Method for manufacturing raised electrical contact pattern of controlled geometry

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6818840
  • Patent Number
    6,818,840
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 7, 2002
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 16, 2004
    19 years ago
Abstract
Spring contact elements are attached to terminals of an electronic component, which may be a semiconductor die. The spring contact elements may comprise a flexible precursor element. The precursor element may be over coated with a resilient material. The spring contact elements may be elongate and attached to the terminals at one end. The other end of the spring contacts may be spaced away from the electronic component.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates in general to electronic assemblies and testing thereof. In particular, the invention relates to a method of manufacture of protruding, controlled aspect ratio and shape contacts for uses in interconnections of assemblies and testing thereof.




Interconnections which involve protruding electrical contacts are used extensively in packaging of electronics. Pin grid array packages, both plastic and ceramic, housing a variety of semiconductors, use area arrays of pins as interconnect contacts for connection to circuit boards. Pins can be attached to their receiving package conductors by use of a variety of methods. For ceramic packages, pins are inserted into non-reacting brazing fixtures and are then gang-brazed to corresponding conductive terminals on the package. This approach is characterized by significant non-recurring engineering costs and lead times involved in production of the brazing fixture. Plastic pin grid array packages most commonly use pins which are inserted into metallized through holes in a circuit board, while the dimensions of pins and the holes normally chosen to facilitate good contact between the walls of the pins and the coating of the holes. This approach has a disadvantage in that the coated holes and the pins block some circuit routing channels within the circuit board, thus forcing either use of narrow circuit traces, or increase in circuit board area, either of which results in increased costs.




Permanent connection of the pin grid array packages to circuit boards often is accomplished by inserting pins through corresponding holes in a circuit board, the pins protruding to a predetermined length beyond the circuit board. A resulting assembly then is passed through a wave soldering machine, and the pin grid array thus is soldered to the circuit board. Alternatively, a pin grid array can be inserted into a low insertion force or zero insertion force socket for a demountable assembly. Such a socket, in its turn, normally is connected permanently to a board.




A current trend in interconnections is toward face-to-face surface mounting of components to boards and semiconductor chips to substrates. This approach is best accomplished with protruding contact structures on top of (or otherwise protruding from) contact carrying conductive terminals or traces. Conductive terminal arrangements on facing components and substrates are increasingly being made of the area array type, as this allows for larger contact-to-contact separation as compared with components characterized by peripheral arrangement of interconnection contacts.




Pins attached to either ceramic or plastic packages according to the traditional methods are, in general, not appropriate for mounting to patterns of surface contacts on circuit boards, due to pin length variation. For surface mounting, the pins would have to be planarized, which represents an additional expensive step subsequent to pin assembly. In addition, there is a significant cost penalty associated with production of pin-carrying packages with pin-to-pin separations of 50 mils, or lower.




There is currently an increasing need for a low cost method of attaching protruding contacts from conductive terminals, arising from proliferation of surface mountable area array contact packages. Stand-off height of protruding contacts is particularly important when coefficients of thermal expansion of components and of circuit board materials differ significantly. The same is true for attachment of un-packaged semiconductor chips to interconnection substrates. These expansive concerns call for a low cost, high volume method of manufacturing protruding, controlled aspect ratio or shape electrical contacts on top of (or otherwise protruding from) contact carrying conductive terminals, on top of any device or circuit bearing substrate, board material or component, and its applications to surface mount interconnections of devices, components and substrates.




THE PRIOR ART




U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,189,507, 5,095,187 and 4,955,523 disclose a method of manufacturing of controlled height protruding contacts in a shape of wires for direct soldering to a mating substrate. The wires are bonded to terminals without use of any material other than that of wire and the terminals, using ultrasonic wirebonding methods and equipment, which comprises a standard industry technique for interconnecting semiconductor chips to packages. The patents also describe a bonding head which incorporates a wire weakening means for controlling length of free standing severed wires. Vertically free standing wires present a handling problem during assembly, which is addressed in the patents by providing for polymer encapsulation of bonds between the wires and terminals. The polymer coating, which is optional, also compensates for another disadvantage of the approach, namely weak points along the wire, typically the point of contact between the wire and terminal metallization, and in case of ball bonding, in a heat effected zone of the wire just above impression of a bonding capillary. While these patents provide for controlled height contacts, and discuss 2 d to 20 d aspect ratios, in practice they do not assume controlled aspect ratios for all kinds of protruding contacts which are required in various applications. For instance, standard, high speed wirebonding equipment could not handle a 30 mil diameter wire. Therefore, according to these inventions, a 30 mil diameter, 100 mil high contact could only be produced on lower throughput specialized equipment, at higher cost. In addition, a gold wire as described in a preferred embodiment, would have a problem of dissolving in solder during a soldering cycle, which causes long term reliability problems with solder joints. Similarly, direct soldering of copper contacts would in many cases result in undesirable reaction between copper and solder at elevated temperatures. While nickel metal is the material of choice for solder joint reliability, nickel wire can not be used for ultrasonic wirebonding to metal terminals due to its high mechanical strength and passivating, oxide forming properties. Chemical, physical and mechanical properties, as well as permissible dimensions and shapes of the protuberant contacts produced according to this invention are limited to the capabilities and materials choices compatible with known wire bonding techniques.




U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,481 describes a method of interconnecting semiconductor components on substrates by means of dissolving protruding gold projections on the components in solder masses formed on the substrate terminals. The gold projections are formed by compression and extrusion of gold balls against the terminals. This approach is incapable of producing high aspect ratio protruding contacts because of limitations of the extrusion method. In addition, dissolution of gold in solder, as taught by this approach creates a problem due to reliability concerns. The method also limits selection of contact material to easily extrudable metals, like gold.




There are several methods in the prior art for controlled elongation of solder masses between a component and a substrate. The goal is to create a column-like solder shape, preferably an hourglass shape, in order to achieve increased resistance to thermal cycling. To that end, U.S. Pat. No. 5,148,968 discloses a web-like device which upon heating during solder reflow stretches the solder connections, forming such hourglass shaped solder columns. Aspect ratios of the columns are determined by the mass of solder in the joint, dimensions of the solder wettable terminals on the substrate and the component, and by the characteristics of the stretch device. This method is only limited to contact materials which are reflowed during the assembly, and requires external hardware for forming the contact shape, which adds cost of the hardware and increases the process complexity.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,878,611 teaches formation of controlled geometry solder joints by applying controlled volumes of solder to a semiconductor package and a substrate, bringing solder masses in contact, and reflowing the solder masses while maintaining controlled separation between the component and the substrate through mechanical means. This approach also requires hardware means for maintaining longitudinal dimension of the contacts, and does not lend itself to standard practices of surface mount soldering, in which industry already has made substantial time and capital investments.




In the same spirit, U.S. Pat. No. 4,545,610 discloses a process for forming elongated solder joints between a plurality of solder wettable terminals on a semiconductor component and a substrate by means of solder extenders, which transform the shape of the solder joints into uniform hourglass shapes during a solder reflow step. This approach requires additional, non-standard processing of either a silicon device, or on a substrate, which includes attachment of reflowable solder extenders, and non-reflowable means of maintaining vertical spacing between the silicon device and the substrate.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,154,341 discloses the use of a spacer bump which is composed of a solder alloy which does not melt at the temperature of component soldering. A eutectic solder microball is placed on a contact, and upon the reflow the reflowable solder encases the non-reflowable spacer, and produces an hourglass shaped joint. The aspect ratios of the joint contacts are controlled by dimensions of the spacer.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,332,341 teaches solid state bonding of solder preforms to components, substrates or both, for further joining. Resulting protruding solder contacts either collapse during soldering if they consist of eutectic solder, or do not reflow at all, when they consist of higher melting temperature solder. In the latter case, a component would not have the benefit of a self-alignment effect as the pool of solder is confined to the vicinity of the terminals, and a main portion of the joint which controls aspect ratio, does not melt.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,914,814 discloses a process for fabricating solder columns through use of a mold with an array of pin holes, which are filled with solder, brought into contact with terminals on a component, and bonded by melting the solder which wets the terminals. The component with columns is then bonded to a substrate through reflow in a solder with lower melting temperature than the solder of the columns. This approach requires generating a mold for each solder column array pattern, commonly involving undesirable non-recurring engineering expenses and associated increase in delivery times.




