This application relates to the general field of Integrated Circuit (IC) devices and fabrication methods, and more particularly to multilayer or Three Dimensional Integrated Circuit (3D IC) devices and fabrication methods.
Semiconductor manufacturing is known to improve device density in an exponential manner over time, but such improvements come with a price. The mask set cost required for each new process technology has also been increasing exponentially. While 20 years ago a mask set cost less than $20,000, it is now quite common to be charged more than $1 M for today's state of the art device mask set.
These changes represent an increasing challenge primarily to custom products, which tend to target smaller volume and less diverse markets therefore making the increased cost of product development very hard to accommodate.
Custom Integrated Circuits can be segmented into two groups. The first group includes devices that have all their layers custom made. The second group includes devices that have at least some generic layers used across different custom products. Well-known examples of the second kind may include Gate Arrays, which use generic layers for all layers up to a contact layer that couples the silicon devices to the metal conductors, and Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) devices where all the layers are generic. The generic layers in such devices may mostly be a repeating pattern structure, called a Master Slice, in an array form.
The logic array technology may be based on a generic fabric customized for a specific design during the customization stage. For an FPGA the customization may be done through programming by electrical signals. For Gate Arrays, which in their modern form are sometimes called Structured Application Specific Integrated Circuits (or Structured ASICs), the customization may be by at least one custom layer, which might be done with Direct Write eBeam or with a custom mask. As designs tend to be highly variable in the amount of logic and memory and type of input & output (I/O) each one may need, vendors of logic arrays create product families, each product having a different number of Master Slices covering a range of logic, memory size and I/O options. Yet, it is typically a challenge to come up with minimum set of Master Slices that can provide a good fit for the maximal number of designs because it may be quite costly to use a dedicated mask set for each product.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,733,288 issued to Sato in March 1988 (“Sato”), discloses a method “to provide a gate-array LSI chip which can be cut into a plurality of chips, each of the chips having a desired size and a desired number of gates in accordance with a circuit design.” The references cited in Sato present a few alternative methods to utilize a generic structure for different sizes of custom devices.
The array structure may fit the objective of variable sizing. The difficulty to provide variable-sized array structure devices may result from the need of providing I/O cells and associated pads to connect the device to the package. To overcome this difficulty Sato suggests a method wherein I/O could be constructed from the transistors also used for the general logic gates. Anderson also suggested a similar approach. U.S. Pat. No. 5,217,916 issued to Anderson et al. on Jun. 8, 1993, discloses a borderless configurable gate array free of predefined boundaries using transistor gate cells, of the same type of cells used for logic, to serve the input and output function. Accordingly, the input and output functions may be placed to surround the logic array sized for the specific application. This method may place a potential limitation on the I/O cell to use the same type of transistors as used for the logic and; hence, may not allow the use of higher operating voltages for the I/O.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,105,871 issued to Or-Bach et al. on Sep. 12, 2006, discloses a semiconductor device that includes a borderless logic array and area I/Os. The logic array may comprise a repeating core, and at least one of the area I/Os may be a configurable I/O.
In the past it was reasonable to design an I/O cell that could be configured to the various needs of most customers. The ever increasing need of higher data transfer rate in and out of the device drove the development of special serial I/O circuits called SerDes (Serializer/Deserializer) transceivers. These circuits are complex and may lead to a far larger silicon area than conventional I/Os. Consequently, the variations may be combinations of various amounts of logic, various amounts and types of memories, and various amounts and types of I/O. This implies that even the use of the borderless logic array of the prior art may still lead to multiple expensive mask sets.
There are many techniques to construct 3D stacked integrated circuits or chips including:
Through-silicon via (TSV) technology: Multiple layers of transistors (with or without wiring levels) can be constructed separately. Following this, they can be bonded to each other and connected to each other with through-silicon vias (TSVs).
Monolithic 3D technology: With this approach, multiple layers of transistors and wires can be monolithically constructed. Some monolithic 3D approaches are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,273,610, 8,557,632, 8,298,875, 8,642,416, 8,362,482, 8,378,715, 8,379,458, 8,450,804, 8,574,929, 8,581,349, 8,642,416, 8,687,399, 8,742,476, 8,754,533, 8,674,470, 8,803,206, 8,902,663, 8,994,404, 9,021,414, 9,023,688, 9,030,858, 9,117,749, 9,136,153, 9,219,005; U.S. patent publication 2011/0092030, 2016/0218046; and U.S. Patent Applications, 62/077,280, 62/042,229, 61/932,617, 14/607,077, 14/642,724, 62/139,636, 62/149,651, 62/198,126, 62/239,931, 62/246,054, 62/307,568, 62/297,857, Ser. Nos. 15/095,187, 15/150,395, 15/173,686, 62/383,463, 15/243,941, PCT/US16/52726, 62/406,376, 62/432,575, 62/440,720, 62/297,857, 62/443,751, Ser. Nos. 15/333,138, 15/344,562, and 15/351,389. The entire contents of the foregoing patents, publications, and applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Electro-Optics: There is also work done for integrated monolithic 3D including layers of different crystals, such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,283,215, 8,163,581, 8,753,913, 8,823,122, 9,197,804; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/461,539. The entire contents of the foregoing patents, publications, and applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Additionally the 3D technology according to some embodiments of the invention may enable some very innovative IC alternatives with reduced development costs, increased yield, and other illustrative benefits.
The invention may be directed to multilayer or Three Dimensional Integrated Circuit (3D IC) devices and fabrication methods.
In one aspect, a semiconductor memory, comprising: a first memory cell comprising a first transistor; a second memory cell comprising a second transistor; and a memory peripherals transistor, said memory peripherals transistor is overlaying said second transistor or is underneath said first transistor, wherein said second memory cell overlays said first memory cell at a distance of less than 200 nm, and wherein said memory peripherals transistor is part of a peripherals circuit controlling said memory.
In another aspect, A semiconductor memory, comprising: a first memory cell comprising a first transistor; a second memory cell comprising a second transistor; and a memory peripherals transistor, said memory peripherals transistor is overlaying said second transistor or is underneath said first transistor, wherein said second memory cell overlays said first memory cell at a distance of less than 200 nm, and wherein the misalignment between said first transistor and said memory peripherals transistor is less than 40 nm.
In another aspect, A semiconductor memory, comprising: a first memory cell comprising a first transistor; a second memory cell comprising a second transistor; and a memory peripherals transistor, said memory peripherals transistor is overlaying said second transistor or is underneath said first transistor, wherein said second memory cell overlays said first memory cell at a distance of less than 200 nm, and wherein said memory peripherals transistor comprises a single crystal channel and is part of a peripherals circuit controlling said memory.
Various embodiments of the invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Embodiments of the invention are described herein with reference to the drawing figures. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the description and figures illustrate rather than limit the invention and that in general the figures are not drawn to scale for clarity of presentation. Such skilled persons will also realize that many more embodiments are possible by applying the inventive principles contained herein and that such embodiments fall within the scope of the invention which is not to be limited except by the appended claims.
Some drawing figures may describe process flows for building devices. These process flows, which may be a sequence of steps for building a device, may have many structures, numerals and labels that may be common between two or more adjacent steps. In such cases, some labels, numerals and structures used for a certain step's figure may have been described in the previous steps' figures.
Some embodiments of the invention may provide a new method for semiconductor device fabrication that may be highly desirable for custom products. Some embodiments of the invention may suggest the use of a re-programmable antifuse in conjunction with ‘Through Silicon Via’ to construct a new type of configurable logic, or as usually called, FPGA devices. Some embodiments of the invention may provide a solution to the challenge of high mask-set cost and low flexibility that exists in the current common methods of semiconductor fabrication. An additional illustrated advantage of some embodiments of the present invention may be that it could reduce the high cost of manufacturing the many different mask sets needed in order to provide a commercially viable logic family with a range of products each with a different set of master slices. Some embodiments of the invention may improve upon the prior art in many respects, including, for example, the structuring of the semiconductor device and methods related to the fabrication of semiconductor devices.
Some embodiments of the invention may reflect the motivation to save on the cost of masks with respect to the investment that would otherwise have been necessary to put in place a commercially viable set of master slices. Some embodiments of the invention may also provide the ability to incorporate various types of memory blocks in the configurable device. Some embodiments of the invention may provide a method to construct a configurable device with the desired amount of logic, memory, I/Os, and analog functions.
In addition, some embodiments of the invention may allow the use of repeating logic tiles that provide a continuous terrain of logic. Some embodiments of the invention may use a modular approach to construct various configurable systems with Through-Silicon-Via (TSV). Once a standard size and location of TSV has been defined one could build various configurable logic dies, configurable memory dies, configurable I/O dies and configurable analog dies which could be connected together to construct various configurable systems. In fact, these embodiments of the invention may allow mixing and matching among configurable dies, fixed function dies, and dies manufactured in different processes.
Some embodiments of the invention may provide additional illustrated benefits by making use of special type of transistors placed above or below the antifuse configurable interconnect circuits to allow for a far better use of the silicon area. In general an FPGA device that utilizes antifuses to configure the device function may include the electronic circuits to program the antifuses. The programming circuits may be used primarily to configure the device and may be mostly an overhead once the device is configured. The programming voltage used to program the antifuse may typically be significantly higher than the voltage used for the operating circuits of the device. The design of the antifuse structure may be designed such that an unused antifuse may not accidentally get fused. Accordingly, the incorporation of the antifuse programming in the silicon substrate may entail special attention for a resulting higher voltage, and additional silicon area may, accordingly, be allocated.
Unlike the operating transistors designed to operate as fast as possible and to enable fast system performance, the programming circuits could operate relatively slowly. Accordingly using a thin film transistor for the programming circuits could fit very well with the function and may reduce the needed silicon area.
The programming circuits may, therefore, be constructed with thin film transistors, which may be fabricated after the fabrication of the operating circuitry, on top of the configurable interconnection layers that incorporate and use the antifuses. An additional illustrated advantage of such embodiments of the invention may be the ability to reduce cost of the high volume production. One may only need to use mask-defined links instead of the antifuses and their programming circuits. One custom via mask may be used, and this may save steps associated with the fabrication of the antifuse layers, the thin film transistors, and/or the associated connection layers of the programming circuitry.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention an Integrated Circuit device may thus be provided, including a plurality of antifuse configurable interconnect circuits and a plurality of transistors to configure at least one of said antifuses; wherein said transistors are fabricated after said antifuse.
Further provided in accordance with an embodiment of the invention may provide an Integrated Circuit device including: a plurality of antifuse configurable interconnect circuits and plurality of transistors to configure at least one of said antifuses; wherein said transistors are placed over said antifuse.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the illustrated invention of the Integrated Circuit device may include second antifuse configurable logic cells and a plurality of second transistors to configure said second antifuses wherein these second transistors may be fabricated before said second antifuses.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the illustrated invention the Integrated Circuit device may also include second antifuse configurable logic cells and a plurality of second transistors to configure said second antifuses wherein said second transistors may be placed underneath said second antifuses.
Further provided in accordance with an embodiment of the illustrated invention may be an Integrated Circuit device including: first antifuse layer, at least two metal layers over it and a second antifuse layer overlaying the two metal layers.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention a configurable logic device may be presented, including: antifuse configurable look up table logic interconnected by antifuse configurable interconnect.
In accordance with an embodiment of the illustrated invention a configurable logic device may also be provided, including: a plurality of configurable look up table logic, a plurality of configurable programmable logic array (PLA) logic, and a plurality of antifuse configurable interconnect.
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention a configurable logic device may also be provided, including: a plurality of configurable look up table logic and a plurality of configurable drive cells wherein the drive cells may be configured by plurality of antifuses.
In accordance with an embodiment of the illustrated invention, a configurable logic device may additionally be provided, including: configurable logic cells interconnected by a plurality of antifuse configurable interconnect circuits wherein at least one of the antifuse configurable interconnect circuits may be configured as part of a non volatile memory.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the configurable logic device may include at least one antifuse configurable interconnect circuit, which may also be configurable to a PLA function.
In accordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention, an integrated circuit system may also be provided, including a configurable logic die and an I/O die wherein the configurable logic die may be connected to the I/O die by the use of Through-Silicon-Via.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the integrated circuit system may include; a configurable logic die and a memory die wherein the configurable logic die and the memory die may be connected by the use of Through-Silicon-Via.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the invention the integrated circuit system may include a first configurable logic die and second configurable logic die wherein the first configurable logic die and the second configurable logic die may be connected by the use of Through-Silicon-Via.
Moreover in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the integrated circuit system may include an I/O die that may be fabricated utilizing a different process than the process utilized to fabricate the configurable logic die.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the integrated circuit system may include at least two logic dies connected by the use of Through-Silicon-Via and wherein some of the Through-Silicon-Vias may be utilized to carry the system bus signal.
Moreover in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the integrated circuit system may include at least one configurable logic device.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the integrated circuit system may include, an antifuse configurable logic die and programmer die which may be connected by the use of Through-Silicon-Via.
Additionally there is a growing need to reduce the impact of inter-chip interconnects. In fact, interconnects may be now dominating IC performance and power. One solution to shorten interconnect may be to use a 3D IC. Currently, the only known way for general logic 3D IC is to integrate finished device one on top of the other by utilizing Through-Silicon-Vias as now called TSVs. The problem with TSVs may be that their large size, usually a few microns each, may severely limit the number of connections that can be made. Some embodiments of the invention may provide multiple alternatives to constructing a 3D IC wherein many connections may be made less than one micron in size, thus enabling the use of 3D IC technology for most device applications.
Additionally some embodiments of the invention may offer new device alternatives by utilizing the proposed 3D IC technology.
Unlike prior art, various embodiments of the present invention suggest constructing the programming transistors not in the base silicon diffusion layer but rather above or below the antifuse configurable interconnect circuits. The programming voltage used to program the antifuse may be typically significantly higher than the voltage used for the operational circuits of the device. This may be part of the design of the antifuse structure so that the antifuse may not become accidentally activated. In addition, extra attention, design effort, and silicon resources might be needed to make sure that the programming phase may not damage the operating circuits. Accordingly the incorporation of the antifuse programming transistors in the silicon substrate may need attention and extra silicon area.
Unlike the operational transistors designed to operate as fast as possible and so to enable fast system performance, the programming circuits could operate relatively slowly. Accordingly, a thin film transistor for the programming circuits could provide the function and could reduce the silicon area.
Alternatively other type of transistors, such as Vacuum FET, bipolar, etc., could be used for the programming circuits and may be placed not in the base silicon but rather above or below the antifuse configurable interconnect.
