The present invention generally relates to integrated circuit chip packaging. More particularly, the present invention relates to integrated circuit chip packaging connecting an integrated circuit chip to a conductive layer embedded between layers of a printed circuit board.
Conventional methods and systems for connecting an integrated circuit chip to a printed circuit board have relied upon a surface attachment. A surface attachment restricts the launch to a conductive layer that is on the surface of a printed circuit board and if a signal from the integrated circuit chip must be launched into a conductive layer that is between the layers of the printed circuit board (i.e., an embedded conductor), then the signal is subject to problems, which may be caused by vias that are used to transfer the signal from the surface to the embedded conductor.
Conventionally, an integrated circuit chip may be placed into a carrier (e.g., a package) and the carrier may then be mounted onto a surface of the printed circuit board. Exemplary conventional techniques are shown in
The second configuration includes a buried via 110 that does not include a lengthy stub and, therefore, avoids the signal degradation associated with a lengthy stub. However, a buried via 110 is more expensive to fabricate. The conventional surface mount package 102 also shows connection to another embedded conductor 111, which connects to the distal end of via 109. This configuration, referred to as a “through via,” minimizes the length of the stub, but the presence of the via still leads to signal distortion.
In addition, if many signals try to connect to embedded conductors at the same level of a layer, then wiring congestion may result.
Integrated circuit chips that operate at high frequencies often rely on flip chip packaging to minimize the parasitics that are associated with conventional chip packages. For best performance, conventionally, the highest speed signals use conductive surface layers or buried vias in the printed circuit board in order to reduce a via stub effect that may compromise signal transmission.
In view of the foregoing and other exemplary problems, drawbacks, and disadvantages of the conventional methods and structures, an exemplary feature of the present invention is to provide an integrated circuit chip package in which a cavity in a printed circuit board receives an integrated circuit chip to connect to a conductor that is embedded between layers of a printed circuit board.
In a first exemplary aspect of the present invention, a printed circuit board has a cavity extending into a surface to a conductor that is embedded between layers of a printed circuit board, an integrated circuit chip is in the cavity, and an electrical connection connects the integrated circuit chip to the embedded conductor.
In a second exemplary aspect of the present invention, a method of mounting an integrated circuit chip to a printed circuit board includes providing a cavity extending from a surface of the printed circuit board to a conductor that is embedded between layers of a printed circuit board, placing the integrated circuit chip into the cavity, and electrically connecting the integrated circuit chip to the conductor.
In a third exemplary aspect of the present invention, a printed circuit board may include a plurality of insulating layers, a conductor embedded between two of the plurality of insulating layers, and a cavity extending from a surface of the printed circuit board to the embedded conductor.
The inventors of the present invention discovered that more direct access to a conductor that is embedded between layers of a printed circuit board is desired, without having to rely upon a surface mount or a via to connect to an embedded conductor.
A printed circuit board may include alternating stacks of patterned conductors, such as, for example, copper planes. Usually those planes are copper, in which case they may include ground planes or power planes. Alternatively, the planes are patterned into narrower traces to form conductors, which are sandwiched between layers to provide controlled impedance transmission lines. These conductors are, thus, embedded between layers of the printed circuit board and are particularly well suited to transmit high fidelity signals. Other signals, such as power, control connections, or the like, do not need controlled impedance lines and may have varying widths depending upon their functional needs.
An embedded conductor is superior to a surface conductor because an embedded conductor has better signal fidelity and an embedded conductor is completely shielded, while a surface conductor is not completely shielded. Therefore, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is advantageous because the integrated circuit chips no longer need to connect to surface conductors, rather the integrated circuit chips may attach more directly to embedded conductors.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention connects a chip to a conductor embedded between layers of a printed circuit board without using a via.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the printed circuit board may be milled to expose an embedded conductor into which a signal from an integrated circuit chip may be launched.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the milling may create a cavity that may be shaped to receive the integrated circuit chip.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention the cavity may be deep enough such that, when the cavity receives the chip, the top of the chip is substantially co-planar with an embedded conductor. In this manner, very short ribbon bonds may be connected between contacts on the chip to the substantially co-planar embedded conductor.
It is advantageous to minimize the length of a wire bond and/or a ribbon bond, because a bond represents a discontinuity. Therefore, milling the cavity such that the top of the chip is substantially co-planar with the launch, minimizes the length of a wire/ribbon bond and, as a result, reduces the adverse affects of the discontinuity.
A launch into an embedded conductor is generally capable of carrying a signal that incorporates frequency components that exceed 40 Ghz. Thus, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention is capable of handling signals incorporating a 40 Ghz component.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the printed circuit board includes a step-shaped (e.g., a terraced) side surface that may reveal launch points into a plurality of embedded conductors and non-controlled impedance traces, such as those used for control and power.