U.S. Pat. No. 3,509,270 discloses a printed circuit assembly which is interconnected with a dielectric carrier that has a plurality of spring elements positioned in its apertures, the springs are optionally encased in a solder material to facilitate permanent electrical contact between circuit elements. This approach requires a custom interposer pattern manufactured for each application, while solder coated springs would have to be placed individually inside the apertures. Additionally, soldering usually requires flux, while the interposer material makes it difficult to clean flux after the reflow process.




U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,664,309 and 4,705,205 disclose a device and a method for interconnection with reinforced solder preforms which use a retaining member provided with apertures. The retaining member is optionally dissolved to leave resilient interconnect structures. The solder columns maintain their shape in the molten state, supported by particles, filaments, spiral metallic wire or tape. 20 to 80% by weight of filler material is specified. This approach, as several of the above described approaches, requires a custom made retaining member for every interconnect application, and therefore requires an additional non-recurring engineering expense and increased delivery time for every production order.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,642,889 teaches use of an interposer with a plurality of interconnect areas, interconnect areas comprise wire means surrounded with solder, and incorporate a soldering flux material. Upon heating the solder reflows and connects to the terminals of the mating components and boards, while the wires in the middle of each solder joint insure a column-like joint shape. The interposer preferably is dissolved away. While providing means for controlled aspect ratio interconnect joints, this approach also requires use of a custom manufactured interposer and inevitable non-recurring engineering expenses and increased delivery times. In addition, when improved alignment of the interconnect to the terminals is required, as terminal-to-terminal distances decrease, this approach suffers from heat and environmental effects on interposer material, causing it to distort or change dimension during processing steps, which makes the alignment difficult, and limits this approach to relatively coarse terminal-to-terminal pitch applications.




An elongated protruding solder contact is taught according to U.S. Pat. No. 5,130,779, by sequentially encapsulating solder deposits with a barrier metal. This approach insures that a staged solder deposit does not collapse upon reflow, and a controlled aspect ratio solder contact is thus formed. In order for the barrier metal to be effective, the walls of sequentially deposited solder masses must have a slope. Deposition of such a structure of solder is a lengthy and expensive process.




A method of attaching highly compliant leads to an array matrix of contacts on a semiconductor package is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,199. An array of leads is manufactured according to the required pattern with temporary tab structures tying the leads together. Compliant leads are gang bonded to terminals on the semiconductor package, and tabs are removed leaving compliant protruding contact leads, ready for attachment to a substrate. This approach, like the interposer techniques described above, requires specific tooling for every new package with a distinct pattern of the array of contacts.




OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One object of the present invention is to provide a high volume, low cost manufacturing process for production of precise shape and geometry protuberant conductive contacts on a wide variety of electronic components, the contacts having a controlled set of physical, metallurgical and mechanical properties, bulk and surface. Such protuberant contacts can be employed to satisfy electrical, thermal or geometrical requirements in various aspects of electronic interconnection applications. An inventive, multiple stage process is provided, according to which, first, wire stems are bonded to contact carrying terminals, the stems being shaped in three dimensional space, to define skeletons of the resulting contacts. The conductive contacts are then completed through at least one deposition step of a coating which envelopes or jackets the wire skeletons and the terminals. The common coating not only helps to “anchor” protruding contacts to the terminals, but also provides for characteristics of the protuberant contacts with respect to long term stability of their engagement contact with mating electronic component, including but not limited to interconnection substrates, semiconductor devices, interconnect or test sockets. The coating also determines soldering assembly characteristics, as well as long term effects from contact with solder. The coating, along with the wire material properties, determines the mechanical characteristics of the resulting protuberant contact. The wire serves as a “skeleton” of a resulting protruding contact, and the coating serves as its “muscle”.




The wire skeleton can be bonded employing high productivity, highly automated ultrasonic, thermosonic and thermocompression wirebonding equipment (hereinafter referred to as ultrasonic wirebonding equipment). The wirebonding equipment can be organized for ball bonding type ultrasonic wirebonding process, typically used for gold or copper wirebonding, but modifiable for use with other types of single phase or noble metal coated wires. Wire skeletons consisting of free standing single or multiple wire stems can be produced. As required by the shape and dimensions of the resulting conductive contacts, the stems can be standing normal to a terminal or at an angle thereto, or can be formed in three dimensional space. Alternatively, wire skeletons produced using an ultrasonic ball bonder can be produced by forming a traditional wire-bonding loop, which originates and terminates on a contact carrying terminal, or which originates on the contact carrying terminal and terminates on a sacrificial conductor outside the terminal area. Then the sacrificial conductor is selectively dissolved away after completion of the contact processing. Optionally, a wedge bonding type ultrasonic wirebonder can be employed, in which case controlled shape loops of wire are formed with both ends of a loop on the same terminal, or they are formed by originating the loops within the area of the terminal and terminating or severing the loops outside the terminals. Both types of wirebonders are available commercially from a variety of suppliers, and are highly automated, with the bonding speeds exceeding 10 wires per second.




An additional object of the present invention is to produce array patterns of contacts for unique component designs, without incurring costs and delays associated with production of unique tooling. This object is achieved through use of a sequential wirebonding process for attaching of the wire skeletons to the terminals, and then overcoating them in a single, non-pattern-specific step. Location targeting and geometric characteristics are entered into an electronic control system of the wirebonding equipment with a specific set of commands. A program controls all aspects of wire forming and shaping process, as well as bond characteristics. Production of the multiple protruding contacts does not require time-limiting and costly production of molds, masks or the like, which otherwise would be specific to every incoming order. This object is exemplified by application of the present invention to production of integrated pin-shaped contacts for ceramic pin grid array packages. This is achieved by bonding straight vertical, single stem skeletons, perpendicular to the surface of terminals, and overcoating them with a conductive structural metal or alloy, consisting substantially of nickel, copper, cobalt, iron or alloys thereof, with the thickness of the deposit determined by the required pin diameter value. This can also be accomplished with equal ease on plastic pin carrying substrates.




Yet another object of the present invention is to create protruding, tower-like solder contacts which substantially maintain a well controlled aspect ratio even when the solder is molten. This object is achieved through first bonding a wire skeleton which will define the final shape and aspect ratio of a solder contact, then optionally overcoating it with a barrier layer which prevents long term reaction between the solder and the wire, and finally depositing a mass of solder which wets the skeleton with a barrier, and clings onto the skeleton even after multiple reflows.




Yet another object of the present invention is to create controlled shape resilient contacts on top of (or otherwise protruding from) contact carrying terminals arranged in various patterns, including arrays. This object is achieved by overcoating the wire skeleton with at least one coating having a predetermined combination of thickness, yield strength and elastic modulus to insure predetermined force-to-deflection characteristics of resulting spring contacts.