Yet in another alternative the programming transistors and the programming circuits could be fabricated on SOI wafers which may then be bonded to the configurable logic wafer and connected to it by the use of through-silicon-via (TSV), or through layer via (TLV). An illustrated advantage of using an SOI wafer for the antifuse programming function may be that the high voltage transistors that could be built on it are very efficient and could be used for the programming circuitry including support functions such as the programming controller function. Yet as an additional variation, the programming circuits could be fabricated by an older process on SOI wafers to further reduce cost. Moreover, the programming circuits could be fabricated by a different process technology than the logic wafer process technology. Furthermore, the wafer fab that the programing circuits may be fabricated at may be different than the wafer fab that the logic circuits are fabricated at and located anywhere in the world.
A common objective may be to reduce cost for high volume production without redesign and with minimal additional mask cost. The use of thin-film-transistors, for the programming transistors, may enable a relatively simple and direct volume cost reduction. Instead of embedding antifuses in the isolation layer a custom mask could be used to define vias on substantially all the locations that used to have their respective antifuse activated. Accordingly the same connection between the strips that used to be programmed may now be connected by fixed vias. This may allow saving the cost associated with the fabrication of the antifuse programming layers and their programming circuits. It should be noted that there might be differences between the antifuse resistance and the mask defined via resistance. A conventional way to handle it may be by providing the simulation models for both options so the designer could validate that the design may work properly in both cases.
An additional objective for having the programming circuits above the antifuse layer may be to achieve better circuit density. Many connections may be needed to connect the programming transistors to their respective metal strips. If those connections are going upward they could reduce the circuit overhead by not blocking interconnection routes on the connection layers underneath.
The device fabrication of the example shown in
Interconnection layer 106 could include multiple layers of long interconnection tracks for power distribution and clock networks, or a portion thereof, in addition to structures already fabricated in the first few layers, for example, logic fabric/first antifuse layer 104.
Second antifuse layer 107 could include many layers, including the antifuse configurable interconnection fabric. It might be called the short interconnection fabric, too. If metal 6 and metal 7 are used for the strips of this configurable interconnection fabric then the second antifuse may be embedded in the dielectric layer between metal 6 and metal 7.
The programming transistors and the other parts of the programming circuit could be fabricated afterward and be on top of the configurable interconnection fabric programming transistors 110. The programming element could be a thin film transistor or other alternatives for over oxide transistors as was mentioned previously. In such case the antifuse programming transistors may be placed over the antifuse layer, which may thereby enable the configurable interconnect in second antifuse layer 107 or logic fabric/first antifuse layer 104. It should be noted that in some cases it might be useful to construct part of the control logic for the second antifuse programming circuits, in the base layers such as silicon substrate 102 and logic fabric/first antifuse layer 104.
The final step may include constructing the connection to the outside 112. The connection could be pads for wire bonding, soldering balls for flip chip, optical, or other connection structures such as those connection structures for TSV.
In another alternative embodiment of the invention the antifuse programmable interconnect structure could be designed for multiple use. The same structure could be used as a part of the interconnection fabric, or as a part of the PLA logic cell, or as part of a Read Only Memory (ROM) function. In an FPGA product it might be desirable to have an element that could be used for multiple purposes. Having resources that could be used for multiple functions could increase the utility of the FPGA device.
The term layer transfer in the use herein may be defined as the technological process or method that enables the transfer of very fine layers of crystalline material onto a mechanical support, wherein the mechanical support may be another layer or substrate of crystalline material. For example, the “SmartCut” process, also used herein as the term ‘ion-cut’ process, together with wafer bonding technology, may enable a “Layer Transfer” whereby a thin layer of a single or mono-crystalline silicon wafer may be transferred from one wafer or substrate to another wafer or substrate. Other specific layer transfer processes may be described or referenced herein.
The terms monocrystalline or mono-crystalline in the use herein of, for example, monocrystalline or mono-crystalline layer, material, or silicon, may be defined as “a single crystal body of crystalline material that contains no large-angle boundaries or twin boundaries as in ASTM F1241, also called monocrystal” and “an arrangement of atoms in a solid that has perfect periodicity (that is, no defects)” as in the SEMATECH dictionary. The terms single crystal and monocrystal are equivalent in the SEMATECH dictionary. The term single crystal in the use herein of, for example, single crystal silicon layer, single crystal layer, may be equivalently defined as monocrystalline.
The term via in the use herein may be defined as “an opening in the dielectric layer(s) through which a riser passes, or in which the walls are made conductive; an area that provides an electrical pathway [connection path] from one metal layer to the metal layer above or below,” as in the SEMATECH dictionary. The term through silicon via (TSV) in the use herein may be defined as an opening in a silicon layer(s) through which an electrically conductive riser passes, and in which the walls are made isolative from the silicon layer; a riser that provides an electrical pathway [connection path] from one metal layer to the metal layer above or below. The term through layer via (TLV) in the use herein may be defined as an opening in a layer transferred layer(s) through which an electrically conductive riser passes, wherein the riser may pass through at least one isolating region, for example, a shallow trench isolation (STI) region in the transferred layer, may typically have a riser diameter of less than 200 nm, a riser that provides an electrical pathway [connection path] from one metal layer to the metal layer above or below. In some cases, a TLV may additionally pass thru an electrically conductive layer, and the walls may be made isolative from the conductive layer.
The reference 108 in subsequent figures can be any one of a vast number of combinations of possible preprocessed wafers or layers containing many combinations of transfer layers that fall within the scope of the invention. The term “preprocessed wafer or layer” may be generic and reference number 108 when used in a drawing figure to illustrate an embodiment of the present invention may represent many different preprocessed wafer or layer types including but not limited to underlying prefabricated layers, a lower layer interconnect wiring, a base layer, a substrate layer, a processed house wafer, an acceptor wafer, a logic house wafer, an acceptor wafer house, an acceptor substrate, target wafer, preprocessed circuitry, a preprocessed circuitry acceptor wafer, a base wafer layer, a lower layer, an underlying main wafer, a foundation layer, an attic layer, or a house wafer.
This layer transfer process can be repeated many times, thereby creating preprocessed wafers comprising many different transferred layers which, when combined, can then become preprocessed wafers or layers for future transfers. This layer transfer process may be sufficiently flexible that preprocessed wafers and transfer layers, if properly prepared, can be flipped over and processed on either side with further transfers in either direction as a matter of design choice.
The thinner the transferred layer, the smaller the through layer via (TLV) diameter obtainable, due to the potential limitations of manufacturable via aspect ratios. Thus, the transferred layer may be, for example, less than about 2 microns thick, less than about 1 micron thick, less than about 0.4 microns thick, less than about 200 nm thick, or less than about 100 nm thick. The TLV diameter may be less than about 400 nm, less than about 200 nm, less than about 80 nm, less than about 40 nm, or less than about 20 nm. The thickness of the layer or layers transferred according to some embodiments of the present invention may be designed as such to match and enable the best obtainable lithographic resolution capability of the manufacturing process employed to create the through layer vias or any other structures on the transferred layer or layers.
In many of the embodiments of the invention, the layer or layers transferred may be of a crystalline material, for example, mono-crystalline silicon, and after layer transfer, further processing, such as, for example, plasma/RIE or wet etching, may be done on the layer or layers that may create islands or mesas of the transferred layer or layers of crystalline material, for example, mono-crystalline silicon, the crystal orientation of which has not changed Thus, a mono-crystalline layer or layers of a certain specific crystal orientation may be layer transferred and then processed whereby the resultant islands or mesas of mono-crystalline silicon have the same crystal specific orientation as the layer or layers before the processing. After this processing, the resultant islands or mesas of crystalline material, for example, mono-crystalline silicon, may be still referred to herein as a layer, for example, mono-crystalline layer, layer of mono-crystalline silicon, and so on.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations in
A technology for such underlying circuitry may be to use the “SmartCut” process. The “SmartCut” process is a well understood technology used for fabrication of SOI wafers. The “SmartCut” process, together with wafer bonding technology, may enable a “Layer Transfer” whereby a thin layer of a single or mono-crystalline silicon wafer may be transferred from one wafer to another wafer. The “Layer Transfer” could be done at less than about 400° C. and the resultant transferred layer could be even less than about 100 nm thick. The transferred layer thickness may typically be about 100 nm, and may be a thin as about 5 nm in currently demonstrated fully depleted SOI (FDSOI) wafer manufacturing by Soitec. In most applications described herein in this invention the transferred layer thickness may be less than about 400 nm and may be less than about 200 nm for logic applications. The process with some variations and under different names may be commercially available by two companies, namely, Soitec (Crolles, France) and SiGen—Silicon Genesis Corporation (San Jose, Calif.). A room temperature wafer bonding process utilizing ion-beam preparation of the wafer surfaces in a vacuum has been recently demonstrated by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. This process may allow for room temperature layer transfer.
Alternatively, other technology may also be used. For example, other technologies may be utilized for layer transfer as described in, for example, IBM's layer transfer method shown at IEDM 2005 by A. W. Topol, et. al. The IBM's layer transfer method employs a SOI technology and utilizes glass handle wafers. The donor circuit may be high-temperature processed on an SOI wafer, temporarily bonded to a borosilicate glass handle wafer, backside thinned by chemical mechanical polishing of the silicon and then the Buried Oxide (BOX) is selectively etched off. The now thinned donor wafer may be subsequently aligned and low-temperature oxide-to-oxide bonded to the acceptor wafer topside. A low temperature release of the glass handle wafer from the thinned donor wafer may be performed, and then through bond via connections may be made. Additionally, epitaxial liftoff (ELO) technology as shown by P. Demeester, et. al, of IMEC in Semiconductor Science Technology 1993 may be utilized for layer transfer. ELO may make use of the selective removal of a very thin sacrificial layer between the substrate and the layer structure to be transferred. The to-be-transferred layer of GaAs or silicon may be adhesively ‘rolled’ up on a cylinder or removed from the substrate by utilizing a flexible carrier, such as, for example, black wax, to bow up the to-be-transferred layer structure when the selective etch, such as, for example, diluted Hydrofluoric (HF) Acid, may etch the exposed release layer, such as, for example, silicon oxide in SOI or AlAs. After liftoff, the transferred layer may then be aligned and bonded to the acceptor substrate or wafer. The manufacturability of the ELO process for multilayer layer transfer use was recently improved by J. Yoon, et. al., of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as described in Nature May 20, 2010. Canon developed a layer transfer technology called ELTRAN—Epitaxial Layer TRANsfer from porous silicon. ELTRAN may be utilized. The Electrochemical Society Meeting abstract No. 438 from year 2000 and the JSAP International July 2001 paper show a seed wafer being anodized in an HF/ethanol solution to create pores in the top layer of silicon, the pores may be treated with a low temperature oxidation and then high temperature hydrogen annealed to seal the pores. Epitaxial silicon may then be deposited on top of the porous silicon and then oxidized to form the SOI BOX. The seed wafer may be bonded to a handle wafer and the seed wafer may be split off by high pressure water directed at the porous silicon layer. The porous silicon may then be selectively etched off leaving a uniform silicon layer.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations in
Now that a “layer transfer” process may be used to bond a thin mono-crystalline silicon layer transferred silicon layer 204 on top of the preprocessed wafer 202, a standard process could ensue to construct the rest of the desired circuits as illustrated in
There may be a few alternative methods to construct the top transistors precisely aligned to the underlying pre-fabricated layers such as pre-processed wafer or layer 108, utilizing “SmartCut” layer transfer and not exceeding the temperature limit, typically about 400° C., of the underlying pre-fabricated structure, which may include low melting temperature metals or other construction materials such as, for example, aluminum or copper. As the layer transfer may be less than about 200 nm thick, then the transistors defined on it could be aligned precisely to the top metal layer of the pre-processed wafer or layer 108 as may be needed and those transistors may have state of the art layer to layer misalignment capability, for example, less than about 40 nm misalignment or less than about 4 nm misalignment, as well as through layer via, or layer to layer metal connection, diameters of less than about 50 nm, or even less than about 20 nm. The thinner the transferred layer, the smaller the through layer via diameter obtainable, due to the potential limitations of manufacturable via aspect ratios. The transferred layer may be, for example, less than about 2 microns thick, less than about 1 micron thick, less than about 0.4 microns thick, less than about 200 nm thick, or less than about 100 nm thick.
The term alignment mark in the use herein may be defined as “an image selectively placed within or outside an array for either testing or aligning, or both [ASTM F127-84], also called alignment key and alignment target,” as in the SEMATECH dictionary. The alignment mark may, for example, be within a layer, wafer, or substrate of material processing or to be processed, and/or may be on a photomask or photoresist image, or may be a calculated position within, for example, a lithographic wafer stepper's software or memory.
Novel monolithic 3D memory technologies utilizing material resistance changes may be constructed in a similar manner. There may be many types of resistance-based memories including phase change memory, Metal Oxide memory, resistive RAM (RRAM), memristors, solid-electrolyte memory, ferroelectric RAM, MRAM, etc. Background information on these resistive-memory types may be given in “Overview of candidate device technologies for storage-class memory,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 52, no. 4.5, pp. 449-464, July 2008 by Burr, G. W., et. al. The contents of this document are incorporated in this specification by reference.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
FIG. 3J1 shows a cross sectional cut II of
As illustrated in
This flow may enable the formation of a resistance-based multi-layer or 3D memory array with zero additional masking steps per memory layer, which may utilize junction-less transistors and may have a resistance-based memory element in series with a select transistor, and may be constructed by layer transfers of wafer sized doped mono-crystalline silicon layers, and this 3D memory array may be connected to an underlying multi-metal layer semiconductor device.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
This flow may enable the formation of a charge trap based 3D memory with zero additional masking steps per memory layer constructed by layer transfers of wafer sized doped layers of mono-crystalline silicon and this 3D memory may be connected to an underlying multi-metal layer semiconductor device.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations in
The monolithic 3D integration concepts described in this patent application can lead to novel embodiments of poly-crystalline silicon based memory architectures. While the following concepts in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
FIG. 5J1 is a cross sectional cut II view of
As illustrated in
This flow may enable the formation of a resistance-based multi-layer or 3D memory array with zero additional masking steps per memory layer, which may utilize poly-crystalline silicon junction-less transistors and may have a resistance-based memory element in series with a select transistor, and may be constructed by layer transfer of wafer sized doped poly-crystalline silicon layers, and this 3D memory array may be connected to an underlying multi-metal layer semiconductor device.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
This flow may enable the formation of a resistance-based multi-layer or 3D memory array with zero additional masking steps per memory layer, which may utilize poly-crystalline silicon junction-less transistors and may have a resistance-based memory element in series with a select transistor, and may be constructed by layer transfers of wafer sized doped poly-crystalline silicon layers, and this 3D memory array may be connected to an overlying multi-metal layer semiconductor device or periphery circuitry.
Persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations in
In this document, various terms may have been used while generally referring to the element. For example, “house” may refer to the first mono-crystalline layer with its transistors and metal interconnection layer or layers. This first mono-crystalline layer may have also been referred to as the main wafer and sometimes as the acceptor wafer and sometimes as the base wafer.
Some embodiments of the invention may include alternative techniques to build IC (Integrated Circuit) devices including techniques and methods to construct 3D IC systems. Some embodiments of the invention may enable device solutions with far less power consumption than prior art. These device solutions could be very useful for the growing application of mobile electronic devices and mobile systems, such as, for example, mobile phones, smart phone, and cameras. For example, incorporating the 3D IC semiconductor devices according to some embodiments of the invention within these mobile electronic devices and mobile systems could provide superior mobile units that could operate much more efficiently and for a much longer time than with prior art technology.
Smart mobile systems may be greatly enhanced by complex electronics at a limited power budget. The 3D technology described in the multiple embodiments of the invention would allow the construction of low power high complexity mobile electronic systems. For example, it would be possible to integrate into a small form function a complex logic circuit with high density high speed memory utilizing some of the 3D DRAM embodiments of the invention and add some non-volatile 3D NAND charge trap or RRAM described in some embodiments of the invention.
In U.S. application Ser. No. 12/903,862, filed by some of the inventors and assigned to the same assignee, a 3D micro display and a 3D image sensor are presented. Integrating one or both of these with complex logic and or memory could be very effective for mobile system. Additionally, mobile systems could be customized to some specific market applications by integrating some embodiments of the invention.
Moreover, utilizing 3D programmable logic or 3D gate array as had been described in some embodiments of the invention could be very effective in forming flexible mobile systems.
The need to reduce power to allow effective use of limited battery energy and also the lightweight and small form factor derived by highly integrating functions with low waste of interconnect and substrate could be highly benefited by the redundancy and repair idea of the 3D monolithic technology as has been presented in embodiments of the invention. This unique technology could enable a mobile device that would be lower cost to produce or would require lower power to operate or would provide a lower size or lighter carry weight, and combinations of these 3D monolithic technology features may provide a competitive or desirable mobile system.
Another unique market that may be addressed by some of the embodiments of the invention could be a street corner camera with supporting electronics. The 3D image sensor described in the Ser. No. 12/903,862 application would be very effective for day/night and multi-spectrum surveillance applications. The 3D image sensor could be supported by integrated logic and memory such as, for example, a monolithic 3D IC with a combination of image processing and image compression logic and memory, both high speed memory such as 3D DRAM and high density non-volatile memory such as 3D NAND or RRAM or other memory, and other combinations. This street corner camera application would require low power, low cost, and low size or any combination of these features, and could be highly benefited from the 3D technologies described herein.
3D ICs according to some embodiments of the invention could enable electronic and semiconductor devices with much a higher performance as a result from the shorter interconnect as well as semiconductor devices with far more complexity via multiple levels of logic and providing the ability to repair or use redundancy. The achievable complexity of the semiconductor devices according to some embodiments of the invention could far exceed what may be practical with the prior art technology. These potential advantages could lead to more powerful computer systems and improved systems that have embedded computers.
Some embodiments of the invention may enable the design of state of the art electronic systems at a greatly reduced non-recurring engineering (NRE) cost by the use of high density 3D FPGAs or various forms of 3D array base ICs with reduced custom masks as described previously. These systems could be deployed in many products and in many market segments. Reduction of the NRE may enable new product family or application development and deployment early in the product lifecycle by lowering the risk of upfront investment prior to a market being developed. The above potential advantages may also be provided by various mixes such as reduced NRE using generic masks for layers of logic and other generic masks for layers of memories and building a very complex system using the repair technology to overcome the inherent yield limitation. Another form of mix could be building a 3D FPGA and add on it 3D layers of customizable logic and memory so the end system could have field programmable logic on top of the factory customized logic. There may be many ways to mix the many innovative elements to form 3D IC to support the need of an end system, including using multiple devices wherein more than one device incorporates elements of embodiments of the invention. An end system could benefit from a memory device utilizing embodiments of the invention 3D memory integrated together with a high performance 3D FPGA integrated together with high density 3D logic, and so forth. Using devices that can use one or multiple elements according to some embodiments of the invention may allow for better performance or lower power and other illustrative advantages resulting from the use of some embodiments of the invention to provide the end system with a competitive edge. Such end system could be electronic based products or other types of systems that may include some level of embedded electronics, such as, for example, cars, and remote controlled vehicles.
Commercial wireless mobile communications have been developed for almost thirty years, and play a special role in today's information and communication technology Industries. The mobile wireless terminal device has become part of our life, as well as the Internet, and the mobile wireless terminal device may continue to have a more important role on a worldwide basis. Currently, mobile (wireless) phones are undergoing much development to provide advanced functionality. The mobile phone network is a network such as a GSM, GPRS, or WCDMA, 3G and 4G standards, and the network may allow mobile phones to communicate with each other. The base station may be for transmitting (and receiving) information to the mobile phone.
A typical mobile phone system may include, for example, a processor, a flash memory, a static random access memory, a display, a removable memory, a radio frequency (RF) receiver/transmitter, an analog base band (ABB), a digital base band (DBB), an image sensor, a high-speed bi-directional interface, a keypad, a microphone, and a speaker. A typical mobile phone system may include a multiplicity of an element, for example, two or more static random access memories, two or more displays, two or more RF receiver/transmitters, and so on.
Conventional radios used in wireless communications, such as radios used in conventional cellular telephones, typically may include several discrete RF circuit components. Some receiver architectures may employ superhetrodyne techniques. In a superheterodyne architecture an incoming signal may be frequency translated from its radio frequency (RF) to a lower intermediate frequency (IF). The signal at IF may be subsequently translated to baseband where further digital signal processing or demodulation may take place. Receiver designs may have multiple IF stages. The reason for using such a frequency translation scheme is that circuit design at the lower IF frequency may be more manageable for signal processing. It is at these IF frequencies that the selectivity of the receiver may be implemented, automatic gain control (AGC) may be introduced, etc.
A mobile phone's need of a high-speed data communication capability in addition to a speech communication capability has increased in recent years. In GSM (Global System for Mobile communications), one of European Mobile Communications Standards, GPRS (General Packet Radio Service) has been developed for speeding up data communication by allowing a plurality of time slot transmissions for one time slot transmission in the GSM with the multiplexing TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) architecture. EDGE (Enhanced Data for GSM Evolution) architecture provides faster communications over GPRS.
4th Generation (4G) mobile systems aim to provide broadband wireless access with nominal data rates of 100 Mbit/s. 4G systems may be based on the 3GPP LTE (Long Term Evolution) cellular standard, WiMax or Flash-OFDM wireless metropolitan area network technologies. The radio interface in these systems may be based on all-IP packet switching, MIMO diversity, multi-carrier modulation schemes, Dynamic Channel Assignment (DCA) and channel-dependent scheduling.
Prior art such as U.S. application Ser. No. 12/871,984 may provide a description of a mobile device and its block-diagram.
It is understood that the use of specific component, device and/or parameter names (such as those of the executing utility/logic described herein) are for example only and not meant to imply any limitations on the invention. The invention may thus be implemented with different nomenclature/terminology utilized to describe the components/devices/parameters herein, without limitation Each term utilized herein is to be given its broadest interpretation given the context in which that term is utilized. For example, as utilized herein, the following terms are generally defined:
(1) Mobile computing/communication device (MCD): is a device that may be a mobile communication device, such as a cell phone, or a mobile computer that performs wired and/or wireless communication via a connected wireless/wired network. In some embodiments, the MCD may include a combination of the functionality associated with both types of devices within a single standard device (e.g., a smart phones or personal digital assistant (PDA)) for use as both a communication device and a computing device.
Some embodiments of the invention may include alternative techniques to build IC (Integrated Circuit) devices including techniques and methods to construct 3D IC systems. Some embodiments of the invention may enable device solutions with far less power consumption than prior art, or with more functionality in a smaller physical footprint. These device solutions could be very useful for the growing application of Autonomous in vivo Electronic Medical (AEM) devices and AEM systems such as ingestible “camera pills,” implantable insulin dispensers, implantable heart monitoring and stimulating devices, and the like. One such ingestible “camera pill” is the Philips' remote control “iPill”. For example, incorporating the 3D IC semiconductor devices according to some embodiments of the invention within these AEM devices and systems could provide superior autonomous units that could operate much more effectively and for a much longer time than with prior art technology. Sophisticated AEM systems may be greatly enhanced by complex electronics with limited power budget. The 3D technology described in many of the embodiments of the invention would allow the construction of a low power high complexity AEM system. For example it would be possible to integrate into a small form function a complex logic circuit with high density high speed memory utilizing some of the 3D DRAM embodiments herein and to add some non-volatile 3D NAND charge trap or RRAM described in embodiments herein. Also in another application Ser. No. 12/903,862 filed by some of the inventors and assigned to the same assignee a 3D micro display and a 3D image sensor are presented. Integrating one or both to complex logic and or memory could be very effective for retinal implants. Additional AEM systems could be customized to some specific market applications. Utilizing 3D programmable logic or 3D gate array as has been described in some embodiments herein could be very effective. The need to reduce power to allow effective use of battery and also the light weight and small form factor derived by highly integrating functions with low waste of interconnect and substrate could benefit from the redundancy and repair idea of the 3D monolithic technology as has been presented in some of the inventive embodiments herein. This unique technology could enable disposable AEM devices that would be at a lower cost to produce and/or would require lower power to operate and/or would require lower size and/or lighter to carry and combination of these features to form a competitive or desirable AEM system.
3D ICs according to some embodiments of the invention could also enable electronic and semiconductor devices with a much higher performance due to the shorter interconnect as well as semiconductor devices with far more complexity via multiple levels of logic and providing the ability to repair or use redundancy. The achievable complexity of the semiconductor devices according to some embodiments of the invention could far exceed what may be practical with the prior art technology. These advantages could lead to more powerful computer systems and improved systems that have embedded computers.
