use semiconductor devices in packages such as the one described in the above drawings have a certain pitch requirement between contact traces and the ends of the contact traces. In general, a semiconductor package has solder bumps or balls mounted on a surface that contacts an end application, such as a printed circuit board. The semiconductor package is heated to melt the solder which then makes a physical and electrical connection with the end application. However, end users' manufacturing tolerances vary widely, and as a result some minimum distance, or pitch between the contact traces or their ends is specified by the end user. As can be seen from the embodiments of
While the invention has been described with reference to numerous specific details, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the invention. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the invention is not to be limited by the foregoing illustrative details, but rather is to be defined by the appended claims.
This application is a Divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/040,112, filed on Mar. 3, 2011, and entitled “LEAD FRAME LAND GRID ARRAY WITH ROUTING CONNECTOR TRACE UNDER UNIT,” which is hereby incorporated by reference. The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/040,112, filed on Mar. 3, 2011, and entitled “LEAD FRAME LAND GRID ARRAY WITH ROUTING CONNECTOR TRACE UNDER UNIT” is a Continuation In Part and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/731,522, filed Mar. 30, 2007, entitled “LEAD FRAME LAND GRID ARRAY,” which in turn claims benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/795,929, filed Apr. 28, 2006, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. The U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/040,112, filed on Mar. 3, 2011, and entitled “LEAD FRAME LAND GRID ARRAY WITH ROUTING CONNECTOR TRACE UNDER UNIT” also claims priority under 35 U.S.C. section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/321,060, filed Apr. 5, 2010, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3611061 | Segerson | Oct 1971 | A |
4411719 | Lindberg | Oct 1983 | A |
4501960 | Jouvet et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4801561 | Sankhagowit | Jan 1989 | A |
4855672 | Shreeve | Aug 1989 | A |
5105259 | McShane et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5195023 | Manzione et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5247248 | Fukunaga | Sep 1993 | A |
5248075 | Young et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5281851 | Mills et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5396185 | Honma et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397921 | Karnezos | Mar 1995 | A |
5479105 | Kim et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5535101 | Miles et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5596231 | Combs | Jan 1997 | A |
5843808 | Karnezos | Dec 1998 | A |
5990692 | Jeong et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6072239 | Yoneda et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111324 | Sheppard et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6159770 | Tetaka et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6197615 | Song et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208020 | Minamio et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229200 | Mclellan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232650 | Fujisawa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242281 | Mclellan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250841 | Ledingham | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6284569 | Sheppard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285075 | Combs et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6294100 | Fan et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304000 | Isshiki et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324754 | DiStefano et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6326678 | Karnezos et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329711 | Kawahara et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353263 | Dotta et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6372625 | Shigeno et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376921 | Yoneda et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392427 | Yang | May 2002 | B1 |
6414385 | Huang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429048 | McLellan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451709 | Hembree | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452255 | Bayan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455348 | Yamaguchi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6489218 | Kim et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498099 | McLellan et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507116 | Caletka et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6545332 | Huang | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6545347 | McClellan | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6552417 | Combs | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6552423 | Song et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566740 | Yasunaga et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6573121 | Yoneda et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585905 | Fan et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6586834 | Sze et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6635957 | Kwan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6667191 | McLellan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6683368 | Mostafazadeh | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6686667 | Chen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703696 | Ikenaga et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723585 | Tu et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724071 | Combs | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6734044 | Fan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6734552 | Combs et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6737755 | McLellan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6764880 | Wu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6781242 | Fan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6800948 | Fan et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812552 | Islam et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6818472 | Fan et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818978 | Fan | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818980 | Pedron, Jr. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6841859 | Thamby et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6876066 | Fee et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6894376 | Mostafazadeh et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6897428 | Minamio et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6927483 | Lee et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6933176 | Kirloskar et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6933594 | McLellan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6940154 | Pedron et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946324 | McLellan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6964918 | Fan et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6967126 | Lee et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979594 | Fan et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982491 | Fan et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6984785 | Diao et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6989294 | McLellan et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6995460 | McLellan et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7008825 | Bancod et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7009286 | Kirloskar et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7049177 | Fan et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7060535 | Sirinorakul et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7071545 | Patel et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7091581 | McLellan et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7101210 | Lin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7102210 | Ichikawa | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7205178 | Shiu et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224048 | McLellan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7247526 | Fan et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7259678 | Brown et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274088 | Wu et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7314820 | Lin et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7315077 | Choi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7315080 | Fan et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7342305 | Diao et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7344920 | Kirloskar et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7348663 | Kirloskar et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7358119 | McLellan et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371610 | Fan et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7372151 | Fan et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7381588 | Patel et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7399658 | Shim et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7408251 | Hata et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7411289 | McLellan et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7449771 | Fan et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7482690 | Fan et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7495319 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7595225 | Fan et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7608482 | Bayan et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7608484 | Lange et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7709857 | Kim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7714418 | Lim et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7790500 | Ramos et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010008305 | McLellan et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020109214 | Minamio et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030006055 | Chien-Hung et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030045032 | Abe | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071333 | Matsuzawa | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030143776 | Pedron, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030178719 | Combs et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030201520 | Knapp et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207498 | Islam et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040014257 | Kim et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040026773 | Koon et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040046237 | Abe et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046241 | Combs et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070055 | Punzalan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080025 | Kasahara et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040110319 | Fukutomi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050003586 | Shimanuki et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050046023 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050077613 | McLellan et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050236701 | Minamio et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050263864 | Islam et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060071351 | Lange | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060192295 | Lee et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060223229 | Kirloskar et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060223237 | Combs et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060273433 | Itou et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001278 | Jeon et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013038 | Yang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029540 | Kajiwara et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070200210 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070235217 | Workman | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080048308 | Lam | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080096046 | Yamashita et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080150094 | Anderson | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080258278 | Ramos et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090152694 | Bemmert et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090230525 | Chang Chien et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236713 | Xu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100133565 | Cho et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149773 | Said | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110169151 | Camacho et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110201159 | Mori et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120018866 | Camacho et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120068318 | Camacho et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120280377 | Do et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Michael Quirk and Julian Serda, Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology, Pearson Education International, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2001, pp. 587-588. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Oct. 7, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/603,311, filed Sep. 4, 2012, Somchai Nondhasitthichai et al. |
Notice of Allowance mailed on Oct. 11, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/904,931, filed May 29, 2013, Somchai Nondhasitthichai et al. |
Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/904,931, filed May 29, 2013, Somchai Nondhasitthichai et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130337609 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60795929 | Apr 2006 | US | |
61321060 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13040112 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13904975 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11731522 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 13040112 | US |