Yet another object of the present invention is to produce protruding contacts on top of (or otherwise protruding from) a multitude of contact-carrying terminals, where the terminals have varying vertical coordinates, corresponding to an origin point of the protruding contacts, while uppermost points of the protruding contacts extend to a vertical coordinate which is substantially identical, within a permissible tolerance level for the component or substrate which is to be subsequently connected to the contacts. In a different embodiment related to this object, the terminals can originate on various electronic components, while the protuberant contacts extend to a substantially identical vertical coordinate. This object is achieved by controlling a wire severing step, by always severing the wire at a predetermined vertical coordinate. Overcoatings then follow the skeleton wire shape and geometry, yielding a contact having a controlled vertical coordinate level, regardless of the Z-axis point of origination of the contact, e.g. plane of the terminal. Some of the terminals having varying Z-coordinates and overlying the component, can optionally and additionally overlie single or multiple electronic devices, placed on the electronic component. In another embodiment related to this object of the present invention, the vertical coordinate of the tips of the protuberant contacts can be controlled by the software algorithm of the appropriately arranged automated wirebonding equipment.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The foregoing and other objects and advantages will appear more fully from a Summary of the Invention which follows viewed in conjunction with drawings which accompany and form part of this Application. In the drawings:





FIGS. 1



a


and


1




b


are schematic representations of a known ball-and-wedge technique to form a loop-like wire skeleton of a protruding electrical contact.





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional representation of a conductive contact resulting after overcoating the wire skeleton depicted in FIG.


2


.





FIG. 3

is a schematic representation of a conductive contacts with skeletons consisting of two loop-like stems.





FIG. 4

is a cross-sectional representation of protruding solder contacts based on loop-like skeletons with a barrier metal between the wire material and the solder.





FIG. 5

is a schematic representation of protruding solder contacts where each skeleton consists of two loop-like stems, the skeleton material overcoated with a barrier layer prior to deposition of solder.





FIGS. 6



a


,


6




b


and


6




c


depict a sequence of bonding one end of a loop-like stem to a sacrificial pad, overcoating the skeleton, and a following step of removal of a sacrificial pad, resulting in protuberant contact with a floating end.





FIGS. 7



a


,


7




b


and


7




c


represent schematically a sequence of bonding single stem, perpendicular skeletons to contact-carrying terminals.





FIG. 8

is a cross-sectional view of vertical protuberant contacts produced by overcoating the skeletons depicted in

FIG. 7



c.







FIGS. 9 and 10

schematically represent an example of the skeletons based on two single stems perpendicular to the plane of contact carrying terminals, and the protuberant contacts resulting after overcoating skeletons shown in

FIG. 9

with contact material.





FIG. 11

is a schematic representation of protuberant contacts originating on terminals lying in different planes, and with tips of the contacts lying in a common horizontal plane.





FIG. 12

is a schematic representation of protuberant contacts originating on terminals lying two distinct electronic components, and with tips of the contacts lying in a common horizontal plane.





FIG. 13

is a schematic representation of a solder protuberant contact based on a double-stem skeleton, with a barrier layer between the skeleton and the solder.





FIG. 14

is a schematic of S-shaped wire skeletons.





FIG. 15

is a cross-sectional representation of resilient protuberant contacts resulting after overcoating the S-shaped skeletons with an appropriate conductive material.





FIG. 16

is a cross-sectional representation of resilient protuberant contacts with microprotrusions for improved contact characteristics.





FIG. 17

is a representation of a fence-like skeleton on top of a contact-carrying terminal.





FIG. 18

is a cross-sectional representation of a pin grid array package incorporating pins produced according to the method of the present invention.





FIG. 19

is a schematic representation of an assembly of a semiconductor package incorporating protuberant solder contacts and an interconnection substrate, after completion of the solder reflow step.





FIG. 20

is a schematic representation of an electronic package, incorporating protuberant solder contacts on its two interconnection surfaces.





FIG. 21

is a schematic representation of a dielectric interposer with resilient protuberant contacts on its two surfaces, the interposer including means of electrical interconnection between the two surfaces.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




The method of the present invention relies on wirebonding equipment to produce controlled aspect ratio and shape wire skeletons, which are subsequently overcoated with a desired material in order to produce a required set of properties for protuberant electrical contacts.

FIGS. 1A and 1B

depict use of a ball-and-wedge wirebonding machine to form a wire skeleton. More detailed descriptions of this and wedge—wedge wirebonding methods, commonly used in the semiconductor industry for interconnecting silicon devices to packages, can be found in


Electronic Packaging and Interconnection Handbook


edited by Charles A. Harper, on pp. 6.62-6.64 and 7.28-7.30.

FIG. 1A

illustrates a capillary


1


, with an open clamp


2


, containing an end portion of a continuous wire


20


with a ball


21


formed at its feed end below the capillary tip. The ball


21


is brought in contact with a contact carrying terminal


90


on top of (or otherwise contained within) a substrate


10


. As a result of application of pressure, temperature or ultrasonic energy, or combinations thereof, a ball is bonded to the terminal. The ball


21


in

FIG. 1A

is in the bonding process changed into ball bond


22


shown in FIG.


1


B. Subsequent capillary motion sets the shape of a wire stem


60


. Loop geometry of the wire stem is controlled by parameter settings in the software control algorithm of the wirebonding equipment. A second end of the wire stem is bonded to the terminal


90


by means of pressure, temperature or ultrasonic energy, and deforming the wire against the terminal


90


. A wedge-shaped joint


23


thereby is produced. The capillary then rises to a predetermined height, a clamp


2


closes, and the wire is severed at a thinnest point of the joint


23


, leaving a fractured free end


24


below the capillary


1


. In preparation for forming a next joint, a next ball


21


is formed at the severed free end


24


of the of the wire underneath the capillary, and the cycle is repeated. The loop-shaped stems can be alternatively produced by wedge—wedge technique, where both end of the stem are bonded by the wedge tool. Wire material for ball-wedge and wedge—wedge type of wire-bonding is most commonly gold, aluminum or copper, with slight modifications by other elements, like beryllium, cadmium, silicon and magnesium to control the properties. other materials, including solder, and specifically lead-tin solder wire, have been employed. Alloys of silver and platinum group elements can also be used for wire material. Gold, aluminum and copper, or alloys based on these metals, are the preferred wire materials. The terminal material should preferably use at least a top layer (if a multi-layer structure) of gold or aluminum, but numerous other metallizations can be successfully used, requiring different levels of ultrasonic vibration, force and temperature. A modern automated wirebonder is capable of bonding over 10 loop-shaped stems per second.




In the embodiment of the present invention represented in

FIGS. 1A and 1B

, a wire skeleton


30


is formed upon severing the single wire stem


60


. As shown in

FIG. 2

, the skeleton


30


geometrically defines the protuberant contact produced by the method of the present invention.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, physical, finishing and determining mechanical and chemical properties of the resulting protuberant contact


50


are provided through overcoating of the skeleton


30


and the contact carrying terminal


90


with a continuous coating


40


, which consists of at least one electrically conducting layer. The continuous coating


40


anchors the skeleton to the terminal by bridging in the areas of contact between the ball bond


22


and wedge bond


23


and the terminal. The overcoating material may be significantly stronger than the skeleton material. It can be applied by wet electrochemical means, e.g. through electrolytic or electroless aqueous solution plating of metals on the skeleton and the terminal. The wet plating techniques are, for instance, described in


Metal Finishing Guidebook


annually published by Metals and Plastics Publications, Inc. One preferred embodiment comprises electroplating of nickel out of nickel and its alloys. This method is capable of depositing controlled thickness coating with a tensile strength in excess of 80,000 pounds per square inch. Additional improvement of mechanical strength of the resulting contact is achieved when a coating with a compressive internal stress is deposited, which effectively increases the stress level required to deform or break a resulting protuberant electrical contact.