It will also be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art that the invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. For example, drawings or illustrations may not show n or p wells for clarity in illustration. Moreover, transistor channels illustrated or discussed herein may include doped semiconductors, but may instead include undoped semiconductor material. Further, any transferred layer or donor substrate or wafer preparation illustrated or discussed herein may include one or more undoped regions or layers of semiconductor material. Rather, the scope of the invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of the various features described herein above as well as modifications and variations which would occur to such skilled persons upon reading the foregoing description. Thus the invention is to be limited only by the appended claims
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/821,683, filed on Aug. 7, 2015, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/492,395, (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,136,153 issued on Sep. 15, 2015) filed on Jun. 8, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/273,712 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,273,610 issued on Sep. 25, 2012) filed Oct. 14, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/016,313 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,362,482 issued on Jan. 29, 2013) filed on Jan. 28, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/970,602, filed on Dec. 16, 2010, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/949,617, (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,754,533 issued on Jun. 17, 2014) filed on Nov. 18, 2010. The contents of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3007090 | Rutz | Oct 1961 | A |
3819959 | Chang et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4009483 | Clark | Feb 1977 | A |
4197555 | Uehara et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4213139 | Rao et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4400715 | Barbee et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4487635 | Kugimiya et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4510670 | Schwabe | Apr 1985 | A |
4522657 | Rohatgi et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4612083 | Yasumoto et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4643950 | Ogura et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4704785 | Curran | Nov 1987 | A |
4711858 | Harder et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4721885 | Brodie | Jan 1988 | A |
4732312 | Kennedy et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733288 | Sato | Mar 1988 | A |
4829018 | Wahlstrom | May 1989 | A |
4854986 | Raby | Aug 1989 | A |
4866304 | Yu | Sep 1989 | A |
4939568 | Kato et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4956307 | Pollack et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5012153 | Atkinson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5032007 | Silverstein et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5047979 | Leung | Sep 1991 | A |
5087585 | Hayashi | Feb 1992 | A |
5093704 | Sato et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5106775 | Kaga et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5152857 | Ito et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162879 | Gill | Nov 1992 | A |
5189500 | Kusunoki | Feb 1993 | A |
5217916 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5250460 | Yamagata et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5258643 | Cohen | Nov 1993 | A |
5265047 | Leung et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5266511 | Takao | Nov 1993 | A |
5277748 | Sakaguchi et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5286670 | Kang et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5294556 | Kawamura | Mar 1994 | A |
5308782 | Mazure et al. | May 1994 | A |
5312771 | Yonehara | May 1994 | A |
5317236 | Zavracky et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324980 | Kusunoki | Jun 1994 | A |
5355022 | Sugahara et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5371037 | Yonehara | Dec 1994 | A |
5374564 | Bruel | Dec 1994 | A |
5374581 | Ichikawa et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5424560 | Norman et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5475280 | Jones et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5478762 | Chao | Dec 1995 | A |
5485031 | Zhang et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5498978 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5527423 | Neville et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535342 | Taylor | Jul 1996 | A |
5554870 | Fitch et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563084 | Ramm et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583349 | Norman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583350 | Norman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586291 | Lasker | Dec 1996 | A |
5594563 | Larson | Jan 1997 | A |
5604137 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617991 | Pramanick et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627106 | Hsu | May 1997 | A |
5656548 | Zavracky et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5656553 | Leas et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659194 | Iwamatsu | Aug 1997 | A |
5670411 | Yonehara | Sep 1997 | A |
5681756 | Norman et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5695557 | Yamagata et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701027 | Gordon et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707745 | Forrest et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714395 | Bruel | Feb 1998 | A |
5721160 | Forrest et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737748 | Shigeeda | Apr 1998 | A |
5739552 | Kimura et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744979 | Goetting | Apr 1998 | A |
5748161 | Lebby et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757026 | Forrest et al. | May 1998 | A |
5770483 | Kadosh | Jun 1998 | A |
5770881 | Pelella et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781031 | Bertin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5817574 | Gardner | Oct 1998 | A |
5829026 | Leung et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835396 | Zhang | Nov 1998 | A |
5854123 | Sato et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861929 | Spitzer | Jan 1999 | A |
5877034 | Ramm | Mar 1999 | A |
5877070 | Goesele et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5882987 | Srikrishnan | Mar 1999 | A |
5883525 | Tavana et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889903 | Rao | Mar 1999 | A |
5893721 | Huang et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5915167 | Leedy | Jun 1999 | A |
5920500 | Tehrani | Jul 1999 | A |
5920788 | Reinberg | Jul 1999 | A |
5937312 | Iyer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943574 | Tehrani et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952680 | Strite | Sep 1999 | A |
5952681 | Chen | Sep 1999 | A |
5965875 | Merrill | Oct 1999 | A |
5977579 | Noble | Nov 1999 | A |
5977961 | Rindal | Nov 1999 | A |
5980633 | Yamagata et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5981335 | Chi | Nov 1999 | A |
5985742 | Henley et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5994746 | Reisinger | Nov 1999 | A |
5998808 | Matsushita | Dec 1999 | A |
6001693 | Yeouchung et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009496 | Tsai | Dec 1999 | A |
6020252 | Aspar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6020263 | Shih et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6027958 | Vu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030700 | Forrest et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034882 | Johnson | Mar 2000 | A |
6052498 | Paniccia | Apr 2000 | A |
6054370 | Doyle | Apr 2000 | A |
6057212 | Chan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071795 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075268 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6103597 | Aspar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111260 | Dawson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6125217 | Paniccia et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6153495 | Kub et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6169689 | Naji | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191007 | Matsui et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200878 | Yamagata | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222203 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226197 | Nishimura | May 2001 | B1 |
6229161 | Nemati et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242324 | Kub et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242778 | Marmillion et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252465 | Katoh | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259623 | Takahashi | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261935 | See et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264805 | Forrest et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281102 | Cao et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6294018 | Hamm et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306705 | Parekh et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321134 | Henley et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322903 | Siniaguine et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331468 | Aronowitz et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331790 | Or-Bach et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331943 | Naji et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353492 | McClelland et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6355501 | Fung et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355976 | Faris | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358631 | Forrest et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365270 | Forrest et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6376337 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377504 | Hilbert | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6380046 | Yamazaki | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392253 | Saxena | May 2002 | B1 |
6404043 | Isaak | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417108 | Akino et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6420215 | Knall et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423614 | Doyle | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429481 | Mo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6429484 | Yu | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430734 | Zahar | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448615 | Forbes | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475869 | Yu | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6476493 | Or-Bach et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6479821 | Hawryluk et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483707 | Freuler et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483734 | Sharma | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483736 | Johnson | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507115 | Hofstee | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515334 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6515511 | Sugibayashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526559 | Schiefele et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6528391 | Henley et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534352 | Kim | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6534382 | Sakaguchi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544837 | Divakauni et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545314 | Forbes et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555901 | Yoshihara et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563139 | Hen | May 2003 | B2 |
6580124 | Cleeves | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580289 | Cox | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6600173 | Tiwari | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6617694 | Kodaira et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620659 | Emmma et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6624046 | Zavracky et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627518 | Inoue et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627985 | Huppenthal et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630713 | Geusic | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635552 | Gonzalez | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6635588 | Hawryluk et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638834 | Gonzalez | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642744 | Or-Bach et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653209 | Yamagata | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653712 | Knall et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661085 | Kellar et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677204 | Cleeves et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686253 | Or-Bach | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689660 | Noble | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6701071 | Wada et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6703328 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6756633 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6756811 | Or-Bach | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759282 | Campbell et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6762076 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774010 | Chu et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805979 | Ogura et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6806171 | Ulyashin et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809009 | Aspar et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6815781 | Vyvoda et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6819136 | Or-Bach | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821826 | Chan et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6841813 | Walker | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6844243 | Gonzalez | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6864534 | Ipposhi et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875671 | Faris | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882572 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888375 | Feng et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6917219 | New | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6927431 | Gonzalez | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6930511 | Or-Bach | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943067 | Greenlaw | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6943407 | Ouyang et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949421 | Padmanabhan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6953956 | Or-Bach et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967149 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6985012 | Or-Bach | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989687 | Or-Bach | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6995430 | Langdo et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6995456 | Nowak | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015719 | Feng et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7016569 | Mule et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018875 | Madurawe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019557 | Madurawe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7043106 | West et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7052941 | Lee | May 2006 | B2 |
7064579 | Madurawe | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067396 | Aspar et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067909 | Reif et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068070 | Or-Bach | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068072 | New et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7078739 | Nemati et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7094667 | Bower | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7098691 | Or-Bach et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7105390 | Brask et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7105871 | Or-Bach et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7109092 | Tong | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7110629 | Bjorkman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7111149 | Eilert | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112815 | Prall | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115945 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7115966 | Ido et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7141853 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7148119 | Sakaguchi et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7157787 | Kim et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7157937 | Apostol et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166520 | Henley | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7170807 | Fazan et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173369 | Forrest et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180091 | Yamazaki et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180379 | Hopper et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7183611 | Bhattacharyya | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7189489 | Kunimoto et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7205204 | Ogawa et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7209384 | Kim | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7217636 | Atanackovic | May 2007 | B1 |
7223612 | Sarma | May 2007 | B2 |
7242012 | Leedy | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7245002 | Akino et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256104 | Ito et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259091 | Schuehrer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7265421 | Madurawe | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271420 | Cao | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7274207 | Sugawara et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7282951 | Huppenthal et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284226 | Kondapalli | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7296201 | Abramovici | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304355 | Zhang | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312109 | Madurawe | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312487 | Alam et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7314788 | Shaw | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7335573 | Takayama et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337425 | Kirk | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7338884 | Shimoto et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7342415 | Teig et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351644 | Henley | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7358601 | Plants et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7362133 | Madurawe | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369435 | Forbes | May 2008 | B2 |
7371660 | Henley et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7378702 | Lee | May 2008 | B2 |
7381989 | Kim | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7385283 | Wu | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393722 | Issaq et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7402483 | Yu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402897 | Leedy | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7419844 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7432185 | Kim | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7436027 | Ogawa et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7439773 | Or-Bach et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7446563 | Madurawe | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7459752 | Doris et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7459763 | Issaq et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7459772 | Speers | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463062 | Or-Bach et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7463502 | Stipe | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470142 | Lee | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7470598 | Lee | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7476939 | Okhonin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477540 | Okhonin et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485968 | Enquist et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7486563 | Waller et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7488980 | Takafuji et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7492632 | Carman | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495473 | McCollum et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7498675 | Farnworth et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7499352 | Singh | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7499358 | Bauser | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7508034 | Takafuji et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514748 | Fazan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7521806 | Trezza | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7525186 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7535089 | Fitzgerald | May 2009 | B2 |