In general, the best launch exposed by the step-shaped structure is the one that is substantially co-planar with the top of a chip. The remaining launches may be used to handle slower and/or less critical signals.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention two integrated circuit chips may be connected by a high speed embedded conductor by placing each of these chips into cavities such that the tops of both chips are substantially co-planar with the same embedded conductor. In this manner, the present invention obviates the necessity of providing vias to connect the two chips to each other.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention may use a precision engraving machine, rather than just a generic milling machine.
Further, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention may be adapted to either wire/ribbon bonding or to a flip chip implementation. This packaging technique offers even higher performance than the conventional techniques mentioned above while at the same time being low in cost.
These and many other advantages may be achieved with the present invention.
The foregoing and other exemplary purposes, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
As explained above, there are many topologies conventionally available for implementing transmission lines in circuit boards (e.g., printed circuit boards (PCBs)). Internal embedded conductors, which may include an embedded conductor sandwiched between solid planes of a reference ground plane, offer many advantages over surface conductors. Embedded conductors support less dispersive transverse electric and magnetic modes which may be advantageous for wide band operation. An embedded conductor may also be self-shielding and, since they may undergo fewer processing steps than surface wiring they may be easier and less costly to fabricate.
Connecting an integrated circuit chip to embedded conductors conventionally requires the use of vias to connect from the surface of a printed circuit board where components are traditionally attached. However, if the overlying layers are removed from the printed circuit board in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention (e.g. by milling) these embedded conductors may permit a more direct attachment of these embedded conductors to high speed nets on a chip. A chip may be connected to an embedded conductor using a wire bond, a ribbon bond, or the like, or may be flip chip connected using solder balls, or the like.
As illustrated by
In other words, the outer surface of the printed circuit board may be milled to form a cavity that extends down to a desired embedded conductor. Further, a side of such a cavity may have a terraced profile (step-shaped side surface) wherein each step of the terraced profile exposes a surface of an embedded conductor.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, after a cavity is formed in the printed circuit board, an exposed surface of the embedded conductor may be treated to facilitate bonding. For example, the surface may be plated with a metal (e.g., a noble metal such as gold, platinum, silver, and the like) to improve wire bonding and/or ribbon bonding.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the cavity in the printed circuit board extends deep enough into the printed circuit board such that a top of an integrated circuit chip positioned in the recess would be substantially co-planar with an embedded conductor. The embedded conductor may then be provided the highest speed signal more directly from the integrated circuit chip.
For example, in
The step-shaped surface of the cavity may also reveal the surfaces of other embedded conductors, which are not substantially co-planar with a top of the chip. In general, as the distance from the top of the chip 204 to an embedded conductor increases, a longer connection will be required. A longer connection will generally offer poorer performance than a shorter connection and, therefore, the printed circuit board may be designed such that, as the distance between an embedded conductor and the top of the chip increases, the less critical a signal will be carried by that respective embedded conductor. For example, most low speed control lines do not require controlled impedance and, therefore, are insensitive to the longer distances that need to be bridged by a wire bond.
Further, the less critical connections may use lower performance connections such as, for example, a wire bond and/or a ball bond as opposed to a ribbon bond. However, one of ordinary skill in the art understands that any type of connection may be used to establish electrical communication between a chip and an embedded conductor and still practice the invention.
In the exemplary embodiment illustrated by
Further, the next closest embedded conductors 216 to the top of the chip 204 are connected by ball bonds 218 to the chip 206.
A printed circuit board may be constructed by laminating many different layers together using, for example, an epoxy resin. That lamination may be done under a high temperature and a pressure to cure the resin. The resin essentially flows between the layers in a pattern sensitive manner depending upon what copper features happen to be nearby. Thus, the surfaces between the layers of a printed circuit board may not necessarily be planar. Rather, the surfaces of the layers may incorporate a bit of waviness depending upon the copper patterns.
Thus, when using a conventional milling machine and open-loop programming on the milling machine to mill down to a certain level into a printed circuit board, there is a likelihood that the milling might not reach a level that corresponds to the level of a desired embedded conductor. The thickness of a patterned copper layer of an embedded conductor is typically about 1 mil and the waviness of a reasonably thick layer of a printed circuit board is typically more than 1 mil. Therefore, a conventional milling machine may cut entirely through the embedded conductor, thereby, destroying the embedded conductor in some places, while simultaneously not even reaching the same embedded conductor in another place.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a precision milling machine may sense an electrical contact between a cutting edge of the milling machine and a stripline. In this manner, the milling machine may incorporate a closed-loop feedback system that regulates the depth of the milling into the printed circuit board.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a closed-loop feedback might not electrically sense the patterned layer of the desired embedded conductor in order to control the depth of the milling process. Rather, a calibration structure that may closely track the local internal waviness may be provided which provides a desired feedback control signal. This may be accomplished either electrically, with optical recognition, or by analyzing the chips as they are received from the milling operation. When copper chips are detected, then the desired target layer has been reached.