The coating method also optionally includes so-called physical and chemical vapor methods of conductor material deposition. These optional techniques are detailed in a book by M. Ohring,


The Materials Science of Thin Films


, Academic Press, 1992. Coating methods also include and contemplate deposition of conductors through various decomposition processes of gaseous, liquid or solid precursors.




Nickel has a strong tendency to form an oxide and is therefore, not the best choice as a contact metal. It requires large contact forces to break through the oxide. For low contact force applications, it requires a second noble or semi-noble coating layer on top. Gold, silver, elements of the platinum group and their alloys are preferred choices as a noble or semi-noble overcoating layer. Similarly, in other instances, multiple layers, comprising conductive overcoating


40


, can be selected to tailor the set of properties of the protuberant contact to a given application.




Within the method of the present invention, a plurality of wire stems can be employed to create a wire skeleton. Referring now to

FIG. 3

, two wire stems


60


comprise each skeleton


31


. Conductive overcoating


40


completes protuberant contact


51


.




In a growing number of applications there is a requirement for controlled aspect ratio columns of solder on top of an area array of terminals on ceramic and plastic semiconductor packages. Most often, an area array of balls made of a solder alloy, commonly a eutectic alloy of lead and tin, is used in surface mounting of components with an array of terminals to a matching array of contacts on a circuit board. Long term resistance of such solder contacts is determined by the height, shape and the material characteristics of the solder joints. The method of the present invention provides for controlled shape solder contacts formed around a wire skeleton. Referring now to

FIG. 4

, wire skeletons


30


are first coated with an optional barrier layer


41


, and in the following step are overcoated by a solder mass


42


. The barrier layer


41


inhibits an undesired reaction between the wire material and the solder mass. This barrier layer is especially important in the embodiment of the invention providing for gold wire skeletons and a solder mass comprising an alloy of lead and tin. Due to reactivity between gold and tin, and detrimental effects of intermetallic, gold-tin compounds on the service performance of solder joints, the reaction between gold and tin must be prevented. A 100 to 1,000 microinch barrier of a nickel alloy is typically a sufficient deterrent to the reaction between solder and gold for most applications.




Deposition of solder overcoating can be accomplished, for example, by sending a package or a substrate through a solder wave process cycle in a solder wave equipment. The solder wets the barrier layer


41


, and bridges among adjacent wire portions forming the loop-shaped stems, to assume a shape depicted in FIG.


4


. The shape does not substantially change during subsequent reflow cycles, as long as there is no significant reaction between the solder and the barrier coating. The overall shape of the solder column depends on area of the terminal and geometry of the skeleton. Bridging by molten solder masses between the ascending and descending branches of loop-shaped stems, and the surface of the terminal, enables the skeletons to contain and support disproportionately large volumes of solder. A preferred solder protuberant contact produced by the method of the present invention will contain more than 70 volume percent of solder, and more preferably over 80 volume percent of solder by volume, with the remainder comprising the skeleton and the barrier material.




A preferred embodiment for a solder column contact, depicted in

FIG. 4

, is a gold based alloy wire loop skeleton


30


, with a nickel based coating


41


, and a near eutectic lead-tin solder mass


42


. The gold wire diameter usually ranges between 0.0005 and 0.005 inches, and preferably between 0.0007 and 0.003 inches. The nickel overcoat


40


usually ranges in thickness between 0.00005 and 0.007 inches, and preferably between 0.000100 and 0.003 inches. Another preferred embodiment is a copper alloy wire skeleton, which can be directly overcoated with solder mass. In another preferred embodiment, copper based wire skeleton is first overcoated with a nickel based barrier layer, followed by deposition of the solder material.




Both types of protuberant contacts, solder contacts


52


shown in

FIG. 4

, and contacts


50


shown in

FIG. 2

, can be soldered to an interconnection substrate or a component using surface mount soldering technology. Solder contacts


52


have an advantage in handling prior to processing, in that solid solder mass


42


,

FIG. 4

, bridging between the wire branches of the skeleton and surface of the terminal, makes the contact more resistant to mechanical damage in handling, e.g. bending and breakage.




Further increase of the overall proportion of solder material in protuberant solder contacts can be achieved by using multiple wire stem skeletons. Referring now to

FIG. 5

, two severed stems


60


comprise each skeleton


31


bonded to a contact carrying terminal


90


. An optional barrier material


41


is first deposited on top of the terminal


90


and the skeleton


31


, in order to inhibit a possible reaction between the solder and the skeleton material. A solder material


42


completes the construction of a protuberant solder contact. By presenting more ascending and descending wire branches for solder bridging, the relative volume content of solder material in the protuberant contact can be significantly increased.




Protuberant solder contacts


52


and


53


in FIG.


4


and

FIG. 5

, substantially retain their shape even during subsequent solder reflows, due to strong wetting between the solder and the barrier layer


41


. This shape retention is despite solder constituting preferably more than 70 volume percent of the protuberant contacts


52


and


53


, and most preferably more than 80 volume percent. This property of protuberant solder contacts produced by the method of the present invention allows for contacts to be put on electronic components prior to device assembly steps, even if the assembly process involves heating the component


10


above the melting temperature of solder material


42


.




In the spirit of the present invention, but in yet an alternate embodiment, either the ball or a wedge bond of the wire stem can be formed outside the area of a contact carrying terminal. As shown in

FIG. 6A

, a wedge bond


29


completes a wire stem


61


, and upon the severing step at the bond


29


, resulting in formation of a wire skeleton


32


. The wedge bond


29


is formed outside the area of the terminal


90


at a terminal


91


. The terminal


91


is positioned on top of a sacrificial layer


80


, or could optionally be sacrificial by being comprised of a dissimilar metal from that of terminal


90


. In both cases, the sacrificial arrangement is temporarily used for electrical contact to an electrode, in that it is required for electroplating of a conductive coating


43


, enveloping the skeletons


32


and the terminals


90


and


91


, to complete protuberant conductive contacts


54


, as illustrated in FIG.


6


B. The sacrificial layer is also used for assuring a different Z-axis coordinate for the bonds


22


and


29


. As illustrated in

FIG. 6C

after a coating deposition and a removal step for the sacrificial layer, one of the ends of the wire loop based contact ends up being suspended above the substrate


10


. This suspension is especially important for formation of controlled geometry spring contacts, capable of resiliently engaging with mating terminals on a component or a substrate for testing, burn-in or demountable electrical interconnect in service. The variation of the Z-coordinate of an end of the wire-loop shaped contact allows for resilient Z-axis movement of a tip of the resulting spring when a force is applied thereto.




Referring now to

FIGS. 7A through 8

, another preferred embodiment of the method for manufacturing controlled aspect ratio protuberant contacts. In this embodiment, only ball bonding is used, the wires are bonded substantially vertically. The software of the control system of the wirebonder is programmed to exclude the common wedge bonding step for severing the wires. Instead the same electronic or hydrogen flame-off used for ball formation prior to the ball bonding is employed to severe the wires at a predetermined height.

FIG. 7A

depicts a ball bonding capillary


1


, wire


20


after the first ball bonding step which created a ball bond


22


on top of contact carrying terminal


11


. After the bond the capillary moves up to a predetermined position, and electrode


3


is brought under a high potential, resulting in a generation of a spark which melts and severe the wire


20


at a predetermined spot, as illustrated in FIG.


7


B. As a result of the severing step a wire skeleton


33


is created, which comprises a single stem


62


extending to its severed end


25


. The severing step also readies the feed end


21


of the wire


20


to the next stem bonding step.