7541616 | Fazan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7547589 | Iriguchi | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553611 | Chen | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7553745 | Lim | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7557367 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7558141 | Katsumata et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563659 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7566855 | Olsen et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7566974 | Konevecki | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7586778 | Ho et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7589375 | Jang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7608848 | Ho et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612411 | Walker | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622367 | Nuzzo et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7632738 | Lee | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7633162 | Lee | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7666723 | Frank et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671371 | Lee | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7671460 | Lauxtermann et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7674687 | Henley | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687372 | Jain | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687872 | Cazaux | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688619 | Lung et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7692202 | Bensch | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7692448 | Solomon | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7692944 | Bernstein et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7697316 | Lai et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7709932 | Nemoto et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7718508 | Lee | May 2010 | B2 |
7719876 | Chevallier | May 2010 | B2 |
7723207 | Alam et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728326 | Yamazaki et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7732301 | Pinnington et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7741673 | Tak et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742331 | Watanabe | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7745250 | Han | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749884 | Mathew et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750669 | Spangaro | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755622 | Yvon | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7759043 | Tanabe et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7768115 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772039 | Kerber | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772096 | DeSouza et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774735 | Sood | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7776715 | Wells et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777330 | Pelley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786460 | Lung et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786535 | Abou-Khalil et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7790524 | Abadeer et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7795619 | Hara | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7799675 | Lee | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800099 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800148 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800163 | Izumi et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7800199 | Oh et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7812390 | Park | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7816721 | Yamazaki | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7843718 | Koh et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846814 | Lee | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863095 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7864568 | Fujisaki et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7867822 | Lee | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7888764 | Lee | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7910432 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7915164 | Konevecki et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919845 | Karp | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7965102 | Bauer et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7968965 | Kim | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7969193 | Wu et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7973314 | Yang | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982250 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8008732 | Kiyotoshi | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8013399 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8014166 | Yazdani | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8014195 | Okhonin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8022493 | Bang | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8026504 | Park | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8030780 | Kirby et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8031544 | Kim et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8032857 | McIlrath | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044448 | Kamigaichi et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8044464 | Yamazaki et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8068364 | Maejima | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8106520 | Keeth et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8107276 | Breitwisch et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8129256 | Farooq et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8129258 | Hosier et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8130547 | Widjaja et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8136071 | Solomon | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8138502 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8153520 | Chandrashekar | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8158515 | Farooq et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8179711 | Kim | May 2012 | B2 |
8183630 | Batude et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8184463 | Saen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185685 | Selinger | May 2012 | B2 |
8203187 | Lung et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208279 | Lue | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8209649 | McIlrath | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8228684 | Losavio et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8266560 | McIlrath | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8264065 | Su et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8273610 | Or-Bach | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8288816 | Komori et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8324680 | Izumi et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8338882 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343851 | Kim et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8354308 | Kang et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8355273 | Liu | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8362482 | Or-Bach | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8374033 | Kito et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8432719 | Lue | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432751 | Hafez | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8470689 | Desplobain et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8497512 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8501564 | Suzawa | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8508994 | Okhonin | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513725 | Sakuma et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8514623 | Widjaja et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8525342 | Chandrasekaran | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8546956 | Nguyen | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8566762 | Morimoto et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8603888 | Liu | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8619490 | Yu | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8624300 | Tang | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634242 | Grossi | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8643162 | Madurawe | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8650516 | McIlrath | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8679861 | Bose | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8754533 | Or-Bach | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8773562 | Fan | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8775998 | Morimoto | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8841777 | Farooq | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8853785 | Augendre | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8896054 | Sakuma et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8928119 | Leedy | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8971114 | Kang | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9013917 | Kang | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9136153 | Or-Bach | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9172008 | Hwang | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9227456 | Chien | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9230973 | Pachamuthu et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9334582 | See | May 2016 | B2 |
9564450 | Sakuma et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9570683 | Jo | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9589982 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9595530 | Zhou | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9613844 | Or-Bach | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9673257 | Takaki | Jun 2017 | B1 |
9711407 | Or-Bach | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9941332 | Or-Bach | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9997530 | Yon et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10354995 | Or-Bach | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20010000005 | Forrest et al. | Mar 2001 | A1 |
20010014391 | Forrest et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010028059 | Emma et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020024140 | Nakajima et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020025604 | Tiwari | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020074668 | Hofstee et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081823 | Cheung et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090758 | Henley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020096681 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020113289 | Cordes et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020132465 | Leedy | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140091 | Callahan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020141233 | Hosotani et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153243 | Forrest et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020153569 | Katayama | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020175401 | Huang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020180069 | Houston | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020190232 | Chason | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199110 | Kean | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030015713 | Yoo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032262 | Dennison et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059999 | Gonzalez | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060034 | Beyne et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061555 | Kamei | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067043 | Zhang | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076706 | Andoh | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030102079 | Kalvesten et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030107117 | Antonelli et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113963 | Wurzer | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119212 | Nishihara | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030119279 | Enquist | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139011 | Cleeves et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153163 | Letertre | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157748 | Kim et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160888 | Yoshikawa | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030173631 | Murakami | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206036 | Or-Bach | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213967 | Forrest et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223292 | Nejad | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030224582 | Shimoda et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030224596 | Marxsen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040007376 | Urdahl et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014299 | Moriceau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033676 | Coronel et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040036126 | Chau et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040047539 | Okubora et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040061176 | Takafuji et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040113207 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143797 | Nguyen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150068 | Leedy | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040150070 | Okada | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040152272 | Fladre et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040155301 | Zhang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156172 | Lin et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040156233 | Bhattacharyya | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040164425 | Urakawa | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166649 | Bressot et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040174732 | Morimoto | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175902 | Rayssac et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178819 | New | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195572 | Kato et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219765 | Reif et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040229444 | Couillard | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040259312 | Schlosser et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262635 | Lee | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262772 | Ramanathan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003592 | Jones | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010725 | Eilert | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023656 | Leedy | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045919 | Kaeriyama et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067620 | Chan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067625 | Hata | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073060 | Datta et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050082526 | Bedell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098822 | Mathew | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110041 | Boutros et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050121676 | Fried et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121789 | Madurawe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122771 | Chen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130351 | Leedy | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130429 | Rayssac et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148137 | Brask et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050176174 | Leedy | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050218521 | Lee | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225237 | Winters | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050266659 | Ghyselen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273749 | Kirk | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280061 | Lee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280090 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280154 | Lee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280155 | Lee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280156 | Lee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282019 | Fukushima et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060014331 | Tang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060024923 | Sarma et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033110 | Alam et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033124 | Or-Bach et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043367 | Chang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060049449 | Iino | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065953 | Kim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067122 | Verhoeven | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071074 | Konevecki | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060071322 | Kitamura | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060071332 | Speers | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083280 | Tauzin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060108613 | Song | May 2006 | A1 |
20060108627 | Choi | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113522 | Lee et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060118935 | Kamiyama et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060121690 | Pogge et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125017 | Liu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150137 | Madurawe | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158511 | Harrold | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060170046 | Hara | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060171224 | Nejad | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179417 | Madurawe | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181202 | Liao et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189095 | Ghyselen et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194401 | Hu et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195729 | Huppenthal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060207087 | Jafri et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224814 | Kim et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060237777 | Choi | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060249859 | Eiles et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275962 | Lee | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070004150 | Huang | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014508 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070023833 | Okhonin | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035329 | Madurawe | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063259 | Derderian et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072391 | Pocas et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076509 | Zhang | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077694 | Lee | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070077743 | Rao et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070090416 | Doyle et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070102737 | Kashiwabara et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070103191 | Sugawara et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070108523 | Ogawa et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109831 | RaghuRam | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111386 | Kim et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111406 | Joshi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070132049 | Stipe | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132369 | Forrest et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135013 | Faris | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141781 | Park | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158659 | Bensce | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070158831 | Cha et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070187775 | Okhonin et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070190746 | Ito et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194453 | Chakraborty et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206408 | Schwerin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070210336 | Madurawe | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211535 | Kim | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070215903 | Sakamoto et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070218622 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070228383 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070252201 | Kito et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070252203 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070262457 | Lin | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275520 | Suzuki | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281439 | Bedell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070283298 | Bernstein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070287224 | Alam et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296073 | Wu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297232 | Iwata | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001204 | Lee | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080003818 | Seidel et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030228 | Amarilio | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080032463 | Lee | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038902 | Lee | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048239 | Huo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080048327 | Lee | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054359 | Yang et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080067573 | Jang | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070340 | Borrelli et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080072182 | He et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080099780 | Tran | May 2008 | A1 |