Before connecting the leads, but after milling, an embedded conductor may have a bare surface. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the bare surfaces of the embedded conductor may be plated with a material, which facilitates bonding. A material for plating may include, for example, gold and the like, which may be electro-lessly plated onto a surface of an embedded conductor.
Alternatively, if a thicker gold layer is required, then a sacrificial plating web may be patterned in the copper and subsequently milled away.
Although not shown in the Figures, ground planes in a printed circuit board may be electrically connected to each other using a via in close proximity to the milled cavity in order to maintain tight coupling between the planes for embedded conductor integrity.
The printed circuit board 300 also includes a thermal slug 314 mounted to a top surface 316 of the chip 304 and a heat sink 318 mounted to an outer surface 320 of the thermal slug 314 to conduct thermal energy away from the printed circuit board 300.
In another exemplary embodiment in accordance with the present invention (not shown), the chip may be accessed from the backside for thermal management.
As illustrated by
The other vias 408 supporting the non-embedded conductor signals from the chip 402 are not buried vias, but are typical through vias that have pads 410 at the level of the embedded conductor 404.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, these pads 410 may be revealed in the course of milling a cavity into the printed circuit board. This exemplary method maintains the low cost of through via construction by avoiding the use of buried vias.
While the invention has been described in terms of several exemplary embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification.
Further, it is noted that, Applicant's intent is to encompass equivalents of all claim elements, even if amended later during prosecution.
The present application is a Divisional Application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/411,920, filed on Apr. 27, 2006, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4715115 | King | Dec 1987 | A |
4855868 | Harding | Aug 1989 | A |
4922324 | Sudo | May 1990 | A |
5008734 | Dutta | Apr 1991 | A |
5175613 | Barker, III | Dec 1992 | A |
5225709 | Nishiuma | Jul 1993 | A |
5235211 | Hamburgen | Aug 1993 | A |
5280409 | Selna et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293069 | Kato | Mar 1994 | A |
5365406 | Kurashima | Nov 1994 | A |
5478420 | Gauci | Dec 1995 | A |
5490324 | Newman | Feb 1996 | A |
5508556 | Lin | Apr 1996 | A |
5545598 | Ogawa | Aug 1996 | A |
5583378 | Marrs | Dec 1996 | A |
5597643 | Weber | Jan 1997 | A |
5625225 | Huang | Apr 1997 | A |
5689091 | Hamzehdoost | Nov 1997 | A |
5696666 | Miles et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710459 | Teng et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5796170 | Marcantonio | Aug 1998 | A |
5831833 | Shirakawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847935 | Thaler | Dec 1998 | A |
5886408 | Ohki | Mar 1999 | A |
5986884 | Jairazbhoy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008988 | Palmer | Dec 1999 | A |
6014318 | Takeda | Jan 2000 | A |
6054758 | Lamson | Apr 2000 | A |
6075700 | Houghton | Jun 2000 | A |
6081028 | Ettehadieh | Jun 2000 | A |
6090237 | Reynolds | Jul 2000 | A |
6175497 | Tseng et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6236568 | Lai | May 2001 | B1 |
6278400 | Cassen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282095 | Houghton et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6323066 | Lai | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6333856 | Harju | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359341 | Huang | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6393696 | Yoon | May 2002 | B1 |
6428908 | Beutel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6469592 | Huang et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6487083 | Kwong | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6521990 | Roh | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6577504 | Lofland | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6596565 | Hembree | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6710442 | Lindgren | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6744640 | Reis | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6979594 | Fan | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6982481 | Sonderegger | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7026710 | Coyle et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7030482 | Haines | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031162 | Arvelo | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7116557 | Raby | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7164587 | Garnett | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7254034 | Bolle | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7529095 | Whitton | May 2009 | B2 |
7656043 | Huang | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7833838 | Haines | Nov 2010 | B2 |
9713258 | Kwark | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20010042907 | Tamaki | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030209732 | Slupe et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040087043 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125579 | Konishi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040191490 | Hara | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050103522 | Grundy | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104205 | Wang | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117314 | Lien | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050121224 | Lien | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050163981 | Osthaus | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060012034 | Kadoya | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060097370 | Bartley | May 2006 | A1 |
20070195505 | Savignac et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070235215 | Bathan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080192443 | Hatanaka | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080277777 | Liao | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20170243802 | Kwark | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170243816 | Kwark | Aug 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11-045955 | Feb 1999 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated May 30, 2008. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Dec. 8, 2008. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Mar. 18, 2009. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Sep. 28, 2009. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411.920 dated May 11, 2010. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Oct. 27, 2010. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Jan. 24, 2011. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated May 11, 2011. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Feb. 12, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Jul. 8, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Dec. 9, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Mar. 25, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Jul. 6, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Oct. 3, 2016. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Oct. 21, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 11/411,920 dated Mar. 10, 2017. |
United States Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/589,108. |
United States Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/589,108. |
United States Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2019 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/589,108. |
United States Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2020 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/589,108. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170243816 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11411920 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 15589131 | US |