After vertical wire stems


62


are formed on contact carrying terminals


90


, and after the severing step which defines single stem skeletons


33


, as shown in

FIG. 7C

, the wire skeletons


33


and the contact carrying terminals


90


are overcoated with a deposit


44


, originating at the terminals and extending to the tops of the wires as a continuous blanket coating, to complete protuberant contacts


55


. As in the previous embodiments, the composition and the thickness of the continuous coating is selected to satisfy requirements of a given application.




The protuberant vertical contacts


55


shown in

FIG. 8

are especially useful as a replacement method for standard techniques for attachment of pins to plastic and ceramic semiconductor packages, a method which results in lower package cost and reduced pinned package production time. This usefulness is due to the fact that the pin-shaped contacts produced by the method of the present invention do not require pattern specific tooling or molds.




Thickness and material composition of conductive layer


44


shown in

FIG. 8

depends on the production, assembly and service requirement, and the characteristics of package material. The layer


44


can comprise nickel alloy. In another embodiment layer


44


can comprise a copper alloy. Yet in another embodiment layer


44


can comprise alloys of nickel, iron and cobalt, with controlled thermal expansion characteristics. In yet additional embodiment, layer


44


is formed through multiple deposition steps, the top deposit comprising a noble or semi-noble metal or alloy, out of a group of gold, platinum, silver, rhodium, ruthenium and copper. The top deposit improves electrical contact characteristics of the pin-like contact


55


.





FIGS. 9 and 10

illustrate the process of attachment of contacts


56


to the contact carrying terminals


90


. The contacts are based on skeletons


34


, each skeleton


34


comprising two vertical wire stems


62


. The skeletons and the terminals


90


are overcoated by layer


44


to complete protuberant, vertical-double-stem contacts


56


. This type of contacts can be useful in soldering, where multiple branches of the contact present themselves to solder for improved assembly yield.




Referring again to

FIG. 7



b


, due to the stationary position of the electrode


3


, the wire


20


always gets severed at a predetermined elevation, regardless the Z-coordinate of the ball bond


22


. Uniform elevation is a very desirable property, especially in cases when contacts are placed on a substrate or a component which is not planar due to manufacturing tolerances, or is warped during thermal assembly or processing steps. In other instances, various terminals


90


on an electronic component


10


are provided in different planes, as illustrated in

FIG. 11

, while the highest elevation points of the protuberant contacts


56


may be required to lie in a substantially identical horizontal plane. This configuration is especially important when contact carrying terminals lie at different positions of an interconnection substrate, but they bear protuberant contacts which must contact a highly planar device or component. This self-planarizing capability of the method of the present invention is also important when the terminals lie on different components, but the tips of protuberant contacts must terminate in a substantially identical horizontal plane. As illustrated in

FIG. 12

, terminals


90


and


92


lie on components


10


and


11


respectively, while the protuberant contacts


56


vertically terminate in a substantially identical plane. In the embodiment depicted in

FIG. 12

, the two components,


10


and


11


, are optionally interconnected electrically by means of conductive masses


900


. In this embodiment of the invention, component


11


can represent an interconnection substrate, while one or a plurality of components


11


can represent passive devices, like capacitors or resistors. The protuberant contacts may serve for interconnection of a bare, unpackaged semiconductor device (not shown in the

FIG. 12

) to the interconnection substrate


10


. Such an electrical arrangement decreases the inductance value between critical contacts on the semiconductor device and a capacitor component, which improves electrical performance of semiconductor devices operating at high frequencies.




Wire skeletons consisting of multiple vertical wire stems are especially useful for protuberant solder contact applications.

FIG. 13

illustrates a cross section of a protuberant solder contact


57


supported by a wire skeleton


34


consisting of two vertical stems


62


. An optional barrier layer


45


is first deposited, followed by the solder


42


deposition step. The deposition step can be accomplished by passing a substrate with protuberant skeletons


34


, overcoated with a barrier metal


45


, through a common wave soldering machine. The solder bridges between the wires, in addition to coating the outsides and top surfaces of the wires due to wetting. In contrast, a single wire skeleton would support solder only through the wetting mechanism, without a possibility of bridging, and would support less bulk solder per wire as a result of solder application by solder wave technique. A common solder state-of-the-art wave soldering method is described in


Electronic Materials Handbook


, Volume 1 Packaging, from ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, on pp. 688 through 696. A preferred method for producing this embodiment of the present invention involves use of multiple gold wires, ranging from 0.0005 to 0.005 inches in diameter, and more preferably 0.0007 to 0.003 inches in diameter, overcoated with 0.000030 to 0.005 inches of nickel or nickel alloy or cobalt or cobalt alloy, and more preferably with 0.000050 to 0.003 inches of nickel or nickel alloy. The amount of solder deposited from solder wave would depend on the wave conditions and the dimension of the overcoated skeleton, as well as the size of the contact carrying terminal.




In another embodiment of the present invention, the solder overcoat


42


, which completes a protuberant solder contact


57


, is a continuous coating deposited over a wire skeleton without a barrier layer between the solder and the wire and terminals. Gold wire without a barrier is not an appropriate choice for this embodiment, because a continuous reaction between the solder and the gold embrittles the solder or solder joint to a substrate or to a component. However, a copper wire is useful to form the wire skeleton, and then a solder coating is applied using, for example, a solder wave approach referred to above.




An alternative approach to forming solder columns on top of wire skeletons is to plate electrolytically the solder. The electrolytically deposited solder is appropriate for standard surface mount assembly. Alternatively, the solder can be reflowed after electrolytic deposition, and prior to the assembly.




The method of forming wire skeletons described by means of ball bonding, shown in

FIGS. 7A through 7C

is appropriate for forming individual resilient contacts. Instead of forming vertical wires, the skeleton wires for spring contacts are formed with the shape which deviates from vertical. One preferred embodiment for forming spring contacts is illustrated in

FIGS. 14 and 15

. A single or multiple wire is ball bonded to a terminal, followed by a motion of the capillary which forms the wire into an S-shaped wire stem


63


. The forming step is followed by a severing step performed by means of an electronic flame-off provided by the tool


3


. The severing step defines a skeleton consisting of single or multiple S-shaped wire stems. The skeletons


35


and the resilient contact carrying terminals


90


are then overcoated by a conductive deposit


46


, which possesses mechanical characteristics, which, along with the s-shape of the stems, ensures a resilient response of the resulting protuberant contacts


58


to a deflective force.




One preferred embodiment for a resilient overcoating is a nickel or a nickel alloy layer. For example, Ni electroplated out of standard nickel sulfamate solution could be used. Such nickel deposit can be produced with compressive internal stress which would improve the spring characteristics, as well as varying strength and ductility levels. A plated nickel-cobalt alloy has greater strength and improved resilient properties. Rhodium, ruthenium or other elements of the platinum group and their alloys with gold, silver and copper constitute another group of preferred embodiment overcoat materials. Tungsten or nickel can also be deposited by chemical vapor deposition techniques, and represent another preferred embodiment materials.




Gold is the most commonly used wire material for ultrasonic wirebonding applications, but it is soft and it may not be an appropriate skeleton material for a spring contact if it constitutes a significant portion of the spring cross-sectional area. One embodiment of the present invention provides for a common high speed bonding of gold skeleton wires. An alloying layer is then deposited, which when reacted with gold, forms a gold alloy, the alloy having higher strength then pure gold. One preferred embodiment provides for deposition of tin on top of gold wire, with subsequent reaction of gold and tin at a temperature below the melting temperature of gold-tin eutectic. A gold-tin alloy results, which is significantly stronger than gold.