20080099819 | Kito et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080108171 | Rogers et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080124845 | Yu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128745 | Mastro et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080128780 | Nishihara | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080135949 | Lo et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136455 | Diamant et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142937 | Chen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142959 | DeMulder et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143379 | Norman | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150579 | Madurawe | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160431 | Scott et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080160726 | Lim et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165521 | Bernstein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175032 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179678 | Dyer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180132 | Ishikawa | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080185648 | Jeong | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080191247 | Yin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080191312 | Oh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194068 | Temmler et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203452 | Moon et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080213982 | Park et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220558 | Zehavi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220565 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224260 | Schmit et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237591 | Leedy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080239818 | Mokhlesi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080242028 | Mokhlesi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248618 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251862 | Fonash et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254561 | Yoo | Oct 2008 | A2 |
20080254572 | Leedy | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254623 | Chan | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261378 | Yao et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266960 | Kuo | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080272492 | Tsang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080277778 | Furman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283873 | Yang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283875 | Mukasa et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080284611 | Leedy | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080296681 | Georgakos et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315253 | Yuan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080315351 | Kakehata | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001469 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090001504 | Takei et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016716 | Ishida | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026541 | Chung | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026618 | Kim | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090032899 | Irie | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090032951 | Andry et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090039918 | Madurawe | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046501 | Ranjan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090052827 | Durfee et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055789 | McIlrath | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090057879 | Garrou et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061572 | Hareland et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064058 | McIlrath | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090065827 | Hwang | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066365 | Solomon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090066366 | Solomon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070721 | Solomon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070727 | Solomon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078970 | Yamazaki | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090079000 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090081848 | Erokhin | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090087759 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096009 | Dong et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090096024 | Shingu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090108318 | Yoon et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090115042 | Koyanagi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090128189 | Madurawe et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090134397 | Yokoi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144669 | Bose et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144678 | Bose et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090146172 | Pumyea | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090159870 | Lin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160482 | Karp et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090161401 | Bigler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090162993 | Yui et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090166627 | Han | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174018 | Dungan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179268 | Abou-Khalil et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090185407 | Park | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194152 | Liu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090194768 | Leedy | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090194829 | Chung | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090194836 | Kim | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204933 | Rezgui | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212317 | Kolodin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218627 | Zhu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090221110 | Lee et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090224330 | Hong | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090224364 | Oh et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230462 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234331 | Langereis et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236749 | Otemba et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090242893 | Tomiyasu | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090242935 | Fitzgerald | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090250686 | Sato et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262572 | Krusin-Elbaum | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262583 | Lue | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090263942 | Ohnuma et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090267233 | Lee | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268983 | Stone et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090272989 | Shum et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290434 | Kurjanowicz | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090294822 | Batude et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090294836 | Kiyotoshi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090294861 | Thomas et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302294 | Kim | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302387 | Joshi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090302394 | Fujita | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090309152 | Knoefler et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315095 | Kim | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090317950 | Okihara | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321830 | Maly | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321853 | Cheng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321948 | Wang et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090325343 | Lee | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001282 | Mieno | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013049 | Tanaka | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100025766 | Nuttinck et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100025825 | DeGraw et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100031217 | Sinha et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100032635 | Schwerin | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038699 | Katsumata et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038743 | Lee | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100045849 | Yamasaki | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052134 | Werner et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100058580 | Yazdani | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100059796 | Scheuerlein | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100078770 | Purushothaman et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100081232 | Furman et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089627 | Huang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100090188 | Fatatsuyama | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112753 | Lee | May 2010 | A1 |
20100112810 | Lee et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100117048 | Lung et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121994 | Kim | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123202 | Hofmann | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123480 | Kitada et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100133695 | Lee | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100133704 | Marimuthu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137143 | Rothberg et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100139836 | Horikoshi | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100140790 | Setiadi et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100155932 | Gambino | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100157117 | Wang | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159650 | Song | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100181600 | Law | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100190334 | Lee | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193884 | Park et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100193964 | Farooq et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100219392 | Awaya | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100221867 | Bedell et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224876 | Zhu | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224915 | Kawashima et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100225002 | Law et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100232200 | Shepard | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252934 | Law | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100264551 | Farooq | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276662 | Colinge | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289144 | Farooq | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100297844 | Yelehanka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100307572 | Bedell et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308211 | Cho et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308863 | Gliese et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320514 | Tredwell | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100320526 | Kidoh et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330728 | McCarten | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330752 | Jeong | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001172 | Lee | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110003438 | Lee | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024724 | Frolov et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110026263 | Xu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110027967 | Beyne | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110037052 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110042696 | Smith et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110049336 | Matsunuma | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110050125 | Medendorp et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110053332 | Lee | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110101537 | Barth et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110102014 | Madurawe | May 2011 | A1 |
20110111560 | Purushothaman | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115023 | Cheng | May 2011 | A1 |
20110128777 | Yamazaki | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110134683 | Yamazaki | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143506 | Lee | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147791 | Norman et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110147849 | Augendre et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159635 | Doan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170331 | Oh | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110204917 | O'Neill | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221022 | Toda | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222356 | Banna | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110227158 | Zhu | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110241082 | Bernstein et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110280076 | Samachisa | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284946 | Kiyotoshi | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110284992 | Zhu | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110286283 | Lung et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110304765 | Yogo et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309432 | Ishihara et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314437 | McIlrath | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120001184 | Ha et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120003815 | Lee | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013013 | Sadaka et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120025388 | Law et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120032250 | Son et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120034759 | Sakaguchi et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120063090 | Hsiao et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074466 | Setiadi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086100 | Andry | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120126197 | Chung | May 2012 | A1 |
20120161310 | Brindle et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169319 | Dennard | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120178211 | Hebert | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120181654 | Lue | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120182801 | Lue | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120187444 | Oh | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120193785 | Lin | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120241919 | Mitani | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120286822 | Madurawe | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120304142 | Morimoto | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120317528 | McIlrath | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120319728 | Madurawe | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130026663 | Radu et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130037802 | England | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130049796 | Pang | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070506 | Kajigaya | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130082235 | Gu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097574 | Balabanov et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130100743 | Lue | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130128666 | Avila | May 2013 | A1 |
20130187720 | Ishii | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130193550 | Sklenard et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130196500 | Batude et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130203248 | Ernst et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130263393 | Mazumder | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130337601 | Kapur | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140015136 | Gan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140048867 | Toh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140099761 | Kim et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140103959 | Andreev | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140117413 | Madurawe | May 2014 | A1 |
20140120695 | Ohtsuki | May 2014 | A1 |
20140131885 | Samadi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137061 | McIlrath | May 2014 | A1 |
20140145347 | Samadi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140146630 | Xie et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149958 | Samadi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140151774 | Rhie | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140191357 | Lee | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140225218 | Du | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225235 | Du | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140252306 | Du | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140252451 | Han | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140253196 | Du et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264228 | Toh | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140357054 | Son et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150243887 | Saitoh | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150255418 | Gowda | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150340369 | Lue | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160049201 | Lue | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160104780 | Mauder | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160133603 | Ahn | May 2016 | A1 |
20160141299 | Hong | May 2016 | A1 |
20160141334 | Takaki | May 2016 | A1 |
20160307952 | Huang | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160343687 | Vadhavkar | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170069601 | Park | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170092371 | Harari | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170098596 | Lin | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170133395 | Or-Bach | May 2017 | A1 |
20170133432 | Or-Bach | May 2017 | A1 |
20170148517 | Harari | May 2017 | A1 |
20170179146 | Park | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170186770 | Or-Bach | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170221900 | Widjaja | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180090368 | Eun-Jeong et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180108416 | Harari | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180190619 | Sekar | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204835 | Or-Bach | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180261600 | Or-Bach | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180294284 | Tarakji | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1267594 | Dec 2002 | EP |
PCTUS2008063483 | May 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Topol, A.W., et al., “Enabling SOI-Based Assembly Technology for Three-Dimensional (3D) Integrated Circuits (ICs),” IEDM Tech. Digest, Dec. 5, 2005, pp. 363-366. |
Demeester, P. et al., “Epitaxial lift-off and its applications,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., 1993, pp. 1124-1135, vol. 8. |
Yoon, J., et al., “GaAs Photovoltaics and optoelectronics using releasable multilayer epitaxial assemblies”, Nature, vol. 465, May 20, 2010, pp. 329-334. |
Bakir and Meindl, “Integrated Interconnect Technologies for 3D Nanoelectronic Systems”, Artech House, 2009, Chapter 13, pp. 389-419. |
Tanaka, H., et al., “Bit Cost Scalable Technology with Punch and Plug Process for Ultra High Density Flash Memory,” VLSI Technology, 2007 IEEE Symposium on , vol., No., pp. 14-15, Jun. 12-14, 2007. |
Lue, H.-T., et al., “A Highly Scalable 8-Layer 3D Vertical-Gate (VG) TFT NAND Flash Using Junction-Free Buried Channel BE-SONOS Device,” Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2010, pp. 131-132. |
Kim, W., et al., “Multi-layered Vertical Gate NAND Flash overcoming stacking limit for terabit density storage”, Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 2009, pp. 188-189. |
Dicioccio, L., et. al., “Direct bonding for wafer level 3D integration”, ICICDT 2010, pp. 110-113. |
Kim, W., et al., “Multi-Layered Vertical Gate NAND Flash Overcoming Stacking Limit for Terabit Density Storage,” Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2009, pp. 188-189. |
Walker, A. J., “Sub-50nm Dual-Gate Thin-Film Transistors for Monolithic 3-D Flash”, IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., vol. 56, No. 11, pp. 2703-2710, Nov. 2009. |
Hubert, A., et al., “A Stacked SONOS Technology, Up to 4 Levels and 6nm Crystalline Nanowires, with Gate-All-Around or Independent Gates (ΦFlash), Suitable for Full 3D Integration”, International Electron Devices Meeting, 2009, pp. 637-640. |
Celler, G.K. et al., “Frontiers of silicon-on-insulator,” J. App. Phys., May 1, 2003, pp. 4955-4978, vol. 93, No. 9. |
Rajendran, B., et al., “Electrical Integrity of MOS Devices in Laser Annealed 3D IC Structures”, proceedings VLSI Multi Level Interconnect Conference 2004, pp. 73-74. |
Rajendran, B., “Sequential 3D IC Fabrication: Challenges and Prospects”, Proceedings of VLSI Multi Level Interconnect Conference 2006, pp. 57-64. |
Jung, S.-M., et al., “The revolutionary and truly 3-dimensional 25F2 SRAM technology with the smallest S3 (stacked single-crystal Si) cell, 0.16um2, and SSTFT (stacked single-crystal thin film transistor) for ultra high density SRAM,” VLSI Technology, 2004. Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 228-229, Jun. 15-17, 2004. |
Hui, K. N., et al., “Design of vertically-stacked polychromatic light-emitting diodes,” Optics Express, Jun. 8, 2009, pp. 9873-9878, vol. 17, No. 12. |