The contact properties of the springs in

FIG. 15

can be enhanced by overcoating the spring material with a noble or semi-noble material, like gold, silver, or elements of the platinum group and their alloys. This overcoating reduces contact resistance of spring contacts


58


when they are engaged against the mating conductive terminals for interconnection purposes. Another embodiment is depicted in

FIG. 16

, with a spring coating


47


having local protrusions. Such a coating can be created through dendritic growth of an electroplated deposit, or through incorporation of foreign particulates into the conductive deposit


47


. Alternatively, a regular uniform first deposit layer can be applied, which provides for resilient properties, and the subsequently deposited top layer incorporates local protrusions or particulates to complete conductive deposit


47


. The local protrusions dramatically increase the local pressures exerted by the resilient protruding contact


59


onto a mating terminal during the interconnection engagement, and reduce contact resistance when contacting easily passivating, oxide forming materials overlying the engaged terminals.




Resilient protuberant contact produced by the method of the present invention rely on the shape of a skeleton and the properties of the conductive material for its spring properties. In another embodiment of the present invention, wire stems or wire skeletons can be additionally shaped by a tool external to a wirebonding equipment, prior or before the deposition step.





FIG. 17

illustrates another embodiment of the present invention, where a fence-like skeleton


36


is erected on top of a contact carrying terminal


90


. The skeleton is formed by sequential bonding of the additional loop-shaped wire stems, without the severing steps between the bonds, until the skeleton is completed. This skeleton shape is especially useful when large masses of solder have to be contained within the spatial boundaries determined by the skeleton


36


. One preferred application of this embodiment is production of massive solder pads for thermal interconnection to heat sinks or substrates.




Protuberant contacts, as manufactured according to the present invention, are mounted on terminals on top of various interconnection substrates; such as laminate printed circuit boards, Teflon based circuit boards, multi-layer ceramic substrates, silicon based substrates, varieties of hybrid substrates, and other substrates for integration of electronic systems known to those skilled in the art. The contacts can also be put on top of terminals directly on semiconductor devices, such as silicon and gallium arsenide devices, for subsequent demountable or permanent attachment to interconnection substrates. The contacts could also be put on terminals on one or both sides of electronic components or devices, such as ceramic and plastic packages housing semiconductor components, and other devices. The contacts could be put directly on top of passive devices, such as resistors and capacitors.




One arrangement is shown in

FIG. 18

, wherein pin-like contacts


55


are mounted to terminals of a ceramic semiconductor package


100


. A semiconductor device


101


is bonded to the package using die attach material


112


. Electrical interconnection of the device to the package is accomplished with industry standard gold wire bonds


113


, extending from terminals


95


on the semiconductor device


101


to terminals


94


on the ceramic package


100


. This could alternatively be accomplished with aluminum wire wedge bonding. Interconnectivity within the ceramic package


100


, between the wirebond terminals


94


and pin contact carrying terminals


96


, is accomplished through the incorporation of conductors


910


within the ceramic package body. The device is sealed hermetically in a package cavity with, typically, a Kovar alloy lid


111


. The contacts can be put on before or after attachment and assembly of the semiconductor device


101


in the package


100


. The package


100


with the protruding contacts is ready for interconnection to an interconnection substrate, such as a printed circuit board. Depending on the method of connection, top deposit layer of the contacts


55


can be gold, noble or semi-noble material, tin, or a tin-lead solder alloy.





FIG. 19

illustrates a cross section of a semiconductor package


100


, with semiconductor device


101


interconnected therewith, and interconnected to a substrate


12


with terminals


97


, the pattern of the terminals


97


matching the pattern of contact carrying terminals


96


on the package


100


. The package solder column shaped joints between the terminals


96


and


97


resulted after solder attachment of the package


100


with columns


57


to a substrate


12


. The surface mount soldering is accomplished preferably by stencil or screen printing solder paste volumes on top of each terminal


97


, positioning contacts


57


in contact with said solder paste, reflowing the solder in an oven at a temperature above the melting temperature of the solder in solder paste. Alternatively solder can be applied by various means of deposition, and placement and reflow methods can be utilized. The soldering process follows industry standard procedure commonly referred to as Surface-Mount Technology, and described in Chapter 9 of


Electronic Packaging and Interconnection Handbook


, edited by Charles A. Harper, and published by McGraw-Hill, Inc. As shown in

FIG. 19

, an hour-glass joint shape results, which is commonly recognized as the most reliable shape for increased resistance to thermally induced joint failures.




Due to the fact that columns


57


can be manufactured with any solder, including eutectic tin-lead solder, the most of the volume of the contact


57


melts during the reflow, and the solder redistributes itself according to the surface area of its reinforcing wire skeleton and the surface area of its mating terminals. This feature allows one to achieve in some cases a self-alignment effect, e.g. the component is pulled into registration with the terminal array on a substrate due to surface forces of solder wetting. This feature is in contrast to other techniques for solder column utilization, which typically use higher melting temperature solder, and only the portions of solder deposited onto terminals on a substrate melt, which reduces the absolute value of solder-surface wetting forces.




The contacts of the present invention can be put on both sides of an electronic package or a substrate for multiple interconnection to various devices. Alternatively, the contacts can be put on one side of an electronic package for interconnection to a semiconductor device, and on the other side of the semiconductor package for subsequent interconnection to a circuit board or any other substrate.

FIG. 20

depicts an electronic package


110


, which has miniature solder columns


570


for interconnecting a flip-chip semiconductor device, on top of the package, and solder columns


57


at the bottom, for subsequent interconnection to a printed circuit board.




Spring contacts produced by the present invention are used as a standard means of interconnect between substrates and components which have matching patterns of terminals. In many cases it is desirable not to manufacture the contacts on either substrates or components, or devices, as the process yield associated with contact manufacturing would cause loss of costly devices, substrates or components. One embodiment of the present invention, illustrated in

FIG. 21

, provides for a substantially planar interposer


120


with matching set of terminals


97


on both sides thereof, and means


930


for connecting electrically the matching terminals on both of the sides. Protuberant resilient contacts


59


are placed on contact carrying terminals


97


on both sides of the interposer


120


. This contact carrying structure is ready for demountable interconnection of a variety of electronic components.




It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that wide deviations may be made from the foregoing preferred embodiments of the invention without departing from a main theme of invention set forth in claims which follow herein.