Chuai, D. X., et al., “A Trichromatic Phosphor-Free White Light-Emitting Diode by Using Adhesive Bonding Scheme,” Proc. SPIE, 2009, vol. 7635. |
Suntharalingam, V. et al., “Megapixel CMOS Image Sensor Fabricated in Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuit Technology,” Solid-State Circuits Conference, Digest of Technical Papers, ISSCC, Aug. 29, 2005, pp. 356-357, vol. 1. |
Coudrain, P. et al., “Setting up 3D Sequential Integration for Back-Illuminated CMOS Image Sensors with Highly Miniaturized Pixels with Low Temperature Fully-Depleted SOI Transistors,” IEDM, 2008, pp. 1-4. |
Flamand, G. et al., “Towards Highly Efficient 4-Terminal Mechanical Photovoltaic Stacks,” III-Vs Review, Sep.-Oct. 2006, pp. 24-27, vol. 19, Issue 7. |
Zahler, J.M. et al., “Wafer Bonding and Layer Transfer Processes for High Efficiency Solar Cells,” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE, May 19-24, 2002, pp. 1039-1042. |
Sekar, D. C., et al., “A 3D-IC Technology with Integrated Microchannel Cooling”, Proc. Intl. Interconnect Technology Conference, 2008, pp. 13-15. |
Brunschweiler, T., et al., “Forced Convective Interlayer Cooling in Vertically Integrated Packages,” Proc. Intersoc. Conference on Thermal Management (ITHERM), 2008, pp. 1114-1125. |
Yu, H., et al., “Allocating Power Ground Vias in 3D ICs for Simultaneous Power and Thermal Integrity” ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems (TODAES), vol. 14, No. 3, Article 41, May 2009, pp. 41.1-41.31. |
Motoyoshi, M., “3D-IC Integration,” 3rd Stanford and Tohoku University Joint Open Workshop, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-52. |
Wong, S., et al., “Monolithic 3D Integrated Circuits,” VLSI Technology, Systems and Applications, 2007, International Symposium on VLSI-TSA 2007, pp. 1-4. |
Batude, P., et al., “Advances in 3D CMOS Sequential Integration,” 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (Baltimore, Maryland), Dec. 7-9, 2009, pp. 345-348. |
Tan, C.S., et al., “Wafer Level 3-D ICs Process Technology,” ISBN-10: 0387765328, Springer, 1st Ed., Sep. 19, 2008, pp. v-xii, 34, 58, and 59. |
Yoon, S.W. et al., “Fabrication and Packaging of Microbump Interconnections for 3D TSV,” IEEE International Conference on 3D System Integration (3DIC), Sep. 28-30, 2009, pp. 1-5. |
Franzon, P.D. et al., “Design and CAD for 3D Integrated Circuits,” 45th ACM/IEEE Design, Automation Conference (DAC), Jun. 8-13, 2008, pp. 668-673. |
Lajevardi, P., “Design of a 3-Dimension FPGA,” Thesis paper, University of British Columbia, Submitted to Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jul. 2005, pp. 1-71. |
Dong, C. et al., “Reconfigurable Circuit Design with Nanomaterials,” Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition, Apr. 20-24, 2009, pp. 442-447. |
Razavi, S.A., et al., “A Tileable Switch Module Architecture for Homogeneous 3D FPGAs,” IEEE International Conference on 3D System Integration (3DIC), Sep. 28-30, 2009, 4 pages. |
Bakir M., et al., “3D Device-Stacking Technology for Memory,” Chptr. 13.4, pp. 407-410, in “Integrated Interconnect Technologies for 3D Nano Electronic Systems”, 2009, Artech House. |
Weis, M. et al., “Stacked 3-Dimensional 6T SRAM Cell with Independent Double Gate Transistors,” IC Design and Technology, May 18-20, 2009. |
Doucette, P., “Integrating Photonics: Hitachi, Oki Put LEDs on Silicon,” Solid State Technology, Jan. 2007, p. 22, vol. 50, No. 1. |
Luo, Z.S. et al., “Enhancement of (In, Ga)N Light-emitting Diode Performance by Laser Liftoff and Transfer from Sapphire to Silicon,” Photonics Technology Letters, Oct. 2002, pp. 1400-1402, vol. 14, No. 10. |
Zahler, J.M. et al., “Wafer Bonding and Layer Transfer Processes for High Efficiency Solar Cells,” NCPV and Solar Program Review Meeting, 2003, pp. 723-726. |
Kada, M., “Updated results of R&D on functionally innovative 3D-integrated circuit (dream chip) technology in FY2009”, (2010) International Microsystems Packaging Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference, IMPACT 2010 and International 3D IC Conference, Proceedings. |
Kada, M., “Development of functionally innovative 3D-integrated circuit (dream chip) technology / high-density 3D-integration technology for multifunctional devices”, (2009) IEEE International Conference on 3D System Integration, 3DIC 2009. |
Marchal, P., et al., “3-D technology assessment: Path-finding the technology/design sweet-spot”, (2009) Proceedings of the IEEE, 97 (1), pp. 96-107. |
Xie, Y., et al., “Design space exploration for 3D architectures”, (2006) ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems, 2 (2), Apr. 2006, pp. 65-103. |
Souri, S., et al., “Multiple Si layers ICs: motivation, performance analysis, and design Implications”, (2000) Proceedings—Design Automation Conference, pp. 213-220. |
Vinet, M., et.al., “3D monolithic integration: Technological challenges and electrical results”, Microelectronic Engineering Apr. 2011 vol. 88, Issue 4, pp. 331-335. |
Bobba, S. et al., “CELONCEL: Effective Design Technique for 3-D Monolithic Integration targeting High Performance Integrated Circuits”, Asia pacific DAC 2011, paper 4A-4. |
Choudhury, D., “3D Integration Technologies for Emerging Microsystems”, IEEE Proceedings of the IMS 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Lee, Y.-J., et. al, “3D 65nm CMOS with 320° C. Microwave Dopant Activation”, IEDM 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Crnogorac, F., et al., “Semiconductor crystal islands for three-dimensional integration”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 28(6), Nov./Dec. 2010, pp. C6P53-C6P58. |
Park, J.-H., et al., “N-Channel Germanium MOSFET Fabricated Below 360° C. by Cobalt-Induced Dopant Activation for Monolithic Three-Dimensional-ICs”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 32, No. 3, Mar. 2011, pp. 234-236. |
Jung, S.-M., et al., “Highly Area Efficient and Cost Effective Double Stacked S3( Stacked Single-crystal Si ) Peripheral CMOS SSTFT and SRAM Cell Technology for 512M bit density SRAM”, IEDM 2003, pp. 265-268. |
Joyner, J.W., “Opportunities and Limitations of Three-dimensional Integration for Interconnect Design”, PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Jul. 2003. |
Choi, S.-J., “A Novel TFT with a Laterally Engineered Bandgap for of 3D Logic and Flash Memory”, 2010 Symposium of VLSI Technology Digest, pp. 111-112. |
Radu, I., et al., “Recent Developments of Cu-Cu non-thermo compression bonding for wafer-to-wafer 3D stacking”, IEEE 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC), Nov. 16-18, 2010. |
Gaudin, G., et al., “Low temperature direct wafer to wafer bonding for 3D integration”, 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC), IEEE, 2010, Munich, Nov. 16-18, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Jung, S.-M., et al., ““Three Dimensionally Stacked NAND Flash Memory Technology Using Stacking Single Crystal Si Layers on ILD and TANOS Structure for Beyond 30nm Node””, IEDM 2006, Dec. 11-13, 2006. |
Souri, S. J., “Interconnect Performance in 3-Dimensional Integrated Circuits”, PhD Thesis, Stanford, Jul. 2003. |
Uemoto, Y., et al., “A High-Performance Stacked-CMOS SRAM Cell by Solid Phase Growth Technique”, Symposium on VLSI Technology, 2010, pp. 21-22. |
Jung, S.-M., et al., “Highly Cost Effective and High Performance 65nm S3( Stacked Single-crystal Si ) SRAM Technology with 25F2, 0.16um2 cell and doubly Stacked SSTFT Cell Transistors for Ultra High Density and High Speed Applications”, 2005 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical papers, pp. 220-221. |
Steen, S.E., et al., “Overlay as the key to drive wafer scale 3D integration”, Microelectronic Engineering 84 (2007) 1412-1415. |
Maeda, N., et al., “Development of Sub 10-μm Ultra-Thinning Technology using Device Wafers for 3D Manufacturing of Terabit Memory”, 2010 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 105-106. |
Chan, M., et al., “3-Dimensional Integration for Interconnect Reduction in for Nano-CMOS Technologies”, IEEE Tencon, Nov. 23, 2006, Hong Kong. |
Dong, X., et al., “Chapter 10: System-Level 3D IC Cost Analysis and Design Exploration”, in Xie, Y., et al., “Three-Dimensional Integrated Circuit Design”, book in series “Integrated Circuits and Systems” ed. A. Andrakasan, Springer 2010. |
Naito, T., et al., “World's first monolithic 3D-FPGA with TFT SRAM over 90nm 9 layer Cu CMOS”, 2010 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 219-220. |
Bernard, E., et al., “Novel integration process and performances analysis of Low STandby Power (LSTP) 3D Multi-Channel CMOSFET (MCFET) on SOI with Metal / High-K Gate stack”, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 16-17. |
Cong, J., et al., “Quantitative Studies of Impact of 3D IC Design on Repeater Usage”, Proceedings of International VLSI/ULSI Multilevel Interconnection Conference, pp. 344-348, 2008. |
Gutmann, R.J., et al., “Wafer-Level Three-Dimensional Monolithic Integration for Intelligent Wireless Terminals”, Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, vol. 4, No. 3, Sep. 2004, pp. 196-203. |
Crnogorac, F., et al., “Nano-graphoepitaxy of semiconductors for 3D integration”, Microelectronic Engineering 84 (2007) 891-894. |
Koyanagi, M, “Different Approaches to 3D Chips”, 3D IC Review, Stanford University, May 2005. |
Koyanagi, M, “Three-Dimensional Integration Technology and Integrated Systems”, ASPDAC 2009 presentation. |
Koyanagi, M., et al., “Three-Dimensional Integration Technology and Integrated Systems”, ASPDAC 2009, paper 4D-1, pp. 409-415. |
Hayashi, Y., et al., “A New Three Dimensional IC Fabrication Technology Stacking Thin Film Dual-CMOS Layers”, IEDM 1991, paper 25.6.1, pp. 657-660. |
Clavelier, L., et al., “Engineered Substrates for Future More Moore and More Than Moore Integrated Devices”, IEDM 2010, paper 2.6.1, pp. 42-45. |
Kim, K., “From the Future Si Technology Perspective: Challenges and Opportunities”, IEDM 2010, pp. 1.1.1-1.1.9. |
Ababei, C., et al., “Exploring Potential Benefits of 3D FPGA Integration”, in book by Becker, J.et al. Eds., “Field Programmable Logic 2004”, LNCS 3203, pp. 874-880, 2004, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. |
Ramaswami, S., “3D TSV IC Processing”, 3DIC Technology Forum Semicon Taiwan 2010, Sep. 9, 2010. |
Davis, W.R., et al., “Demystifying 3D Ics: Pros and Cons of Going Vertical”, IEEE Design and Test of Computers, Nov.-Dec. 2005, pp. 498-510. |
Lin, M., et al., “Performance Benefits of Monolithically Stacked 3DFPGA”, FPGA06, Feb. 22-24, 2006, Monterey, California, pp. 113-122. |
Dong, C., et al., “Performance and Power Evaluation of a 3D CMOS/Nanomaterial Reconfigurable Architecture”, ICCAD 2007, pp. 758-764. |
Gojman, B., et al., “3D Nanowire-Based Programmable Logic”, International Conference on Nano-Networks (Nanonets 2006), Sep. 14-16, 2006. |
Dong, C., et al., “3-D nFPGA: A Reconfigurable Architecture for 3-D CMOS/Nanomaterial Hybrid Digital Circuits”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 54, No. 11, Nov. 2007, pp. 2489-2501. |
Golshani, N., et al., “Monolithic 3D Integration of SRAM and Image Sensor Using Two Layers of Single Grain Silicon”, 2010 IEEE International 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC), Nov. 16-18, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
Rajendran, B., et al., “Thermal Simulation of laser Annealing for 3D Integration”, Proceedings VMIC 2003. |
Woo, H.-J., et al., “Hydrogen Ion Implantation Mechanism in GaAs-on-insulator Wafer Formation by Ion-cut Process”, Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, vol. 6, No. 2, Jun. 2006, pp. 95-100. |
Sadaka, M., et al., “Building Blocks for wafer level 3D integration”,www.electroiq.com, Aug. 18, 2010, last accessed Aug. 18, 2010. |
Madan, N., et al., “Leveraging 3D Technology for Improved Reliability,” Proceedings of the 40th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO 2007), IEEE Computer Society. |
Hayashi, Y., et al., “Fabrication of Three Dimensional IC Using “Cumulatively Bonded IC” (CUBIC) Technology”, 1990 Symposium on VLSI Technology, pp. 95-96. |
Akasaka, Y., “Three Dimensional IC Trends,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 24, No. 12, Dec. 1986. |
Guarini, K. W., et al., “Electrical Integrity of State-of-the-Art 0.13um SOI Device and Circuits Transferred for Three-Dimensional (3D) Integrated Circuit (IC) Fabrication,” IEDM 2002, paper 16.6, pp. 943-945. |
Kunio, T., et al., “Three Dimensional Ics, Having Four Stacked Active Device Layers,” IEDM 1989, paper 34.6, pp. 837-840. |
Gaillardon, P-E., et al., “Can We Go Towards True 3-D Architectures?,” DAC 2011, paper 58, pp. 282-283. |
Yun, J-G., et al., “Single-Crystalline Si Stacked Array (STAR) NAND Flash Memory,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 58, No. 4, Apr. 2011, pp. 1006-1014. |
Kim, Y., et al., “Three-Dimensional NAND Flash Architecture Design Based on Single-Crystalline Stacked Array,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 59, No. 1, Jan. 2012, pp. 35-45. |
Goplen, B., et al., “Thermal via Placement in 3DICs,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Physical Design, Apr. 3-6, 2005, San Francisco. |
Bobba, S., et al., “Performance Analysis of 3-D Monolithic Integrated Circuits,” 2010 IEEE International 3D Systems Integration Conference (3DIC), Nov. 2010, Munich, pp. 1-4. |
Batude, P., et al., “Demonstration of low temperature 3D sequential FDSOI integration down to 50nm gate length,” 2011 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 158-159. |
Batude, P., et al., “Advances, Challenges and Opportunties in 3D CMOS Sequential Integration,” 2011 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, paper 7.3, Dec. 2011, pp. 151-154. |
Yun, C. H., et al., “Transfer of patterned ion-cut silicon layers”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 19, Nov. 1998, pp. 2772-2774. |
Ishihara, R., et al., “Monolithic 3D-ICs with single grain Si thin film transistors,” Solid-State Electronics 71 (2012) pp. 80-87. |
Lee, S. Y., et al., “Architecture of 3D Memory Cell Array on 3D IC,” IEEE International Memory Workshop, May 20, 2012, Monterey, CA. |
Lee, S. Y., et al., “3D IC Architecture for High Density Memories,” IEEE International Memory Workshop, p. 1-6, May 2010. |
Rajendran, B., et al., “CMOS transistor processing compatible with monolithic 3-D Integration,” Proceedings VMIC 2005. |
Huet, K., “Ultra Low Thermal Budget Laser Thermal Annealing for 3D Semiconductor and Photovoltaic Applications,” NCCAVS 2012 Junction Technology Group, Semicon West, San Francisco, Jul. 12, 2012. |
Derakhshandeh, J., et al., “A Study of the CMP Effect on the Quality of Thin Silicon Films Crystallized by Using the u-Czochralski Process,” Journal of the Korean Physical Society, vol. 54, No. 1, 2009, pp. 432-436. |
Kim, J., et al., “A Stacked Memory Device on Logic 3D Technology for Ultra-high-density Data Storage,” Nanotechnology, vol. 22, 254006 (2011). |
Lee, K. W., et al., “Three-dimensional shared memory fabricated using wafer stacking technology,” IEDM Tech. Dig., 2000, pp. 165-168. |
Chen, H. Y., et al., “HfOx Based Vertical Resistive Random Access Memory for Cost Effective 3D Cross-Point Architecture without Cell Selector,” Proceedings IEDM 2012, pp. 497-499. |
Huet, K., et al., “Ultra Low Thermal Budget Anneals for 3D Memories: Access Device Formation,” Ion Implantation Technology 2012, AIP Conf Proceedings 1496, 135-138 (2012). |
Batude, P., et al., “3D Monolithic Integration,” ISCAS 2011 pp. 2233-2236. |
Batude, P., et al., “3D Sequential Integration: A Key Enabling Technology for Heterogeneous C-Integration of New Function With CMOS,” IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems (JETCAS), vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 2012, pp. 714-722. |
Vinet, M., et.al., “Germanium on Insulator and new 3D architectures opportunities for integration”, International Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 7, No. 4, (Aug. 2010) pp. 304-319. |
Bernstein, K., et al., “Interconnects in the Third Dimension: Design Challenges for 3DICs,” Design Automation Conference, 2007, DAC'07, 44th ACM/IEEE, vol., No., pp. 562-567, Jun. 4-8, 2007. |
Kuroda, T., “ThruChip Interface for Heterogeneous Chip Stacking,” ElectroChemicalSociety Transactions, 50(14) 63-68 (2012). |
Miura, N., et al., “A Scalable 3D Heterogeneous Multi-Core Processor with Inductive-Coupling ThruChip Interface,” IEEE Micro Cool Chips XVI, Yokohama, Apr. 17-19, 2013, pp. 1-3(2013). |
Kuroda, T., “Wireless Proximity Communications for 3D System Integration,” Future Directions in IC and Package Design Workshop, Oct. 29, 2007. |
Qiang, J-Q, “3-D Hyperintegration and Packaging Technologies for Micro-Nano Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 97.1 (2009) pp. 18-30. |
Lee, B.H., et al., “A Novel Pattern Transfer Process for Bonded SOI Giga-bit DRAMs,” Proceedings 1996 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 1996, pp. 114-115. |
Wu, B., et al., “Extreme ultraviolet lithography and three dimensional circuits,” Applied Phyisics Reviews, 1, 011104 (2014). |
Delhougne, R., et al., “First Demonstration of Monocrystalline Silicon Macaroni Channel for 3-D NAND Memory Devices” IEEE VLSI Tech Digest, 2018, pp. 203-204. |
Colinge, J. P., et al., “Nanowire transistors without Junctions”, Nature Nanotechnology, Feb. 21, 2010, pp. 1-5. |
Kim, J.Y., et al., “The breakthrough in data retention time of DRAM using Recess-Channel-Array Transistor (RCAT) for 88 nm feature size and beyond,” 2003 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 11-12, Jun. 10-12, 2003. |
Kim, J.Y., et al., “The excellent scalability of the RCAT (recess-channel-array-transistor) technology for sub-70nm DRAM feature size and beyond,” 2005 IEEE VLSI-TSA International Symposium, pp. 33-34, Apr. 25-27, 2005. |
Abramovici, Breuer and Friedman, Digital Systems Testing and Testable Design, Computer Science Press, 1990, pp. 432-447. |
Yonehara, T., et al., “ELTRAN: SOI-Epi Wafer by Epitaxial Layer transfer from porous Silicon”, the 198th Electrochemical Society Meeting, abstract No. 438 (2000). |
Yonehara, T. et al., “Eltran®, Novel SOI Wafer Technology,” JSAP International, Jul. 2001, pp. 10-16, No. 4. |
Suk, S. D., et al., “High performance 5 nm radius twin silicon nanowire MOSFET(TSNWFET): Fabrication on bulk Si wafer, characteristics, and reliability,” in Proc. IEDM Tech. Dig., 2005, pp. 717-720. |
Bangsaruntip, S., et al., “High performance and highly uniform gate-all-around silicon nanowire MOSFETs with wire size dependent scaling,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2009 IEEE International, pp. 297-300, Dec. 7-9, 2009. |
Burr, G. W., et al., “Overview of candidate device technologies for storage-class memory,” IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 52, No. 4.5, pp. 449-464, Jul. 2008. |
Bez, R., et al., “Introduction to Flash memory,” Proceedings IEEE, 91(4), 489-502 (2003). |
Auth, C., et al., “45nm High-k + Metal Gate Strain-Enchanced Transistors,” Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 2008, pp. 128-129. |
Jan, C. H., et al., “A 32nm SoC Platform Technology with 2nd Generation High-k/Metal Gate Transistors Optimized for Ultra Low Power, High Performance, and High Density Product Applications,” IEEE International Electronic Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 7-9, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
Mistry, K., “A 45nm Logic Technology With High-K+Metal Gate Transistors, Strained Silicon, 9 Cu Interconnect Layers, 193nm Dry Patterning, and 100% Pb-Free Packaging,” Electron Devices Meeting, 2007, IEDM 2007, IEEE International, Dec. 10-12, 2007, p. 247. |
Ragnarsson, L., et al., “Ultralow-EOT (5 Å) Gate-First and Gate-Last High Performance CMOS Achieved by Gate-Electrode Optimization,” IEDM Tech. Dig., pp. 663-666, 2009. |
Sen, P & Kim, C.J., “A Fast Liquid-Metal Droplet Microswitch Using EWOD-Driven Contact-Line Sliding”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 18, No. 1, Feb. 2009, pp. 174-185. |
Iwai, H., et. al., “NiSi Salicide Technology for Scaled CMOS,” Microelectronic Engineering, 60 (2002), pp. 157-169. |
Froment, B., et. al., “Nickel vs. Cobalt Silicide integration for sub-50nm CMOS”, IMEC ESS Circuits, 2003. pp. 215-219. |
James, D., “65 and 45-nm Devices—an Overview”, Semicon West, Jul. 2008, paper No. ctr_024377. |
Davis, J.A., et. al., “Interconnect Limits on Gigascale Integration(GSI) in the 21st Century”, Proc. IEEE, vol. 89, No. 3, pp. 305-324, Mar. 2001. |
Shino, T., et al., “Floating Body RAM Technology and its Scalability to 32nm Node and Beyond,” Electron Devices Meeting, 2006, IEDM '06, International, pp. 1-4, Dec. 11-13, 2006. |
Hamamoto, T., et al., “Overview and future challenges of floating body RAM (FBRAM) technology for 32 nm technology node and beyond”, Solid-State Electronics, vol. 53, Issue 7, Papers Selected from the 38th European Solid-State Device Research Conference—ESSDERC'08, Jul. 2009, pp. 676-683. |
Okhonin, S., et al., “New Generation of Z-RAM”, Electron Devices Meeting, 2007. IEDM 2007. IEEE International, pp. 925-928, Dec. 10-12, 2007. |
Henttinen, K. et al., “Mechanically Induced Si Layer Transfer in Hydrogen-Implanted Si Wafers,” Applied Physics Letters, Apr. 24, 2000, p. 2370-2372, vol. 76, No. 17. |
Lee, C.-W., et al., “Junctionless multigate field-effect transistor,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, pp. 053511-1 to 053511-2, 2009. |
Park, S. G., et al., “Implementation of HfSiON gate dielectric for sub-60nm DRAM dual gate oxide with recess channel array transistor (RCAT) and tungsten gate,” International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM 2004, pp. 515-518, Dec. 13-15, 2004. |
Kim, J.Y., et al., “S-RCAT (sphere-shaped-recess-channel-array transistor) technology for 70nm DRAM feature size and beyond,” 2005 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, 2005 pp. 34-35, Jun. 14-16, 2005. |
Oh, H.J., et al., “High-density low-power-operating DRAM device adopting 6F2 cell scheme with novel S-RCAT structure on 80nm feature size and beyond,” Solid-State Device Research Conference, ESSDERC 2005. Proceedings of 35th European, pp. 177-180, Sep. 12-16, 2005. |
Chung, S.-W., et al., “Highly Scalable Saddle-Fin (S-Fin) Transistor for Sub-50nm DRAM Technology,” 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 32-33. |
Lee, M. J., et al., “A Proposal on an Optimized Device Structure With Experimental Studies on Recent Devices for the DRAM Cell Transistor,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 54, No. 12, pp. 3325-3335, Dec. 2007. |
Henttinen, K. et al., “Cold ion-cutting of hydrogen implanted Si,” J. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. B, 2002, pp. 761-766, vol. 190. |
Brumfiel, G., “Solar cells sliced and diced”, May 19, 2010, Nature News. |
Dragoi, et al., “Plasma-activated wafer bonding: the new low-temperature tool for MEMS fabrication”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 6589, 65890T (2007). |
Vengurlekar, A., et al., “Mechanism of Dopant Activation Enhancement in Shallow Junctions by Hydrogen”, Proceedings of the Materials Research Society, vol. 864, Spring 2005, E9.28.1-6. |
Yamada, M. et al., “Phosphor Free High-Luminous-Efficiency White Light-Emitting Diodes Composed of InGaN Multi-Quantum Well,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 2002, pp. L246-L248, vol. 41. |
Guo, X. et al., “Cascade single-chip phosphor-free white light emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, 2008, pp. 013507-1-013507-3, vol. 92. |
Takafuji, Y. et al., “Integration of Single Crystal Si TFTs and Circuits on a Large Glass Substrate,” IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Dec. 7-9, 2009, pp. 1-4. |
Wierer, J.J. et al., “High-power AlGaInN flip-chip light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, May 28, 2001, pp. 3379-3381, vol. 78, No. 22. |
El-Gamal, A., “Trends in CMOS Image Sensor Technology and Design,” International Electron Devices Meeting Digest of Technical Papers, Dec. 2002. |
Ahn, S.W., “Fabrication of a 50 nm half-pitch wire grid polarizer using nanoimprint lithography,” Nanotechnology, 2005, pp. 1874-1877, vol. 16, No. 9. |
Johnson, R.C., “Switching LEDs on and off to enlighten wireless communications,” EE Times, Jun. 2010, last accessed Oct. 11, 2010, <http://www.embeddedinternetdesign.com/design/225402094>. |
Ohsawa, et al., “Autonomous Refresh of Floating Body Cell (FBC)”, International Electron Device Meeting, 2008, pp. 801-804. |
Chen, P., et al., “Effects of Hydrogen Implantation Damage on the Performance of InP/InGaAs/InP p-i-n Photodiodes, Transferred on Silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 94, No. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 012101-1 to 012101-3. |
Lee, D., et al., “Single-Crystalline Silicon Micromirrors Actuated by Self-Aligned Vertical Electrostatic Combdrives with Piston-Motion and Rotation Capability,” Sensors and Actuators A114, 2004, pp. 423-428. |
Shi, X., et al., “Characterization of Low-Temperature Processed Single-Crystalline Silicon Thin-Film Transistor on Glass,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 24, No. 9, Sep. 2003, pp. 574-576. |
Chen, W., et al., “InP Layer Transfer with Masked Implantation,” Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Issue 12, No. 4, Apr. 2009, H149-H150. |
Feng, J., et al., “Integration of Germanium-on-Insulator and Silicon MOSFETs on a Silicon Substrate,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27, No. 11, Nov. 2006, pp. 911-913. |
Zhang, S., et al., “Stacked CMOS Technology on SOI Substrate,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 9, Sep. 2004, pp. 661-663. |
Brebner, G., “Tooling up for Reconfigurable System Design,” IEE Colloquium on Reconfigurable Systems, 1999, Ref. No. 1999/061, pp. 2/1-2/4. |
Bae, Y.-D., “A Single-Chip Programmable Platform Based on a Multithreaded Processor and Configurable Logic Clusters,” 2002 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 3-7, 2002, Digest of Technical Papers, ISSCC, vol. 1, pp. 336-337. |
Lu, N.C.C., et al., “A Buried-Trench DRAM Cell Using a Self-aligned Epitaxy Over Trench Technology,” Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM '88 Technical Digest, International, 1988, pp. 588-591. |
Valsamakis, E.A., “Generator for a Custom Statistical Bipolar Transistor Model,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Apr. 1985, pp. 586-589, vol. SC-20, No. 2. |
Srivastava, P. et al., “Silicon Substrate Removal of GaN DHFETs for enhanced (>1100V) Breakdown Voltage,” Aug. 2010, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 851-852. |
Gosele, U., et al., “Semiconductor Wafer Bonding,” Annual Review of Materials Science, Aug. 1998, pp. 215-241, vol. 28. |
Spangler, L.J. et al., “A Technology for High Performance Single-Crystal Silicon-on-Insulator Transistors,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Apr. 1987, pp. 137-139, vol. 8, No. 4. |
Larrieu, G., et al., “Low Temperature Implementation of Dopant-Segregated Band-edger Metallic S/D junctions in Thin-Body SOI p-MOSFETs”, Proceedings IEDM, 2007, pp. 147-150. |
Qui, Z., et al., “A Comparative Study of Two Different Schemes to Dopant Segregation at NiSi/Si and PtSi/Si Interfaces for Schottky Barrier Height Lowering”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 55, No. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 396-403. |
Khater, M.H., et al., “High-k/Metal-Gate Fully Depleted SOI CMOS With Single-Silicide Schottky Source/Drain With Sub-30-nm Gate Length”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 31, No. 4, Apr. 2010, pp. 275-277. |
Abramovici, M., “In-system silicon validation and debug”, (2008) IEEE Design and Test of Computers, 25 (3), pp. 216-223. |
Saxena, P., et al., “Repeater Scaling and Its Impact on CAD”, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 23, No. 4, Apr. 2004. |
Abrmovici, M., et al., A reconfigurable design-for-debug infrastructure for SoCs, (2006) Proceedings—Design Automation Conference, pp. 7-12. |
Anis, E., et al., “Low cost debug architecture using lossy compression for silicon debug”, (2007) Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM Design, pp. 225-230. |
Anis, E., et al., “On using lossless compression of debug data in embedded logic analysis”, (2007) Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference, paper 18.3, pp. 1-10. |
Boule, M., et al., “Adding debug enhancements to assertion checkers for hardware emulation and silicon debug”, (2006) Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design, pp. 294-299. |
Boule, M., et al., “Assertion checkers in verification, silicon debug and in-field diagnosis”, (2007) Proceedings—Eighth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design, ISQED 2007, pp. 613-618. |
Burtscher, M., et al., “The VPC trace-compression algorithms”, (2005) IEEE Transactions on Computers, 54(11), Nov. 2005, pp. 1329-1344. |
Frieden, B., “Trace port on powerPC 405 cores”, (2007) Electronic Product Design, 28 (6), pp. 12-14. |
Hopkins, A.B.T., et al., “Debug support for complex systems on-chip: A review”, (2006) IEEE Proceedings: Computers and Digital Techniques, 153 (4), Jul. 2006, pp. 197-207. |
Hsu, Y.-C., et al., “Visibility enhancement for silicon debug”, (2006) Proceedings—Design Automation Conference, Jul. 24-28, 2006, San Francisco, pp. 13-18. |
Josephson, D., et al., “The crazy mixed up world of silicon debug”, (2004) Proceedings of the Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, paper 30-1, pp. 665-670. |
Josephson, D.D., “The manic depression of microprocessor debug”, (2002) IEEE International Test Conference (TC), paper 23.4, pp. 657-663. |
Ko, H.F., et al., “Algorithms for state restoration and trace-signal selection for data acquisition in silicon debug”, (2009) IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 28 (2), pp. 285-297. |
Ko, H.F., et al., “Distributed embedded logic analysis for post-silicon validation of SOCs”, (2008) Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference, paper 16.3, pp. 755-763. |
Ko, H.F., et al., “Functional scan chain design at RTL for skewed-load delay fault testing”, (2004) Proceedings of the Asian Test Symposium, pp. 454-459. |
Ko, H.F., et al., “Resource-efficient programmable trigger units for post-silicon validation”, (2009) Proceedings of the 14th IEEE European Test Symposium, ETS 2009, pp. 17-22. |
Liu, X., et al., “On reusing test access mechanisms for debug data transfer in SoC post-silicon validation”, (2008) Proceedings of the Asian Test Symposium, pp. 303-308. |
Liu, X., et al., “Trace signal selection for visibility enhancement in post-silicon validation”, (2009) Proceedings DATE, pp. 1338-1343. |
McLaughlin, R., et al., “Automated debug of speed path failures using functional tests”, (2009) Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, pp. 91-96. |
Morris, K., “On-Chip Debugging—Built-in Logic Analyzers on your FPGA”, (2004) Journal of FPGA and Structured ASIC, 2 (3). |
Nicolici, N., et al., “Design-for-debug for post-silicon validation: Can high-level descriptions help?”, (2009) Proceedings—IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop, HLDVT, pp. 172-175. |
Park, S.-B., et al., “IFRA: Instruction Footprint Recording and Analysis for Post-Silicon Bug Localization”, (2008) Design Automation Conference (DAC08), Jun. 8-13, 2008, Anaheim, CA, USA, pp. 373-378. |
Park, S.-B., et al., “Post-silicon bug localization in processors using instruction footprint recording and analysis (IFRA)”, (2009) IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 28 (10), pp. 1545-1558. |
Moore, B., et al., “High Throughput Non-contact SiP Testing”, (2007) Proceedings—International Test Conference, paper 12.3. |
Riley, M.W., et al., “Cell broadband engine debugging for unknown events”, (2007) IEEE Design and Test of Computers, 24 (5), pp. 486-493. |
Vermeulen, B., “Functional debug techniques for embedded systems”, (2008) IEEE Design and Test of Computers, 25 (3), pp. 208-215. |
Vermeulen, B., et al., “Automatic Generation of Breakpoint Hardware for Silicon Debug”, Proceeding of the 41st Design Automation Conference, Jun. 7-11, 2004, p. 514-517. |
Vermeulen, B., et al., “Design for debug: Catching design errors in digital chips”, (2002) IEEE Design and Test of Computers, 19 (3), pp. 37-45. |
Vermeulen, B., et al., “Core-based scan architecture for silicon debug”, (2002) IEEE International Test Conference (TC), pp. 638-647. |
Vanrootselaar, G. J., et al., “Silicon debug: scan chains alone are not enough”, (1999) IEEE International Test Conference (TC), pp. 892-902. |
Kim, G.-S., et al., “A 25-mV-sensitivity 2-Gb/s optimum-logic-threshold capacitive-coupling receiver for wireless wafer probing systems”, (2009) IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 56 (9), pp. 709-713. |
Sellathamby, C.V., et al., “Non-contact wafer probe using wireless probe cards”, (2005) Proceedings—International Test Conference, 2005, pp. 447-452. |
Jung, S.-M., et al., “Soft Error Immune 0.46pm2 SRAM Cell with MIM Node Capacitor by 65nm CMOS Technology for Ultra High Speed SRAM”, IEDM 2003, pp. 289-292. |
Brillouet, M., “Emerging Technologies on Silicon”, IEDM 2004, pp. 17-24. |
Meindl, J. D., “Beyond Moore's Law: The Interconnect Era”, IEEE Computing in Science & Engineering, Jan./Feb. 2003, pp. 20-24. |
Lin, X., et al., “Local Clustering 3-D Stacked CMOS Technology for Interconnect Loading Reduction”, IEEE Transactions on electron Devices, vol. 53, No. 6, Jun. 2006, pp. 1405-1410. |
He T., et al., “Controllable Molecular Modulation of Conductivity in Silicon-Based Devices”, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10023-10030. |
Henley, F., “Engineered Substrates Using the Nanocleave Process”, SemiconWest, TechXPOT Conference—Challenges in Device Scaling, Jul. 19, 2006, San Francisco. |
Diamant, G., et al., “Integrated Circuits based on Nanoscale Vacuum Phototubes”, Applied Physics Letters 92, 262903-1 to 262903-3 (2008). |
Landesberger, C., et al., “Carrier techniques for thin wafer processing”, CS MANTECH Conference, May 14-17, 2007 Austin, Texas, pp. 33-36. |
Shen, W., et al., “Mercury Droplet Micro switch for Re-configurable Circuit Interconnect”, The 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. Boston, Jun. 8-12, 2003, pp. 464-467. |
Bangsaruntip, S., et al., “Gate-all-around Silicon Nanowire 25-Stage CMOS Ring Oscillators with Diameter Down to 3 nm”, 2010 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of papers, pp. 21-22. |
Borland, J.O., “Low Temperature Activation of Ion Implanted Dopants: A Review”, International Workshop on Junction technology 2002, S7-3, Japan Society of Applied Physics, pp. 85-88. |
Vengurlekar, A., et al., “Hydrogen Plasma Enhancement of Boron Activation in Shallow Junctions”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 18, Nov. 1, 2004, pp. 4052-4054. |
El-Maleh, A. H., et al., “Transistor-Level Defect Tolerant Digital System Design at the Nanoscale”, Research Proposal Submitted to Internal Track Research Grant Programs, 2007. Internal Track Research Grant Programs. |
Austin, T., et al., “Reliable Systems on Unreliable Fabrics”, IEEE Design & Test of Computers, Jul./Aug. 2008, vol. 25, issue 4, pp. 322-332. |
Borkar, S., “Designing Reliable Systems from Unreliable Components: The Challenges of Transistor Variability and Degradation”, IEEE Micro, IEEE Computer Society, Nov.-Dec. 2005, pp. 10-16. |
Zhu, S., et al., “N-Type Schottky Barrier Source/Drain MOSFET Using Ytterbium Silicide”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 2004, pp. 565-567. |
Zhang, Z., et al., “Sharp Reduction of Contact Resistivities by Effective Schottky Barrier Lowering With Silicides as Diffusion Sources,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 31, No. 7, Jul. 2010, pp. 731-733. |
Lee, R. T.P., et al., “Novel Epitaxial Nickel Aluminide-Silicide with Low Schottky-Barrier and Series Resistance for Enhanced Performance of Dopant-Segregated Source/Drain N-channel MuGFETs”, 2007 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 108-109. |
Awano, M., et al., “Advanced DSS MOSFET Technology for Ultrahigh Performance Applications”, 2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 24-25. |
Choi, S.-J., et al., “Performance Breakthrough in NOR Flash Memory with Dopant-Segregated Schottky-Barrier (DSSB) SONOS Devices”, 2009 Symposium of VLSI Technology Digest, pp. 222-223. |
Zhang, M., et al., “Schottky barrier height modulation using dopant segregation in Schottky-barrier SOI-MOSFETs”, Proceeding of ESSDERC, Grenoble, France, 2005, pp. 457-460. |
Larrieu, G., et al., “Arsenic-Segregated Rare-Earth Silicide Junctions: Reduction of Schottky Barrier and Integration in Metallic n-MOSFETs on SOI”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 30, No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 1266-1268. |
Ko, C.H. et al., “NiSi Schottky Barrier Process-Strained Si (SB-PSS) CMOS Technology for High Performance Applications”, 2006 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers. |
Kinoshita, A., et al., “Solution for High-Performance Schottky-Source/Drain MOSFETs: Schottky Barrier Height Engineering with Dopant Segregation Technique”, 2004 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 168-169. |
Kinoshita, A., et al., “High-performance 50-nm-Gate-Length Schottky-Source/Drain MOSFETs with Dopant-Segregation Junctions”, 2005 Symposium on VLSI Technology Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 158-159. |
Kaneko, A., et al., “High-Performance FinFET with Dopant-Segregated Schottky Source/Drain”, IEDM 2006. |
Kinoshita, A., et al., “Ultra Low Voltage Operations in Bulk CMOS Logic Circuits with Dopant Segregated Schottky Source/Drain Transistors”, IEDM 2006. |
Kinoshita, A., et al., “Comprehensive Study on Injection Velocity Enhancement in Dopant-Segregated Schottky MOSFETs”, IEDM 2006. |
Choi, S.-J. et al., “High Speed Flash Memory and 1T-DRAM on Dopant Segregated Schottky Barrier (DSSB) FinFET SONOS Device for Multi-functional SoC Applications”, 2008 IEDM, pp. 223-226. |
Chin, Y.K., et al., “Excimer Laser-Annealed Dopant Segregated Schottky (ELA-DSS) Si Nanowire Gate-All-Around (GAA) pFET with Near Zero Effective Schottky Barrier Height (SBH)”, IEDM 2009, pp. 935-938. |
Agoura Technologies white paper, “Wire Grid Polarizers: a New High Contrast Polarizer Technology for Liquid Crystal Displays”, 2008, pp. 1-12. |
Unipixel Displays, Inc. white paper, “Time Multi-plexed Optical Shutter (TMOS) Displays”, Jun. 2007, pp. 1-49. |
Azevedo, I. L., et al., “The Transition to Solid-State Lighting”, Proc. IEEE, vol. 97, No. 3, Mar. 2009, pp. 481-510. |
Crawford, M.H., “LEDs for Solid-State Lighting: Performance Challenges and Recent Advances”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 15, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2009, pp. 1028-1040. |
Tong, Q.-Y., et al., “A “smarter-cut” approach to low temperature silicon layer transfer”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, No. 1, Jan. 5, 1998, pp. 49-51. |
Tong, Q.-Y., et al., “Low Temperature Si Layer Splitting”, Proceedings 1997 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 1997, pp. 126-127. |
Nguyen, P., et al., “Systematic study of the splitting kinetic of H/He co-implanted substrate”, SOI Conference, 2003, pp. 132-134. |
Ma, X., et al., “A high-quality SOI structure fabricated by low-temperature technology with B+/H+ co-implantation and plasma bonding”, Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 21, 2006, pp. 959-963. |
Yu, C.Y., et al., “Low-temperature fabrication and characterization of Ge-on-insulator structures”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 101913-1 to 101913-2 (2006). |
Li, Y. A., et al., “Surface Roughness of Hydrogen Ion Cut Low Temperature Bonded Thin Film Layers”, Japan Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 39 (2000), Part 1, No. 1, pp. 275-276. |
Hoechbauer, T., et al., “Comparison of thermally and mechanically induced Si layer transfer in hydrogen-implanted Si wafers”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 216 (2004), pp. 257-263. |
Aspar, B., et al., “Transfer of structured and patterned thin silicon films using the Smart-Cut process”, Electronics Letters, Oct. 10, 1996, vol. 32, No. 21, pp. 1985-1986. |
Agarwal, A., et al., “Efficient production of silicon-on-insulator films by co-implantation of He+ with H+” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, No. 9, Mar. 1998, pp. 1086-1088. |
Cook III, G. O., et al., “Overview of transient liquid phase and partial transient liquid phase bonding,” Journal of Material Science, vol. 46, 2011, pp. 5305-5323. |
Moustris, G. P., et al., “Evolution of autonomous and semi-autonomous robotic surgical systems: a review of the literature,” International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Wiley Online Library, 2011, DOI: 10.10002/rcs.408. |
Subbarao, M., et al., “Depth from Defocus: A Spatial Domain Approach,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 271-294 (1994). |
Subbarao, M., et al., “Focused Image Recovery from Two Defocused Images Recorded with Different Camera Settings,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, No. 12, Dec. 1995, pp. 1613-1628. |
Guseynov, N. A., et al., “Ultrasonic Treatment Restores the Photoelectric Parameters of Silicon Solar Cells Degraded under the Action of 60Cobalt Gamma Radiation,” Technical Physics Letters, vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 18-21 (2007). |
Gawlik, G., et al., “GaAs on Si: towards a low-temperature “smart-cut” technology”, Vacuum, vol. 70, pp. 103-107 (2003). |
Weldon, M. K., et al., “Mechanism of Silicon Exfoliation Induced by Hydrogen/Helium Co-implantation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, No. 25, pp. 3721-3723 (1998). |
Miller, D.A.B., “Optical interconnects to electronic chips,” Applied Optics, vol. 49, No. 25, Sep. 1, 2010, pp. F59-F70. |
En, W. G., et al., “The Genesis Process: A New SOI wafer fabrication method”, Proceedings 1998 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 1998, pp. 163-164. |
Uchikoga, S., et al., “Low temperature poly-Si TFT-LCD by excimer laser anneal,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 383 (2001), pp. 19-24. |
He, M., et al., “Large Polycrystalline Silicon Grains Prepared by Excimer Laser Crystallization of Sputtered Amorphous Silicon Film with Process Temperature at 100 C,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, No. 3B, 2007, pp. 1245-1249. |
Kim, S.D., et al., “Advanced source/drain engineering for box-shaped ultra shallow junction formation using laser annealing and pre-amorphization implantation in sub-100-nm SOI CMOS,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 1748-1754, Oct. 2002. |
Ahn, J., et al., “High-quality MOSFET's with ultrathin LPCVD gate SiO2,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 186-188, Apr. 1992. |
Yang, M., et al., “High Performance CMOS Fabricated on Hybrid Substrate with Different Crystal Orientation,” Proceedings IEDM 2003. |
Yin, H., et al., “Scalable 3-D finlike poly-Si TFT and its nonvolatile memory application,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 578-584, Feb. 2008. |
Kawaguchi, N., et al., “Pulsed Green-Laser Annealing for Single-Crystalline Silicon Film Transferred onto Silicon wafer and Non-alkaline Glass by Hydrogen-Induced Exfoliation,” Japanese Journal of Appl,ied Physics, vol. 46, No. 1, 2007, pp. 21-23. |
Faynot, O. et al., “Planar Fully depleted SOI technology: A Powerful architecture for the 20nm node and beyond,” Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 2010 IEEE International, vol., No., pp. 3.2.1, 3.2.4, Dec. 6-8, 2010. |
Khakifirooz, A., “ETSOI Technology for 20nm and Beyond”, SOI Consortium Workshop: Fully Depleted SOI, Apr. 28, 2011, Hsinchu Taiwan. |
Kim, I.-K., et al.,“Advanced Integration Technology for a Highly Scalable SOI DRAM with SOC (Silicon-On-Capacitors)”, IEDM 1996, pp. 96-605-608, 22.5.4. |
Lee, B.H., et al., “A Novel CMP Method for cost-effective Bonded SOI Wafer Fabrication,” Proceedings 1995 IEEE International SOI Conference, Oct. 1995, pp. 60-61. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170186770 A1 | Jun 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13273712 | Oct 2011 | US |
Child | 13492395 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14821683 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15460230 | US | |
Parent | 13492395 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 14821683 | US | |
Parent | 13016313 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13273712 | US | |
Parent | 12970602 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13016313 | US | |
Parent | 12949617 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 12970602 | US |