Claims
  • 1. An electronic assembly comprising:a semiconductor die having a plurality of terminals; and a plurality of resilient, springable interconnection elements, each of the interconnection elements having a die end attached directly to a respective one of the terminals on the die, an elongate section between the die end and a contact end, and a tip on the contact end, the tip pointing away from the die, wherein the interconnection elements include a precursor element and an overcoat material covering said precursor element, wherein the precursor element is of a flexible, substantially non-resilient material and the overcoat material provides the resilient springability of the interconnection element.
  • 2. The electronic assembly of claim 1 wherein the precursor element includes a material selected from the group of gold, aluminum and copper, and the overcoat material includes material selected from the group of nickel, cobalt and iron.
  • 3. The electronic assembly of claim 1 wherein the elongate section includes at least one bend.
  • 4. The electronic assembly of claim 1 wherein the elongate section includes a proximate portion extending from said die end at an angle away from the die, a mid-portion extending at an angle from said proximate portion, and a distal portion extending at an angle from said mid-portion and away from the die.
  • 5. The electronic assembly of claim 4 wherein the proximate portion extends from the die end at an angle substantially perpendicular to the die.
  • 6. The electronic assembly of claim 1 wherein the tip has a contact region which provides a releasable point contact.
  • 7. The electronic assembly of claim 1 wherein the contact end is moveable toward the surface of the die upon the application of a downward pressure upon the tip.
  • 8. The electronic assembly of claim 1, wherein the overcoat material is stronger than the precursor element material.
  • 9. The electronic assembly of claim 1, wherein the overcoat material anchors the precursor element to the terminal.
  • 10. An electronic assembly comprising:a semiconductor die having a plurality of terminals; and a plurality of resilient, springable interconnection elements, each of the interconnection elements including a precursor element of a flexible, non-resilient material and an overcoat material covering said precursor element, the overcoat material providing the resilient springability of the interconnection element, and having a die end attached directly to a respective one of the terminals on the die, an elongate section extending from the die end to a contact end, the elongate section including at least a first bend and a second bend, and a tip on the contact end, the tip pointing away from the die.
  • 11. The electronic assembly of claim 10, wherein the overcoat material is stronger than the precursor element material.
  • 12. An electronic assembly comprising:a semiconductor die having a plurality of terminals; and a plurality of resilient, springable interconnection elements, each of the interconnection elements having a die end attached directly to a respective one of the terminals on the die, an elongate section between the die end and a contact end, and a tip on the contact end, wherein the interconnection elements include a precursor element and an overcoat material covering said precursor element, the precursor element is of a flexible, substantially non-resilient material and the overcoat material provides the resilient springability of the interconnection element.
  • 13. The electronic assembly of claim 12 wherein the precursor element includes a material selected from the group of gold, aluminum and copper, and the overcoat material includes material selected from the group of nickel, cobalt and iron.
  • 14. The electronic assembly of claim 12 wherein the elongate section includes at least one bend.
  • 15. The electronic assembly of claim 12 wherein the elongate section includes a proximate portion extending from said die end at an angle away from the die, a mid-portion extending at an angle from said proximate portion, and a distal portion extending at an angle from said mid-portion and away from the die.
  • 16. The electronic assembly of claim 15 wherein the proximate portion extends from the die end at an angle substantially perpendicular to the die.
  • 17. The electronic assembly of claim 12 wherein the tip has a contact region which provides a releasable point contact.
  • 18. The electronic assembly of claim 12 wherein the contact end is moveable toward the surface of the die upon the application of a downward pressure upon the tip.
  • 19. The electronic assembly of claim 12, wherein the overcoat material is stronger than the precursor element material.
  • 20. The electronic assembly of claim 12, wherein the overcoat material anchors the precursor element to the terminal.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/245,499, filed Feb. 5, 1999 now abandoned, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/457,479, filed Jun. 1, 1995 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,976), which is a divisional of application Ser. No. 08/152,812, filed Nov. 16, 1993 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,211).

US Referenced Citations (212)
Number Name Date Kind
2429222 Ehrhardt et al. Oct 1947 A
2820932 Looney Jan 1958 A
2869040 Pifer Jan 1959 A
3087239 Clagett Apr 1963 A
3119172 Mazenro et al. Jan 1964 A
3188535 Walraven et al. Jun 1965 A
3189799 Moroney Jun 1965 A
3241011 De Mille et al. Mar 1966 A
3271851 Hayes Sep 1966 A
3373481 Lins Mar 1968 A
3389457 Goldman et al. Jun 1968 A
3445770 Harmon May 1969 A
3460238 Christy et al. Aug 1969 A
3509270 Dube et al. Apr 1970 A
3519890 Ashby Jul 1970 A
3569789 Jenik Mar 1971 A
3616532 Beck Nov 1971 A
3623127 Glenn May 1972 A
3662454 Miller May 1972 A
3672047 Sakamot et al. Jun 1972 A
3734386 Hazel May 1973 A
3747198 Bensen et al. Jul 1973 A
3753665 McCary et al. Aug 1973 A
3779804 Urban Dec 1973 A
3787966 Klessika Jan 1974 A
3795037 Luttmer Mar 1974 A
3842189 Southgate Oct 1974 A
3844909 McCary et al. Oct 1974 A
3849728 Evans Nov 1974 A
3849872 Hubacher Nov 1974 A
3924918 Friend Dec 1975 A
3982811 Siu et al. Sep 1976 A
4038599 Bove Jul 1977 A
4067104 Tacy Jan 1978 A
4085502 Ostman et al. Apr 1978 A
4295700 Sado Oct 1981 A
4303291 Dines Dec 1981 A
4330165 Sado May 1982 A
4332341 Minetti Jun 1982 A
4385341 Main May 1983 A
4418857 Ainslie et al. Dec 1983 A
4522893 Bohen et al. Jun 1985 A
4523144 Okubo et al. Jun 1985 A
4532152 Elarde Jul 1985 A
4545610 Lakritz et al. Oct 1985 A
4548451 Benarr et al. Oct 1985 A
4553192 Babuka et al. Nov 1985 A
4567433 Ohkubo et al. Jan 1986 A
4615573 White et al. Oct 1986 A
4618879 Mizukoshi et al. Oct 1986 A
4634199 Anhalt et al. Jan 1987 A
4642889 Grabbe Feb 1987 A
4664309 Allen et al. May 1987 A
4667219 Lee et al. May 1987 A
4697143 Lockwood Sep 1987 A
4705205 Allen et al. Nov 1987 A
4707657 Boegh-Petersen Nov 1987 A
4724383 Hart Feb 1988 A
4727319 Shahriary Feb 1988 A
4728751 Canestate Mar 1988 A
4732313 Kobayashi et al. Mar 1988 A
4746857 Sakai May 1988 A
4751199 Phy Jun 1988 A
4757256 Whann et al. Jul 1988 A
4764122 Sorel et al. Aug 1988 A
4764723 Strid Aug 1988 A
4764848 Simpson Aug 1988 A
4777564 Derfiny et al. Oct 1988 A
4780836 Miyazaki Oct 1988 A
4784872 Moeller et al. Nov 1988 A
4793814 Zifeak et al. Dec 1988 A
4821148 Kobayashi et al. Apr 1989 A
4860433 Miura Aug 1989 A
4870356 Tingley Sep 1989 A
4878611 LoVasco et al. Nov 1989 A
4893172 Matsumoto et al. Jan 1990 A
4899099 Mendenhall Feb 1990 A
4899107 Corbett Feb 1990 A
4914814 Behum et al. Apr 1990 A
4918032 Jain et al. Apr 1990 A
4955523 Carlomagno et al. Sep 1990 A
4961052 Tada Oct 1990 A
4983907 Crowley Jan 1991 A
4985676 Karawawa Jan 1991 A
4989069 Hawkins Jan 1991 A
4996629 Christiansen et al. Feb 1991 A
4998062 Ikeda Mar 1991 A
4998885 Beaman Mar 1991 A
5007576 Congleton et al. Apr 1991 A
5007872 Tang Apr 1991 A
5010388 Sasame et al. Apr 1991 A
5045410 Hiesbock et al. Sep 1991 A
5045975 Cray et al. Sep 1991 A
5047711 Smith Sep 1991 A
5055778 Okubo et al. Oct 1991 A
5055780 Takagi et al. Oct 1991 A
5059143 Grabbe Oct 1991 A
5066907 Tarzwell et al. Nov 1991 A
5067007 Otsuka et al. Nov 1991 A
5070297 Kwon Dec 1991 A
5071359 Arnio et al. Dec 1991 A
5073117 Malhi Dec 1991 A
5086337 Noro et al. Feb 1992 A
5090119 Tsuda et al. Feb 1992 A
5091772 Kohara et al. Feb 1992 A
5095187 Gliga Mar 1992 A
5097100 Jackson Mar 1992 A
5109596 Driller et al. May 1992 A
5110032 Akiyama et al. May 1992 A
5123850 Elder et al. Jun 1992 A
5130644 Ott Jul 1992 A
5130779 Agarwala et al. Jul 1992 A
5136367 Chiu Aug 1992 A
5139427 Boyd et al. Aug 1992 A
5140405 King Aug 1992 A
5148968 Schmidt et al. Sep 1992 A
5154341 Melton et al. Oct 1992 A
5157325 Murphy Oct 1992 A
5163834 Chapin et al. Nov 1992 A
5166774 Banerji et al. Nov 1992 A
5173055 Grabbe Dec 1992 A
5187020 Kwon et al. Feb 1993 A
5189507 Carlomango et al. Feb 1993 A
5195237 Cray et al. Mar 1993 A
5198752 Miyata Mar 1993 A
5199889 McDevitt, Jr. Apr 1993 A
5214375 Ikeuchi May 1993 A
5218292 Goto Jun 1993 A
5220277 Reitinger Jun 1993 A
5228861 Grabbe Jul 1993 A
5230632 Baumberger et al. Jul 1993 A
5298464 Schlesinger et al. Jul 1993 A
5239126 Oshiba Aug 1993 A
5240588 Uchida Aug 1993 A
5247250 Rios Sep 1993 A
5266889 Harwood Nov 1993 A
5294039 Pai et al. Mar 1994 A
5296744 Lang et al. Mar 1994 A
5397967 Baumberger et al. Mar 1994 A
5299939 Walker et al. Apr 1994 A
5303938 Miller Apr 1994 A
5317479 Pai et al. May 1994 A
5325052 Yamashita Jun 1994 A
5329228 Comeau Jul 1994 A
5336992 Saito Aug 1994 A
5338223 Melatti Aug 1994 A
5349495 Visel et al. Sep 1994 A
5350947 Takekawa et al. Sep 1994 A
5355081 Nakata Oct 1994 A
5359227 Liang et al. Oct 1994 A
5363038 Love Nov 1994 A
5366380 Reymond Nov 1994 A
5386344 Beaman et al. Jan 1995 A
5389743 Simila et al. Feb 1995 A
5389873 Ishii Feb 1995 A
5391984 Worley Feb 1995 A
5396104 Kimura Mar 1995 A
5397997 Tuckerman Mar 1995 A
5399982 Driller et al. Mar 1995 A
5410162 Tigelaar Apr 1995 A
5414298 Grube et al. May 1995 A
5422516 Hosokawa et al. Jun 1995 A
5424651 Green Jun 1995 A
5434513 Fujii Jul 1995 A
5436571 Karasawa Jul 1995 A
5440241 King Aug 1995 A
5442282 Rostoker et al. Aug 1995 A
5444366 Chiu Aug 1995 A
5444386 Mizumura Aug 1995 A
5446395 Goto Aug 1995 A
5455390 DiStefano et al. Oct 1995 A
5457398 Schwindt Oct 1995 A
5457400 Ahmad Oct 1995 A
5461328 Devereaux Oct 1995 A
5476211 Khandros Dec 1995 A
5479108 Cheng Dec 1995 A
5479109 Lau Dec 1995 A
5483175 Ahmad Jan 1996 A
5488292 Tsuta Jan 1996 A
5495395 Yoneda et al. Feb 1996 A
5495667 Farnworth et al. Mar 1996 A
5497079 Yamada et al. Mar 1996 A
5506498 Anderson Apr 1996 A
5510724 Itoyama Apr 1996 A
5517126 Yamaguchi May 1996 A
5518964 DiStefano et al. May 1996 A
5525545 Grube et al. Jun 1996 A
5532609 Harwood Jul 1996 A
5532610 Tsujide Jul 1996 A
5532614 Chiu Jul 1996 A
5534784 Lum Jul 1996 A
5534786 Kaneko Jul 1996 A
5536973 Yamaji Jul 1996 A
5550482 Sano Aug 1996 A
5555422 Nakano Sep 1996 A
5557501 DiStefano et al. Sep 1996 A
5559444 Farnworth Sep 1996 A
5568056 Ishimoto Oct 1996 A
5570032 Atkins Oct 1996 A
5585737 Shibata Dec 1996 A
5598627 Saka et al. Feb 1997 A
5599446 Junker et al. Feb 1997 A
5601740 Eldridge et al. Feb 1997 A
5606196 Lee et al. Feb 1997 A
5613861 Smith Mar 1997 A
5621263 Kaida Apr 1997 A
5626953 Fujimoto et al. May 1997 A
5627406 Pace May 1997 A
5639558 Tatsumi et al. Jun 1997 A
5656830 Zechman Aug 1997 A
5708297 Clayton Jan 1998 A
5773889 Love et al. Jun 1998 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (31)
Number Date Country
1026876 Mar 1958 DE
3129568 Apr 1982 DE
2166 May 1979 EP
396248 Nov 1990 EP
402756 Dec 1990 EP
500074 Aug 1992 EP
528367 Feb 1993 EP
593966 Apr 1994 EP
614089 Sep 1994 EP
708338 Apr 1996 EP
2643753 Aug 1990 FR
2680284 Feb 1993 FR
54-146581 Nov 1979 JP
56-26446 Mar 1981 JP
60-150657 Aug 1985 JP
61-170054 Jul 1986 JP
61-244057 Oct 1986 JP
61-287254 Dec 1986 JP
62-165994 Jul 1987 JP
63-56924 Mar 1988 JP
01-313969 Dec 1989 JP
03-068163 Mar 1991 JP
03-14287 Jun 1991 JP
03-142847 Jun 1991 JP
04-65840 Mar 1992 JP
04-240570 Aug 1992 JP
05-129357 May 1993 JP
1003396 Mar 1983 RU
WO 9112706 Aug 1991 WO
WO 9403036 Feb 1994 WO
WO 9602959 Feb 1996 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (15)
Entry
“Cooling System For Semiconductor Modules,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 26 No. 3B p. 1548 (Aug. 1983).
“Bimetal VLSI Chip Interconnections” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 29 No. 11 pp. 5021-5022 (Apr. 1987).
“Chip Column Package Structure” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 40 No. 08 pp. 117-118 (Aug. 1997).
“Compliant Lead reform Tool and Process” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 31 No. 6 pp. 160-162 (Nov. 1988).
“Method of Testing Chips and Joining Chips to Substrates” Research Disclosure 2244 No. 322 Emsworth GB p. 130 (Feb. 1991).
Ando “Plating Micro Bonding Used For Tape Carrier Package” NIST VSLI Packaging Workshop Yorktown Heights N.Y. one page (Oct. 11-13, 1993).
Beaman “Elastomeric Connector for MCM and Test Applications” ICEMM Proceedings '93 pp. 341-346 (1993).
Knight “MCM-To-Printed Wiring Board (Second Level) Connection Technology Options” Chapter 10 pp. 487-523.
Kong “Integrated Electrostatically Resonant Scan Tip For An Atomic Force Microscope” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B vol. 11(3) No. 3 pp. 634-641 (May/Jun. 1993).
Master “Corrosion Protection for Incusil Brazed Joints on Modules” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 19 No. 6 p. 2059 (Nov. 1976).
Ohring “The Materials Science Of Thin Films” (Academic Press Inc.) pp. 79-83 147-151 (1992).
Renz Multipoint Test Probe for Printed Cards IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin vol. 17 No. 2 (Jul. 1974).
Shih et al. “A Novel Elastomeric Connector For Packaging Interconnections Testing And Burn-In Applications” IEEE pp. 126-133 (May 21, 1995).
Tummala et al. “Microelectronics Packaging Handbook” (Van Nostrand Reinhold New York 1989) p. 802.
Weast, Handbook Of Chemistry and Physics (1975-1976), pp. D-171 to D-172, (CRC Press, Cleveland, Ohio).
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/245499 Feb 1999 US
Child 10/290639 US
Parent 08/457479 Jun 1995 US
Child 09/245499 US